• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제29권1호
• /
• pp.1-12
• /
• 2010

The purpose of this study is to analyze elementary school students' class contents and activities between the invention class for the gifted under the local education office by the 'Gifted Education Promotion Act' and that under the invention classroom by the 'Invention Promotion Act'. For this study, the survey was conducted to 1,788 elementary school students who attended the invention class for the gifted both under the local education office and under the invention classroom. The analysis of the survey showed that the students of the invention class for the gifted under the local education office had higher motivation and participation rate in class, higher interest in invention, and stronger significantly in a future oriented will than those under the invention classroom. The parents of the invention class for the gifted under the local education office showed more enthusiastic attitude to support their students, and had significantly stronger recognition that the participation of the students in the invention education for the gifted helped enter an advanced school than those under the invention classroom. However, the class contents of the invention class for the gifted under the local education office such as 'understanding the influence of the invention history and products on society', 'scientific inquiry skills for problem solving', 'technological and engineering abilities for creating an invention', 'developing knowledge and abilities about business and management by using a new invention' were not different from those under the invention classroom. In addition, discussion and presentation were not active in the class activities of the invention class for the gifted under the local education office. Therefore, the researchers should compensate and develop a program which can apply strategically differentiated class contents and class activities to the students who participate in the invention class for the gifted under the local education office by the 'Gifted Education Promotion Act'.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제27권4호
• /
• pp.437-445
• /
• 2008

The purpose of this study was to examine about science gifted class student's effect of education for the science gifted class. For this, 21 item-questionnaires were given to 292 students at the 4th, 5th and 6th graders in 3 elementary gifted schools located in Incheon. The results of this study were as follows: First, science gifted students were positive in effect of gifted class. This was more positive as class is low. Second, gifted students are thinking that it is helped to own learning that study at gifted class in cognitive side but appeared relatively low regarding school record or utterance, study method, thinking faculty, creativity. Third, they did not think that is exerting a lot of effects about own habit that study, interest, pride in emotional side. Fourth, they thought that is effective in relation with new friends more than teachers and parents in sociocultural side. Fifth, in private tutoring side they thought that is not influencing to solve academy taking a course of decrease.

• 정보교육학회논문지
• /
• 제21권6호
• /
• pp.711-721
• /
• 2017

SW교육의 중요성이 증가함에 따라 SW분야에 재능이 뛰어난 학생들을 조기에 발굴하여 SW인재로 양성하기 위한 SW영재교육의 필요성이 높아지고 있다. 이에 2016년 초중고 학생을 대상으로 하는 SW영재학급 30곳이 설치되어 SW영재교육을 시작하였다. 그러나 각각의 영재학급이 선발 방법, 교육과정, 환경 등의 조건들이 모두 달라서 일관성과 체계성을 갖기 어려운 상황이다. 따라서 기관에 따른 SW영재학급의 편차를 줄이고, 효과적인 SW영재교육 수행을 위해서는 현황 조사를 통한 문제점 분석과 개선방향 도출이 필요하다. 이에 본 연구에서는 모든 학급의 설치운영계획서와 현장 방문을 통해 SW영재학급의 교육과정, 환경, 선발 내용을 조사하여 현재 SW영재학급의 전반적인 현황 분석하였으며 이를 기반으로 한계점 및 문제점을 도출하고 개선 방향을 제안하였다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구
• /
• 제5권2호
• /
• pp.87-98
• /
• 2001

