• 제목/요약/키워드: Research Performance Evaluation

검색결과 5,283건 처리시간 0.041초

AHP를 이용한 정부출연연구소 평가 모형 연구 (A Study on the Evaluation Model of Government-funded Research Institutes Using AHP)

  • 손은일;백창화
    • 품질경영학회지
    • /
    • 제50권4호
    • /
    • pp.665-677
    • /
    • 2022
  • Purpose: The purpose of this study is to analyze the current status and investigate relevant indicators so that R&D performance evaluation suitable for government-funded research institutes can proceed. A suitable performance evaluation model was presented based on the surveyed indicators. Based on the presented performance evaluation model, the importance was analyzed to calculate the weight for each indicator of the performance evaluation model. Methods: The method applied in this study presented a performance evaluation model based on the organizational performance evaluation cases of advanced overseas countries. By using the AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) technique, the weight of each indicator of the performance evaluation model was studied. Results: As a result of examining the indicators necessary for the evaluation model, focusing on overseas cases, 13 evaluation items were derived. A weight was calculated for the importance of the study results. And the scientific/technical research results showed the highest excellence. Conclusion: Key indicators of performance evaluation suitable for government-funded research institutes were derived and presented through detailed modeling in three stages. A realistic model that can objectively evaluate the performance of government-funded research institutes was proposed using the AHP technique.

출연연구기관의 연구회 단위 기관평가제도의 적합성 분석 (Relevance Analysis of Performance Evaluation Systems of Government S&T Research Groups)

  • 남영호;김병태
    • 기술혁신연구
    • /
    • 제14권3호
    • /
    • pp.117-154
    • /
    • 2006
  • This research examines performance evaluatees' opinions regarding the current institutional performance evaluation systems of Government S&T Research Institutes (GRIs). Under the current evaluation systems, twenty GRIs are grouped into three Research Groups and each Group has its own evaluation systems. One problem of the current institutional evaluation systems is that the systems cannot reflect individual GRIs' characteristics. The following methods are used. First, based on four perspectives of Kaplan & Norton(1992)'s Balanced Scorecard(BSC) model, six perspectives appropriate to GRUs' characteristics are derived. Second, experts classify current performance evaluation measures into the six perspectives. This enables different evaluation systems of three GRI Research Groups to be compared under the same evaluation measures. Third, GRIs' evaluatees are asked to allocate appropriate weights on the performance measures. Evaluatees' weights of a GRI are compared with average weights of the related Group. Finally in every BSC's perspective, GRIs that have extraordinarily over-scored or under-scored weights are analyzed in terms of GRIs' missions, customers, capability of human resources, etc. In the Basic Research Group, the Korea Basic Science Institute is deviated in the financial perspective and the strategic direction perspectives. In the Public Research Group, Korea Institute of Construction Technology is significantly different from other GRIs in three perspectives. Five out of eight GRIs in the Industrial Research Group, GRIs are significantly different each other in several perspectives. It could be concluded that the current institutional evaluation systems are least appropriate in measuring performance of the GRIs of the Industrial Research Group.

  • PDF

연구업적 평가에 관한 대학 교수 인식 연구 (A Study on Faculty Perception of Research Performance Evaluation)

