DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of a Rubric for Assessing Middle School Students' Conceptual Understanding about Dew Point

이슬점에 대한 중학생들의 개념 이해 평가 루브릭 개발

  • Lee, Kiyoung (Division of Science Education, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Lee, Jaebong (Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation) ;
  • Oh, Hyunseok (Middle School, Seoul National University)
  • 이기영 (강원대학교 과학교육학부) ;
  • 이재봉 (한국교육과정평가원) ;
  • 오현석 (서울대학교사범대학부설중학교)
  • Received : 2020.12.09
  • Accepted : 2020.12.29
  • Published : 2020.12.31

Abstract

In this study, we developed a rubric for assessing middle school students' conceptual understanding about dew point. For this purpose, we analyzed 9th grade students' responses collected by using a multi-tiers constructed-response item of National Assessment of Educational Achievement (NAEA) and classified the types of the responses according to their characteristics. In addition, we analyzed the distribution of student response types according to mean achievement scores and developed an assessment rubric of conceptual understanding about dew point. The findings are as follows: First, the analysis of student responses to finding dew point in the saturation curve showed that many students had no or lack understanding of the scientific concept of dew point. Second, as a result of analyzing the student response to the water vapor condensation process at dew point, the proportion of scientific conception types was very low, while the proportion of misconception types was relatively high and the types varied as well. Third, a four- level assessment rubric was developed based on the analysis of the distribution of student response types according to the mean achievement scores. Based on the findings, we suggested the development and utilization of assessment rubric in the field of Earth science education.

이 연구에서는 이슬점에 대한 중학생들의 개념 이해를 평가하기 위한 루브릭을 개발하였다. 이를 위해 국가 수준 학업성취도 평가의 다층 서답형 문항에 대한 중학생의 응답을 분석하였다. 학생들의 응답 특성에 따라 유형을 분류하고, 성취도 점수 평균에 따른 응답 유형의 분포를 분석하였다. 이를 토대로 이슬점 개념 이해를 평가하기 위한 루브릭을 작성하였다. 연구 결과 다음과 같다: 첫째, 포화수증기량 곡선에서 이슬점 찾기에 대한 학생 응답을 분석한 결과, 다수의 학생들이 이슬점에 대한 개념이 없거나 부족한 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 이슬점에서 수증기 응결과정에 대한 학생 응답을 분석한 결과, 과학적 개념 유형의 비율은 매우 낮았으며, 오개념 유형의 비율이 상대적으로 높았으며 유형 또한 다양하였다. 셋째, 성취도 점수 평균에 따른 학생 응답 유형 분포 분석을 토대로 4수준의 평가 루브릭을 작성하였다. 이러한 연구 결과를 토대로 지구과학 분야에서 개념 이해 평가를 위한 루브릭 개발과 활용 측면에서 제언을 하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Cho, B., Ko, Y., Kim, H., Paik, S., Park, J., Park, J., and Im, M., 2002, A study of kindergarden, elementary, and middle school students' conception types and trend of grade related to evaporation and conditions of evaporation activities. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 22, 286-298. (in Korean)
  2. Cho, H., 2015, Driver's alternative science conception. Kyoyookgwahaksa, Gyeonggi, Korea. (in Korean)
  3. Clement, J., 2000, Model based learning as a key research area for science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 1041-1053. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900416901
  4. Clement, J. and Steinerg, M., 2002, Step-wise evolution of mental models of electric circuits: a "learning-aloud" case study. The Journal of The Learning Sciences, 11, 389-452. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1104_1
  5. Corcoran, T., Mosher, F., and Rogat, A., 2009, Learning progressions in science: an evidence-based approach to reform (Consortium for Policy Research in Education Report #RR-63). Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
  6. Duschl, R., Maeng, S., and Sezen, A., 2011, Learning progressions and teaching sequences: A review and analysis. Studies in Science Education, 47(2), 123-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2011.604476
  7. Goodrich, H., 1996, Understanding rubrics. Educational Leadership, 54, 14-17.
  8. Kang, S., Seo, E., and Kim, D., 2019, Earth science prospective teachers' perceptions on the relationship between absolute humidity and dew point temperature. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 40, 624-638. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2019.40.6.624
  9. Lee, J, Dong, H., Choi, W., Kim, Y., and Lee, K., 2017, An analysis of the results of 2016 National Assessment of Educational Achievement (NAEA) (ORM 2017-95-4). Seoul: Korean Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation. (in Korean)
  10. Lee, J., Lee, K., and Park, Y., 2010, Graph interpretation ability and perception of high school students and preservice secondary teachers in earth science. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 31, 378-391. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2010.31.4.378
  11. Lee, K., Dong, H., Choi, W., Kwon, G., Lee, I., and Kim, Y., 2017, Exploring a learning progression for eight core concepts of middle school science using constructed response items in the National Assessment of Educational Achievement (NAEA). Journal of Science Education, 41(3), 382-404. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2017.41.3.382
  12. Lee, K., Maeng, S., Park, Y., Lee, J., and Oh, H., 2016, Validation of learning progressions for Earth's motion and solar system in elementary grades: Focusing on construct validity and consequential validity. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 36(1), 177-190. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.1.0177
  13. Maeng, S., Lee, K., Park, Y., Lee, J., and Oh, H., 2014, Development and validation of a learning progression for astronomical system using ordered multiple-choice assessment. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 34(8), 703-718. (in Korean)
  14. National Research Council., 2007, Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. committee on science learning, kindergarten through eighth grade. R.A. Duschl, H.A. Schweingruber, & A.W. Shouse (Eds.). The National Academies Press.
  15. Oh, H., 2019, Action research for co-construction of scientific models using smart devices: The case of science teachers's teaching practices on the atmosphere units in middle school. School Science Journal, 13, 225-240. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.15737/SSJ.13.3.201908.225
  16. Oh, H., 2020, Case study for earth science education using smart devices: Focused on the case of science preservice teachers' teaching practices about atmosphere and astronomy units in middle school. School Science Journal, 14, 423-440. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.15737/SSJ.14.4.202011.423
  17. Oh, H. and Lee, K., 2020, The development and validation of learning progression for solar system structure using multi-tiers supply form items. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 41, 291-306. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2020.41.3.291
  18. Rea-Ramirez, M., 1998, Model of conceptual understanding in human respiration and strategies for instruction. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Massachusetts.
  19. Shin, J. and Yang, I., 2017, Problems and improvements of science performance assessment. Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology, 7, 873-883. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.14257/AJMAHS.2017.01.71
  20. Son, M. and Jeong, D., 2019, Development worksheet and rubric for system thinking assesment-focused on the earth system unit in 'Integrated Science'. School Science Journal, 13, 78-94. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.15737/SSJ.13.1.201902.78
  21. Vygotsky, L., 1978, Interaction between learning and development. In Gauvain, M. and Cole, M (Eds.) Readings on the development of children (pp. 34-40). Scientific American Books, New York, USA.
  22. Yang, I., Lee, H., Lee H.. and Cho, H., 2009, The development of rubrics to assess scientific argumentation. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 29, 203-220. (in Korean)