• Title/Summary/Keyword: 2022 교육과정

Search Result 689, Processing Time 0.027 seconds

Analysis of the Meaning of the 2022 Revised Curriculum (2022 개정 교육과정 의미 분석)

  • Han, Yoon Ok
    • The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology
    • /
    • v.8 no.5
    • /
    • pp.59-69
    • /
    • 2022
  • The purpose of this study is to suggest improvement directions by analyzing the meaning of the 2022 revised curriculum. Research methods include literature research, surveys, and interviews. The conclusion is as follows. First, The background of the promotion has been revised to cultivate the competencies necessary for the future society and to strengthen the learner-tailored education. Second, what characterizes the 2022 revised curriculum is that it is being created in collaboration with people as a future-oriented curriculum for the first time in history. Third, the implementation of the 2022 revised curriculum is being directed towards individuality and diversity, decentralization and autonomy, digitally based education, and public performance and accountability. Fourth, the principal contents are curriculum innovation in response to future changes, cultivating community values and capacity building for learners, strengthening education for elementary, middle, and high school students to develop digital and AI literacy, and strengthening the curriculum for all.

Exploring the Direction of Middle School Statistics Education through a Comparison of Statistical Content between China & Korea: Focused on the Revised 2022 Mathematics Curriculum (중국의 중학교 통계 교육과정 분석을 통한 통계교육 방안 탐색: 2022 개정 수학과 교육과정을 중심으로)

  • Suh, Boeuk;Rim, Haemee
    • Communications of Mathematical Education
    • /
    • v.37 no.3
    • /
    • pp.329-348
    • /
    • 2023
  • This study is necessary for the stable settlement of the 2022 revised mathematics curriculum 'data and possibility' area. This study was conducted centering on literature analysis. The purpose of this study is to realize statistics education in line with the 2022 revised mathematics curriculum. This purpose was achieved by examining the statistics learning contents of the 2022 revised curriculum, analyzing Chinese mathematics curriculum, and analyzing Chinese mathematics textbooks. In this study, the following studies were conducted. First, five elements were extracted through the analysis of the 'statistics and probability' area of the Chinese mathematics curriculum. The extracted elements are the 4th grade goals, synthesis and practice content areas, achievement standards for statistics and probability (6), (9), and (11). Second, examples presented in Chinese mathematics textbooks and Chinese curriculum appendices related to the extracted elements were analyzed. Regarding the 4th grade goal, the statistical problem-solving process of the 7th grade 2nd semester mathematics textbook was analyzed. Regarding the synthesis and practice content area, the data analysis unit of the 8th grade 2nd semester mathematics textbook was analyzed. In relation to the achievement standard (6), Example 85 of the curriculum appendix was analyzed, in relation to the achievement standard (9), Example 86 was analyzed, and in relation to the achievement standard (11), Example 87 was analyzed. Third, based on the analysis results, implications for the development of new curriculum and 'textbook development, teaching and learning methods' according to the 2022 revised middle school mathematics curriculum were derived. Through the results of this study, we expect the successful realization of the 2022 revised middle school mathematics and curriculum statistics education.

Improving the 2022 Revised Science Curriculum: Elementary School "Earth and Universe" Units (2022 개정 과학과 교육과정 개선 방향 고찰 - 초등학교 '지구와 우주' 영역을 중심으로 -)

  • Yu, Eun-Jeong;Park, Jae Yong;Lee, Hyundong
    • Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education
    • /
    • v.41 no.2
    • /
    • pp.173-185
    • /
    • 2022
  • The purpose of this study is to present a reflective review of the earth and universe units from the revised elementary curriculum of 2007-2015 and suggest changes in the 2022 revised curriculum. For this purpose, we conducted an FGI with earth science educators and elementary school teachers regarding the content elements and system, the achievement standards and inquiry activity composition, and the vertical and horizontal curriculum connectivity. Free response and weighted hierarchical analysis items were incorporated into the FGI to ensure logical consistency of the inductively derived improvement. This analysis revealed that the composition of units by grade group had been unevenly distributed among each of the "earth systems" until the 2015 revised curriculum was finalized. Furthermore, the basic concept was still insufficient. We suggest that achievement standards centered on the learning content and skills must state specific scientific core competencies, and inquiry activities should include rigorous critical thinking, student written responses, and student inquiry and analysis. In the hierarchical analysis items, FGI emphasized the inclusion of essential content elements rather than reduction of content elements, understanding-oriented concept learning rather than interest-centered phenomenon learning, basic concept division learning before integration between subjects, and expanding vertical-horizontal connectivity rather than repeating and advancing learning. There is a limit to the generalizing the suggestions proposed in this study to the common opinion of elementary earth science experts. However, since the main vision of the 2022 revised curriculum is to gather opinions through educational entities' participation in a variety of educational subjects, it is suggested that our results should be incorporated as one of the opinions proposed for the 2022 curriculum revision.

