• 암석학회지
• /
• 제23권2호
• /
• pp.145-152
• /
• 2014

지질유산은 보전가치를 가지는 지질기록들을 총칭하며 지질유산의 보전을 위해서는 지질노두에 대한 조사와 평가가 수행되어야 한다. 각종 개발사업으로부터 지질유산이 훼손되는 것을 방지하기 위한 방안의 하나로서 지질노두에 대해 조사표와 평가표를 작성하여 데이터베이스를 구축함으로써 환경영향평가에 활용하도록 하는 방안을 제안한다. 지질노두 조사표의 내용은 조사지역, 분야, 세부분야, 위치, 규모, 특징, 사진 및 설명, 조사자로 구성되어 있다. 지질노두 평가표는 평가유형, 세부평가, 종합평가, 최종평가등급으로 구성된다. 평가유형은 학술, 교육, 경관으로 구분된다. 학술교육 분야는 대표성, 희소성, 다양성, 전형성을 세부항목으로 평가한다. 지형경관 분야는 특이성, 심미성, 자연성을 세부항목으로 평가한다. 최종평가등급은 5개 등급으로 구분되며 1등급은 보전가치가 가장 높은 등급으로 절대보전을 요한다.

• 농촌계획
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.53-61
• /
• 2008

This study has intended to elicit the definition of rural landscape, to classify rural landscape type, and to develop the evaluation indicators of rural landscape, meeting the definition through delphi expert survey method. The survey was performed five times for 80 days by 20 experts. The delphi expert survey asked experts as follows: 1) to fill out open-ended questions regarding the definition of rural landscape, and classification of rural landscape types, and evaluation indicators; 2) to provide their own feasibility evaluation regarding the results of the previous answer; and 3) to reevaluate the feasibility of the definition, types, and indicators. Based on the survey results, this study has found the appropriate definition of rural landscape like the comprehensive complex of physical (objective) and nonphysical (subjective) factors characterizing natural and/or artificial scenary of rural village itself Also, this study has developed the evaluation indicators of rural landscape in accordance with space types and landscape units classified. The developed indicators included areal ratio, the degree of green naturality, the building coverage ratio for physical landscape field, and skyline, landscape adjectives, color landscape, semantic scale.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제56권4호
• /
• pp.309-333
• /
• 2022

본 연구에서는 전국의 국공립 및 사립, 전문대학의 교수들 2,618명을 대상으로 교수연구업적평가와 관련하여 교수들의 인식을 파악하고자 설문조사를 수행하였다. 설문조사는 두 가지 부분에 대한 인식을 파악하기 위한 조사로 하나는 현재 각 대학에서 진행되고 있는 교수연구업적평가에 대한 인식조사이며, 다른 하나는 정량 위주의 업적평가 방식의 대안으로 여겨지는 정성적 평가 지표의 도입에 대한 인식조사이다. 설문 결과, 교수 연구업적평가에서 정량 중심 평가는 여전히 대다수의 대학에서 크게 활용되며, 계열 또는 분야에 적합하지 않은 연구업적평가가 이루어지고 있으며, 평가 기간의 확대가 필요를 요구하고, 정량 위주의 업적평가 방식은 학술 커뮤니티에 부정적인 영향을 가져오며, 연구업적평가에 대한 개선의 필요하다는 인식을 가지고 있는 것을 확인할 수 있었다. 정성적 평가 지표의 도입과 관련하여 교수들은 연구업적평가에 정성적 평가가 필요하다는 인식을 하고 있으며, 정성적 평가 도입과 관련하여 부정적인 의견 또한 존재하는 것을 확인할 수 있었다.

• 융합경영연구
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.53-64
• /
• 2024

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to develop a satisfaction evaluation survey tool that reflects the characteristics of the program for housing welfare supported in long-term public rental housing in Seoul. Research design, data and methodology: The main research methods of the study were review of previous studies, literature review, and expert consultation. Results: First, the characteristics of each housing welfare program being promoted by Seoul City were summarized, and the characteristics were reflected in the evaluation survey tool. Second, the SERVOUAL model, a service quality model, was used to measure satisfaction with the housing welfare program and modified to suit the characteristics of the program. Third, an evaluation survey tool was constructed by dividing the evaluation tool into common questions and individual questions, and for the operation and sustainability of the housing welfare program, rather than just evaluating satisfaction, program loyalty was used as a survey item. Fourth, through expert advice, more than 10 evaluation questions for each housing welfare program were revised. Conclusions: The results of future research are expected to be used to prepare practical operation plans through annual monitoring of housing welfare programs and comparative analysis between programs.

