• Title/Summary/Keyword: s theorem.

Search Result 1,346, Processing Time 0.021 seconds

ON WEYL'S THEOREM FOR QUASI-CLASS A OPERATORS

  • Duggal Bhagwati P.;Jeon, In-Ho;Kim, In-Hyoun
    • Journal of the Korean Mathematical Society
    • /
    • v.43 no.4
    • /
    • pp.899-909
    • /
    • 2006
  • Let T be a bounded linear operator on a complex infinite dimensional Hilbert space $\scr{H}$. We say that T is a quasi-class A operator if $T^*\|T^2\|T{\geq}T^*\|T\|^2T$. In this paper we prove that if T is a quasi-class A operator and f is a function analytic on a neigh-borhood or the spectrum or T, then f(T) satisfies Weyl's theorem and f($T^*$) satisfies a-Weyl's theorem.

MULTIPLICITY OF SOLUTIONS FOR A CLASS OF NON-LOCAL ELLIPTIC OPERATORS SYSTEMS

  • Bai, Chuanzhi
    • Bulletin of the Korean Mathematical Society
    • /
    • v.54 no.3
    • /
    • pp.715-729
    • /
    • 2017
  • In this paper, we investigate the existence and multiplicity of solutions for systems driven by two non-local integrodifferential operators with homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions. The main tools are the Saddle point theorem, Ekeland's variational principle and the Mountain pass theorem.

A GENERALIZATION OF PREECE`S IDENTITY

  • Kim, Yong-Sup;Arjun K.Rathie
    • Communications of the Korean Mathematical Society
    • /
    • v.14 no.1
    • /
    • pp.217-222
    • /
    • 1999
  • The aim of this research is to provide a generalization of the well-known, interesting and useful identity due to Preece by using classical Dixon`s theorem on a sum of \ulcornerF\ulcorner.

  • PDF

The Origin of Newton's Generalized Binomial Theorem (뉴턴의 일반화된 이항정리의 기원)

  • Koh, Youngmee;Ree, Sangwook
    • Journal for History of Mathematics
    • /
    • v.27 no.2
    • /
    • pp.127-138
    • /
    • 2014
  • In this paper we investigate how Newton discovered the generalized binomial theorem. Newton's binomial theorem, or binomial series can be found in Calculus text books as a special case of Taylor series. It can also be understood as a formal power series which was first conceived by Euler if convergence does not matter much. Discovered before Taylor or Euler, Newton's binomial theorem must have a good explanation of its birth and validity. Newton learned the interpolation method from Wallis' famous book ${\ll}$Arithmetica Infinitorum${\gg}$ and employed it to get the theorem. The interpolation method, which Wallis devised to find the areas under a family of curves, was by nature arithmetrical but not geometrical. Newton himself used the method as a way of finding areas under curves. He noticed certain patterns hidden in the integer binomial sequence appeared in relation with curves and then applied them to rationals, finally obtained the generalized binomial sequence and the generalized binomial theorem.

Pedagogical implication of Euclid's proof about Pythagorean theorem (피타고라스 정리에 대한 Euclid의 증명이 갖는 교육적 함의)

  • 박문환;홍진곤
    • School Mathematics
    • /
    • v.4 no.3
    • /
    • pp.347-360
    • /
    • 2002
  • This study analyzed the mathematical and didactical contexts of the Euclid's proof about Pythagorean theorem and compared with the teaching methods about Pythagorean theorem in school mathematics. Euclid's proof about Pythagorean theorem which does not use the algebraic methods provide students with the spatial intuition and the geometric thinking in school mathematics. Furthermore, it relates to various mathematical concepts including the cosine rule, the rotation, and the transfor-mation which preserve the area, and so forth. Visual demonstrations can help students analyze and explain mathematical relationship. Compared with Euclid's proof, Algebraic proof about Pythagorean theorem is very simple and it supplies the typical example which can give the relationship between algebraic and geometric representation. However since it does not include various spatial contexts, it forbid many students to understand Pythagorean theorem intuitively. Since both approaches have positive and negative aspects, reciprocal complementary role is required in pedagogical aspects.

  • PDF

FURTHER SUMMATION FORMULAS FOR THE APPELL'S FUNCTION $F_1$

  • CHOI JUNESANG;HARSH HARSHVARDHAN;RATHIE ARJUN K.
    • The Pure and Applied Mathematics
    • /
    • v.12 no.3 s.29
    • /
    • pp.223-228
    • /
    • 2005
  • In 2001, Choi, Harsh & Rathie [Some summation formulas for the Appell's function $F_1$. East Asian Math. J. 17 (2001), 233-237] have obtained 11 results for the Appell's function $F_1$ with the help of Gauss's summation theorem and generalized Kummer's summation theorem. We aim at presenting 22 more results for $F_1$ with the help of the generalized Gauss's second summation theorem and generalized Bailey's theorem obtained by Lavoie, Grondin & Rathie [Generalizations of Whipple's theorem on the sum of a $_3F_2$. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 72 (1996), 293-300]. Two interesting (presumably) new special cases of our results for $F_1$ are also explicitly pointed out.

  • PDF

AN EXTENSION OF THE TRIPLE HYPERGEOMETRIC SERIES BY EXTON

  • Lee, Seung-Woo;Kim, Yong-Sup
    • Honam Mathematical Journal
    • /
    • v.32 no.1
    • /
    • pp.61-71
    • /
    • 2010
  • The aim of this paper is to extend a number of transformation formulas for the four $X_4$, $X_5$, $X_7$, and $X_8$ among twenty triple hypergeometric series $X_1$ to $X_{20}$ introduced earlier by Exton. The results are derived from the generalized Kummer's theorem and Dixon's theorem obtained earlier by Lavoie et al..

CONSTRUCTIVE AND DISCRETE VERSIONS OF THE LYAPUNOV′S STABILITY THEOREM AND THE LASALLE′S INVARIANCE THEOREM

  • Lee, Jae-Wook
    • Communications of the Korean Mathematical Society
    • /
    • v.17 no.1
    • /
    • pp.155-163
    • /
    • 2002
  • The purpose of this paper is to establish discrete versions of the well-known Lyapunov's stability theorem and LaSalle's invariance theorem for a non-autonomous discrete dynamical system. Our proofs for these theorems are constructive in the sense that they are made by explicitly building a Lyapunov function for the system. A comparison between non-autonomous discrete dynamical systems and continuous dynamical systems is conducted.