A Critical Analysis of the Draft Proposal of 2022 Revised Practical Arts (Technology·Home Economics) Curriculum (2022 개정 실과(기술·가정) 교육과정 시안에 대한 비판적 검토)

  • Youngsik Jeong
    • Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education
    • /
    • v.26 no.5
    • /
    • pp.457-465
    • /
    • 2022
  • The government has proposed various policies to 'extend the time for teaching information education in elementary schools'. However, in the 2022 revised practical arts (technical·home economics) curriculum, information education is still organized for only 17 hours the same as before, and there is not enough connection with the middle school information subject. In this study, policies related to information education in elementary schools such as National Strategy of Artificial Intelligence, Comprehensive Plan of Information Education, Education Policy Direction and Core Tasks in the Artificial Intelligence Era, and Digital Talent Education Plan were analyzed. In addition, after the '2022 revised national curriculum guidelines' was announced in 2021, the problems of the practical arts curriculum were analyzed by analyzing materials of the draft proposal of the curriculum and comments posted on the Public Participation Communication Channel. Finally, I suggested a plan to link the 2022 revised practical arts (technology·home economic) curriculum to the information subject of middle school in detail, and to expand information education in elementary schools.

Analysis of Terms by Curriculum in 2015 Revised Curriculum for Digital Knowledge Education in 2022 Revised Curriculum (2022 개정 교육과정의 디지털 소양 교육을 위한 2015 개정 교육과정 교과별 용어 분석)

  • Kim, Eun-Ji;Lee, Young-Jun
    • Proceedings of the Korean Society of Computer Information Conference
    • /
    • 2022.07a
    • /
    • pp.725-726
    • /
    • 2022
  • 디지털 소양의 용어는 2022 개정 교육과정에서 새롭게 다루어지는 개념이다. 그동안은 디지털 소양의 의미를 담은 다양한 용어들이 각 교과 특성에 맞게 혼재되어 사용되어 왔다. 하지만 2022 개정 교육과정에서는 모든 교과에서 디지털 소양을 다룰 것을 강조하고 있기 때문에 각 교과와의 개념에 대한 합의가 필요하다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 2015 개정 교육과정의 초등 각 교과에서는 디지털 소양과 관련된 어떤 용어들이 사용되어왔는지 분석해보고자 한다.

  • PDF

Exploring Development Achievement of the 2022 Revised High School Earth Science Curriculum to Cultivate Transformative Competency (변혁적 역량 함양을 위한 2022 개정 고등학교 과학과 지구과학 교육과정 개발 성과 탐색)

  • Youngsun Kwak;Jong-Hee Kim;Hyunjong Kim
    • Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education
    • /
    • v.17 no.1
    • /
    • pp.49-59
    • /
    • 2024
  • In this study, we investigated the philosophical background and progress of the 2022 revised curriculum development in the high school earth science field. Research that was not covered in the research report includes the relevance of the transformative competency of OECD Education 2030, and that core ideas and achievement standards are organized around knowledge understanding, process functions, and value attitudes that constitute the learning compass needle. In addition, the composition of core ideas and Earth science electives in light of the understanding-centered curriculum, and IB type inquiry-based teaching and learning. Main research results include that the 2022 revised Earth science curriculum emphasized the student agency to foster the transformative competency and scientific literacy, and the curriculum document system in the field of earth science uses a learning compass needle. In addition, based on the understanding-centered curriculum, core ideas of Earth science were derived, and elective courses were organized to help students reach these core ideas. Also, IB-type inquiry-based teaching and learning was emphasized to foster student agency with knowledge construction competency. Based on the research results, slimming of the national and general level curriculum, the need to develop process-centered assessment methods for value and attitudes, the need for curriculum backward design, and ways to develop student agency through inquiry-based teaching and learning were suggested.

Exploring the Meaning of the 2018 'Comprehensive Plan for Vitalizing Democratic Citizenship Education' (2018년 '민주시민 교육 활성화를 위한 종합계획' 의미탐색)

  • Yoon Ok Han
    • The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology
    • /
    • v.10 no.1
    • /
    • pp.51-60
    • /
    • 2024
  • The purpose of this study is to explore the meaning of the 2018 'Comprehensive Plan for the Vitalization of Democratic Citizenship Education' centered on the '2022 Revised Curriculum General Discussion'. Research Results First, in the case of strengthening democratic citizenship education in schools, one of the main tasks in the general discussion of the 2022 revised curriculum emphasizes democratic citizenship education to cultivate citizenship. are doing Second, in the case of teacher professionalism enhancement and support for educational activities, development of teaching and learning materials and reinforcement of teacher training are promoted in the 2022 revised curriculum summary. Third, in the case of creating a democratic school culture, the 2022 revised curriculum outline guarantees student safety and learning rights through remodeling or remodeling old schools to restructure learning spaces and realize a digital-based learning environment. Fourth, in the case of revitalization of student autonomy, in the general discussion of the 2022 revised curriculum, the autonomy of the school curriculum considering the needs of students and school conditions is expanded, and classes centered on participatory experiences and self-government activities are strengthened. Fifth, in the case of establishing a democratic citizenship education support system, the 2022 revised curriculum outline establishes a mutual cooperation system that respects the roles and expertise of various educational subjects and a mutual cooperation system between the local community and the educational community.

