Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2016.60.1.39

The Effect of Negotiation in Argument-Based Inquiry on Middle School Students’ Claim and Evidence  

Jang, KyungHwa (Department of Chemistry Education, Pusan National University)
Nam, Jeonghee (Department of Chemistry Education, Pusan National University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Chemical Society / v.60, no.1, 2016 , pp. 39-47 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of negotiation in Argument-Based Inquiry on students’ claim and evidence. A total of 126 first grade middle school students participated in this study and they performed five Argument-Based Inquiry (ABI) programs for one academic a year. To investigate the process of generating claim and evidence through the ABI, we interviewed students after they completed five ABI activities. The study findings showed that students ability to make claim and evidence improved as they progressed from individual activity to group activity in ABI activity and as ABI activities. The results also showed that students generated high level of claim and evidence through internal and external negotiation in ABI programs.
Keywords
Argumentation; Negotiation; Claim; Evidence; Argument-Based Inquiry (ABI);
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Zeidler, D. L. Science Education 1997, 81, 483.   DOI
2 Chinn, C. A.; Brewer, W. F. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1998, 35, 623.   DOI
3 Nodding, N. Philosophy of Education. Westview Press: Oxford, 1995.
4 Webb, N. M.; Sydney, H. F.; Ann, M. M. Theory Into Practice 2002, 41, 13.   DOI
5 Spence, D. J.; Yore, L. D. Explicit Science Reading Instruction in Grade 7: Metacognitive awareness, metacognitive self-management and science reading comprehension. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual meeting, San francisco, CA, 1995.
6 Wittrock, M. Educational Psychologist 1990, 24, 345.
7 Pressley, M.; Gaskins, I. W. Metacognition and Learning 2006, 1, 99.   DOI
8 Crawford, B. A.; Krajcik, J. S.; Marx, R. W. Science & Education 1999, 83, 701.   DOI
9 Duschl, R. A.; Osborne, J. Studies in Science Education 2002, 38, 39.   DOI
10 Rahwan, I.; Ramchurn, S. D.; Jennings, N. R.; Mcburney, P.; Parsons, S.; Sonenberg, L. The Knowledge Engineering Review 2003, 18, 343.   DOI
11 Kuhn, D. Harvard Educational Review 1992, 62, 155.
12 Cavagnetto, A. R.; Hand, B.; Norton-Meier, L. Research in Science Education 2011, 41, 193.   DOI
13 Osborne, J.; Erduran, S.; Simon, S.; Monk, M. School Science Review 2001, 82, 63.
14 Newton, P.; Driver, P.; Osborne, J. International Journal of Science Education 1999, 21, 553.   DOI
15 Lemke, J. L. Talking science: Language, Learning, and Values. Ablex Publishing Corporation: Norwood, NJ, 1990.
16 Latour, B. W.; Woolgar, S. An anthropologist visits the laboratory. In Laboratory life: The Construction of Scientific Facts; Latour, B. W., Woolgar, S. Eds.; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, 1986; p.83.
17 National Research Council[NRC]. National science education standards. National Academy Press: Washington, D.C., 1996.
18 Brown, J. S.; Collins, A.; Duguid, P. Educational Researcher 1989, 18, 32.
19 Driver, R.; Newton, P.; Osborne, J. Science Education 2000, 84, 287.   DOI
20 Zembal-Saul, C.; Land, S. Scaffolding the Construction of Scientific Arguments by Preservice Teachers in a Problem-based Environment. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA, 2002.
21 Bell, P.; Linn, M. C. International Journal of Science Education 2000, 22, 797.   DOI
22 Abell, S. K.; Anderson, G.; Chezem, J. Science as argument and explanation. In Inquiring into Inquiry Learning and Teaching in Science; Minstrell, J., Zee, E. V. Eds.; American Association for the Advancement of Science: Washington, DC, 2000; p.65.
23 Ohlsson, S. Science & Education 1992, 1, 181.   DOI
24 Sandoval, W.; Reiser, B. Evolving Explanations in High School Biology. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual meeting, Chicago, IL, 1997.
25 Carey, S.; Evans, R.; Honda, M.; Jay, E.; Unger, C. International Journal of Science Education 1989, 11, 514.   DOI
26 Lawson, A. E. International Journal of Science Education 2003, 25, 1387.   DOI
27 Sandoval, W. A. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 2003, 12, 5.   DOI
28 Sampson, V.; Clark, D. Science Education 2008, 93, 448.
29 Hogan, K.; Maglienti, M. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2001, 38, 663.   DOI
30 Linn, M.; Eylon, B. S. Science education. In Handbook of Educational Psychology, 2nd edition. Alexander, P.A., Winne, P. H. Eds.; Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ, 2006.
31 Keys, C. W.; Hand, B.; Prian, V.; Collins, S. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1999, 36, 1065.   DOI
32 Brennan, R. L.; Lockwood, R. E. Applied Psychological Measurement 1980, 4, 219.   DOI
33 Norcini, J. J.; Lipner, R. S.; Langdon, L. O.; Strecker, C. A. Journal of Educational Measurement 1987, 24, 56.   DOI
34 Fleiss, J. L. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportion. Wiley: New York, 1981.
35 Kil, H. J. The Impact of Science Writing as a Learning Tool on Science Learning. Ph.D. Thesis, Pusan National University: Korea, 2010.