DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Friendship Expectation Perceived in Gifted and Regular Class by Gifted Students of Gifted Science Education Institute attached to University

대학부설과학영재교육원 영재학생이 인식하는 영재교육원과 학교에서의 교우기대감

  • Received : 2016.09.30
  • Accepted : 2017.04.11
  • Published : 2017.04.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare the friendship expectation that gifted students perceived in the gifted class and the regular class. To this study, friendship expectation survey, which sub-domains were intimacy, ability similarity, and morality, was conducted to 121 gifted students. The results of this study were as follows: First, according to the results of comparing the friendship expectations of gifted students in the gifted class and the regular class, there were statistically significant differences in the sub-domains of intimacy and morality. But there was no significant difference in the sub-domain of ability similarity. Second, there were statistically significant differences in the some detail items of all sub-domain(intimacy, ability similarity, and morality). Based the results of this, the implications to understand the friendship of the gifted students were suggested.

이 연구의 목적은 대학부설과학영재교육원과 일반학교 수업에서 영재학생이 인식하는 교우기대감을 비교하기 위한 것이다. 경기도에 소재하고 있는 A 대학부설과학영재교육원의 영재 121명에게 친밀성, 능력 유사성, 도덕성을 하위 영역으로 하는 교우기대감 검사를 실시하였다. 연구 결과는 다음과 같다. 대학부설 과학영재교육원과 일반학교에서 영재학생이 인식하는 교우기대감은 친밀성, 도덕성의 하위 영역에서 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 있었고, 능력 유사성의 하위 영역에서는 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다. 일반학급에서는 친밀성에 대한 교우 기대감이 높았고, 영재학급에서는 도덕성에 대한 교우기대감이 높았다. 또한, 교우기대감의 각 하위 영역의 일부 세부문항에서 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보이는 교우기대감도 있었다. 그리고 대학부설과학영재교원의 영재학생은 지역교육청부설영재교육원과 단위학교 영재학급의 영재학생이 보이는 교우기대감과 다른 특징도 보였다. 연구 결과를 토대로 영재학생의 교우기대감이 주는 시사점에 대하여 논의하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, D., Ha, K. S., & Kim, S. K. (2009). Effects of university-based science gifted education program on the science problem-finding ability and cognitive-affective factors of science gifted students. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 19(2), 279-302.
  2. Berndt, T. J. (1999). Friends' influence on students' adjustment to school. Educational Psychologist, 34(1), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3401_2
  3. Berndt, T. J., & Keefe, K. (1995). Friends' influence on adolescents' adjustment to school. Child development, 66(5), 1312-1329. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131649
  4. Bigelow, B. J. (1977). Children's friendship expectations: A cognitive-developmental study. Child development, 48(1), 246-253. https://doi.org/10.2307/1128905
  5. Bigelow, B. J. (1983). Assessing children's friendship expectations: Supplementing the semi structured interview with picture sequence tasks. Human Relations, 36(3), 285-308. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678303600305
  6. Clack, B. (2008). Growing up gifted: Developing the potential of children at home and at school (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  7. Coleman, L. J., & Cross, T. L. (2014). Is Being Gifted a Social Handicap?. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 37(1), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353214521486
  8. Gifted Education Database [GED]. (2016). 영재교육종합데이터베이스 2016 통계 [Education for the gifted children single integrated data base 2016 statistics]. Retrieved from https://ged.kedi.re.kr/stss/viewStatistic04.do
  9. Gyeonggido Office of Education. (2011). 2012 Selection Guidelines of the Gifted Education Institute of University. Science Career Education Division-12030 (2011.9.16.).
  10. Gyeonggido Office of Education. (2012). 2013 Selection Guidelines of the Gifted Education Institute of University. Science Career Education Division-13904 (2012.9.20.).
  11. Gyeonggido Office of Education. (2013). 2014 Selection Guidelines of the Gifted Education Institute of University. Science Career Education Division-15704(2013.10.1.).
  12. Gyeonggido Office of Education. (2014). 2015 Selection Guidelines of the Gifted Education Institute of University. Science Career Education Division-14322(2014.9.5.).
  13. Gyeonggido Institute of Science Education. (2015). 2016 Selection Guidelines of the Gifted Education Institute of University. Steam Science Education Division-1040 (2015.9.3.).
  14. Gyeonggido Institute of Science Education. (2016). 2017 Selection Guidelines of the Gifted Education Institute of University. Steam Science Education Division-1309 (2016.9.1.).
  15. Jang, N., H., Ryoo, J. W., & Ryu, H. (2006). Comparative analysis on selecting process of gifted students in science education institute for the gifted. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 16(2), 101-122.
  16. Jeong, H.-W., Kim, J. M., & Hong, S.-H. (2008). Development and validation of inventory of peer relation problems for elementary school children. The Korean Journal of School Psychology, 5(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.16983/kjsp.2008.5.1.1
  17. Joo, S., & Yeo, S.-I. (2016). Friendship expectation perceived by science-gifted and non-gifted elementary students. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 26(1), 37-51. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2016.26.1.37
  18. Jung, H.-G., Sin, Y. J., & Cho, S. H., (2013). Analyses of curriculums at institutes for science gifted education in universities: focused on enrichment step. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 23(2), 215-236. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2013.23.2.215
