• 영재교육연구
• /
• 제20권3호
• /
• pp.809-830
• /
• 2010

본 연구에서는 수학, 과학교사들이 영재교육을 어떻게 이해하고 인식하는지를 탐색하고, 시교육청 영재교육원과 과학고 영재교육원의 교사 집단별, 과목별로 영재교육에 대한 인식의 차이가 있는지를 알아내는데 목적을 둔다. 본 연구의 대상은 부산광역시에 소재하고 있는 시교육청 영재교육원과 과학고 영재교육원 수학, 과학교사들이었으며, 총 62명의 수학, 과학교사의 설문 응답지를 분석하였다. 시교육청 영재교육원 교사집단은 '영재교육이 매우 필요하다'에 대하여 41.0%의 응답률을 보인 반면에, 과학고 영재교육원 교사집단은 8.7%의 응답률을 보였다. 전체 교사의 54.8%가 자신이 가르치는 영재학생이 영재성을 보인다고 하였으며, 수학영재 선발의 타당한 도구는 창의력 문제해결력 검사, 과학영재 선발의 타당한 도구는 과학 교사의 지속적 관찰 결과물에 가장 높은 응답률을 보였으며, 수학영재 선발 시는 수학과목이, 과학영재 선발 시는 과학과 수학과목이 고려해야 할 가장 중요한 과목이라고 하였다. 강의식 수업이 51.6%로 가장 많이 사용하는 영재 수업의 교수-학습 형태라고 응답하였으며, 영재교육의 적임자로 정규 과학영재학교 재직교사를, 적합한 영재교육기관으로 정규 과학영재학교에 각각 38.7%, 53.2%의 가장 높은 응답률을 보였다. 과학고의 영재교육원 운영에 대하여 전체적으로 46.7%가 필요하다고 응답하였으며, 영재교육원의 수학, 과학 분리 운영에 대하여 전체적으로 46.7%가 운영의 분리가 필요하다고 하였다.

• 영재교육연구
• /
• 제14권4호
• /
• pp.1-13
• /
• 2004

Although over - 600 students in Incheon has been participated in the gifted education programs under the colleges and Office of Education Department every year, it is reported that the number of teachers have insufficient teaching abilities in primary, advanced, and after-advanced gifted classes. The Gifted Education Research Institute in Incheon University introduced R&E activities for the improvement of teachers' abilities in science research and student guiding. Professors in science department conducted the R & E activities to select the research thesis. The professors and the guidance teachers decided the directions of the research, and the guidance teachers who learned from the professors taught 3-5 students to practice the research. Five professor-teacher-student research teams in math, physics, chemistry and biology conducted the research after school and during the vacation for 7 months. The results of the research were submitted to the journals of research activities and the result papers were presented to the seminar. On this research, the possibilities and the difficulties of the R&E activities based of the journals of research activities, oral presentation and the research results reports were analyzed with a purpose of improving the professionalism of the science gifted teachers. Although the professors proposed many difficulties or problems about the R&E activities, the teachers reported that the R & E activities he1ped them to improve their research activities and student guiding techniques. The teachers acquired more knowledge on the principles of the science related areas than before. Moreover, they thought it was very meaningful experience in using the science related instruments, guiding the students' research and writing the research reports. The students also gave the positive responses with the increased interests in new science studies and with the experience of learning the way of research.

• 한국지구과학회지
• /
• 제42권4호
• /
• pp.459-469
• /
• 2021

In this study, we investigated the difference in the affective characteristics between science-gifted students and general students through the positive experiences about science (PES) index. We also explored ways to apply the characteristics of gifted classes suggeseted by the teachers of this study, which had a positive effect on science-gifted students, to general science classes. For this study, a PES survey was carried on middle school science-gifted students enrolled in the gifted education center in the central region and general middle school students in the same area who had no experience in gifted education. Based on the survey result, we conducted in-depth interviews with teachers, having teaching experience with both science-gifted and general students. The results revealed that science-gifted students showed a significantly higher PES index than general students in all five areas of PES. The area with the largest difference between the two groups was science-related self-concept and the smallest was science academic emotion. Teachers suggested ways to apply the characteristics of science-gifted classes to general science classes, such as organizing general science classes around inquiry activities, supporting class materials such as MBL or tablets, reconstructing the classes using materials reflecting students' needs, and changing the textbook content and narrative style, to induce students' interest and curiosity. Based on the study results, ways to enhance the PES through science classes for general students were proposed.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제38권1호
• /
• pp.55-72
• /
• 2019

