산업공학 (IE interfaces)

  • 제23권1호
  • /
  • Pages.78-88
  • /
  • 2010
  • /
  • 1225-0996(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-6465(eISSN)
대한산업공학회 (Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers)
권호 표지

국방연구개발 시험개발사업 성과평가지표 개발에 관한 연구

A Study on Developing the Performance Evaluation Indicators of Defense R&D Test Development Projects

  • 이형준 (서울산업대학교 IT정책전문대학원) ;
  • 김우제 (서울산업대학교 산업정보시스템공학과) ;
  • 김찬수 (국방기술품질원 기획조정부)
  • Lee, Hyung-Jun (The Graduate School of public Policy and Information Technology, Seoul National University of Technology) ;
  • Kim, Woo-Je (Dept. of Industrial and information Systems Engineering, Seoul National University of Technology) ;
  • Kim, Chan-Soo (Planning and Coordination Department, Defense Agency for Technology and Quality)
  • 투고 : 2009.08.29
  • 심사 : 2010.01.31
  • 발행 : 2010.03.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In this paper we develop a model for the performance evaluation of defense R&D test development projects based on analytic hierarchy process. First, evaluation indicators are collected through the related literature survey and a delphi inquiry method. Second, stepwise multiple linear regression is used for developing a hierarchical structure for analytic hierarchy process in the evaluation model, which can make the selected evaluation indicators of the hierarchical structure independent. Also we verify the effectiveness of proposed indicators of the performance evaluation by comparing with the existing evaluation indicators. The developed indicators for the performance evaluation is more reasonable and practical than the previous indicators on defense R&D test development projects.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Cho, T. (2007), A Study on Improvement Administration Evaluation Indicator of Government Agency, The Korea Association for Governance, 14(3), 285-313. https://doi.org/10.17089/kgr.2007.14.3.011
  2. Cho, K. T., Jo, Y. G., and Kang, H. S. (2003), The Analytic Hierarchy Process, Donghyun Pub., Seoul Korea.
  3. DAPA (2007), Defense Project Management Provisions, Defense Acquisition Program Administrator, Korea.
  4. Hyot, W. T., Leierer, S., and Millington, M. J. (2006), Analysis and Interpretation Of Findings Using Multiple Regression Techniques, Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin(RCB), 49(4), 223-233. https://doi.org/10.1177/00343552060490040401
  5. Kang, B. S. and Kim, G. S. (2007), Statistics Analysis of Social Science(SPSS 12K), Hannarae Pub. Seoul Korea.
  6. Lee, H. J. and Kim, W. J. (2008), A Study on the Development of Evaluation Indicators for the Performance of Defense Core-Technology R&D Project, KIMST Conference, 41-44.
  7. Lee, H. J., Kim, C. S., and Kim, W. J. (2009), The Development of Evaluation Indicators for the Performance of Defense Core-Technology R&D Projects Using SMR/AHP, Journal of the Korea Institute of Military Science and Technology, 12(1), 70-79.
  8. Moon, Y. S. (2007), Development Performance Goal and Indicator of Defense R&D Projects Self Evaluation, DTAQ, 1-11.
  9. Oh, D. H. and Kim, J. Y. (2005), Development Public R&D Project Evaluation Guideline and Education Program for Performance Evaluation, Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning, Policy Research 2005-06, 100-104.
  10. Park, S. H. (2006), A Study on Improvement Evaluation Indicator of Recognition Types, Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning, 1-12.
  11. Saaty, T. L. and Vargas, L. G. (2001), Model, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 3-9.
  12. Yu, J. S. (2008), A Field Focused Process for Improving Evaluation Models, Dept. of Industrial Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, 7-9.
  13. Yang, H. S. (2004), A Study on Improvement R&D Evaluation Indicator of National R&D Projects, The Conference of The Korea Institute of Industrial Engineers, SA-10, 1-4.