1 |
Lee, Hyobin & Cho, Youngdon (2021). A Study on the Research Ethics Awareness Level of University Faculty in 2021. National Research Foundation of Korea.
|
2 |
Lee, Jongwook & Yang, Kiduk (2011). A bibliometric analysis of faculty research performance assessment methods. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 28(4), 119-140.
DOI
|
3 |
Park, Namgi (2007). Analysis of professor achievement evaluation by university and development of professor achievement evaluation model. Higher Education, 148, 126-131.
|
4 |
Yu, So-Young, Lee, Jae-Yun, Chung, Eunkyung, & Lee, Boram (2015). A review of declarations on appropriate research evaluation for exploring their applications to research evaluation system of Korea. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 32(4), 249-272.
DOI
|
5 |
ARC (2015). Excellence in Research for Australia. Available: http://www.arc.gov.au/excellence-research-australia
|
6 |
Bladek, M. (2014). DORA: San Francisco declaration on research assessment (May 2013). College & Research Libraries News, 75(4), 191-196.
DOI
|
7 |
Hatch, A. & Curry, S. (2020). Research culture: Changing how we evaluate research is difficult, but not impossible. Elife, 9, e58654.
DOI
|
8 |
Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520(7548), 429-431. Available: http://www.nature.com/news/bibliometrics-the-leiden-manifesto-for-research-metrics-1.17351
DOI
|
9 |
IEEE (2013). Appropriate use of bibliometric indicators for the assessment of journals, research proposals, and individuals. Available: https://magazines.ieeeauthorcenter.ieee.org/wp-content/uploads/ieee_bibliometric_statement.pdf
|
10 |
REF2021 (2020). Index of revisions to the 'Panel criteria and working methods'. Available: https://www.ref.ac.uk/media/1450/ref-2019_02-panel-criteria-and-working-methods.pdf
|
11 |
Choi, Incheol (2008). The desirable direction of evaluation of professors' research performance in the College of Social Sciences. Korean Social Sciences, 30.
|
12 |
Ban, Sangjin (2010). Discussion on the Improvement of Faculty Performance Evaluation. Korean Association of Educational Administration 2010 Policy Development Discussion.
|
13 |
Cho, Sungtaek (2013). Problems in university faculty' research performance evaluation: focusing on humanities and social sciences. Critical Review of History, 89-120.
|
14 |
Choi, Eunjoo, Yang, Kiduk, & Lee, HyeKyung (2016). Quality factor: a new bibliometric measure for assessing the quality of faculty research performance. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 47(2), 287-304.
DOI
|
15 |
Chung, Jin-Sik (2009). A study on assessment of faculty performance in research achievement: a focus on library and information science field. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 20(2), 129-142.
DOI
|
16 |
Chung, Yeon-Kyoung & Choi, Yoon-Kyung (2011). A study on faculty evaluation of research achievements in humanities and social sciences. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 42(3), 211-233.
|
17 |
Kim, Dong-No, Lee, Min-Haeng, & Park, TaeGyun (2006). Constructing an evaluation model for the professors' academic achievement in the humanities. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 19(3), 1-20.
|
18 |
Kim, Wang-Jun, Yun, Hongju, & Rah, Min-joo (2012). A comparative analysis of faculty evaluation systems of national universities in Korea. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 29(1), 143-165.
DOI
|
19 |
Lee, HyeKyung & Yang, Kiduk (2017). Comparative analysis of Korean universities'journal publication research performance evaluation standards. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 48(2), 295-322.
DOI
|