The purpose of this study is to find out what kind of difficulties teachers face in the management of the elementary gifted institutions in the rural area of Chungbuk province. In this study, rural area was defined that the area where gifted education is difficult to access due to geographical accessibility or where gifted education service is restricted. The participants of the this study were three elementary gifted teachers who manage elementary gifted education institutions and is teaching science to disadvantaged gifted students. We collected data about the difficulties and support needs for the management of the gifted institutions in the rural area through the questionnaire and the interview. The results of this study are as follows. First, the common difficulty that teachers expressed was the lack of parental attention and awareness of gifted education. Second, the teachers who participated in this study perceived different difficulties according to their area, experience, and environment. Teacher A is the lack of awareness of the managers, teacher B is the difficulty of student selection, teacher C is the most difficult factor in teacher quality management. This difference in perceptions also led to differences in the support improvements required by gifted class teachers in the rural area. Third, the three teachers commonly referred to difficulties to access due to geographical accessibility, and demanded the integrated management of the gifted class in the rural area and the support for the expansion of the class.

• 영재교육연구
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.597-612
• /
• 2014

본 연구는 국내 영재교육의 새로운 분야로 확대되고 있는 '발명교육'이 영재교육의 독립적 영역으로서 정체성을 가질 수 있는지를 현장 교사들의 인식분석을 통하여 판단해 보고자 수행되었다. 연구의 대상은 총 576명의 현직 교사들로서 직무연수 등의 기회를 통해 배포된 인쇄된 설문지나 이메일을 통해 안내된 온라인 설문지를 통해 응답하도록 하였다. 본 조사연구를 통해 확인할 수 있었던 가장 중요한 정보는 교사들 대부분(93.9%)이 발명영재교육이 별도의 영재교육 분야로서 필요하다는 의견을 보였다는 것이다. 또한 발명영재의 특성, 교육프로그램, 담당교사에게 요구되는 자질, 진도지도 및 상담, 선발방식, 필요한 교육시설 등 다양한 측면에서 수학이나 과학 분야의 영재교육과 뚜렷한 차별성을 갖는 것으로 인식하고 있었다. 기존 국내연구에서 밝히고 있는 발명영재 특성의 차별성에 대한 인식을 살펴본 결과로는 지식기술역량에 해당하는 3가지 특성 중 3가지 모두, 통합창의역량에 해당하는 3가지 특성 중 2가지, 인성역량에 해당하는 4가지 특성 중 1가지가 발명영재에게 특별히 요구되는 고유한 특성으로 인식하고 있는 것을 확인할 수 있었다. 본 연구의 결과를 통해, 발명영재교육은 선진 외국의 영재교육에서 충분한 이론적 근거를 얻거나 관련 프로그램의 선례를 찾아볼 수는 없더라도 국내 영재교육에서 이미 독립적인 한 분야로서 인식되고 있으며, 어떤 면에서는 우리나라 영재교육이 해외의 영재교육 발전에도 크게 기여할 수 있는 선구자적 역할을 수행할 수 있는 좋은 기회가 될 수 있음을 알 수 있다.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제39권3호
• /
• pp.338-352
• /
• 2020

This study analyzed and compared the characteristics in plan and practice of elementary school teachers' science-gifted classes and invention-gifted classes based on pedagogical content knowledge (PCK). To do this, we selected eight elementary school teachers with experience in conducting elementary science-gifted classes and/or invention-gifted classes were selected at the gifted education institutes in Seoul and conducted individual in-depth interviews. The analysis of the results reveal that the teachers tended to organize the science-gifted classes with a focus on the exploration of causes and application activities for scientific phenomena, but tended to organize the invention-gifted classes with a focus on producing creative output based on methodology. They were all emphasizing the enhancement of creativity in planning and practicing both science-gifted classes and invention-gifted classes. However, there were also some differences in the elements of creativity required by each class. They tended to select subjects for science-gifted classes based on regular science curriculum, while selecting subjects for invention-gifted classes focused on creative design rather than considering the practical art curriculum related to invention-gifted education. They tended to pursue and practice STEAM education in both science-gifted classes and invention-gifted classes. In a way that conforms to these class goals and points, they were using experiments and practices, providing feedback to students, and conducting evaluations. However, some shortcomings were also revealed in the processes. Educational implications of these findings are discussed.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제15권3호
• /
• pp.291-302
• /
• 1995

