• Title/Summary/Keyword: (m, n)-ideal

Search Result 181, Processing Time 0.026 seconds

THE MINIMAL FREE RESOLUTION OF CERTAIN DETERMINANTAL IDEA

  • CHOI, EUN-J.;KIM, YOUNG-H.;KO, HYOUNG-J.;WON, SEOUNG-J.
    • Communications of the Korean Mathematical Society
    • /
    • v.20 no.2
    • /
    • pp.275-290
    • /
    • 2005
  • Let $S\;=\;R[\chi_{ij}\mid1\;{\le}\;i\;{\le}\;m,\;1\;{\le}\;j\;{\le}\;n]$ be the polynomial ring over a noetherian commutative ring R and $I_p$ be the determinantal ideal generated by the $p\;\times\;p$ minors of the generic matrix $(\chi_{ij})(1{\le}P{\le}min(m,n))$. We describe a minimal free resolution of $S/I_{p}$, in the case m = n = p + 2 over $\mathbb{Z}$.

ON ALMOST QUASI-COHERENT RINGS AND ALMOST VON NEUMANN RINGS

  • El Alaoui, Haitham;El Maalmi, Mourad;Mouanis, Hakima
    • Bulletin of the Korean Mathematical Society
    • /
    • v.59 no.5
    • /
    • pp.1177-1190
    • /
    • 2022
  • Let R be a commutative ring with identity. We call the ring R to be an almost quasi-coherent ring if for any finite set of elements α1, …, αp and a of R, there exists a positive integer m such that the ideals $\bigcap{_{i=1}^{p}}\;R{\alpha}^m_i$ and AnnRm) are finitely generated, and to be almost von Neumann regular rings if for any two elements a and b in R, there exists a positive integer n such that the ideal (αn, bn) is generated by an idempotent element. This paper establishes necessary and sufficient conditions for the Nagata's idealization and the amalgamated algebra to inherit these notions. Our results allow us to construct original examples of rings satisfying the above-mentioned properties.

THE ANNIHILATING-IDEAL GRAPH OF A RING

  • ALINIAEIFARD, FARID;BEHBOODI, MAHMOOD;LI, YUANLIN
    • Journal of the Korean Mathematical Society
    • /
    • v.52 no.6
    • /
    • pp.1323-1336
    • /
    • 2015
  • Let S be a semigroup with 0 and R be a ring with 1. We extend the definition of the zero-divisor graphs of commutative semigroups to not necessarily commutative semigroups. We define an annihilating-ideal graph of a ring as a special type of zero-divisor graph of a semigroup. We introduce two ways to define the zero-divisor graphs of semigroups. The first definition gives a directed graph ${\Gamma}$(S), and the other definition yields an undirected graph ${\overline{\Gamma}}$(S). It is shown that ${\Gamma}$(S) is not necessarily connected, but ${\overline{\Gamma}}$(S) is always connected and diam$({\overline{\Gamma}}(S)){\leq}3$. For a ring R define a directed graph ${\mathbb{APOG}}(R)$ to be equal to ${\Gamma}({\mathbb{IPO}}(R))$, where ${\mathbb{IPO}}(R)$ is a semigroup consisting of all products of two one-sided ideals of R, and define an undirected graph ${\overline{\mathbb{APOG}}}(R)$ to be equal to ${\overline{\Gamma}}({\mathbb{IPO}}(R))$. We show that R is an Artinian (resp., Noetherian) ring if and only if ${\mathbb{APOG}}(R)$ has DCC (resp., ACC) on some special subset of its vertices. Also, it is shown that ${\overline{\mathbb{APOG}}}(R)$ is a complete graph if and only if either $(D(R))^2=0,R$ is a direct product of two division rings, or R is a local ring with maximal ideal m such that ${\mathbb{IPO}}(R)=\{0,m,m^2,R\}$. Finally, we investigate the diameter and the girth of square matrix rings over commutative rings $M_{n{\times}n}(R)$ where $n{\geq} 2$.

