Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15267/keses.2019.38.1.55

A Case Study of the Difficulties and Support Needs of Elementary Teachers in the Management of Gifted Institutions in the Rural Areas of Chungcheongbuk-do Province  

Choi, Bomi (Gakri Elementary School)
Chung, Jungin (Cheongju National University of Education)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education / v.38, no.1, 2019 , pp. 55-72 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to find out what kind of difficulties teachers face in the management of the elementary gifted institutions in the rural area of Chungbuk province. In this study, rural area was defined that the area where gifted education is difficult to access due to geographical accessibility or where gifted education service is restricted. The participants of the this study were three elementary gifted teachers who manage elementary gifted education institutions and is teaching science to disadvantaged gifted students. We collected data about the difficulties and support needs for the management of the gifted institutions in the rural area through the questionnaire and the interview. The results of this study are as follows. First, the common difficulty that teachers expressed was the lack of parental attention and awareness of gifted education. Second, the teachers who participated in this study perceived different difficulties according to their area, experience, and environment. Teacher A is the lack of awareness of the managers, teacher B is the difficulty of student selection, teacher C is the most difficult factor in teacher quality management. This difference in perceptions also led to differences in the support improvements required by gifted class teachers in the rural area. Third, the three teachers commonly referred to difficulties to access due to geographical accessibility, and demanded the integrated management of the gifted class in the rural area and the support for the expansion of the class.
Keywords
gifted institution; rural area; elementary gifted teacher; difficulties; support needs; disadvantaged gifted students;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 McIntosh, M. & Greenlaw, M. (1986). Fostering the post-secondary aspiration of gifted urban minority students. Roeper Review, 9(2), 104-107.   DOI
2 Noh, T., Lee, J. & Kang, H. (2012). A case study on the changes in teaching professionalism of beginning science-gifted education teachers through mentioning in the aspects of pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(7), 1187-1204.   DOI
3 Seo, H. (2008). Needs assessment of administrative and financial support for effective performance of teacher professionalism of gifted education. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 18(2), 175-200.
4 Sin, J. (2013). Study on the awareness of parents with specially gifted children attending institutions for the education of gifted children. Master's thesis, Yeonsei University.
5 Swanson, J. D. (2006). Breaking through assumptions about low-income, minority gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50, 11-25.   DOI
6 Van Tassel-Baska, J. (1983). Profiles of precocity: The 1982 Mis-West talent search finalists. Gifted and Child Quarterly, 27, 139-144.   DOI
7 Van Tassel-Baska, J. (2003). Contend-based curriculum for low income and minority gifted learner. Research Monograph No. RM 0310. Storrs, CT : The Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
8 Won, U. & Oh, J. (2008). An investigative study on the recognition for the talented children education, classified with parents' upbringing styles. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 18(2), 265-292.
9 Cho, S., Lee, M., Hwang, D. & Lee, H. (2006). Finding and educational plan for alienated science gifted: Focusing on the effectiveness of educational program. (Report No CR2006-20), Korean Educational Development Institute Press.
10 Bae, J. (2010). Teachers' and parents' recognitions of gifted education at the elementary school. Master's thesis, Konkuk University.
11 Han, K. & Whang, H. (2012). What bothers current gifted education operation?: Gifted education teachers' perception on the operating status and barriers of the gifted education. The Journal of the Korean Society for the Gifted and Talented, 11(2), 147-170.   DOI
12 Choi, B. & Kim, J. (2014). A phenomenological analysis on gifted education experiences of elementary gifted class teachers. The Journal of the Korean Society for the Gifted and Talented, 13(2), 97-116.
13 Choi, B. & Lee, M. (2008). Novice teachers' beliefs about gifted education and classroom practices. The Journal of the Korean Society for the Gifted and Talented, 7(1), 95-114.
14 Choi, S. (2004). Educational status and policy tasks of the disadvantaged students. (Report No OR 2004-03), Korean Educational Development Institute Press.
15 Chung, K., Chun, M. & Choe, S. (2008). Investigation research on gifted education teachers' beliefs of gifted education, identification, class preparations, and supports. The Journal of the Korean Society for the Gifted and Talented, 7(2), 161-177.
16 Chungcheongbuk-do Office of Education (2017). 2017 Chungcheongbuk-do gifted education basic plan. Chungcheongbuk-do Office of Education Press.
17 Kwon, H. (2014). The awareness difference of unit school gifted class in present situation and obstructive & support factors by school managers and gifted class teachers. Master's thesis, Incheon National University.
18 Kim, J. (2012). Comparing a teacher's perspective according to principal's perspective for gifted education of elementary school. Master's thesis, Ajou University.
19 Kim, M. & Seo, H. (2005). Strengthening gifted education program and studying intelligence. (Report No CR 2005-59), Korean Educational Development Institute press.
20 Kim, O. & Kim, H. (2012). A phenomenological study on gifted education experiences of elementary gifted teachers. The Journal of the Korean Society for the Gifted and Talented, 11(2), 47-72.
21 Lee, B., Son, J., Choi, W., Lee, I., Jhun, Y. & Choi, J. (2008). Difficulties experienced by teachers in science gifted education. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 27(3), 252-260.
22 Lee, H., Ha, J. & Oh, H. (2009). Disadvantaged gifted students' characteristics and needs in Daegu and Kyongsang-bukdo providence. Journal of Science Education, 33(2), 220-236.   DOI
23 Lee, J., Yoo, K. & Yeo, S. (2011). Exploring cases and support plans for disadvantaged gifted students. (Report No CR 2011-70), Korean Educational Development Institute press.
24 Lee, K. & Lee, S. (2016). Teachers' perceptions of economically disadvantaged gifted students. The Journal of the Korean Society for the Gifted and Talented, 15(1), 5-27.
25 Lee, M. (2010). The effect of job stress on gifted education retention and attrition among teachers for gifted. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 27(3), 419-436.   DOI
26 Joo, Y. & Yoe, S. (2014). A phenomenological study of gifted class management by the teachers of elementary gifted class in science. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 24(6), 935-959.   DOI
27 Hong, Y. (2013). A study on teachers' recognition about management of gifted classes in elementary school. Master's thesis, Pusan University.
28 Jeon, J. (2008). Selection and education of gifted children in social and economically disadvantaged areas - Comparison of recognition of gifted teachers in rural and urban areas (Report No 2006-551-B00069), Korean Research Memory Press, retrieved October 10, 2018, from by https://www.krm.or.kr/krmts/search/detailview/research.html?dbGubun=SD&category=Research&m201_id=10013058
29 Jung, H. (2017). Cyber bridge program for underprivileged students (Report No RR2017-019) KAIST Global Institute for Talented Institute Press, retrieved October 10, 2018, from http://kms.kofac.re.kr/openapi/kofac.html
30 Kim, H. (2011). A study on elementary school teachers' perception of gifted education as an after school program: Using the concept mapping method. Master's Thesis, Incheon National University.
31 McBee, M. (2006). A descriptive analysis of referral sources for gifted identification screening by race and socioeconomic status. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17(2), 103-111.   DOI