• Title/Summary/Keyword: generalized left derivation

Search Result 16, Processing Time 0.02 seconds

LEFT JORDAN DERIVATIONS ON BANACH ALGEBRAS AND RELATED MAPPINGS

  • Jung, Yong-Soo;Park, Kyoo-Hong
    • Bulletin of the Korean Mathematical Society
    • /
    • v.47 no.1
    • /
    • pp.151-157
    • /
    • 2010
  • In this note, we obtain range inclusion results for left Jordan derivations on Banach algebras: (i) Let $\delta$ be a spectrally bounded left Jordan derivation on a Banach algebra A. Then $\delta$ maps A into its Jacobson radical. (ii) Let $\delta$ be a left Jordan derivation on a unital Banach algebra A with the condition sup{r$(c^{-1}\delta(c))$ : c $\in$ A invertible} < $\infty$. Then $\delta$ maps A into its Jacobson radical. Moreover, we give an exact answer to the conjecture raised by Ashraf and Ali in [2, p. 260]: every generalized left Jordan derivation on 2-torsion free semiprime rings is a generalized left derivation.

Generalized Derivations on ∗-prime Rings

  • Ashraf, Mohammad;Jamal, Malik Rashid
    • Kyungpook Mathematical Journal
    • /
    • v.58 no.3
    • /
    • pp.481-488
    • /
    • 2018
  • Let I be a ${\ast}$-ideal on a 2-torsion free ${\ast}$-prime ring and $F:R{\rightarrow}R$ a generalized derivation with an associated derivation $d:R{\rightarrow}R$. The aim of this paper is to explore the condition under which generalized derivation F becomes a left centralizer i.e., associated derivation d becomes a trivial map (i.e., zero map) on R.

On Prime Near-rings with Generalized (σ,τ)-derivations

  • Golbasi, Oznur
    • Kyungpook Mathematical Journal
    • /
    • v.45 no.2
    • /
    • pp.249-254
    • /
    • 2005
  • Let N be a prime left near-ring with multiplicative center Z and f be a generalized $({\sigma},{\tau})-derivation$ associated with d. We prove commutativity theorems in prime near- rings with generalized $({\sigma},{\tau})-derivation$.

  • PDF

MULTIPLICATIVE (GENERALIZED) (𝛼, 𝛽)-DERIVATIONS ON LEFT IDEALS IN PRIME RINGS

  • SHUJAT, FAIZA
    • Journal of Applied and Pure Mathematics
    • /
    • v.4 no.1_2
    • /
    • pp.1-7
    • /
    • 2022
  • A mapping T : R → R (not necessarily additive) is called multiplicative left 𝛼-centralizer if T(xy) = T(x)𝛼(y) for all x, y ∈ R. A mapping F : R → R (not necessarily additive) is called multiplicative (generalized)(𝛼, 𝛽)-derivation if there exists a map (neither necessarily additive nor derivation) f : R → R such that F(xy) = F(x)𝛼(y) + 𝛽(x)f(y) for all x, y ∈ R, where 𝛼 and 𝛽 are automorphisms on R. The main purpose of this paper is to study some algebraic identities with multiplicative (generalized) (𝛼, 𝛽)-derivations and multiplicative left 𝛼-centralizer on the left ideal of a prime ring R.

GENERALIZED DERIVATIONS ON PRIME RINGS SATISFYING CERTAIN IDENTITIES

  • Al-Omary, Radwan Mohammed;Nauman, Syed Khalid
    • Communications of the Korean Mathematical Society
    • /
    • v.36 no.2
    • /
    • pp.229-238
    • /
    • 2021
  • Let R be a ring with characteristic different from 2. An additive mapping F : R → R is called a generalized derivation on R if there exists a derivation d : R → R such that F(xy) = F(x)y + xd(y) holds for all x, y ∈ R. In the present paper, we show that if R is a prime ring satisfying certain identities involving a generalized derivation F associated with a derivation d, then R becomes commutative and in some cases d comes out to be zero (i.e., F becomes a left centralizer). We provide some counter examples to justify that the restrictions imposed in the hypotheses of our theorems are not superfluous.

Correction to "On prime near-rings with generalized (σ, τ)- derivations, Kyungpook Math. J., 45(2005), 249-254"

  • Al Hwaeer, Hassan J.;Albkwre, Gbrel;Turgay, Neset Deniz
    • Kyungpook Mathematical Journal
    • /
    • v.60 no.2
    • /
    • pp.415-421
    • /
    • 2020
  • In the proof of Theorem 3 on p.253 in [4], both right and left distributivity are assumed simultaneously which makes the proof invalid. We give a corrected proof for this theorem by introducing an extension of Lemma 2.2 in [2].