• 제목/요약/키워드: assessment item analysis

검색결과 353건 처리시간 0.028초

수학과 중등임용 확률과 통계학 기출문항 분석 (An Analysis on the Past Items of Probability and statistics in Secondary School Mathematics Teacher Certification Examination)

  • 김창일;전영주
    • 한국학교수학회논문집
    • /
    • 제20권4호
    • /
    • pp.387-404
    • /
    • 2017
  • 본 연구에서는 최근 4개년(2014~2017학년도)의 수학교과내용학 기출문항 가운데 확률과 통계학 문항을 분석 대상 문항으로 분류하고, 수학과 임용시험 문항 분석틀을 기반으로 분류된 문항을 분석하였다. 그 결과 첫째, 확률과 통계학 교육과정의 정상화를 유도하기 위하여 4개 평가영역이 고르게 출제되어야 한다. 둘째, 통합적 사고, 종합 분석적인 사고 평가가 이루어져야 한다. 셋째, 수학적 사고력과 논리적 역량을 측정할 수 있는 문항 발문이 사용되어야 한다. 넷째, 문항 수에 의한 출제 비율은 7.7%~10.0%이고, 배점에 따른 비율은 이 보다 낮은 5.0%~7.5% 사이로 출제되었다. 다섯째, 적정난이도 안정화 정책을 유지하고 있다. 여섯째, 확률과 통계학은 귀납적 관점의 문제해결력 측정을 해야 한다는 결론과 시사점을 얻었다.

  • PDF

한국형 작업균형 평가도구 개발 (Development of Korean Occupational Balance Assessment(K-OBA) Tool)

  • 홍소영;홍덕기
    • 대한지역사회작업치료학회지
    • /
    • 제9권2호
    • /
    • pp.43-58
    • /
    • 2019
  • 목적 : 본 연구는 한국형 작업균형을 측정할 수 있는 평가도구를 개발하고자 실시되었다. 연구방법 : 2017년 3월부터 2019년 7월까지 선행연구 분석, 전문가 포커스 회의를 통해 예비문항을 작성하였고, 2차의 델파이조사를 통해 예비문항을 선정하였다. 문항의 타당성 검증을 위해 라쉬분석을 실시하여 대상자 및 문항적합도, 문항난이도, 평정척도, 분리신뢰도를 분석하여 최종문항을 도출하였다. 결과 : 조사대상자 141명 중 시간사용에서 9명(6.38%), 작업영역에서 11명(7.80%)이 부적합 대상자로 나타났다. 시간사용 적합대상자 132명, 작업영역 적합대상자 130명을 대상으로 문항의 적합도를 분석한 결과 3개 문항이 부적합 문항으로 판정되었으나, 이론 및 임상적 근거에 기초하여 최종적으로 작업특성 영역의 1개 문항을 삭제하였다. 문항의 난이도 분석에서 당신은 가정 내에서 다른 사람을 위한 활동에 사용하는 시간의 양은 어떠합니까?, 당신은 정규교육이나 관심분야를 위한 교육을 받고 있습니까? 문항이 높은 난이도를 보였다. 평정척도 분석결과에서는 5점 척도보다 4점 척도가 적합한 것으로 나타났고, 분리신뢰도는 .86~.94이었다. 최종적으로 3개 범주(시간사용, 작업영역, 작업특성), 18개 문항이 최종 선정되었다. 결론 : 작업균형 평가도구는 3개 범주 영역, 18개 문항을 최종 선정하였고, 4점 리커트 척도로 개발되었다. 추후 연구에서는 작업균형을 측정하는 다른 평가도구와의 상관관계를 통해 공인타당도를 입증하고, 작업균형에 영향을 미치는 요인을 분석하는 추가연구가 필요할 것이다.

