Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2022.33.4.093

A Study on Improvements of Research Performance Evaluation for Enhancing the Soundness of Academic Activities  

Younghee, Noh (건국대학교 문헌정보학과 )
Ji Hei, Kang (동덕여자대학교 문헌정보학과 )
Yong Hwan, Kim (청주대학교 문헌정보학과 )
Jeong-Mo, Yang (한국연구재단 )
Jongwook, Lee (경북대학교 문헌정보학과 )
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science / v.33, no.4, 2022 , pp. 93-114 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study aims to propose the ways to improve the research performance evaluation to support the establishment of a sound research culture. For the study, we analyzed the cases of domestic and foreign research performance evaluation, and a survey and an interview were conducted for faculty and research performance evaluation officials, respectively. In the study, the direction of establishing the principle of research performance evaluation, the method of categorizing the type of research performance, the method and procedure of research performance evaluation, and necessary documents were proposed. First, eight principles were suggested to be considered in evaluating research achievements to ensure the validity, reliability, and transparency of the evaluation while supplementing the limitations of quantitative evaluation. Second, the main types of research achievements were categorized into journal articles, books, and presentations at academic conferences. Third, as a research achievement evaluation method, a hybrid evaluation using quantitative and qualitative and multiple measurement indicators was proposed. Fourth, a total of 11 steps (required 7 steps) were presented as a procedure for research achievement evaluation. Fifth, publications, evaluation documents, and committee chair's reports were proposed as major documents for research achievement evaluation. The research achievement evaluation improvement plan presented in this study should be flexibly applied in consideration of the characteristics of the academic and research fields and universities.
Keywords
Research Performance Evaluation; Faculty Evaluation; Academic Activity; Quantitative Evaluation; Qualitative Evaluation;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 5  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Choi, Eunjoo, Yang, Kiduk, & Lee, Hyekyung (2016). Quality Factor: A new bibliometric measure for assessing the quality of faculty research performance. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 47(2), 287-304. http://dx.doi.org/10.16981/kliss.47.201606.287   DOI
2 Choi, Junryeol, Jang, Jisang, Park, Jeongsoo, & Ban, Sangjin (2010). A Study on Improvement Plans for the Personnel Management System of National Universities. Seoul: Ministry of Education, Science and Technology.
3 Choi, Ki-Seok (2004). A Case Study on the Research Performance Evaluation System for Professors at A University. Master's thesis, Department of Business Administration, Graduate School of Business, Dongguk University.
4 Hwang, Il-kyu, Kim, Kyungsook, Kwon, O young, Ahn, Taewon, & Park, Young-tae (2011). A study on the faculty evaluation model with considering the characteristics of education-based colleges. The Journal of Vocational Education Research, 20(4), 23-49.
5 Jung, Eui-jin & Roh, Yoo-jung (2019. 06. 11). [Exclusive] Expansion of Qualitative Evaluation for Promotion and Promotion of Professors at Universities Such as Yonsei University and Hanyang University. Korean Economy. Available: https://www.hankyung.com/society/article/201906117427i
6 Kim, Doo Beom (1996). The analytic approach for faculty performances evaluation. Journal of the Korean Society of Women's Culture, 3, 13-29.
7 Kim, Shinbok, Lee, Jaegi, & Jin, Jaegu (1999). Implementation plan for professor contract system and annual salary system. Researcher Public Hearing materials on Professor Appointment and Remuneration System.
8 Kim, Wang Jun, Yun, Hongju, & Rah, Min-joo (2012). A comparative analysis of faculty evaluation systems of national universities in Korea. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 29(1), 143-165. http://dx.doi.org/10.24211/tjkte.2012.29.1.143   DOI
9 Kim, Yong Hwan, Kang, Ji Hei, Lee, Jongwook, & Noh, Younghee (2022). A study on faculty perception of research performance evaluation. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 56(4), 309-333.
10 Korea Council for University Education (1995). A study on system development for the performance evaluation of university professors. Higher Education, 77, 104-114.
11 Lee Jang-ik (2006). An analysis of faculty evaluation system in Korean two-year colleges. The Journal of Vocational Education Research, 25(1), 159-176.
12 Lee, Hyekyung & Yang, Kiduk (2015). Comparative analysis of Korean universities' co-author credit allocation standards on journal publications. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 46(4), 191-205. http://dx.doi.org/10.16981/kliss.46.4.201512.191   DOI
13 Park, Namgi (2007). Analysis of professor achievement evaluation by university and development of professor achievement evaluation model. Higher Education, 148, 126-131.
14 Lee, Hyobin & Cho, Youngdon (2021). A study on the research ethics awareness level of university faculty. NRF ISSUE REPORT, 13.
15 Lee, Jongwook & Yang, Kiduk (2011). A bibliometric analysis of faculty research performance assessment methods. Journal of Korea Society for Information Management, 28(4), 119-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.4.119   DOI
16 Lee, Suk-Yeol, Byun, Ki-yong, Park, Changun, Lee, Bo-kyung, Han, Shin il, & Kim, Kyu Tae (2012). Controversial issues on action plans in introduction of performance-based annual professor salary system of national universities. The Politics of Education, 19(1), 79-104.
17 Yook, Keun-Hyo (2010). Causal relationship among variables of faculty performance evaluation - an empirical analysis -. Journal of Finance and Accounting Information, 10(4), 1-18.
18 Balon, R. (2022). What is a review article and what are its purpose, attributes, and goal(s). Psychotheraphy and Psychosomatics, 91, 152-155.   DOI
19 Nundy, S., Kakar, A., & Bhutta, Z. A. (2022). How to write an editorial?. In Nundy, Samiran, Kakar, Atul and Bhutta, Zulfiqar eds. How to Practice Academic Medicine and Publish from Developing Countries?. Singapore: Springer, 263-266
20 Tierney, E., O'Rourke, C., Fenton, J. E. (2015). What is the role of 'the letter to the editor'?. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 272(9), 2089-2093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-3289-7   DOI