Most middle school and high school students learns under the same study plans and educational courses. Such an equal level education policies prevent the science-gifted from developing and promoting their ability. So it is severely necessary to sort out the gifted in science and make them develop their ability. In this paper, the attitudes of teachers and parents toward the science-gifted student in middle school were investigated as well as the characteristics of the gifted. One hundred science teachers of middle school who recommended the gifted in science and their parents in Seoul area were questionnaired. The follows are the consequences of investigation. 1. Most teachers and parents of the gifted considered that the school should do a special care for the gifted in science. That is, they prefer the enrichment course to the acceleration course for it. 2. The teachers play the role of motivating the study and promotion very well, but do not well as either the advisor or the cooperator with the parents because of their excessive work and lack of professional knowledgement about education of the gifted. 3. The parents play the role of the advisor or the counselor well, but do not well as the cooperator with school. 4. Among the characteristics of the gifted, there are not any differences between boys and girls in conduct characteristics. But there are meaningful difference in emotion characteristics. 5. The education of the gifted is very important for developing of country and personal promotion. So the administrative and financial support are necessary in order to sort out the gifted in science earlier and provide various programs.

• 영재교육연구
• /
• 제24권6호
• /
• pp.935-959
• /
• 2014

본 연구에서는 서울지역 초등과학영재학급의 영재교사를 대상으로 이들의 영재교육 운영에 대한 경험의 의미를 탐색하고자 하였다. 본 연구의 대상은 저소득층 밀집지역에 위치한 단위 학교 초등과학영재학교 영재교사 4명이며, 연구 참여자에게 인터뷰를 실시하고 현상학적 연구 방법인 Giorgi 분석 방법을 사용하여 이들의 영재교육 운영 경험의 의미를 분석하였다. 영재교사들의 느낌, 생각, 행동, 생활변화를 중심으로 연구 참여자의 경험을 분석한 결과 총 123개의 유의미한 진술을 도출하였고, 이를 바탕으로 총 26개의 주제와 12개의 중심의미를 규명하였다. 이렇게 분석된 중심의미와 주제를 토대로 영재교사의 경험이 가지는 의미에 대하여 상황적 구조적 진술과 일반적 구조적 진술을 하였다. 단위학교 초등과영재학급 운영에서 영재교사가 경험하는 문제점에 대한 이해를 토대로 단위학교 수준에서의 영재학급 운영에 대한 개선점 등에 대한 시사점을 제안하였다.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제31권8호
• /
• pp.1214-1228
• /
• 2011

이 연구는 과학영재교육에서 초임 교사들의 수업 전문성에 대한 사례연구로, 그들의 수업 전문성을 PCK 측면에서 분석했다. 이를 위해 수도권의 과학영재교육 담당 기관에 소속된 초등 교사 3명과 중등 교사 3명을 선정한 후 그들의 과학영재수업을 관찰하고 심층 면담을 실시했으며, 수업 동영상과 관찰 노트, 교사들과의 심층 면담 전사본 등을 분석했다. 연구 결과, 대부분의 교사들이 과학영재교육에 대해서는 비교적 올바른 신념을 지니고 있었으나, 과학영재학생, 과학영재 교육과정, 과학내용, 과학영재 교수전략, 과학영재교육 평가 측면에서는 실천적 지식이 다소 부족한 경향이 있었다. 이는 많은 교사들의 과학영재교육 관련 수업 전문성이 여러 측면에서 다소 부족할 가능성을 의미하는 것으로, 이들의 수업 전문성 향상을 위한 방안 마련이 필요함을 시사한다.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제32권2호
• /
• pp.169-184
• /
• 2013

The purpose of this study is to investigate teachers' recognition and to suggest an improvement in the system of teacher's observation and nomination used to selecting gifted and talented students in Science in the Busan Metropolitan School District in 2013 by investigating teachers' recognition of the system and their expressed needs. The results are as follows. First, it was observed that teachers are of the opinion that it is difficult to determine the science gifted students by observation due to their lack of expertise in giftedness and gifted education, the lack of a check list to use, and the difficulty of ensuring the objectivity of the results of the determination. Second, the absence of objective screening tools used for the selection, the selection of gifted students based on their subjective judgment, and the possibility to select students based only on visible manifestations of ability may cause parents to mistrust the system. Thus, institutional support is required to address the concerns of teachers and parents. Third, the teachers who are in charge of observation, nomination, selection and determination need to be trained. After that, at least one of these teachers should be assigned in each school and training should operate continuously and systematically. Lastly, while these things are occurring, the process of observation and nomination of by teachers, which is the basis of pooling gifted students at the level of Busan Metropolitan School District, should be continued.