IE interfaces (산업공학)

Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers (대한산업공학회)
권호 표지

A Study on the Development of Evaluation Indicators for the Proposals of National Defense Core-Technology R&D Projects

국방핵심기술 연구개발의 제안서 평가를 위한 평가지표 개발에 관한 연구

  • Kim, Chan-Soo (Defense Agency for Technology and Quality) ;
  • Cho, Kyu-Kab (Department of Industrial Engineering, Pusan National University)
  • 김찬수 (국방기술품질원 기술기획본부 기술평가부) ;
  • 조규갑 (부산대학교 산업공학과)
  • Received : 20070800
  • Accepted : 20070900
  • Published : 2008.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper proposes the systematic design approach for developing the evaluation indicators that evaluate the candidate proposals in the national defense core-technology R&D projects. To improve the validity and fairness of the evaluation indicators, the existing evaluation process in a military and a public sector are surveyed and also the existing evaluation system of the core-technology R&D programs for the national defense is analysed and discussed. A new system for the evaluation indicators is designed by using the axiomatic design, factor analysis and the analytic hierarchy process. It is expected that the proposed evaluation indicators contribute to enhance the fairness and the reliability of the evaluation process for the proposal of the national defense core-technology R&D projects.

Keywords

References

  1. Cho, K. T., Jo, Y. G., and Kang H. S. (2003), The Analytic Hierarchy Process, Donghyun Pub., Seoul. Korea
  2. Cho, K. T. (2002), Aggregation of Multi Evaluator's Weights in Applying the AHP to Evaluate Technology Alternatives, Korea J. of Management Science, 19(2), 139-153
  3. Ho, W. (2007), Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its application-A literature review, European Journal of Operational Research, Article in Press
  4. Hong, H. D. (2001), Comparative Analysis on the Evaluation Systems of the Public R&D Programs in the Developed Countries, J. of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 4(3), 275-290
  5. Hong, S. W. (2003), Assessing R&D Best Practices in Technological Best Practices in Technological Innovation Process, IE Interface, 16(2), 125-139
  6. Linck, J. (2001), A Decomposition-Based Approach for Manufacturing System Design, Ph.D. Thesis, Massachuesetts Institute of Technology
  7. Ministry of National Defense (2004, 2006), Defense White Paper, The Republic of Korea, www.mnd.go.kr
  8. Roessner, D. (1989), Evaluating Government Innovation Programmes: Lessons from the US Experience, Research Policy, 18(6), 343-359 https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(89)90022-X
  9. Saaty, T. L. (1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process, New York, McGraw- Hill, Inc
  10. Saaty, T. L. (1990), How to make a decision : The Analytic Hierarchy Process, European Journal of Operational Research, 48, 9-26 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
  11. Suh, Nam P. (1999), A Theory of Complexity, Periodicity and the Design Axioms, Research in Engineering Design, 11, 116-131 https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00003883
  12. Suh, Nam P. (2001), Axiomatic Design: advances and applications, Oxford University Press, New York
  13. Sykes, A. (1990), Macro Projects: Status, Prospects, and the Need for International Cooperation, Technology in Society, 12, 157-172 https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-791X(90)90006-X