• 한국정보관리학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국정보관리학회 2002년도 추계학술발표논집
• /
• pp.23-65
• /
• 2002

This study is to consider varying factors of internal/external informational and operational environments in libraries, and develop a new evaluation indicators for university libraries in digital environments. In order to do this research, the previous works have been investigated, and the Delphi study and our own analysis have been performed. The main research results are as follows. First, the results through the Delphi method that was to adopted to verify evaluation items and indicators determined by the literature review show that the repressed values for each evaluation category is greater than 3.00. overall average is 4.02. and standard deviation is ranged from 0.40 to 0.62 for each category. This means that the evaluation indicators are valid. Second, the factor analysis was performed to verify the construct validity of evaluation indicators. As a result. the cumulative variance of evaluation indicators consisting of 11 dimensions per factor is 72.733%. In turn, this result shows that the validity of these indicators is very reliable. Third, t-test and one way ANOVA are performed within significance probability 0.05 in order to verify differences in each librarians point of views for the degree of importance in evaluation indicators. The results show that these evaluation indicators are verified to be appropriate since there is no significant difference. Based on the Delphi study and our own analysis. we developed a new evaluation indicators that consists of 7 evaluation categories, 35 evaluation items, and 92 evaluation indicators.

• 산업공학
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.78-88
• /
• 2010

In this paper we develop a model for the performance evaluation of defense R&D test development projects based on analytic hierarchy process. First, evaluation indicators are collected through the related literature survey and a delphi inquiry method. Second, stepwise multiple linear regression is used for developing a hierarchical structure for analytic hierarchy process in the evaluation model, which can make the selected evaluation indicators of the hierarchical structure independent. Also we verify the effectiveness of proposed indicators of the performance evaluation by comparing with the existing evaluation indicators. The developed indicators for the performance evaluation is more reasonable and practical than the previous indicators on defense R&D test development projects.

• 정보관리학회지
• /
• 제19권4호
• /
• pp.258-296
• /
• 2002

본 연구는 도서관 내·외적인 정보환경과 운영환경의 변화요인을 수용하여 디지털 환경에서 대학도서관 평가지표를 개발하는데 있다. 이러한 연구를 수행하기 위하여 문헌연구와 델파이 조사, 본 조사를 실시하였으며, 본 연구를 통하여 규명된 연구의 주요 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 문헌 연구를 통하여 설정한 평가 항목 및 지표의 내용타당도를 검증하기 위한 델파이 조사 결과, 각 평가영역별 평정 값이 3.00이상이고 전체 평균이 4.02이며, 표준편차는 .40～.62 사이에 분포되어 있으므로 델파이 조사결과 평가지표는 타당한 것으로 조사되었다. 둘째, 본 평가지표의 구인타당도를 검증하기 위하여 요인분석을 실시하였다. 그 결과 11개 요인으로 구성된 평가항목의 요인별 누적 변량은 72.733%로서 타당성이 높은 것으로 검증되었다. 셋째, 사서의 특성별로 인지하는 정도의 차이를 검증하기 위하여 유의확률 0.05 수준에서 t-검증과 일원 변량분석을 실시하였다. 이상과 같이 델파이 조사와 본 조사의 결과를 토대로 하여 전체 7개 평가부분 35개 평가항목 92개의 평가지표로 구성된 새로운 평가지표를 개발하였다.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제47권4호
• /
• pp.767-781
• /
• 2019

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to derive key evaluation indicators to improve the quality of daycare centers by identifying the relationships among the 18 evaluation indicators of the daycare evaluation system using the DEMATEL technique. Methods: In this study, the questionnaires are completed by 17 daycare center directors who have received accreditation of daycare center. They are requested to consider the level of direct influence between two evaluation indicators. A DEMATEL analysis was conducted based on the survey results. Results: The result of the study shows that the most important indicators of daycare center quality are directors leadership, institutional operations and professionalism of staff. Among evaluation areas, educational childcare curriculum & interactions is affected by all areas, and staff area affect all areas. Conclusion: The evaluation areas and indicators of the daycare center are judged to be well-balanced. It is expected that the findings of the key evaluation indicators that should be prioritized among the evaluation indicators will be helpful to those preparing for the evaluation of the daycare center.

• 산업공학
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.96-108
• /
• 2008

This paper proposes the systematic design approach for developing the evaluation indicators that evaluate the candidate proposals in the national defense core-technology R&D projects. To improve the validity and fairness of the evaluation indicators, the existing evaluation process in a military and a public sector are surveyed and also the existing evaluation system of the core-technology R&D programs for the national defense is analysed and discussed. A new system for the evaluation indicators is designed by using the axiomatic design, factor analysis and the analytic hierarchy process. It is expected that the proposed evaluation indicators contribute to enhance the fairness and the reliability of the evaluation process for the proposal of the national defense core-technology R&D projects.