The Center for Science Gifted Education (CSGE) of Chongju National University of Education was established in 1998 with the financial support of the Korea. Science & Engineering Foundation (KOSEF). In fact, we had prepared mathematics and science gifted education program beginning in 1997. It was possible due to the commitment of faculty members with an interest in gifted education. Now we have 5 classes in Mathematics, two of which are fundamental, one of which is a strengthened second-grade class gifted elementary school students, and one a fundamental class, and one a strengthened class for gifted middle school students in Chungbuk province. Each class consists of 16 students selected by a rigorous examination and filtering process. Also we have a mentoring system for particularly gifted students in mathematics. We have a number of programs for Super-Saturday, Summer School, Winter School, and Mathematics and Science Gifted Camp. Each program is suitable for 90 or 180 minutes of class time. The types of tasks developed can be divided into experimental, group discussion, open-ended problem solving, and exposition and problem solving tasks. Levels of the tasks developed for talented elementary students in mathematics can be further divided into grade 5 and under, grade 6, and grade 7 and over. Types of the tasks developed can be divided into experimental, group discussion, open-ended problem solving, and exposition and problem solving task. Also levels of the tasks developed for talented elementary students in mathematics can be divided into the level of lower than grade 5, level of grade 6, and level of more than grade 7. Three tasks developed and practiced are reported in this article.

• 대한화학회지
• /
• 제53권2호
• /
• pp.189-201
• /
• 2009

이 연구의 목적은 고등학교 1학년 과학영재 학급 학생과 일반 학급 학생의 창의적 성격과 창의 적 인지력을 비교함으로써 과학 창의성이 있는 학생이 과학영재로 선발되었는지와 과학영재 학급 수 업을 통해 창의성이 향상되었는지를 알아보는 것이다. 연구를 위하여 과학영재 학급 학생과 일반 학급 학생에 대해 Khatena-Torrance 창의적 성격검사와 Torrance 창의성 검사 중 언어검사 A형을 영재 수업 전․후에 실시하였다. 연구결과, 과학영재 학급 학생이 일반 학급 학생에 비하여 창의적인 성격을 가지 고 있는 것으로 나타났으나, 창의적 인지력 면에서는 유의미한 차이를 보이지 않았다. 과학영재 학급 학생과 일반 학급 학생의 창의적 성격의 하위 요인과 창의적 인지력의 하위 요인 사이의 상관관계가 매 우 낮아, 창의적 성격과 창의적 인지력이 서로 독립적인 것으로 나타났다. 그리고 과학영재 수업 실시 후에 과학영재 학급 학생들의 창의적 성격과 창의적 인지력은 향상되지 않았다. 따라서 과학 창의성이 있는 학생을 과학영재 학생으로 선발하는 방법과 과학영재 학생의 창의성을 향상시킬 수 있는 교수-학 습 방법에 대한 연구와 개발이 필요하다.

• 과학교육연구지
• /
• 제41권1호
• /
• pp.98-110
• /
• 2017

이 연구의 목적은 대학부설과학영재교육원과 일반학교 수업에서 영재학생이 인식하는 교우기대감을 비교하기 위한 것이다. 경기도에 소재하고 있는 A 대학부설과학영재교육원의 영재 121명에게 친밀성, 능력 유사성, 도덕성을 하위 영역으로 하는 교우기대감 검사를 실시하였다. 연구 결과는 다음과 같다. 대학부설 과학영재교육원과 일반학교에서 영재학생이 인식하는 교우기대감은 친밀성, 도덕성의 하위 영역에서 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 있었고, 능력 유사성의 하위 영역에서는 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다. 일반학급에서는 친밀성에 대한 교우 기대감이 높았고, 영재학급에서는 도덕성에 대한 교우기대감이 높았다. 또한, 교우기대감의 각 하위 영역의 일부 세부문항에서 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보이는 교우기대감도 있었다. 그리고 대학부설과학영재교원의 영재학생은 지역교육청부설영재교육원과 단위학교 영재학급의 영재학생이 보이는 교우기대감과 다른 특징도 보였다. 연구 결과를 토대로 영재학생의 교우기대감이 주는 시사점에 대하여 논의하였다.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제23권3호
• /
• pp.192-198
• /
• 2004