  • 김용환;강지혜;이종욱;노영희
    • 한국문헌정보학회지
    • /
    • 제56권4호
    • /
    • pp.309-333
    • /
    • 2022
  • 본 연구에서는 전국의 국공립 및 사립, 전문대학의 교수들 2,618명을 대상으로 교수연구업적평가와 관련하여 교수들의 인식을 파악하고자 설문조사를 수행하였다. 설문조사는 두 가지 부분에 대한 인식을 파악하기 위한 조사로 하나는 현재 각 대학에서 진행되고 있는 교수연구업적평가에 대한 인식조사이며, 다른 하나는 정량 위주의 업적평가 방식의 대안으로 여겨지는 정성적 평가 지표의 도입에 대한 인식조사이다. 설문 결과, 교수 연구업적평가에서 정량 중심 평가는 여전히 대다수의 대학에서 크게 활용되며, 계열 또는 분야에 적합하지 않은 연구업적평가가 이루어지고 있으며, 평가 기간의 확대가 필요를 요구하고, 정량 위주의 업적평가 방식은 학술 커뮤니티에 부정적인 영향을 가져오며, 연구업적평가에 대한 개선의 필요하다는 인식을 가지고 있는 것을 확인할 수 있었다. 정성적 평가 지표의 도입과 관련하여 교수들은 연구업적평가에 정성적 평가가 필요하다는 인식을 하고 있으며, 정성적 평가 도입과 관련하여 부정적인 의견 또한 존재하는 것을 확인할 수 있었다.

국방규격 개선사업의 성과평가모형 개발 및 적용방안 연구 (A Study on the Development and Application of Performance Evaluation Model for Defense Standard Improvement Projects)

  • 이민철;김영현;안영준;김준수
    • 품질경영학회지
    • /
    • 제51권2호
    • /
    • pp.185-202
    • /
    • 2023
  • Purpose: The purpose of this study is to identify key performance evaluation items and factors that are effective and practical for project management of defense standard standard improvement projects, and to develop a quantitative performance evaluation model. Methods: For the development of a performance evaluation model for defense standard improvement projects, we analyzed past major project performance and derived evaluation items and factors. To increase the objectivity and efficiency of project evaluation, we developed an evaluation index that enables relative evaluation of evaluation targets, and calculated the main importance of evaluation items using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method based on the main opinions of expert groups. Results: The study resulted in the identification of main performance items for defense standard improvement projects, which were classified into defense standard conformity review performance and defense standard improvement performance items. We also simplified the evaluation model by integrating various evaluation items into similar evaluation factors. Additionally, we developed a quantitative evaluation index that enables relative evaluation of the targets and verified the objectivity and validity of the suggested performance evaluation model by reevaluating it using performance data from past commissioned professional institutions Conclusion: Developing a quantitative evaluation model for defense standard improvement projects is expected to provide a means of measuring the effectiveness of the project, and to be used as a tool to determine the appropriateness and effectiveness of medium and long-term project plans.

학술 활동 건전성 제고를 위한 연구업적평가 개선에 관한 연구 (A Study on Improvements of Research Performance Evaluation for Enhancing the Soundness of Academic Activities)

  • 노영희;강지혜;김용환;양정모;이종욱
    • 한국비블리아학회지
    • /
    • 제33권4호
    • /
    • pp.93-114
    • /
    • 2022
  • 본 연구는 올바른 연구문화 정착지원을 위한 대학의 연구업적평가 개선방안을 도출하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 국내외 연구업적평가와 관련한 사례를 조사·분석하고, 대학 교원과 연구업적평가 관계자를 대상으로 각각 설문조사와 면담조사를 실시하였다. 이를 통해 연구업적평가 원칙 수립 방향, 연구업적물 유형의 범주화 방안, 연구업적평가 방식과 절차, 필요 서류 등을 제안하였다. 구체적으로 첫째, 정량평가의 한계점을 보완하면서 평가의 타당성과 신뢰성, 투명성을 확보하기 위해 연구업적평가 시 고려해야 하는 8가지 원칙을 제시하였다. 둘째, 연구업적물의 주요 유형을 학술논문, 저서, 학술대회 발표로 범주화하였다. 셋째, 연구업적평가 방식으로는 정량 및 정성, 복수의 계량지표를 활용하는 하이브리드 평가를 제안하였다. 넷째, 연구업적평가의 절차로 총 11단계(필수 7단계)를 제시하였다. 다섯째, 연구업적 평가를 위한 주요 서류로 출판물, 평가서, 위원장 보고서 등을 제안하였다. 본 연구에서 제시된 연구업적평가 개선방안은 학문 및 연구 분야와 대학의 특성을 고려하여 유연하게 적용되어야 할 것이다.

