Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2020.64.1.38

Characteristics and Changes of Epistemic Thinking in Middle School Students on Class-Argument Activities in an Argument-Based Inquiry(ABI) Science Class  

Park, Jiyeon (Department of Chemistry Education, Pusan National University)
Jung, Dojun (Department of Chemistry Education, Pusan National University)
Nam, Jeonghee (Department of Chemistry Education, Pusan National University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Chemical Society / v.64, no.1, 2020 , pp. 38-48 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to analysis characteristics and changes of epistemic thinking in middle school students on class-argument activities in an argument-based inquiry(ABI) science class. Data was collected from class recording video and activity worksheets of five subjects argument-based inquiry. Results of the analysis of student epistemic cognition characteristics show that experimental data was presented the most as evidence, and depending on the ABI activity, personal experience-based evidence and evidence based on scientific principles were used. As a result of analyzing the changes between claims made before and after class argumentations on five ABI activities in an argument-based inquiry science class, student claim modifications could be classified, according to reasons for the modification, into three types: correcting incorrect claims, clarifying unclear content, and expanding the concept.
Keywords
Argument-Based Inquiry(ABI); Class-Argument Activity; Epistemic Thinking;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Kwak, K. H. The Characteristics of the Argumentation in Different Approaches and Contexts. Master Thesis, Pusan National University of Education, Busan, Korea, 2010.
2 Henderson, J. B.; McNeill, K. L.; Gonzalez-Howard, M.; Close, K.; Evans, M. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2018, 55, 5.   DOI
3 Osborne, J. Science Education 1996, 80, 53.   DOI
4 Hofer, B. K. Epistemic Cognition as a Psychological Construct: Advancements and Challenges. In Handbook of Epistemic Cognition; Greene, J. A., Sandoval, W. A., Braten, I., Eds.; Routledge: New York, 2016.
5 Moshman, D.; Tarricone, P. Logical and Causal Reasoning. In Handbook of Epistemic Cognition; Greene, J. A., Sandoval, W. A., Braten, I., Eds.; Routledge: New York, 2016.
6 Nam, J.; Kwak, K.; Jang, K.; Hand, B. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2008, 28, 922.
7 Jang, K.; Nam, J.; Choi, A. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2012, 32, 1099.   DOI
8 Keys, C. W.; Hand, B.; Prain, V.; Collins, S. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1999, 36, 1065.   DOI
9 Sampson, V.; Clark, D. B. Science Education 2008, 92, 447.   DOI
10 Perry, W. G. Forms of Intellectual Development in the College Years; Holt: New York, 1970.
11 Belenky, M. F.; Clinchy, B. M.; Goldberger, N. R.; Tarule, J. M. Women's Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice, and Mind; Basic books: New York, 1986.
12 King, P. M.; Kitchener, K. S. Developing Reflective Judgment: Understanding and Promoting Intellectual Growth and Critical Thinking in Adolescents and Adults; Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, 1994.
13 Hofer, B. K.; Pintrich, P. R. Review of Educational Research 1997, 67, 88.   DOI
14 Chinn, C. A.; Buckland, L. A.; Samarapungavan, A. L. A. Educational Psychologist 2011, 46, 141.   DOI
15 Sandoval W. A.; Millwood K. A. What Can Argumentation Tell Us About Epistemology ?. In Argumentation in Science Education; Erduran, S., Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, 2007.
16 Elby, A.; Hammer, D. Science Education 2001, 85, 554.   DOI
17 Lederman, N. G. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1992, 29, 331.   DOI
18 Richter, T. Discourse Processes 2015, 52, 337.   DOI
19 Sandoval, W. A.; Millwood, K. A. Cognition and Instruction 2005, 23, 23.   DOI
20 Chinn, C. A.; Buckland, L. A. Model-Based Instruction: Fostering Change in Evolutionary Conceptions and in Epistemic Practices. In Evolution Challenges: Integrating Research and Practice in Teaching and Learning About Evolution; Rosengren, K. S., Evans, E. M., Brem, S. K., Sinatra, G. M., Eds.; Oxford University Press: UK, 2012.
21 Barzilai, S.; Eshet-Alkalai, Y. Learning and Instruction 2015, 36, 86.   DOI
22 Norris, S. P.; Phillips, L. M. Science Education 2003, 87, 224.   DOI
23 Kang, S. M. Characteristics of Argumentation Components in Solving Processes of the Scientific Argument Tasks. Master Thesis, Korea National University of Education, Chung- Buk, Korea, 2014.
24 Yao, J.; Guo, Y. Journal of Reasearch in Science Teaching 2018, 55, 299.   DOI
25 Kwak, Y. S. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2012, 32, 855.   DOI
26 Henderson, J. B.; McNeill, K. L.; Gonzalez-Howard, M.; Close, K.; Evans, M. Journal of Reasearch in Science Teaching 2018, 55, 5.   DOI
27 Williams, J. M.; Colomb, G. G. The Craft of Argument; Pearson Longman Press: New York, 2007.
28 Driver, R.; Newton, P.; Osborne, J. Science Education 2000, 84, 287.   DOI
29 Osborne, J.; Erduran, S.; Simon, S. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2004, 41, 994.   DOI
30 Asterhan, C. S.; Schwarz, B. B. Journal of Educational Psychology 2007, 99, 626.   DOI
31 Mercer, N.; Dawes, L.; Wegerif, R.; Sams, C. British Educational Research Journal 2004, 30, 359.   DOI
32 Sampson, V.; Clark, D. B. Science Education 2009, 93, 448.   DOI
33 Zohar, A.; Nemet, F. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2002, 39, 35.   DOI
34 Osborne, J.; Erduran, S.: Simon, S.; Monk, M. School Science Review 2001, 82, 63.
35 Nam, J. H.; Koh, M. R.; Bak, D. C.; Lim, J. H.; Lee, D. W.; Choi, A. R. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2011, 31, 1077.   DOI
36 Yore, L.; Bisanz, G. L.; Hand, B. M. International Journal of Science Education 2003, 25, 689.   DOI
37 Brown, J. S.; Collins, A.; Duguid, P. Educational Researcher 1989, 18, 32.   DOI
38 Cavagnetto, A. R. Review of Educational Research 2010, 80, 336.   DOI
39 Kuhn, D. Science Education 1993, 77, 319.   DOI
40 Newton, P.; Driver, R.; Osborne, J. International Journal of Science Education 1999, 21, 553.   DOI