• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.32 no.5
• /
• pp.1007-1026
• /
• 2012

The purpose of this study was to develop analytic framework for dialogic argumentation to show the context and flow visualizing interactions of argumentation, to be able to present quality of argumentation specifically. For this, we formulated a method of the argumentation diagram using feature of diagram simple and structurally visualizing interrelation between argument components, and then quantified quality of argumentation to argument level score on this basis. We have developed the learning material for argumentation about a vertical circular motion and used the obtained translations from applying it in developing the framework. We chose argument statements among full transcript and then coded as Toulmin's argument components, and these codes was effectively arranged and linked to show argumentation diagram. Results by argumentation diagram could be useful understanding of interactive argumentation context and the flow and present frequency, the combination of argument elements, rough qualitative level of argumentation. To quantify argumentation quality, we gave different scores to different link lines reflecting indication of argumentation quality like that diversity of argument component, justification, presence or absence of rebuttals. The process of identification of argument level is very simple, qualitative level of argumentation represented as concrete score could present various and concrete argument level. Developed analytic framework might contribute to argumentation research field, because it can present effectively dialogic argumentation result. Also, various analysis cases might guide designing an effective argumentation practice and circular motion learning.

• Journal of the Korean Chemical Society
• /
• v.59 no.1
• /
• pp.78-87
• /
• 2015

The purpose of this study was to investigate the argumentation of middle school students during the argument-based inquiry. A total of sixty eight 8th grade middle school students participated in this study and they performed six argument-based inquiry programs. Data were collected from two of the latest programs by audio-recording and transcription of each group engaging in argumentation. The study findings showed that; first, the most frequent element of argumentation in the all of stages of the two programs was following order: 'claim' and 'request and response' and 'simple agreement'. The most active argumentation was showed at the designing experiments stage and the most inactive was showed at the generating questions stage. Second, as a result of analyzing the argumentation level for each stage of the argument-based inquiry, a high level of argumentation was shown at the claim and evidence stage, and a low level of argumentation was shown at the generating questions stage in the argumentation structure. As a result of the validity of argumentation, the validity of argumentation was the highest level in the claim and evidence stage.

• Annual Conference on Human and Language Technology
• /
• 2022.10a
• /
• pp.545-550
• /
• 2022

본 연구의 목적은 2021년 메신저 언어 200만 어절을 대상으로 수행된 맞춤법 교정 병렬 말뭉치의 설계와 구축의 쟁점을 소개하고, 교정 말뭉치의 주요 교정 및 주석 내용을 기술함으로써 맞춤법 교정 병렬 말뭉치의 특성을 분석하는 것이다. 2021년 맞춤법 교정 병렬 말뭉치의 주요 목표는 메신저 언어의 특수성을 살림과 동시에 형태소 분석이나 기계 번역 등 한국어 처리 도구가 분석할 수 있는 수준으로 교정하는 다소 상충되는 목적을 구현하는 것이었는데, 이는 교정의 수준과 병렬의 단위 설정 등 상당한 쟁점을 내포한다. 본 연구에서는 말뭉치 구축 시점에서 미처 논의하지 못한 교정 수준의 쟁점과 교정 전후의 통계적 특성을 함께 논의하고자 하며, 다음과 같은 몇 가지 하위 내용을 중심으로 논의하고자 한다.첫째, 맞춤법 교정 병렬 말뭉치의 구조 설계와 구축 절차에 대한 논의로, 2022년 초 국내 최초로 공개된 한국어 맞춤법 교정 병렬 말뭉치('모두의 말뭉치'의 일부)의 구축 과정에서 논의되어 온 말뭉치 구조 설계와 구축 절차를 논의한다. 둘째, 문장 단위로 정렬된 맞춤법 교정 말뭉치에서 관찰 가능한 띄어쓰기, 미등재어, 부호형 이모티콘 등의 메신저 언어의 몇 가지 특성을 살펴본다. 마지막으로, 2021년 메신저 맞춤법 교정 말뭉치의 구축 단계에서 미처 논의되지 못한 남은 문제들을 각각 데이터 구조 설계와 구축 차원의 주요 쟁점을 중심으로 논의한다. 특히 메신저 맞춤법 병렬 말뭉치의 주요 목표인 사전학습 언어모델의 학습데이터로서의 가치와 메신저 언어 연구의 기반 자료 구축의 관점에서 맞춤법 교정 병렬 말뭉치 구축의 의의와 향후 과제를 논의하고자 한다.

• Education of Primary School Mathematics
• /
• v.25 no.4
• /
• pp.433-457
• /
• 2022

An effective teacher community helps the participating teachers improve their instructional quality. This study reports a teacher community consisting of 15 elementary school teachers and one teacher educator. This paper analyzed 15 mathematics lessons in which the teachers implemented the five practices for orchestrating productive mathematics discussions by Smith and Stein (2018) based on the grade-specific discussions as well as the whole community's discussions. The results of this study showed that the overall levels of each practice either increased gradually or maintained at the highest Level 4, as mathematics lessons had been implemented. Specifically, the following practices were quite successful: setting goals for a lesson, selecting an appropriate task, anticipating student responses, and selecting student solutions. However, both sequencing and connecting student solutions were implemented at various levels. Monitoring student work tended to remain at Level 2 which included incorrect implementation of the practice. This paper closes with implications related to the skillful implementation of the five practices through a teacher community.