REGULARITY AND SEMIPOTENCY OF HOM

  • Hakmi, Hamza
    • Korean Journal of Mathematics
    • /
    • v.22 no.1
    • /
    • pp.151-167
    • /
    • 2014
  • Let M, N be modules over a ring R and $[M,N]=Hom_R(M,N)$. The concern is study of: (1) Some fundamental properties of [M, N] when [M, N] is regular or semipotent. (2) The substructures of [M, N] such as radical, the singular and co-singular ideals, the total and others has raised new questions for research in this area. New results obtained include necessary and sufficient conditions for [M, N] to be regular or semipotent. New substructures of [M, N] are studied and its relationship with the Tot of [M, N]. In this paper we show that, the endomorphism ring of a module M is regular if and only if the module M is semi-injective (projective) and the kernel (image) of every endomorphism is a direct summand.

Semi M-Projective and Semi N-Injective Modules

  • Hakmi, Hamza
    • Kyungpook Mathematical Journal
    • /
    • v.56 no.1
    • /
    • pp.83-94
    • /
    • 2016
  • Let M and N be modules over a ring R. The purpose of this paper is to study modules M, N for which the bi-module [M, N] is regular or pi. It is proved that the bi-module [M, N] is regular if and only if a module N is semi M-projective and $Im({\alpha}){\subseteq}^{\oplus}N$ for all ${\alpha}{\in}[M,N]$, if and only if a module M is semi N-injective and $Ker({\alpha}){\subseteq}^{\oplus}N$ for all ${\alpha}{\in}[M,N]$. Also, it is proved that the bi-module [M, N] is pi if and only if a module N is direct M-projective and for any ${\alpha}{\in}[M,N]$ there exists ${\beta}{\in}[M,N]$ such that $Im({\alpha}{\beta}){\subseteq}^{\oplus}N$, if and only if a module M is direct N-injective and for any ${\alpha}{\in}[M,N]$ there exists ${\beta}{\in}[M,N]$ such that $Ker({\beta}{\alpha}){\subseteq}^{\oplus}M$. The relationship between the Jacobson radical and the (co)singular ideal of [M, N] is described.

w-INJECTIVE MODULES AND w-SEMI-HEREDITARY RINGS

  • Wang, Fanggui;Kim, Hwankoo
    • Journal of the Korean Mathematical Society
    • /
    • v.51 no.3
    • /
    • pp.509-525
    • /
    • 2014
  • Let R be a commutative ring with identity. An R-module M is said to be w-projective if $Ext\frac{1}{R}$(M,N) is GV-torsion for any torsion-free w-module N. In this paper, we define a ring R to be w-semi-hereditary if every finite type ideal of R is w-projective. To characterize w-semi-hereditary rings, we introduce the concept of w-injective modules and study some basic properties of w-injective modules. Using these concepts, we show that R is w-semi-hereditary if and only if the total quotient ring T(R) of R is a von Neumann regular ring and $R_m$ is a valuation domain for any maximal w-ideal m of R. It is also shown that a connected ring R is w-semi-hereditary if and only if R is a Pr$\ddot{u}$fer v-multiplication domain.

NOTE ON GOOD IDEALS IN GORENSTEIN LOCAL RINGS

  • Kim, Mee-Kyoung
    • Bulletin of the Korean Mathematical Society
    • /
    • v.39 no.3
    • /
    • pp.479-484
    • /
    • 2002
  • Let I be an ideal in a Gorenstein local ring A with the maximal ideal m and d = dim A. Then we say that I is a good ideal in A, if I contains a reduction $Q=(a_1,a_2,...,a_d)$ generated by d elements in A and $G(I)=\bigoplus_{n\geq0}I^n/I^{n+1}$ of I is a Gorenstein ring with a(G(I)) = 1-d, where a(G(I)) denotes the a-invariant of G(I). Let S = A[Q/a$_1$] and P = mS. In this paper, we show that the following conditions are equivalent. (1) $I^2$ = QI and I = Q:I. (2) $I^2S$ = $a_1$IS and IS = $a_1$S:sIS. (3) $I^2$Sp = $a_1$ISp and ISp = $a_1$Sp :sp ISp. We denote by $X_A(Q)$ the set of good ideals I in $X_A(Q)$ such that I contains Q as a reduction. As a Corollary of this result, we show that $I\inX_A(Q)\Leftrightarrow\IS_P\inX_{SP}(Qp)$.

