• School Mathematics
• /
• v.19 no.1
• /
• pp.77-93
• /
• 2017

The purpose of this study is to investigate the characteristics of problem making of 19 mathematically gifted students in junior high school. In this study, we examined the expansion and sophistication of the problems made by gifted students, focusing on the analysis framework proposed in the previous research. Next, the problem making by gifted students were categorized into 'horizontal problem making' and 'vertical problem making.' As a result of this study, it was found that problem making by gifted students was not enough in terms of extension and sophistication. In addition, gifted students made problems in the direction of decreasing complexity than original problems when creating new problems, and considered the conditions presented in the original text separately but not comprehensively.

• Journal of Gifted/Talented Education
• /
• v.18 no.1
• /
• pp.79-109
• /
• 2008

In most curricular model for gifted children, independent study is included as an important element for developing students' study ability and producing creative production Gifted children also prefers this style of learning and they study more easily and with more fun when they learn in the learning style they prefer. This study aims to find out how gifted children in math area performs independent study and how teachers who teach them recognize independent study; survey study was used to analyze the reality of the production in relation to independent study. In result, gifted children's independent study ability was rather very low and teachers recognized the necessity of independent study but lacked understanding of the method of independent study.

• School Mathematics
• /
• v.16 no.1
• /
• pp.181-199
• /
• 2014

This study set out to analyze and compare gifted elementary students and non-gifted students in emotional intelligence and creative nature. To understand the characteristics of the former, and provide assistance for career education for both groups. For this purpose, the three following research questions were set: First, what kind of difference is there in emotional intelligence between gifted elementary students and non-gifted students? Second, what kind of difference is there in creative nature between gifted elementary students and non-gifted students? Third, what is the connection between emotional intelligence and creative nature in gifted elementary students and non-gifted students? For this study, 102 students from the gifted class and 132 students from non-gifted classes were selected. In total 234 questionnaires were distributed, and the results were analyzed. The results of this study were as follows. First, as a result of the independent sample T-test, there were noticeable differences in giftedness. Gifted students scored significantly higher than non-gifted students in creative nature. Second, as a result of the independent sample T-test, there were noticeable differences in the creative nature of gifted and non-gifted students. Gifted students scored significantly higher than non-gifted students in creative nature. Third, by analyzing the results found for emotional intelligence and creative nature with Pearson's product-moment correlation, there was a positive correlation between both emotional intelligence and creative nature in both groups of results.

• Journal of Gifted/Talented Education
• /
• v.13 no.1
• /
• pp.1-19
• /
• 2003

The purpose of this study is to investigate the self-efficacy of gifted students in the area of sciences. For this purpose, The Self-efficacy Beliefs Inventory was administered to 220 5th and 6th gifted students and high achievers. The research findings were as follows; First, there was no statistically significant difference in the general, academic, self regulated learning, and others’ expectation self-efficacy beliefs between gifted students and high achievers as well as among groups of gifted students. Second, the gifted students in mathematics were higher than other groups in the mathematics self-efficacy beliefs. Third, the high achievers were higher than other groups in the language art self-efficacy beliefs. Fourth, the gifted students in mathematics were higher than other groups in mathematics self-efficacy beliefs. Fifth, the gifted students in science were higher than other groups in science self-efficacy beliefs. Sixth, the gifted students in IT were higher than other groups in computer self-efficacy beliefs. Seventh, the gifted students in IT were lower than other groups in social self-efficacy beliefs.

• Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea
• /
• v.14 no.2
• /
• pp.263-285
• /
• 2010

It is necessary to accumulate the studies on the practical learning and teaching for the Mathematical talent education in elementary school. In this study, I set the 4th grade children mathematically gifted in elementary school to pose the various number calculating formulars, 4 4 4 4 = 0, 1, 2,$\cdots$10, by using to +, -, ${\times}$, $\div$, ( ). And I analysed their products. In 2007, I gave the same task to 5th graders and got a significant result. To expand the target of my study, I used the same investigating method for children of different graders. As a result, I conclude that math brains in 4th grade also can create various many number calculating formulas. I find that children pose to various many calaulating formulars becoming 0, 1, 8, 4 in order whereas they pose to a little calaulating formulars becoming 10, 6, 5, 9 orderly. Most errors are due to the order of calculation or confusion about parenthesis. This study contributes to test methods and text development for math brains in elementary school.

• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.18 no.3 s.20
• /
• pp.149-161
• /
• 2004

영재교육 프로그램 참여와 관련하여 학생들의 수학학습실태를 분석하고 암묵적 이론의 관점에서 영재교육 프로그램 참여학생들의 수학학습활동에 영향을 주는 요인은 무엇이고 어떻게 구성되어 있으며, 이러한 동기화 요인의 구성은 비슷한 학령의 일반학생 및 과학고등학교에 재학중인 학생들과는 어떤 차이가 있는지를 밝히는데 주된 목적을 두고 있다.

• Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society
• /
• v.9 no.3
• /
• pp.287-308
• /
• 2006

In this study, an instrument of mathematical problem solving ability test was considered, and the difference between gifted and regular students in the ability were investigated by the test. The instrument consists of 10 items, and verified its quality due to reliability, validity and discrimination. Participants were 168 regular students and 150 gifted from seventh grade. As a result, not only problem solving but also problem finding and problem posing could be the characteristics of the giftedness.

• Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea
• /
• v.15 no.1
• /
• pp.19-38
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study was to analyze the responses and the behavioral characteristics between mathematically promising students and normal students in solving open-ended problems. For this study, 55 mathematically promising students were selected from the Science Education Institute for the Gifted at Seoul National University of Education as well as 100 normal students from three 6th grade classes of a regular elementary school. The students were given 50 minutes to complete a written test consisting of five open-ended problems. A post-test interview was also conducted and added to the results of the written test. The conclusions of this study were summarized as follows: First, analysis and grouping problems are the most suitable in an open-ended problem study to stimulate the creativity of mathematically promising students. Second, open-ended problems are helpful for mathematically promising students' generative learning. The mathematically promising students had a tendency to find a variety of creative methods when solving open-ended problems. Third, mathematically promising students need to improve their ability to make-up new conditions and change the conditions to solve the problems. Fourth, various topics and subjects can be integrated into the classes for mathematically promising students. Fifth, the quality of students' former education and its effect on their ability to solve open-ended problems must be taken into consideration. Finally, a creative thinking class can be introduce to the general class. A number of normal students had creativity score similar to those of the mathematically promising students, suggesting that the introduction of a more challenging mathematics curriculum similar to that of the mathematically promising students into the general curriculum may be needed and possible.

• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.15
• /
• pp.77-86
• /
• 2003

초등학교 영재들은 여러 사설 교육기관이나 국립기관 그리고 개인 교습을 통하여 많은 양의 선수학습을 행하고 있다. 이들 중 일부는 방법과 이유를 아는 관계 이해를 하기보다는, 주어진 규칙을 적용하여 정답을 찾아내는 도구적 이해를 하고 있다. 그들은 수학을 능동적이기보다는 수동적인 입장에서 받아들이기에 새로운 수학적 지식을 창출하지 못하는 성향을 강하게 보이고 있다. 이에 본 연구자는 이러한 문제의 해결을 위해 초등학교 영재들이 가지고 있는 수학적 스키마와 선생님들이 가르치는 스키마 사이의 간격에 초점을 맞추어 연구하였다. 대전에 있는 영재교육기관에 등록된 초등학교 3학년 영재들을 대상으로 하여 연구한 결과, 스키마와 스키마 사이의 간격이 멀수록 학생들이 방법과 이유를 아는 관계적 이해를 하기보다는 주어진 규칙을 적용하여 정답을 찾아내는 도구적 이해를 하고, 그 간격을 줄일수록 수학에 흥미를 느끼고 고학년의 수학내용까지도 스스로 파악하고 이해하려는 성향이 나타난다는 사실을 발견하게 되었다. 그 간격이 적을수록 학생들은 교사로부터 학습받은 내용을 자신의 지식으로 재구성하여 새로운 문제에 적용을 쉽게 하였다. 본 발표에서는, 학생들의 수학적 스키마와 선생님들이 가르치는 스키마 사이의 간격을 줄이는 것이 학생들이 수학을 관계적 이해를 하는데 큰 도움을 줄 수 잇음을 보이려고 한다.

• Journal of Gifted/Talented Education
• /
• v.22 no.1
• /
• pp.23-37
• /
• 2012

The purpose of this study is to design a more satisfactory and efficient teaching strategy for the gifted by comparing teaching type and learning environment preferred by the gifted with that preferred by normal students. As a result, the following findings are obtained. First, while the normal class students show higher preference for clarification and organization, gifted students prefer for diversification and specialization. Second, with the respect to the gender-related forms of mathematics classroom environment, the overall female preference and the average score are higher, indicating significant difference in the area is only a psychological domain. Third, compared to the regular classroom, the gifted have significantly different preference for teaching method, classroom and teachers' attitude between in the gifted class and regular class.