Quality Reporting of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis According to PRISMA 2020 Guidelines: Results from Recently Published Papers in the Korean Journal of Radiology

  • Ho Young Park;Chong Hyun Suh;Sungmin Woo;Pyeong Hwa Kim;Kyung Won Kim
    • Korean Journal of Radiology
    • /
    • 제23권3호
    • /
    • pp.355-369
    • /
    • 2022
  • Objective: To evaluate the completeness of the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in a general radiology journal using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Materials and Methods: Twenty-four articles (systematic review and meta-analysis, n = 18; systematic review only, n = 6) published between August 2009 and September 2021 in the Korean Journal of Radiology were analyzed. Completeness of the reporting of main texts and abstracts were evaluated using the PRISMA 2020 statement. For each item in the statement, the proportion of studies that met the guidelines' recommendation was calculated and items that were satisfied by fewer than 80% of the studies were identified. The review process was conducted by two independent reviewers. Results: Of the 42 items (including sub-items) in the PRISMA 2020 statement for main text, 24 were satisfied by fewer than 80% of the included articles. The 24 items were grouped into eight domains: 1) assessment of the eligibility of potential articles, 2) assessment of the risk of bias, 3) synthesis of results, 4) additional analysis of study heterogeneity, 5) assessment of non-reporting bias, 6) assessment of the certainty of evidence, 7) provision of limitations of the study, and 8) additional information, such as protocol registration. Of the 12 items in the abstract checklists, eight were incorporated in fewer than 80% of the included publications. Conclusion: Several items included in the PRISMA 2020 checklist were overlooked in systematic review and meta-analysis articles published in the Korean Journal of Radiology. Based on these results, we suggest a double-check list for improving the quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Authors and reviewers should familiarize themselves with the PRISMA 2020 statement and check whether the recommended items are fully satisfied prior to publication.

간병인을 위한 기능적 유니폼 개발 -노인의료복지시설 간병인을 대상으로- (Development of Functional Uniform for Caregivers)

  • 이은영;최혜선;김은경
    • 한국의류학회지
    • /
    • 제31권5호
    • /
    • pp.788-800
    • /
    • 2007
  • The purpose of this study was to develop a caregiver's uniform that is appropriate for nursing and to improve movement adaptability as well as having a pleasing appearance. Based on the results of preliminary study, I investigated the inconvenience and problems with the existing uniforms and made a sample uniform taking into consideration the design, the material, and the pattern. We carried out a sensory assessment and quantitative assessment in order to compare the sample uniform with existing uniforms. Following are the results of this research. The top is a short-sleeved blouse with a round neckline having no collar and with armpit gussets. The armpit gussets are semicircles and the inverted pleats in the back are an improvement designed for activity. The pants are long reaching to the ankles with elastic in the waist so that the waist measurement may be adjusted. The length of the pants can be adjusted with strings and the pants have a funnel-shaped pocket for adjustment of length. We used a mix of polyurethane and polyester for the outer cloth of the uniform in order to improve activity function and used $Coolever^{TM}$, the sanitary textile that absorbs moisture well and dries in a short time, for gussets in the armpits, which is the heavy sweat area. The appearance assessment and movement adaptability assessment were performed with 5 subjects and 9 experts. For the results of the assessment, the sample uniform was appraised to be better than the existing uniforms in every item of an appearance comparison assessment except for the neckline assessment by the experts. As for the assessment of movement appropriateness and wearing assessment, the same subjects were used for analysis. As the results of the assessment, the sample uniform was rated higher than the existing uniforms in movement adaptability and pleasing appearance.

휴양림 조성 대상지 선정을 위한 타당성 평가 연구 - 경기도 광주시를 중심으로 - (A Study on the Feasibility Assessment for Selecting Recreation Forest Sites: The Case of Gwangju-si in Gyeonggi-do)