SYMMETRIC BI-DERIVATIONS IN PRIME RINGS

  • Jung, Yong-Soo
    • Journal of applied mathematics & informatics
    • /
    • v.5 no.3
    • /
    • pp.819-826
    • /
    • 1998
  • The purpose of this paper is to prove the following results; (1) Let R be a prime ring of char $(R)\neq 2$ and I a nonzero left ideal of R. The existence of a nonzero symmetric bi-derivation D : $R\timesR\;\longrightarrow\;$ such that d is sew-commuting on I where d is the trace of D forces R to be commutative (2) Let m and n be integers with $m\;\neq\;0.\;or\;n\neq\;0$. Let R be a noncommutative prime ring of char$ (R))\neq \; 2-1\; p_1 \;n_1$ where p is a prime number which is a divisor of m, and I a nonzero two-sided ideal of R. Let $D_1$ ; $R\;\times\;R\;\longrightarrow\;and\;$ $D_2\;:\;R\;\times\;R\;longrightarrow\;R$ be symmetric bi-derivations. Suppose further that there exists a symmetric bi-additive mapping B ; $R\;\times\;R\;\longrightarrow\;and\;$ such that $md_1(\chi)\chi + n\chi d_2(\chi)=f(\chi$) holds for all $\chi$$\in$I, where $d_1 \;and\; d_2$ are the traces of $D_1 \;and\; D_2$ respectively and f is the trace of B. Then we have $D_1=0 \;and\; D_2=0$.

Where Some Inert Minimal Ring Extensions of a Commutative Ring Come from

  • Dobbs, David Earl
    • Kyungpook Mathematical Journal
    • /
    • v.60 no.1
    • /
    • pp.53-69
    • /
    • 2020
  • Let (A, M) ⊂ (B, N) be commutative quasi-local rings. We consider the property that there exists a ring D such that A ⊆ D ⊂ B and the extension D ⊂ B is inert. Examples show that the number of such D may be any non-negative integer or infinite. The existence of such D does not imply M ⊆ N. Suppose henceforth that M ⊆ N. If the field extension A/M ⊆ B/N is algebraic, the existence of such D does not imply that B is integral over A (except when B has Krull dimension 0). If A/M ⊆ B/N is a minimal field extension, there exists a unique such D, necessarily given by D = A + N (but it need not be the case that N = MB). The converse fails, even if M = N and B/M is a finite field.

COLOCALIZATION OF GENERALIZED LOCAL HOMOLOGY MODULES

  • Hatamkhani, Marziyeh
    • Bulletin of the Korean Mathematical Society
    • /
    • v.59 no.4
    • /
    • pp.917-928
    • /
    • 2022
  • Let R be a commutative Noetherian ring and I an ideal of R. In this paper, we study colocalization of generalized local homology modules. We intend to establish a dual case of local-global principle for the finiteness of generalized local cohomology modules. Let M be a finitely generated R-module and N a representable R-module. We introduce the notions of the representation dimension rI(M, N) and artinianness dimension aI(M, N) of M, N with respect to I by rI(M, N) = inf{i ∈ ℕ0 : HIi(M, N) is not representable} and aI(M, N) = inf{i ∈ ℕ0 : HIi(M, N) is not artinian} and we show that aI(M, N) = rI(M, N) = inf{rIR𝔭 (M𝔭,𝔭N) : 𝔭 ∈ Spec(R)} ≥ inf{aIR𝔭 (M𝔭,𝔭N) : 𝔭 ∈ Spec(R)}. Also, in the case where R is semi-local and N a semi discrete linearly compact R-module such that N/∩t>0ItN is artinian we prove that inf{i : HIi(M, N) is not minimax}=inf{rIR𝔭 (M𝔭,𝔭N) : 𝔭 ∈ Spec(R)\Max(R)}.