• Journal of the Korean Chemical Society
• /
• v.64 no.1
• /
• pp.38-48
• /
• 2020

The purpose of this study was to analysis characteristics and changes of epistemic thinking in middle school students on class-argument activities in an argument-based inquiry(ABI) science class. Data was collected from class recording video and activity worksheets of five subjects argument-based inquiry. Results of the analysis of student epistemic cognition characteristics show that experimental data was presented the most as evidence, and depending on the ABI activity, personal experience-based evidence and evidence based on scientific principles were used. As a result of analyzing the changes between claims made before and after class argumentations on five ABI activities in an argument-based inquiry science class, student claim modifications could be classified, according to reasons for the modification, into three types: correcting incorrect claims, clarifying unclear content, and expanding the concept.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.33 no.2
• /
• pp.522-537
• /
• 2013

This study analyzed the relationship among the construct level of analogical reasoning, prediction and uncertainty, and the construction of an explanatory model that were produced during small group discussions for scientific problem solving. This study was participated in by 8 students of K University divided into 2 teams conducting scientific problem solving. The participants took part in discussions in groups after achieving scientific problem solving individually. Through individual interviews afterwards, changes in their thinking through discussion activities were looked into. The results are as follows: The analogy at the Entities/Attributes level was used to make people clearly understand the characteristics of certain objects or entities in the discussions. The analogy at the Configuration/Motion level that was produced during the discussions ensured other participants to predict the results of problem solving. The analogy at the Mechanism/Causation level changed the structure of problem situations either to help other participants to reconstruct the explanatory model or to come up with a new situation that was never been through before to justify the created mechanism and through this, the case of creating Thought Experiments during the discussions were observed. if looking into the changes of analogies, each individual's analogic paradigm during the discussions were shown as production paradigm, reception-production paradigm, production-reception paradigm, and reception paradigm. The construction and reconstruction of the explanatory model were shown in analogic production paradigm, and in the reception paradigm of an analogy, participants changed their predictions or their certainty.

• Journal of the Korean Chemical Society
• /
• v.48 no.1
• /
• pp.85-93
• /
• 2004

The purpose of this research was to investigate the change of argumentation of middle school students when they participated in argument tasks with CASE(Cognitive acceleration through science education) programs. Students argumentations were divided into two categories; 'explanatory argumentation' and 'dialogic argumentation'. Several argumentation components were used in their argumentation. Among argumentation components, claim and ground took place more than half of argumentation components. The percentage of 'dialogic argumentation' was lower than the percentage of 'explanatory argumentation'. The percentage of 'dialogic argumentation' was getting higher during CASE intervention. CASE programs had more effect on symmetric group than asymmetric group, however it was unstable. In general, participation ratio in argumentation of the formal operational student was high and the ratio in argumentation of the transitional student was getting higher.

• School Mathematics
• /
• v.16 no.3
• /
• pp.409-444
• /
• 2014

There have been many discussions of teaching and learning mathematics through modeling activities in mathematics education research community. Although there has been some agreement regarding modeling activity as an alternative way to support mathematics teaching and learning, there is still no clear consensus on these issues. This paper reports a case study which aims to identify ways to design modeling tasks and instruction to foster meta-level learning, and investigate how modeling activities can facilitate meta-level learning. From the results of teaching experiment, this study examines the potential of modeling activities in mathematics teaching and learning.

• Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics
• /
• v.12 no.2
• /
• pp.247-264
• /
• 2002

본 연구의 목적은 교사들이 갖고 있는 수학 및 수학을 어떻게 가르칠 것인가에 대한 신념과 수업 관행과의 관계를 문헌적 고찰을 통하여 교사 변화를 위한 모델을 제시하는데 있다. 이를 위하여 먼 저 신념에 대한 정의, 신념과 지식의 차이점, 그리고 신념이 교사들의 수업 관행과 어떻게 관련이 있는지를 논의하였다. 신념과 수업 관행과의 상호 관계를 통하여 본 연구에서는 수업 개선 프로그램의 개발을 위한 모델을 개인적 수준, 학급 수준, 및 학교 수준의 세 시각에서 논의하였다. 이들 모델들은 결국 교사의 학습도 학생들의 학습 방법과 유사한 형태를 띄고 있다는 점에서 현재의 주요한 수학 학습 이론들에 근거를 두고 있다. 결국, 교사들의 수업 관행에 큰 영향을 끼치는 것으로 알려진 교사들의 수학적 신념은 위에 논의된 세 요소의 측면에서 수업 개선 프로그램들이 운영될 때 수업 관행과 함께 변화한다는 것을 본 이론 연구에서는 암시해 주고 있다.

• Journal of the Korean Chemical Society
• /
• v.60 no.1
• /
• pp.39-47
• /
• 2016

The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of negotiation in Argument-Based Inquiry on students’ claim and evidence. A total of 126 first grade middle school students participated in this study and they performed five Argument-Based Inquiry (ABI) programs for one academic a year. To investigate the process of generating claim and evidence through the ABI, we interviewed students after they completed five ABI activities. The study findings showed that students ability to make claim and evidence improved as they progressed from individual activity to group activity in ABI activity and as ABI activities. The results also showed that students generated high level of claim and evidence through internal and external negotiation in ABI programs.