Communications of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집)

Korean Society of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Exploring the Direction of Middle School Statistics Education through a Comparison of Statistical Content between China & Korea: Focused on the Revised 2022 Mathematics Curriculum

중국의 중학교 통계 교육과정 분석을 통한 통계교육 방안 탐색: 2022 개정 수학과 교육과정을 중심으로

  • Received : 2023.08.25
  • Accepted : 2023.09.25
  • Published : 2023.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study is necessary for the stable settlement of the 2022 revised mathematics curriculum 'data and possibility' area. This study was conducted centering on literature analysis. The purpose of this study is to realize statistics education in line with the 2022 revised mathematics curriculum. This purpose was achieved by examining the statistics learning contents of the 2022 revised curriculum, analyzing Chinese mathematics curriculum, and analyzing Chinese mathematics textbooks. In this study, the following studies were conducted. First, five elements were extracted through the analysis of the 'statistics and probability' area of the Chinese mathematics curriculum. The extracted elements are the 4th grade goals, synthesis and practice content areas, achievement standards for statistics and probability (6), (9), and (11). Second, examples presented in Chinese mathematics textbooks and Chinese curriculum appendices related to the extracted elements were analyzed. Regarding the 4th grade goal, the statistical problem-solving process of the 7th grade 2nd semester mathematics textbook was analyzed. Regarding the synthesis and practice content area, the data analysis unit of the 8th grade 2nd semester mathematics textbook was analyzed. In relation to the achievement standard (6), Example 85 of the curriculum appendix was analyzed, in relation to the achievement standard (9), Example 86 was analyzed, and in relation to the achievement standard (11), Example 87 was analyzed. Third, based on the analysis results, implications for the development of new curriculum and 'textbook development, teaching and learning methods' according to the 2022 revised middle school mathematics curriculum were derived. Through the results of this study, we expect the successful realization of the 2022 revised middle school mathematics and curriculum statistics education.