  • 서정영;염성진
    • 한국환경과학회지
    • /
    • 제28권11호
    • /
    • pp.959-969
    • /
    • 2019
  • This study sought to contribute to the revitalization of local economy by developing a natural recreation forest, which is the base of ecotourism recreation, through utilizing forest resources and the natural environment of Gwangju-si. The study conducted a feasibility assessment through on-site surveys such as the suitability of the candidate sites, location analysis, and possibility of damage to the forest, before developing recreation forest sites in Gwangju-si and, based on the result, selected appropriate subject sites. The candidates for this study were 5 forest sites such as one site in the Mokheon-dong area, two in the Docheok-myeon area, and one in the Toechon-myeon area. For this study, the current status of the natural recreation forest was surveyed, its feasibility index and assessment process were investigated, and the local status and related regulations of Gyeonggi-do and Gwangju-si were reviewed. The final subject sites were selected after feasibility assessment utilizing assessment index in order to evaluate the candidate sites. The feasibility assessment was conducted after three separate on-site surveys for each candidate site between October 2018 and January 2019 utilizing "The Feasibility Assessment Criteria for Natural Recreation Forest (Notification 2018-71)" of the Korean Forest Service. The items instrumental to the feasibility assessment were classified into landscape, location, water system, induction of recreation, and development condition; the assessment was made after redefining each item into detailed items. Through this process, the Usan-ri area was selected as the final site for developing natural recreation forest, having obtained more than 100 points according to "The Feasibility Assessment Criteria for Natural Recreation Forest" of the Korean Forest Service. In order to develop natural recreation forest in the Usan-ri area in the future, further discussion is necessary with the relevant departments in consideration of the degree of ecological zoning map.

이슬점에 대한 중학생들의 개념 이해 평가 루브릭 개발 (Development of a Rubric for Assessing Middle School Students' Conceptual Understanding about Dew Point)

  • 이기영;이재봉;오현석
    • 한국지구과학회지
    • /
    • 제41권6호
    • /
    • pp.684-694
    • /
    • 2020
  • 이 연구에서는 이슬점에 대한 중학생들의 개념 이해를 평가하기 위한 루브릭을 개발하였다. 이를 위해 국가 수준 학업성취도 평가의 다층 서답형 문항에 대한 중학생의 응답을 분석하였다. 학생들의 응답 특성에 따라 유형을 분류하고, 성취도 점수 평균에 따른 응답 유형의 분포를 분석하였다. 이를 토대로 이슬점 개념 이해를 평가하기 위한 루브릭을 작성하였다. 연구 결과 다음과 같다: 첫째, 포화수증기량 곡선에서 이슬점 찾기에 대한 학생 응답을 분석한 결과, 다수의 학생들이 이슬점에 대한 개념이 없거나 부족한 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 이슬점에서 수증기 응결과정에 대한 학생 응답을 분석한 결과, 과학적 개념 유형의 비율은 매우 낮았으며, 오개념 유형의 비율이 상대적으로 높았으며 유형 또한 다양하였다. 셋째, 성취도 점수 평균에 따른 학생 응답 유형 분포 분석을 토대로 4수준의 평가 루브릭을 작성하였다. 이러한 연구 결과를 토대로 지구과학 분야에서 개념 이해 평가를 위한 루브릭 개발과 활용 측면에서 제언을 하였다.

초등학교 6학년 성취도평가 문항에 나타난 성차의 원인 분석 (The Analysis of Cause of Gender Gap in Items of 6th Grade National Assessment of Educational Achievement)

  • 서보억;이광상
    • 한국수학교육학회지시리즈C:초등수학교육
    • /
    • 제15권1호
    • /
    • pp.13-29
    • /
    • 2012
  • 본 연구는 초동학교 6학년 국가수준 학업성취도평가에서 남녀간 성차가 두드러진 문항에 대한 심층 분석 연구이다. 국가단위 시험에서 남녀 간에 차이가 큰 문항들을 선택하고, 이러한 문항에서 어떤 수학 내적 원인이 성차를 유발하였는지 분석한다. 이러한 분석을 용이하게 하기 위해 지난 8년간의 성취도평가 문항 중에서 남녀 차가 현저한 문항들을 선택하고, 이러한 문항에 대한 문항 개념도를 작성한다. 문항 개념도를 바탕으로 본검사 문항을 개발하고 검사를 실시한다. 검사 결과를 분석하여 국가수준 학업성취도평가에서 남녀 차가 발생한 원인을 수학적인 관점에서 분석하고 그 결과를 도출하였다. 이러한 연구결과를 바탕으로 초등학교 수학 교수-학습 및 교과서 개발에 유의미한 방향을 제시할 것으로 기대한다.

