Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2014.24.4.597

Teachers' Perception on Differentiation of Gifted Education in Invention from Gifted Education in Science  

Lee, Jaeho (Gyeongin National University of Education)
Park, Kyungbin (Gachon University)
Jin, Sukun (Konkuk University)
Chun, Miran (Gongju National University)
Ryu, Jiyoung (KAIST)
Lee, Hangeun (Korea Invention Promotion Association)
Lee, Yunjo (Korea Invention Promotion Association)
Lee, Kyungpyo (Korea Invention Promotion Association)
Publication Information
Journal of Gifted/Talented Education / v.24, no.4, 2014 , pp. 597-612 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate how teachers recognize the differentiation of gifted education in invention to gifted education in science. An online survey was conducted to more than 500 hundred school teachers to ask (1) if gifted education in invention is necessary as an independent area of gifted education, (2) if gifted education in invention should be differentiated in identification, education programs, councelling, facilities and so on to gifted education in science, and (3) what problems gifted education in invention are facing and how we can promote gifted education in invention. Findings by this study are like the following: 1. Almost all teachers, regardless of whether their duty is related to gifted education in invention or not, recognized the necessity of gifted education in invention as an independent area of gifted education, especially from gifted education in science. 2. Teachers recognized the differentiation of gifted education in invention in diverse aspects of gifted education, like identification, educational programming, and so on, especially to gifted education in science. 3. Teachers recognized the shortage of trained teachers as the most critical obstacles to gifted education in invention, and also thought training programs for teachers as the most important means that can promote gifted education in invention.
Keywords
Invention; Gifted Education; Giftedness in Invention;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 육근철, 최석남, 한승록, 박상태, 류지영, 맹동술, 원희정, 김유상, 이재복, 천가경(2011). 발명영재 선발을 위한 자유선택형 다단계 선발 모형 및 관찰 추천제. 영재교육의 새로운 패러다임: 초교과형 발명영재육성. 특허청, 한국발명진흥회
2 이재호, 박경빈, 진석언, 류지영, 이상철, 안성훈, 진병욱(2012). 발명 영재상 수립을 위한 발명영재의 특성 이해. 영재교육연구, 22(3), 551-573.
3 이재호, 박경빈(2014). 발명영재들의 ICT 관련 인식에 대한 조사. 영재교육연구, 24(3),463-477.
4 최유현(2007). 주니어 발명리더과정 발명교육 프로그램 개발과 효과 분석. 한국실과교육학회지, 20(4). 171-193.
5 최유현, 이경화, 반재천, 임윤진, 강경균, 김동하, 박기문 (2010). 발명영재 선발도구 개발연구. 특허청, 한국발명진흥회.
6 VanTassel-Baska, J. (2002). Considerations in evaluating gifted programs. The Communicator, 33(2), 20-24.
7 Hany, E. A. (1994). The development of basic cognitive components of technical creativity: A longitudinal comparison of children and youth with high and average intelligence. In R. G. Subotnik & K. D. Arnold (Eds.), Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent (pp.115-154). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
8 Stankowski, W. M. (1978). Definition. In R. E. Clasen & B. Robinson (Eds.). Simple gifts: The education of the gifted, talented, and creative. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Exension.
9 Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
10 유영길(2007). 발명영재반 운영 방안 모색. 국제과학영재학회, 1(2). 145-155.
11 맹희주, 서혜애(2010). 발명영재교육 운영체제 별 초등 발명영재 수업 내용 및 수업 활동분석. 초등과학교육, 29(1), 1-12.
12 서예원, 김아름, 문대진, 김효미 (2014). 영재교육통계연보. 서울: 한국교육개발원 영재교육연구센터.
13 서혜애, 조석희, 김홍원, 정현철, 손연아 (2002). 공교육차원의 발명영재교육 체제 구축 방안 연구. 수탁연구 CR 2002-29. 한국교육개발원
14 이재호, 박경빈, 진석언, 류지영, 안성훈, 진병욱(2013). 3대 핵심역량을 중심으로 한 미래지향적 발명영재상 정립에 대한 연구. 영재교육연구, 23(3), 435-452.
15 특허청(2007). 발명영재교육프로그램 개발 연구. 한국학교발명협회.