1 |
우광식 (2005). 초등학교 수학영재교육에 대한 사례조사 연구. 박사학위논문. 한국교원대학교
|
2 |
윤여홍 (2003). 영재의 지적, 정의적 특성. 영재교육학원론. 서울: 교육과학사
|
3 |
Betts, G. T. (1985). The autonomous Learner Model for gifted and talented. Greeley, CO: ALPS Publications
|
4 |
Betts, G. T., & Kercher, J. K. (1999). The autonomous Learner Model: Optimizing ability. Greeley, CO: ALPS Publications
|
5 |
Betts, G. T., & Neight, M. (2005). Profiles of gifted and talented. In R. J. Sternberg (Eds), Definitions and conceptions of Giftedness. (pp. 97-106). Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press
|
6 |
Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. B. (2004). Education of the gifted and talented. Boston: Ally & Bacon
|
7 |
Delcourt, M. A. (1993). Creative productive among secondary school students: Combining energy, interest, and imagination. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37. 23-31
DOI
|
8 |
Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1992). Teaching secondary students through their individual learning styles; Practical approaches for grade 3-6. Boston: Allyn ane Bacon
|
9 |
Feldhusen, J. F., & Kolloff, P. B. (1986). The Purdue three-stage enrichment model for gifted education at the elementary level. In J. S Renzulli (Ed.), Systems and models for developing for the gifted and talented (pp. 102-145). Mansfild Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
|
10 |
Gallagher, S. A. (2001) Adapting Problem-Based Learning for Gifted Students. In F.A.Karnes and S.M. Bean (Eds.) Methods and Materials for teaching the gifted, (pp. 369-397). Prufrock Press Inc
|
11 |
Gardner, H. (2000). Intelligence Reframed: Multiple intelligence for the 21s century. New York: Basic Books
|
12 |
Kitano, M., & Kirby, D. F. (1986). Gifted education: A comprehensive view. Boston: Little Brown
|
13 |
Renzulli, J. S. (1997). The schoolwide enrichment model: A guide for development defensible programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfild Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
|
14 |
Renzulli, J. S. (1998). The multiple menu model for developing differentiated curriculum for the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32. 298-309
DOI
|
15 |
서혜애, 손연아, 김경진 (2003). 영재교육기관 교수.학습 실태 분석. 한국교육개발원 연구보고
|
16 |
Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60(3). 180-184
|
17 |
Renzulli, J. S, & Leppien, J. H & Hays, T. S(2000). The Multiple Menu Model: A Pratical Guide For Developing Differentiated Curriculum. Mansfild Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
|
18 |
교육인적자원부 (2007). 제2차 영재교육진흥종합계획('08-'12). 교육인적자원부
|
19 |
Kaplan, S. N., & Gould, B.(2002). Independent Study. California: E2E
|
20 |
Renzulli, J. S, & Reis, S. M. (2003). The schoolwide enrichment model: A how-to guide for educational excellence(2nd ed.). Creative Learning Press
|
21 |
Starko, A. J., & Schack, G.D. (1992). Looking for data in all the right places: A guidebook for conducting original research with young investigators. Mansfild Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
|
22 |
Olenchak, F. R., & Renzulli, J. S. (1989). The effectiveness of the Schoolwide Enrichment Model on selected aspects of elementary school change. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33. 36-46
DOI
|
23 |
Renzulli, J. S(1994). Schools for Talent Development: A Practical Plan For Total School Improvement. Mansfild Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
|
24 |
최호성, 강호감, 서혜애, 박일영, 이혁우 (2003). 연구와 교육 프로그램을 통한 과학영재의 창의성 신장 방안에 관한 연구. 서울: 한국과학재단
|
25 |
경기도교육청 (2007). 영재교육 담당교원 심화연수 교재. 경기도과학교육원
|
26 |
Feldhusen, J. F. (1995). Talent development: The new direction in gifted education. Roeper Review, 18. 92
DOI
|
27 |
정현철, 윤초희, 허남영 (2005). 과학영재의 자율연구능력에 영향을 미치는 교수전략 탐색 및 교수.학습 모형 개발 연구. 한국교육개발원 연구보고. RM 2005-45
|
28 |
Johnsen, S. K., & Johnsen, K. (1986). Independent Study Program. WACO, TX: Profrock Press
|
29 |