  19. Jung, J.-H., Yu, H.-K., & Shin, H.-S. (2008). The development of peer praise program for improving the elementary school students’ peer relationship and degree of satisfaction with school life. The Journal of Child Education, 17(4), 273-283.
  20. Kang, P.-L., & Kim, H. Y. (2008). The analysis of elementary mathematics curricula of university attached science education institutes of the gifted. E-Communications of Mathematical Education, 22(1), 13-26.
  21. Kim, H., & Yeo, S.-I. (2014). A comparison of over excitability and social self-concept between the scientifically gifted and non-gifted elementary students. Journal of Science Education, 38(2), 401-414. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2014.38.2.401
  22. Kim, K.-S., & Lee, J.-H. (2009). The types of gifted children’s peer relationships in the classroom / formative factors. The Journal of Education Research, 30(2), 41-64.
  23. Kim, S., & Kim, H. (2016). Development of a science ethicality test for elementary school students. Journal of the korean association for science education, 36(1), 1013.
  24. Kim, N. S. (1998). Educational Psychology. Seoul: Education Science Press.
  25. Ko, H. W., & Choi, H. R. (2006). The relationship among psychological independence from mother, sociality and peer relationship of children. Journal of Human Understanding and Counseling, 27, 17-33.
  26. Kwon, H., Ha. M., Chung, D.-H., & Lee, J.-K. (2012). A study of gifted students’ peer relationship in a elementary school’s general and gifted classes. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 22(3), 757-777. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2012.22.3.757
  27. Lee, C. D., & Kim, J. R. (2015). Comparative analysis on friendship expectation of college students toward students with and without disabilities. The Journal of Special Education: Theory and Practice, 16(1), 161-179.
  28. Lee, J., & Jin, S. (2015). Teachers’ recognition on enhancing ICT-related capabilities of gifted students. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 25(2), 261-277. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2015.25.2.261
  29. Lee, K.-M., Sung, S. M., Jang, N. H., & Yeo, S.-I. (2015). A comparison of resilience and task commit between elementary gifted students in science and non-gifted students. Journal of Science Education, 39(3), 307-320. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2015.39.3.307
  30. Lee, S. K., & Mo, R. (2012). Analysis of the secondary chemistry materials at 5 centers for the university affiliated science-gifted education and investigation of the gifted students’ perception. Journal of Science Education, 36(1), 106-119. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2012.36.1.106
  31. Luftig, R. L., & Nichols, M. L. (1990). Assessing the social status of gifted students by their age peers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34(3), 111-115. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629003400305
  32. Nam, K. (2011). Friendship expectation of students without disabilities toward peers with mental retardation in inclusive classrooms (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Dankook University, .
  33. Nam, K. U., & Shin, H. K. (2012a). Friendship expectation of students without disabilities toward peers with intellectual disabilities in inclusive classrooms. Journal of intellectual Disabilities, 14(2), 47-74.
  34. Nam, K. U., & Shin, H. K. (2012b). Development study of korean friendship expectation scale. The Journal of Special Education: Theory and Practice, 13(1), 41-69. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246697901300106
  35. O'Brien, S. F., & Bierman, K. L. (1988). Conceptions and perceived influence of peer groups: Interviews with preadolescents and adolescents. Child development, 59(5), 1360-1365. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130498
  36. Rhee, U., Kim, J. Y., & Oh, W. (2001). Peer status and friendship as predictors of children’s school adjustment. Korean Journal of Child Studies, 22(1), 1-18.
  37. Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of research in science teaching, 42(1), 112-138. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20042
  38. Shin, H. K. (2012). Comparative analysis on friendship expectations of elementary and middle school students toward peers with and without disabilities. The Journal of Special Education: Theory and Practice, 3(3), 185-208.
  39. Song, Y., Lee, H., & Oh, S. (2010). The longitudinal study on impact factors and change of peer relationship of elementary school students in korea. The Journal of Elementary Education, 23(1), 65-86.
  40. Yang, T.-Y., Han, K.-S., & Park, I.-H., (2007). Meaning and impact of gifted education: erspectives of graduates form the science gifted education center affiliated with university. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 17(3), 463-493.
  41. Yeo, S.-I., & Park, S.-H. (2005). Comparing peer relations of gifted elementary students in science and ordinary students. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 15(1), 49-66.
  42. Yeom, S. Y., Jang, K. A., Kim, S.-J., Chung, B. H., & Park, J. (2008). Evaluating the impact of educational programs at science education center for the gifted by its graduates who are currently attending college. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 28(1), 100-110.
  43. Yun, E., & Park, Y. (2013). The survey of academic integrity of student in mentorship program at a science gifted institute attached to university. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 23(2), 275-287. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2013.23.2.275