The use of iTokTok in terms of teaching and learning in the 2022 revised curriculum (2022 개정 교육과정의 교수학습 측면에서 아이톡톡의 활용)

  • Eun-Ji Kim;Young-Jun Lee
    • Proceedings of the Korean Society of Computer Information Conference
    • /
    • 2023.01a
    • /
    • pp.237-238
    • /
    • 2023
  • 2022 개정 교육과정은 미래 사회에 대응하기 위한 역량을 함양하는 것에 중점을 두고 있다. 특히 디지털 대전환에 중점을 두고 지능정보기술 활용과 디지털 학습 환경 구축을 강조하고 있다. 경상남도 교육청에서는 미래교육 환경 구축을 위해 빅데이터-AI 플랫폼 아이톡톡을 개발하여 이에 대응하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 2022 개정 교육과정의 교수학습 측면에서 아이톡톡의 활용을 살펴보았다.

  • PDF

Exploring the Meaning of Democratic Citizenship Education Revealed in the General Discussion of the 2022 Revised Curriculum (개정 교육과정 총론(2022)에 드러난 민주 시민 교육 의미 탐색)

  • Yoon Ok Han
    • The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology
    • /
    • v.10 no.4
    • /
    • pp.33-40
    • /
    • 2024
  • The Ministry of Education announced the main points of the 2022 revised curriculum on November 24, 2021. Democratic citizenship education to foster citizenship appears as one of the detailed tasks among the key tasks of the 2022 revised curriculum. We are promoting democratic citizenship education to foster citizenship. Therefore, what does democratic citizenship education specifically mean and what does it consist of? There is a need to look into what methods this should be used for. The purpose of this study is to explore the meaning of democratic citizenship education revealed in the 2022 revised curriculum. The contents of democratic citizenship education for the cultivation of citizenship revealed in the general discussion of the 2022 revised curriculum are analyzed as follows. First, it means education related to democracy and social issues. The specific contents of democracy and social issues are ① peace, ② human rights, ③ gender equality, and ④ cultural diversity. Second, critical thinking education. Third, media literacy education is necessary because democratic citizenship education must respond appropriately to the times in line with social changes such as the emergence of Chat GPT. Fourth, while emphasizing democratic decision-making education, it includes social empathy and communication education. Fifth, it contains local and national community participation and practical education as a method for citizen participation and practice. As described above, democratic citizenship education was specified in the general introduction of the 2022 revised curriculum. In order to carry out such democratic citizenship education systematically, it is necessary to establish the principles of democratic citizenship education.

Analysis of Achievement Standards Statements of 2022 Revised Elementary School Science Curriculum (2022 개정 초등학교 과학과 교육과정 성취기준 진술 분석)

  • Park, Ki Rak
    • Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education
    • /
    • v.43 no.2
    • /
    • pp.284-300
    • /
    • 2024
  • This study elucidates the achievement standards statements of the 2022 revised elementary school science curriculum to identify specific achievement standards for the upcoming curriculum. Therefore, the researcher analyzed the statements of the overall elementary school achievement standards based on Bloom's taxonomy of new educational objectives. The results are as follows. First, the achievement standards statements are biased toward certain knowledge and cognitive process dimensions; this aspect is not consistent with the goals of the 2022 revised curriculum and the teaching and learning directions of the science department. Thus, achievement standards that enable various types of activities and inquiry learning should be developed. Second, a need emerges for the hierarchization of knowledge and cognitive levels by grade level. The proportions of low levels of knowledge and cognitive process dimensions increased in the upper grades, such that a systematic hierarchy should be considered. Third, the need to diversify the use of the descriptors of achievement standards is also identified. Although the tendency to rely on specific descriptors decreased during the previous curriculum, approx imately half of the descriptors were only used once or twice. Therefore, balancing the use of various descriptors is necessary. To ensure that the results are reflected in the achievement standards for elementary school science textbooks under the revised science curriculum for elementary schools in 2022, a discussion is required on the design of achievement standards statements. As a follow-up study, the researcher proposes a comparative analysis of the achievement standards of science curricula for middle and high schools to explore the wording of achievement standards appropriate for elementary school science education considering its nature, goals, and contents and to analyze the hierarchy and continuity of the entire science curriculum.