1 |
Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students'knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 689-725.
|
2 |
Leitao, S. (2007). Arguing and learning. In J. Valsiner, C. Lightfoot, M. C. D. P. Lyra, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Advances in cultural psychology Constructing human development: Vol. 2, Challenges and strategies for studying human development in cultural contexts. Greenwich, CT: InfoAge (in press).
|
3 |
Leff, H. S. (2002). Acceleration for circular motion. American Journal of Physics, 70(5), 490-492.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
4 |
Maloney, J., & Simon, S. (2006). Mapping children's discussion of evidence in science to assess collaboration and argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 28(15), 1817-1841.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: Toward a shared craft. Education Researcher.
|
6 |
National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science Press.
|
7 |
National Science Teachers Association. (1982). Science, technology, society: Science education for the 1980's. Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.
|
8 |
Newton, P., Driver, R., & Osborne, L. (1999). The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 553-576.
DOI
|
9 |
Osborne, L., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in science school. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994-1020.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Sampson, V., & Clark, D. B. (2008). Assessment of the Ways Students Generate Arguments in Science Education-Current Perspectives and Recommendations for Future Directions. Science Education, 92(3), 447-472.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
11 |
Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 235-260.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
|
13 |
Toulmin, S. (1958). The use of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
|
14 |
Verlinden, J. (2005), Critical Thinking and Everyday Argument. Belmont: Wadworth/Thomson Learning.
|
15 |
Von Aufschnaiter, C., Erduran, S., Osborne, J., & Simon, S. (2008). Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of how students'argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 101-131.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Walton, D, N. (1990). Practical Reasoning: Goal-Driven, Knowledge-Based, Action-Guiding Argumentation. Savage: Row man and Little field.
|
17 |
Warren, J. W. (1971). Circular motion, Physics Education, 6(2), 74-78.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Agar, M. H. (1980). The professional stranger: An informal introduction to ethnography. San diego, CA: Academic Press.
|
19 |
Yore, L. D., & Treagust, D. F. (2006). Current realities and future possibilities: Language and science literacy-empowering research and informing instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2-3), 291-314.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
20 |
조현준, 양일호, 송윤미, 이효녕 (2008). 초등과학 영재의 논증활동에서 사용된 증거의 수준 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 28(5), 495-505.
|
21 |
American Association for the advancement of science, Benchmarks for science literacy (1993): A tool for curriculum. Oxford University Press.
|
22 |
Berland, l., & Reiser, B. (2009). Making sense of argumentation and explanation. Science Education, 93, 26-55.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
23 |
Bricker, L., & Bell, P. (2008). Conceptualization of argumentation from science studies and learning sciences and their implications for the practices of science education. Science Education, 92(3), 473-498.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
24 |
Chinn, C. A., & Anderson, R. C. (1998). The Structure of discussions that Promote Reasoning. Teachers College Record, 100(2), 315-368.
|
25 |
Clark, D. B., & Sampson, V. (2008). Assessing Dialogic Argumentation in Online Environments to Relate Structure, Grounds, and Conceptual Quality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(3), 293-321.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
26 |
Clark, D. B., Sampson, V., Weinberger, A., & Erkens, G. (2007). Analytic Frameworks for Assessing Dialogic Argumentation in Online Learning Environments. Educational Psychol Rev. 19, 343-374.
DOI
|
27 |
Duschl, R. A., Ellenbogen, K., & Erduran, S. (1999). Promoting argumentation in middle school science classroom. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting og National Association for Research in science Teaching(Boston, MA, March 28-31, 1999). Full text from http://www.educ.sfu.ca/narstsite/conference/duschletal/duschlrta;.html.
|
28 |
Hogan, K., & Maglenti, M. (2001). Comparing the epistemological underpinning of students'and scientists'reasoning about conclusions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(6), 663-687.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
29 |
Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classroom. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312.
DOI
|
30 |
Erduran, S., Simon, S.,& Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin''s argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88, 915-933.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
31 |
Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Pereiro-Munaz, C. (2005). Argument construction and change while working on a real environment problem. In L. Boersma, M Goedhart, O. De Jong, & H. Eijklhof(Eds.), Research and quality of science education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
|
32 |
Kelly, G., Drucker, S., & Chen, K. (1998). Student's reasoning about electricity: Combining performance assessment with argumentation analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 20(7), 849-871.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
33 |
Kuhn, D. (1992). Thinking as argument. Harvard Educational Review, 62(2), 155-178.
DOI
|
34 |
Leitao, S. (2000). The potential of argument in knowledge building. Human Development, 43, 332-360.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
35 |
교육과학기술부 (2009). 고등학교 과학과 교육과정 해설서.
|
36 |
강순민 (2004). 과학적 맥락의 논의 과제 해결 과정에서 나타나는 논의과정요소의 특성. 한국교원대학교 박사학위논문.
|
37 |
강순민, 곽경화, 남정희 (2006). 논의과정을 강조한 교수 학습 전략이 중학생들의 인지발달, 과학개념 이해, 과학관련 태도 및 논의과정에 미치는 영향. 한국과학교육학회지, 26(3), 456-461.
|
38 |
곽경화, 남정희 (2009). 과학적 논의과정 활동을 통한 학생들의 논의과정 변화 및 논의상황에 따른 논의과정 특성. 한국과학교육학회지, 29(4), 400-413.
|
39 |
박지연, 이경호, 신종호, 송상호 (2006). 과학수업 후 변하는 것과 변하지 않는 것: 정신모형 이론을 중심으로 한 고등학생의 원운동 개념변화 사례 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 26(4), 475-491.
|
40 |
박지연, 이경호 (2008). 통합적 정신모형 이론에 기반한 4M 순환학습 수업모형의 효과: 고등학생의 원운동관련 기초개념과 정신모형의 발달 측면에서. 한국과학교육학회지, 28(4), 302-315.
|
41 |
송진웅, 김익균, 김영민, 군성기, 오원근, 박종원 (2004). 학생의 물리 오개념 지도. 서울: 북스힐.
|
42 |
교육과학기술부 (2009). 2009 개정교육과정에 따른 중 고등학교 교육과정 해설 총론.
|
43 |
신호심, 김현주 (2011). 문제해결형 탐구실험에서 나타난 영재학생들의 논의 양상 및 논의활동에 대한 인식. 한국과학교육학회지, 31(4), 567-586.
|
44 |
오진아, 이선경, 김찬종 (2008). 지구과학 MBL 수업의 과학 탐구와 논의적 의사소통에 관한 사례연구. 한국지구과학교육학회지, 29(2), 189-203.
|
45 |
위수민, 조현준, 김선홍, 이효녕 (2009). 학생 특성에 따른 소그룹 논증 수준 분석, 과학교육연구지, 33(1), 1-11.
|
46 |
이경호 (2007). 왜 학생들은 물리학을 어려워하는가?: 지식 신념틀을 이용한 물리학습의 어려움에 대한 구조적 분석을 향하여. 새물리, 54(4), 284-295.
|
47 |
이주현, 송진웅 (2006). 원심력에 관한 대학생들의 이해 유형 조사. 한국과학교육학회지, 26(4), 132-142.
|
48 |
이하룡, 남경희, 문성배, 김용권, 이석희 (2005). 논의과정 활용 수업이 초등학생의 학습 동기화 과학 태도에 미치는 영향. 초등과학교육, 24(2), 183-191.
|
49 |
이효녕, 조현준, 손정주 (2009). 학교과학교육에서의 논증활동 활용에 대한 교사들의 인식. 한국과학교육학회지, 29(6), 666-679.
|