외국대학 사례 조사를 통한 교수 연구업적평가 개선방안에 관한 연구 (A Study on The Improvement for Professor Research Achievement Evaluation Applying a Case Study of Foreign Universities)

  • 강지혜;이종욱;김용환;노영희
    • 한국도서관정보학회지
    • /
    • 제53권4호
    • /
    • pp.211-232
    • /
    • 2022
  • 연구업적평가는 계량서지학을 중심으로 활용하여 정량적인 기준을 중심으로 이루어져 왔다. 하지만 정량평가만을 활용한 평가에 여러 한계점이 드러나고 연구품질의 우수성 평가에 대한 요구가 커지며 정성적인 평가 요소의 중요성이 커지고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 2010년 이후 전 세계에서 나타난 연구 평가 개선을 위한 사례를 조사하여 소개하고, 연구업적평가에 도입 가능한 정성적인 요소를 추출하기 위해 외국대학의 업적평가 사례를 조사·정리하여 국내 도입을 제안하였다. 전 세계 상위 10개 대학의 업적평가 서류, 평가 절차, 심사기준 등을 분석하여 정성적 평가 요소를 추출하였다. 결과로 본 연구는 업적평가 문서의 다각화, 다면 평가와 다단계 업적평가 과정, 다양한 질적 업적평가 기준에 대해 국내 도입을 제안한다. 전통적인 계량서지학에서 연구 평가 지표 생성 시 인용도를 측정하였다면, 미래 지표에서는 추천 점수를 지표로 반영하거나, 산업 연계성, 교육/산업에서의 활용도 등을 포함할 수 있다. 궁극적으로 본 논문을 통해 업적평가 방식이 균형을 이루고, 교수의 연구업적평가가 개인이 우수한 연구자로 성장하여 연구 환경 발전에 도움이 될 수 있는 과정으로 기능하게 되기를 희망한다.

금융시장에서 영업사원의 지각된 평가 공정성과 직무성과 간의 구조적 관계 (Structural Relationship between Salesperson's Perceived Evaluation Fairness and Job Performance in the Financial Market)

  • 이준섭;김지영;이한근
    • 유통과학연구
    • /
    • 제14권12호
    • /
    • pp.141-151
    • /
    • 2016
  • Purpose - Salesperson perceptions of the fairness and accuracy of a performance evaluation system were examined by managerial and professional employees of large organization. The performance evaluation process is central to many personal decisions such as attitude for job and sales performance. This study investigates the relationship between perceived evaluation fairness, job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and sales performance. The main purpose of this study is to develop and empirically test a comprehensive model of salespersons' perceived evaluation fairness on sales performance. For this purpose, we identified the structural relationship between perceived evaluation fairness, job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and sales performance. Also we investigate the mediating effects on job satisfaction and organizational commitment between perceived evaluation fairness and sales performance. Research design, data, and methodology - To empirically test these relationships, data were collected by in-depth interviews from sales managers and questionnaire surveys from 300 salespersons who work for sales area (credit card company, insurance company). Demographically, the overall sample was 91.6% female, 77.9% 30s and 40s, and 34% college educated, with an average tenure with their present organizations of 4 years. The questionnaire was composed of total 20 items dealing with frequency, quality, and consequences of perceived evaluation fairness, job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and sales performance. To test the research hypotheses, collected data analyzed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and structure equation model (SEM). Results - Through extensive and rigorous literature review process of related literature(Perceived evaluation fairness, Job satisfaction, Organizational commitment, Sales performance), research model and research hypothesis was set up. This study obtains the following research results. First, perceived evaluation fairness has a positive effect on job satisfaction, whereas the effects of perceived evaluation fairness on organizational commitment and sales performance did not show statistically significant result. Second, job satisfaction and organizational commitment have complete mediating roles to the relationship between perceived evaluation fairness and organizational commitment, and relationship between perceived evaluation fairness and sales performance. Conclusions - Based on the results, salespersons' perceived evaluation fairness is one of the key independent variable for making high job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and sales performance. Finally the theoretical, managerial implication and research limitations are mentioned in the discussion.

