Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2009.53.2.189

Science-Gifted Class Students' Change in Creative Personality and Creative Thinking Ability and Comparison to General Class Students in the First Grade of High School  

Kim, Hyung-Do (Kyesan High School, Incheon)
Kim, Dong-Jin (Department of Chemistry Education, Korea National University of Education)
Park, Kwang-Seo (Department of Chemistry Education, Korea National University of Education)
Kim, Eun-Suk (Department of Chemistry Education, Korea National University of Education)
Jin, Dong-Joo (Department of Chemistry Education, Korea National University of Education)
Park, Kuk-Tae (Department of Chemistry Education, Korea National University of Education)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Chemical Society / v.53, no.2, 2009 , pp. 189-201 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to find out whether scientifically creative students were selected as science-gifted class students and whether their creativity improved after class for the science-gifted students by comparing the science gifted class students to general class students in the first grade of high school. This was achieved by comparing science-gifted class students with general ones on creative personality and creative thinking ability. For this study, science-gifted class students and general class students were surveyed using Khatena-Torrance creative perception inventory and Torrance test of creative thinking with words of form A, before and after class for the science-gifted group. The results showed that science-gifted class students scored significantly higher than general class students on the creative personality. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in their creative thinking ability. Also, in this study, the sub-factors of creative personality and those of creative thinking ability showed very low levels of correlation, which implies that the two variables are highly independent. In addition, science-gifted class students did not show significant improvement in their scores on the creative personality and the creative thinking ability after class. Therefore, further research and development on the selection of science-gifted students and teaching-learning methods which can improve the creativity of these students are needed.
Keywords
Science-gifted Students; Creative Personality; Creative Thinking Ability;
Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By SCOPUS : 0
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 최취임; 정민수; 홍훈기; 채희권; 정대홍 대한화학회지 2008, 52, 295
2 박춘성; 김동일 열린교육연구 2007, 5, 47
3 Miller, T. L. J. Chem. Educ. 1993, 70, 187   DOI   ScienceOn
4 http://gifted.kedi.re.kr
5 최인수 유아교육연구 2000, 20, 139
6 Almeida, L. S.; Prietob, L. P.; Ferrando, M.;Oliveira, E.; Ferrándiz, C. Thinking Skills and Creativity 2008, 3, 53   DOI   ScienceOn
7 http://www.indiana.edu/~bobweb/Handout/d3.ttct.htm
8 김영채 교육학연구 2001, 39, 119
9 조은부; 백성혜 한국과학교육학회지 2006, 26, 307
10 김영채; 전현선; 박권생 교육학연구 2002, 40, 29
11 Buono, J. A.; Fasching, J. L. J. Chem. Educ. 1973, 9, 616
12 Amabile, T. M. Growing up creative; Crown Publisher Inc: New York, U. S. A., 1989
13 Sternberg, R. J. Intelligence applied: Understanding and increasing your intellectual skills;Harcourt Brace Jovanovich: San Diago, U. S. A.,1986
14 Sternberg, R. J. High Ability Studies 2003, 14, 109-137   DOI   ScienceOn
15 신지은; 한기순; 정현철; 박병건; 최승언 한국과학교육학회지 2002, 22, 158
16 Csikzentmihalyi, M.; Wolfe, R. In Handbook of creativity; R. J. Sternberg, Ed.; Harpercollins:New York, U. S. A., 2000
17 서혜애 교육개발 2000, 10, 93
18 정종진 초등교육 연구논총 2003, 18, 93
19 이경화 영재와 영재교육 2002, 1, 47
20 박주용; 오현숙 한국심리학회지: 사회문제 2005, 1, 143
21 이기영; 동효관; 홍준의; 김현경; 조봉제 한국과학교육학회지 2008, 28, 32
22 윤경미; 김정섭 교육심리연구 2006, 20, 587
23 Cardellini L. J. Chem. Educ. 2005, 82, 751   DOI   ScienceOn
24 http://ksan.hs.kr
25 http://isep.incheon.ac.kr
26 http://gifted.inha.ac.kr/EduIntro/EduPrgm/EduPrgm.asp
27 http://cge.ajou.ac.kr/eduinfo/eduinfo3.asp
28 http://www.ice.go.kr
29 Khatena, J.; Torrance, E. P. Khatena-Torrance creative perception inventory; Stoelting: Chicago, U. S. A., 1976
30 김영채 Torrance 창의력 검사 TTCT (언어, A형)검사 요강; 토랜스 창의력 한국 FPSP: 대구, 한국, 2002
31 김지영; 하지희; 박국태; 강성주 영재교육연구 2008, 18, 1
32 Oh, C.-H. Development of the inquiry model for science-gifted students based on the scientists' practical research process. Ph.D. Thesis, Korea National University of Education: Chungbuk, Korea, 2008
33 심규철; 김현섭 한국생물교육학회지 2007, 35, 101
34 주희영; 동효관; 김성하; 김희백; 이길재 한국생물교육학회지 2006, 34, 257
35 김소형; 박재일; 정진수; 이혜정; 권용주; 박국태 초등과학교육 2005, 24, 1
36 서혜애; 손연아; 김경진 영재교육기관 교수-학습 실태연구(CR 2003-26); 한국교육개발원: 서울, 2003
37 송인섭; 한기순 한국영재교육의 새로운 지평;학지사: 서울, 2008
38 Terman, L. M. Genetic studies of genius. The mental and physical trait of a thousand gifted children, Vol. 1; Stanford University Press: Stanford, U. S. A., 1925
39 김정휘 교육연구 1987, 5, 139
40 양태영; 배미란; 한기순; 박인호 한국과학교육학회지 2003, 25, 531
41 Guilford, J. P. Psychological Review 1982, 89, 48   DOI
42 이기영; 김찬종 한국지구과학교육학회지 2005, 26, 511
43 권치순 초등과학교육 2005, 24, 192
44 Marland, S. P. Education of the gifted and talented;U. S. Government Printing Office: Washington D.C., U. S. A., 1972
45 Renzulli, J. S. Phi Delta Kappan 1978, 59, 180
46 Gardner, H. Frames of minds: The theory of multiple intelligence; Basic Books: New York, U.S. A., 1983