본 연구는 2022년 12월에 고시된 2022 개정 중학교 수학과 교육과정에서 제시한 통계 내용의 안정적인 현장 정착이라는 현실적인 필요성에 의해 수행된 문헌 연구이다. 2022 개정 수학과 교육과정 개정 방향 중의 하나인 통계교육의 변화 요구를 고려하였다. 특별히 본 연구에서는 중국 중학교 수학과 교육과정의 통계 내용을 면밀히 분석하였다. 왜냐하면 10년마다 수학과 교육과정을 개정하는 중국이 우리나라와 동일한 2022년에 새로운 수학과 교육과정을 고시하였기 때문이다. 이에 본 연구는 대한민국의 2022 개정 중학교 수학과 교육과정 통계 내용 및 2022년판 중국 중학교 수학과 교육과정 및 현재 사용 중인 수학교과서 통계 내용에 대한 상호 분석을 통하여, 우리나라의 새로운 교육과정의 방향에 부합된 통계교육 실현을 위한 기초 자료를 제공하는 것을 연구 목적으로 설정하였다. 이러한 목적을 달성하기 위해 다음과 같은 연구를 수행하였다. 첫째, 중국 중학교 수학과 교육과정의 '통계와 확률' 영역 분석을 통해 우리나라 통계교육에 유의미한 시사점을 제공할 수 있는 요소 5가지를 추출하였다. 둘째, 추출된 요소가 반영된 중국의 수학교과서 및 교육과정 부록에 제시된 예시 내용을 분석하였다. 셋째, 분석 결과를 바탕으로 2022 개정 중학과 수학과 교육과정에 따른 통계교육의 이상을 실현하기 위한 교과서 개발, 교실의 교수·학습 방안 및 추후 새로운 수학과 교육과정에 대한 시사점을 도출하였다. 본 연구를 통해 2022 개정 중학교 수학과 교육과정에서 표방하는 방향에 부합된 현장 통계교육의 안착을 기대한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of Education (2015). Mathematics curriculum. Notification of the Ministry of Education No. 2015-74 [Vol 8]. Ministry of Education.
  2. Ministry of Education (2022). Mathematics curriculum. Notification of the Ministry of Education No. 2022-33 [Vol 8]. Ministry of Education.
  3. Kim, D. W. et al. (2020). An analysis of the current state of the revised 2015 mathematics curriculum and its implementation in Schools. Research Report BD21010009. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity.
  4. Kim S. H., & Han, S. Y. (2021). Analyzing research questions from pre-service mathematics teachers in statistical problem solving process. The Mathematical Education, 60(3), 363-386.
  5. Kim S. H., & Han, S. Y. (2022). Analysis on statistical problem solving process of pre-service mathematics teachers: foc us on the result interpretation stage. Communications of Mathematical Education, 36(4), 535-558.
  6. Park, K. M. et al. (2015a). A policy study on the development of the 2015 revised mathematics curriculum draft. Research Report BD15110001. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity.
  7. Park, K. M. et al. (2015a). Research on the development of the 2015 revised mathematics curriculum draft II . Research Report BD15120005. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity.
  8. Suh, B. E. (2015). A Comparative Study on 2011 Reformed Elementary School Mathematics Curriculum Between Korea and China. Education of Primary School Mathematics, 18(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmec.2015.18.1.1
  9. Suh, B. E. et al. (2018). An analytical study on the change of mathematics curriculum. Research report BD 18070008. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity.
  10. Suh, B. E. et al. (2018). Mathematical processes and curriculum competencies in mathematics education. Kyung Moon Sa.
  11. Lee, K. H. et al. (2022). A study on the development of the 2022 revised mathematics curriculum. Ministry of Education.
  12. Bargagliotti, A., Franklin, C., Arnold, P., Gould, R., Johnson, S., Perez, L., & Spangler, D. A. (2020). Pre-K-12 guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education II: A framework for statistics and data science education. American Statistical Association.
  13. Blazar, D. et al. (2020). Curriculum reform in the Common Core era: Evaluating elementary math textbooks across six US states. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 39(4), 966-1019. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22257
  14. Chinese Ministry of Education (2019). The national university, middle and primary school textbook construction plan (2019-2022).
  15. Chinese Ministry of Education (2020). List of Middle School Mathematics Curriculum Violations. Source of data (search date 2023.2.7.): http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A06/s3321/202005/t20200509_451674.html.
  16. Chinese Ministry of Education (2022). 2022 reformed Chinese mathematics curriculum. Beijing Teachers University Press.
  17. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., & Foy, P.(2012). TIMSS 2011 International mathematics report. Boston College.
  18. OECD(2014). PISA 2012 Results: What students know and can do - Student performance in mathematics. Reading and Science (Vol. I, Revised Edition). OECD.
  19. People's Education Publishing Materials Research Institute (2012a). Compulsory education textbook mathematics grade 7-1. People's Education Press.
  20. People's Education Publishing Materials Research Institute (2012b). Compulsory education textbook mathematics grade 7-2. People's Education Press.
  21. People's Education Publishing Materials Research Institute (2013a). Compulsory education textbook mathematics grade 8-1. People's Education Press.
  22. People's Education Publishing Materials Research Institute (2013b). Compulsory education textbook mathematics grade 8-2. People's Education Press.
  23. People's Education Publishing Materials Research Institute (2014a). Compulsory education textbook mathematics grade 9-1. People's Education Press.
  24. People's Education Publishing Materials Research Institute (2014b). Compulsory education textbook mathematics grade 9-2. People's Education Press.
  25. Sum, E., & Kwon, O. (2016). High school mathematics curriculum in East Asia: Design & trends. Proceedings of the 2016 Spring Conference of the Korean Society of Mathematical Education, 158-161.
  26. Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum development: Theory and practice. Harcourt, Brace & World.
  27. Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. University of Chicago Press.
  28. Yan, F., & Lu, S. (2022). New Changes in the Curriculum Content of the Mathematics Curriculum Standards for Compulsory Education(2022 Edition). 天津师范大学学报(基础教育版), 23(4), 19-24.
  29. Zhu, L. (2022). From "Key Concepts" to "Key Competences":A Comparative Study of Mathematics Curriculum Standards for Compulsory Education Between 2011 Edition and 2022 Edition. 天津师范大学学报(基础教育版), 23(3), 1-6.