• 한국보육지원학회지
• /
• 제19권5호
• /
• pp.65-79
• /
• 2023

Objective: The purpose of this study was to identify the importance and performance of the evaluation indicators of the childcare center evaluation system among childcare center staff and to find ways to improve the evaluation indicators of the childcare center evaluation system. Methods: A survey was conducted among 296 directors and teachers of childcare centers located in Busan and Gyeongnam. The collected data were analyzed using a paired sample t-test and an IPA analysis with SPSS 23.0 and Excel 2010. Results: There was a difference between the perceived importance and performance of childcare staff for the overall evaluation indicators, and significant differences were found in all areas and nine evaluation indicators except for "childcare environment and operation management". According to the IPA analysis, Health and Safety fell into quadrant 1, Staff into quadrant 2, and Child Care Process, Interaction, Child Care Environment, and Operations into quadrant 3. This distribution resulted in 6 indicators in quadrant 1, 4 in quadrant 2, 7 in quadrant 3, and 1 in quadrant 4. Conclusion/Implications: This study provides essential data for exploring ways to enhance the evaluation indicators of the childcare center evaluation system, with the goal of improving the quality of childcare services. Additionally, it offers policy implications.

• 한국환경과학회지
• /
• 제15권12호
• /
• pp.1205-1220
• /
• 2006

This study was conducted to develop the evaluation model which can analyse local agenda 21 comprehensively and systematically from the making process to the designed contents. The evaluation model was devised through the theoretical review of local agenda 21 and designing the evaluation system composed of evaluation domains, related indicators and scales. The evaluation system was carefully constructed based on planning theories and the discussion and agreement of specialists regarding local agenda 21. This model has three evaluation domains of process, content, and evaluation of implementation with different weighting values. Each domain contains large indicators, medium indicators and small indicators. Each indicator has different weighting value according to its importance. Basically, each small indicator was scored by 3 or 5 point scale. This evaluation system can not only analyse local agenda 21 quantitatively, but also find out good points, problems, and limits of various phases of planning and implementing local agenda 21.

• 정보관리학회지
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.239-264
• /
• 2001

이 연구는 국내외에서 대학도서관을 대상으로 제안된 평가(성과)지표의 현황을 개관하고 비교·분석하는데 그 목적이 있다. 이를 위하여 지금가지 제안된 지표들 중에서 국제기구(IFLA, ISO)와 관련단체(미국의 ALA/ACR·LARL, 영국의 LA·HEFCE·CERLIM, 일본의 대학기준협회·사립대학도서관협의회, 한국의 대학교육협의회·도서관협회)의 모형을 중심으로 주요 특징과 내용, 장점과 한계를 분석하고, 함의와 시사점을 논급하였다. 대부분의 모형은 전통적 도서관의 양적 지표에 이용자의 인식가치를 포함시키고, 전자형 자료와 서비스를 수용하는 방향으로 나아가고 있다. 그럼에도 각각의 지표에 대한 실효성은 불확실하고 미진하고, 계량화가 불가능한 것도 적지 않으며, 평가도구로 사용하기에 부적합한 것도 있다. 게다가 가장 중요한 구비조건인 가중치가 배정되지 않았거나, 부여한 경우에도 그 논리적 근거가 불분명하다. 따라서 전통적 및 전자형 대학도서관의 투입-과정-산출을 종합적으로 측정·재단할 수 있는 평가지표(명칭 및 구성의 최적성, 가중치와 척도의 적절성 등)의 개발이 필요하다.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제45권2호
• /
• pp.309-324
• /
• 2011

이 연구의 목적은 우리나라 대학도서관 평가에 적용할 수 있는 평가 지표를 개발하는 것이다. 이 연구에서는 (1) 평가 방법, 절차 및 기준의 확정, (2) 평가에 사용될 정량적 및 정성적 평가 지표의 개발, (3) 시범 평가를 통한 지표의 적용 가능성 평가라는 세 가지 요소로 구성된 대학도서관 평가 모형을 구축하는 동시에 일반 현황 지표, 전국 대학 공동활용 지표, 특성화 지표 및 이용자 만족도 지표를 개발하였다. 이 지표들을 사용하여 2010년 대학도서관 평가 시범사업을 시행함으로써 이들의 적용 가능성 및 타당성을 검증하고자 시도하였다.

• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.23-38
• /
• 1997

In this Study, indicators for the evaluation of environmental amenity were determined through the investigation of the resident's consciousness in all thirty one cities and counties of Kyonggi. Also, environmental amenity that the resident feel in terms of recognition level was evaluated and based on the determined environmental indicators, environmental amenity for the physical environmental situation was evaluated. By analyzing the results, basic data for the planning of the future environmental management were prepared. The results of this study can be summarized as follows First, the developed indicators for the evaluation of environmental amenity consist of four intermediate evaluation items and fifteen individual evaluation items, and fifty four evaluation standards in total . Two to five evaluation standards were determined for the respective individual evaluation items. Second, using the developed indicators, the evaluation of environmental amenity were implemented based on both resident's consciousness and statistical data. Third, by analyzing the difference between two evaluation results, future research plan was proposed.