• 한국산업보건학회지
• /
• 제29권2호
• /
• pp.217-225
• /
• 2019

Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate the quality management systems of domestic asbestos survey and monitoring service providers and the relationships with the number of licenses or designations and sales performances. Methods: Data on quality management systems were collected by assessors who were assigned by the Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency(KOSHA) during a pilot evaluation program for designated asbestos survey and monitoring service providers in 2016 using evaluation criteria developed by KOSHA. Basic characteristics, evaluated scores, and sales performance were gathered and statistically analyzed. Results: The median and arithmetic mean of the total scores were 0.64 and 0.66. Evaluation fields that scored highly with the highest percentages were sales performance, installation and availability of equipment, compliance with the mandatory minimum number of airborne samples, laboratory independence, and results of proficiency analytical testing, in that order. Evaluation fields that received low marks with the highest percentages were the training of personnel, blank field samples, calibration of flow rates, preliminary check and visual inspection of the work area prior to the clearance test, and review and approval of final reports, in that order. Comparison of normalized scores between service providers registered for asbestos and other tasks and those designated for only asbestos showed significant differences in their evaluated scores. Sales performance did not show a positive correlation with evaluated scores. Conclusions: The quality management systems of domestic asbestos survey and monitoring service providers were poor. High scores were recorded mostly in evaluation fields related to regulatory requirements. Low scores were recorded mostly in evaluation fields related to documentation and recordkeeping. Considering the low influence of quality on sales performance, the government needs to evaluate the quality management of asbestos survey and monitoring service providers and provide the results to public in order to address their low levels of quality management.

• 한국조사연구학회지:조사연구
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.161-176
• /
• 2010

본 논문은 학위논문에 사용된 여론조사 자료의 품질을 평가하였으며, 또한 학위논문에 사용되는 데이터의 품질평가 모형을 제시하였다. 데이터의 품질평가와 평가모형에 사용한 평가지표는 한국조사연구학회에서 제시한 조사윤리강령 제3조의 16가지 항목을 사용하였다. 연구결과 학위논문에 사용된 여론조사 데이터의 품질은 낮은 수준임을 확인할 수 있었다. 16개 항목별로 석 박사학위에 따른 유의적인 차이가 있는지를 확인하기 위하여 두 집단 간 비율 차이 검정을 실시한 결과 표집오차와 분석방법의 수에서만 차이가 있을 뿐 다른 지표에서는 차이가 나타나지 않았다. 끝으로 학위논문에 사용된 여론조사 자료의 질을 평가하기 위한 품질평가를 위해 9가지 주요 평가지표에 가중치를 부여하는 모형을 제시하였다.

• KIEAE Journal
• /
• 제7권2호
• /
• pp.31-37
• /
• 2007

Despite of many supportive research to the usefulness of slide evaluation on environment of outdoor lighting, study method of using slides have provoked many discussions of its manifestation of reality of field conditions. This study aims to compare the results of slide survey with that of field survey. Distant view and short range view of nightscape of Seoul were selected. Field measurement of luminance and chromaticity were conducted and questionnaire survey were conducted. Frequency analysis, T-test, factor analysis were conducted. Results shows that distant view and short range view of field survey have better visual atmosphere than slide survey. In addition, slide survey on distant view shows lowest values. Difference between field survey and slide survey on distant view is much bigger than the results of short range view.

• 한국항공운항학회지
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.74-84
• /
• 2015

The purpose of this study is to develop competitiveness evaluation index for global aviation training organizations. Research and studies on relevant documents were conducted to establish the index. With no sufficient study results previously done directly associated with global aviation training organization, relevant and related documents, such as studies on competitiveness evaluation index of higher educational institutions, were reviewed as an alternative. Two rounds of delphi surveys were conducted based on the review and consultation from experts in aviation training and human resource management fields. First round of survey with 62 evaluation indices were carried out, through which a total of 29 were selected, and 19 indices were chosen during the second round of survey. However, factor analysis was conducted in order to justify the survey result, which eliminated 3 more indices, with 16 finally selected. This study will provide implications for aviation training organizations which need to further improve their competitiveness globally.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제20권5호
• /
• pp.74-86
• /
• 2017

The purpose of this study is to analyze the perceptions of college officials about the evaluation of university education on the perspective of industry, to make policy proposals for improvement by analyzing the preparing process of the departments that have received the evaluation of the best universities, In order to achieve the purpose of the study, we conducted literature review, survey studies, and in-depth interviews. The survey was conducted by professors related to this system, and finally the results of 51 responses were used for analysis. The contents of the survey were composed of the recognition, appropriateness, the utilization of the results, the proliferation and improvement plan of the evaluation of university education on the perspective of industry. In-depth interviews conducted 1:1 interviews with 5 professors. The evaluation of university education on the perspective of industry is generally perceived to be a bridge between industry and university education, but there is room for improvement in evaluation criteria, operating methods, and promotion strategies to public.

• 한국환경복원기술학회지
• /
• 제18권6호
• /
• pp.27-38
• /
• 2015

This study is for deriving an evaluation system which fits to the domestic urban river. For this, two times of Delphi survey was conducted to various experts who are eminent for ecology, urban design, governance, landscape architecture, hydrology. The purpose was for analysing validity and getting extra opinion of evaluation items which were preferentially have chosen. Reflecting $1^{st}$ survey's opinions as changing the word or explaining more details, the second survey was conducted, In this time, all evaluation items were analysed as valid and experts agreed with that. In conclusion, the evaluation items, "Amenity", "Biodiversity", "Ecosystem service", "Governance", "Management", which are for evaluating domestic urban river environment were derived.