Browse > Article

A Study on the Development of Evaluation Indicators for the Proposals of National Defense Core-Technology R&D Projects  

Kim, Chan-Soo (Defense Agency for Technology and Quality)
Cho, Kyu-Kab (Department of Industrial Engineering, Pusan National University)
Publication Information
IE interfaces / v.21, no.1, 2008 , pp. 96-108 More about this Journal
Abstract
This paper proposes the systematic design approach for developing the evaluation indicators that evaluate the candidate proposals in the national defense core-technology R&D projects. To improve the validity and fairness of the evaluation indicators, the existing evaluation process in a military and a public sector are surveyed and also the existing evaluation system of the core-technology R&D programs for the national defense is analysed and discussed. A new system for the evaluation indicators is designed by using the axiomatic design, factor analysis and the analytic hierarchy process. It is expected that the proposed evaluation indicators contribute to enhance the fairness and the reliability of the evaluation process for the proposal of the national defense core-technology R&D projects.
Keywords
defense core-technology; evaluation indicators; axiomatic design; factor analysis; AHP;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Cho, K. T., Jo, Y. G., and Kang H. S. (2003), The Analytic Hierarchy Process, Donghyun Pub., Seoul. Korea
2 Cho, K. T. (2002), Aggregation of Multi Evaluator's Weights in Applying the AHP to Evaluate Technology Alternatives, Korea J. of Management Science, 19(2), 139-153
3 Hong, S. W. (2003), Assessing R&D Best Practices in Technological Best Practices in Technological Innovation Process, IE Interface, 16(2), 125-139
4 Ministry of National Defense (2004, 2006), Defense White Paper, The Republic of Korea, www.mnd.go.kr
5 Saaty, T. L. (1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process, New York, McGraw- Hill, Inc
6 Saaty, T. L. (1990), How to make a decision : The Analytic Hierarchy Process, European Journal of Operational Research, 48, 9-26   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Suh, Nam P. (2001), Axiomatic Design: advances and applications, Oxford University Press, New York
8 Linck, J. (2001), A Decomposition-Based Approach for Manufacturing System Design, Ph.D. Thesis, Massachuesetts Institute of Technology
9 Hong, H. D. (2001), Comparative Analysis on the Evaluation Systems of the Public R&D Programs in the Developed Countries, J. of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 4(3), 275-290   과학기술학회마을
10 Sykes, A. (1990), Macro Projects: Status, Prospects, and the Need for International Cooperation, Technology in Society, 12, 157-172   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Ho, W. (2007), Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its application-A literature review, European Journal of Operational Research, Article in Press
12 Roessner, D. (1989), Evaluating Government Innovation Programmes: Lessons from the US Experience, Research Policy, 18(6), 343-359   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Suh, Nam P. (1999), A Theory of Complexity, Periodicity and the Design Axioms, Research in Engineering Design, 11, 116-131   DOI