The purpose of this study was to analysis the curriculum for educating and operating the classes of elementary science gifted in Incheon Metropolitan Office of Education. We developed the framework for curriculum content analysis based on the principles of curriculum development for gifted education. The developed framework was applied to the curricula of four classes of elementary science gifted in Incheon. And the needs of gifted students were surveyed in the classes of the elementary science gifted. The results of this study were as follows: 1. The current curriculums of two classes described the goal of the elementary gifted education, but the content and theme of the curricula of three classes were not related to the contents of the 7th national curriculum. 2. The teaching methods used in the science gifted class were mainly a lecture and an experimental activity. and there was little the process of individual instruction. 3. There was not mostly the products as the results of learning because of little performed by a project teaming, an announcement and an exhibition in gifted class. 4. Most of the students of the science gifted class were estimated by the paper tests and observation of the teacher in charge of the gifted class, not by the products and presentation etc. 5. They mostly preferred the theme of everyday life in addition to the textbook, and the instructional type of enrichment teaming and acceleration learning over the grade of themselves. 6. They mainly expected that the curriculum of the gifted class is operated during the semester.

• 대한지구과학교육학회지
• /
• 제8권3호
• /
• pp.346-354
• /
• 2015

The purpose of this study was to be a help with designing science curriculum and developing science programs for the science gifted students by comparing their preferences about science class forms and class environments between science gifted students and normal students. For this study, 2 classes of science gifted students and 5 classes of normal students in 4th, 5th grade joined in this survey and their preferences about science class forms and class environments were checked using questionnaire. As a result, the following findings were obtained. First, in the area of class form, from comparing their preferences about teaching content domain, science gifted students showed meaningful higher preferences in all factors such as clarification, structuralization, thinking of high level and diversification. In comparing their preferences about teaching process domain, science gifted students also showed meaningful higher preferences in all factors such as diversification and self directed learning. Second, in the area of class environment, from comparing their preferences about classroom domain, science gifted students showed meaningful higher preferences in all factors such as teacher's support and rule and organization. In comparing their preferences about mentality domain, science gifted students also showed meaningful higher preferences in all factors such as influence of friends and parents. Third, in science gifted students, from comparing their preferences by gender about science class forms and class environments, female students showed meaningful higher preferences in factors of clarification. And in other factors females showed similar preference tendency with male students. In normal students' comparing, female students showed meaningful higher preferences in factors of teacher's support. And male students showed meaningful higher preferences in factors of high level thinking and influence of friend and influence of parents.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제33권1호
• /
• pp.95-104
• /
• 2014

The purpose of this study is to analyze the state of science teaching anxiety of elementary teachers for the scientifically gifted according to their personal variables such as gender, career in education and gifted education, training course for gifted education, participation in meeting related to gifted education. The subjects in this study were 64 elementary school teachers who were in charge of science gifted education. The instrument to assess their science teaching anxiety was Westerback's S-STAI, modified in this study to be suitable for science gifted education. The collected data were analyzed by the statistical package SPSS. The findings of the study were as follows: The teachers for gifted felt more teaching anxiety in gifted classes than in normal classes on the whole. There were statistically significant differences in their personal variables such as gender, career in education experience, experience of taking gifted education training courses, and participation in meeting related to gifted education. Implications related to reduce the gifted education teachers' teaching anxiety were discussed in depth.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제36권2호
• /
• pp.155-162
• /
• 2017

The purpose of this study was to analyze science academic emotion and scientific imagination of students between a science gifted class and a general class in elementary school. Samples of this study were composed of 212 fifth and sixth graders in Gyeonggi province. The results of this study were as follows. First, positive scientific academic emotion of students in a science gifted class was higher than that of general class. Second, boredom and laziness of negative scientific academic emotion were higher scores in general students, whereas, angry area was higher scores of students in a science gifted class. Third, scientific imagination of students in a science gifted class was higher than that of general class. Fourth, both groups had a positive correlation between scientific imagination and positive science academic emotion. Especially, interest area of positive scientific academic emotion in both of the two groups influenced scientific imagination.