AHP기법을 이용한 수요자 중심의 농업가뭄 영향 평가 기준 도출 연구 (A Study on the Derivation of the User-Oriented Agricultural Drought Assessment Criteria Using the AHP technique)

  • 이석주;송재도;장태일;설동문;손재권
    • 농촌계획
    • /
    • 제24권4호
    • /
    • pp.47-55
    • /
    • 2018
  • Currently in the drought evaluation, which is a supplier-oriented standard that applies storage rates of reservoirs, evaluation for users that use agricultural water is not done. Therefore, this study established drought evaluation items for drought evaluation based on farmers' judgement, conducted a survey on farmers and experts, compared and analyzed weighted value between two groups, and then classified the evaluation standards per each evaluation item. The agricultural drought evaluation items are 5 major items of water supply lapse rate, agricultural weather, agricultural irrigation facility, crop and soil, and 12 subsections for regional characteristics and opinions of consumers that use water to be reflected. The result of analyzing weighted value of farmers and experts' major items shows that farmers is agricultural irrigation facility(0.219), water supply lapse rate(0.211), agricultural weather(0.204), crop(0.183) and soil(0.183). Experts is agricultural weather(0.297), agricultural irrigation facility(0.202), water supply lapse rate(0.189), crop(0.162) and soil(0.150), which displays difference between the two groups. The agricultural drought criteria standards are established based on precedent studies and cases, and grades of evaluation items are 1st grade(extreme stage), 2nd grade(warning stage), 3rd grade(alert stage) and 4th grade(attention stage). The above analysis per each consumer-oriented agricultural drought evaluation item and the analysis on the standards of evaluation grades are expected to be used as a basic resource for establishing agriculture drought policy and selecting drought area in the future.

자동차용 에어컨 클러치 코일의 수명평가 기준과 고장해석 (Lifetime Assessment Criteria and Failure Analysis for the Clutch Coil in an Automotive Air Conditioner)

  • 최만엽;위신환;김정식;정해성
    • 한국신뢰성학회지:신뢰성응용연구
    • /
    • 제11권2호
    • /
    • pp.111-126
    • /
    • 2011
  • The clutch coil mounted on the automotive air conditioner is an important part which actuates the clutch to connect or disconnect the pulley and the compressor according to the climate control condition in an automobile. Here, it is generally required that the clutch coil should ensure the long term durability requirement, such as a warranty for the 10 years of field operation or 160,000 km driving, especially in a brand new item, and so forth. However, some difficulties have arisen in restoring its credibility, since domestic specifications for the part have not been yet unified. In order to ensure the reliability, test methods and assessment criteria should be standardized. Moreover, assessed lifetime under specific conditions and potential failure analysis would be important. In this study, lifetime test specifications for the clutch coil have been reviewed and methodological suggestions are provided to ensure reliability, utilizing a quality function deployment through the potential failure mode effect analysis.

FMEDA 기법을 적용한 SIL 등급 판정에 관한 사례연구 (Case Study on the Assessment of SIL Using FMEDA)

  • 김병철;김영진
    • 산업공학
    • /
    • 제25권4호
    • /
    • pp.376-381
    • /
    • 2012
  • As the number, complexity and interaction of electrical, electronic and programmable electronic (E/E/PE) systems increase, a growing emphasis has been placed on the concept of functional safety during product development. IEC 61508 provides guidelines and standardized procedures in the development of reliable and dependable E/E/PE systems to assure functional safety. Determining risk classes (i.e., safety integrity levels, SILs) associated to a specific E/E/PE item may be recognized as one of the most crucial activities in the product development per IEC 61508 since SILs are used to specify necessary safety requirements for achieving an acceptable residual risk. This article presents a case study on the assessment of SILs applying failure modes, effects and diagnostic analysis (FMEDA) from which failure rates may be derived for each important failure category by combining a standard FMEA with online diagnostic techniques.