A Simple Procedure of Seismic Performance Evaluation for Unreinforced Masonry Buildings in Korea

  • Kim, Taewan
    • Architectural research
    • /
    • 제15권3호
    • /
    • pp.159-166
    • /
    • 2013
  • This study was aimed at analyzing the three-step seismic performance evaluation procedure of Korea Infrastructure Safety Cooperation and proposing a new procedure suitable for unreinforced masonry buildings in Korea. For the study, it was investigated the performance evaluation results of five example URM buildings. First of all, it was found that the performance evaluation procedure for the URM buildings should be different from that for the other structural systems. As a result, a simple procedure of seismic performance evaluation was proposed, which includes elimination of elastic and inelastic push-over analysis and reduction of performance levels and evaluation steps. With the simple procedure, the URM buildings could be evaluated more easily than the other structures. It would be expected that the procedure can provide structural engineers with a simple and easy way to evaluate the seismic performance of the Korean URM buildings. Nevertheless, the procedure must be revised continuously by reflecting new research products for the URM buildings in Korea.

Designing a Hydro-Structural Ship Model to Experimentally Measure its Vertical Bending and Torsional Vibrations

  • Houtani, Hidetaka;Komoriyama, Yusuke;Matsui, Sadaoki;Oka, Masayoshi;Sawada, Hiroshi;Tanaka, Yoshiteru;Tanizawa, Katsuji
    • Journal of Advanced Research in Ocean Engineering
    • /
    • 제4권4호
    • /
    • pp.174-184
    • /
    • 2018
  • We herein propose a new design procedure of a flexible container ship model where the vertical bending and torsional vibration modes are similar to its prototype. To achieve similarity in torsional vibration mode shapes, the height of the shear center of the model must be located below the bottom hull, similar to an actual container ship with large opening decks. Therefore, we designed a ship model by imparting appropriate stiffness to the hull, using urethane foam without a backbone. We built a container ship model according to this design strategy and validated its dynamic elastic properties using a decay test. We measured wave-induced structural vibrations and present the results of tank experiments in regular and freak waves.

정부출연연구소의 지식관리 성과 평가항목 및 측정지표 개발 (Development of Evaluation Items and Measurement Indices for Knowledge Management Performance of Government-funded Research Institutes)

  • 정택영;김상훈;박일규;김창규
    • 한국IT서비스학회지
    • /
    • 제10권4호
    • /
    • pp.171-189
    • /
    • 2011
  • KAs information and knowledge are increasingly becoming more important in the knowledge-driven society, knowledge management, as a very important management paradigm, is securing firm position in private and public sectors. Complying with this paradigm, government-funded research institutes in science-technology sector are actively utilizing knowledge management by employing knowledge management system and evaluating its applications' performance. The purpose of this study is to develop evaluation items and measurement indices to rationally measure knowledge management performance of the government-funded research institutes and to verify the feasibility of applying these evaluation items and indices. To achieve this research goal, the evaluation model of knowledge management performance was constructed by reviewing and integrating the existing studies, and subsequently, evaluation areas, evaluation items, measurement indices were derived from this evaluation model. Also, the feasibility analysis on the evaluation items and measurement indices was performed by means of FGI(Focus Group Interview) with the knowledge management experts belonging to Korean government-funded institutions in science-technology sector. The implications of this study are as follows : in theoretical perspective, this study has proposed a criterion frame to evaluate knowledge management performance, and has rationally drawn evaluation items and measurement indices from the criterion frame. And in practical perspective, this study has improved the validity and practicality of the measurement indices, which can lead to more reasonable and easier evaluation of knowledge management performance of the government-funded research institutes.