Kaplan, S. N. (1986). The grid: A model to construct differentiated curriculum for the gifted. In J. S. Renzulli(Ed.), systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented. (pp. 180-193). Mansfild Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
|
30 |
Starko, A. J. (1988). Effects of the revolving door identification model on creative productivity and self-efficacy. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32. 291-297
DOI
|
31 |
VanTassel-Baska, J. (1997). What matters in curriculum for gifted learners: Reflections on theory, research, and practice. In N. Colangelo & G. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education. (pp. 204-235). Boston: Allyn & Bacon
|
32 |
Renzulli, J. S, & Reis, S. M. (1997). The schoolwide enrichment model: Developing creative and productive giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. Davise (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 184-203). Boston: Allyn & Bacon
|
33 |
조석희 (2005). 영재를 위한 심화 교육 프로그램. 창의적 지식 생산자 양성을 위한 영재교육(영재교육담당교원심화연수교재). 한국교육개발원
|
34 |
Hebert, T. P. (1993). Reflections at graduation: The long-time impact of elementary school experiences in creative productivity. Roeper Review, 16. 22-28
DOI
ScienceOn
|
35 |
Treffinger, D. J. (1975). Teaching for self-directed learning: A priority of the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 19. 46-59
DOI
|
36 |
Moote, B. (2001). Developing of Research skill for gifted students. In Karnes, F. A., & Bean, S. M. (Ed.), Methods and materials for teaching the gifted.(pp. 458-492). Prufrock Press Inc
|
37 |
Reis, S. M., & Burns, D. E., & Renzulli, J. S. (1992). Curriculum Compacting: The complete Guide to Modifying the Regular Curriculum for High Ability Students. Storrs, CT: Creative Learning Press
|
38 |
Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1997). The schoolwide enrichment model: A how-to guide for educational excellence (2nd ed.). Storrs, CT: Creative Learning Press
|
39 |
Cindy Nottage, M. A., & Virginia Morse, M.A. (2003). Independent Investigation Method. New Hampshire: Active Learning Systems
|
40 |
정미란 (2006). 영재의 특성. 창의적 지식 생산자 양성을 위한 영재교육[제7기 영재 교육교원 기초연수 공통이론편]. 한국교육개발원, 연수교재 TM 2006-2
|
41 |
이상섭 (2001). 연세국어사전. 서울: 두산동아
|
42 |
광주광역시교육청 (2007). 영재교육 담당교원 직무연수 교재. 광주교육연수원
|
43 |
Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to Differentiate Instruction in Mixed-Ability Classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
|
44 |
Wiggins, G. (1989). Teaching to the (authentic) test. Educational Leadership, 46. 41-46
|
45 |
Zimmerman, B. J., & Marinez-Pons, M.(1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and stratege use. Journal of Educationl Psychology, 82. 51-59
DOI
|
46 |
경상대학교 (2007). 영재교육 담당교원 기초연수 교재. 경상대학교
|
47 |
김석우, 최태진 (2007). 교육연구방법론. 학지사
|
48 |
김미숙 (2005). 영재학생들의 지적. 정의적 특성. 한국교육개발원
|
49 |
한국교육개발원 (2007). 창의적 지식 생산자 양성을 위한 영재교육(제7기 기초연수). 한국교육개발원
|
50 |
Leitze, A. R., & Mau, S. T. (1999). Assessing problem-solving thought. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 4(5). 304-311
|
51 |
조연순 (2001). 창의성 계발을 위한 교수.학습 및 평가방법, 창의성 계발을 위한 교육전략 연구 세미나. 한국교육개발원, 연구자료 그 2001.32
|
52 |
Purcell, J. H., & Renzulli, J. S. (1998). Total Talent Portfolio: A Systematic Plan to Identify and Nurture Gifts and Talents. Mansfild Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
|
53 |
Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligence: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books
|
54 |
Karnes, F. A., & Bean, S. M. (1990). Process Skills Scales. Buffalo, NY: United Educational Services
|
55 |
Clark, B. (1997). Growing up Gifted: Developing the potential of children at home and at school(5th ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill
|
56 |
Gallagher, J. J., & Gallagher, S. A.(1994). Teaching gifted children(4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
|
57 |
Johnsen, S. K., & Goree, K. (2005). Independent Study for Gifted Learners. New York: Prufrock Press, Inc
|
58 |
김미숙, 서혜애, 이혜연 (2005). 영재교육 강화 사업성과 지표 평가 연구. 한국교육개발원 연구 보고
|