Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management (품질경영학회지)

Korean Society for Quality Management (한국품질경영학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Development and Application of Performance Evaluation Model for Defense Standard Improvement Projects

국방규격 개선사업의 성과평가모형 개발 및 적용방안 연구

  • Lee, Min Cheol (Defense Procurement Research Center, Korea Institute of Procurement) ;
  • Kim, Young Hyun (Defense Standards Research Team, Defense Agency for Technology and Quality) ;
  • Ahn, Young Jun (Defense Procurement Research Center, Korea Institute of Procurement) ;
  • Kim, Jun Su (Defense Standards Research Team, Defense Agency for Technology and Quality)
  • 이민철 (한국조달연구원 국방조달연구센터) ;
  • 김영현 (국방기술품질원 표준연구실) ;
  • 안영준 (한국조달연구원 국방조달연구센터) ;
  • 김준수 (국방기술품질원 표준연구실)
  • Received : 2023.03.22
  • Accepted : 2023.04.04
  • Published : 2023.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to identify key performance evaluation items and factors that are effective and practical for project management of defense standard standard improvement projects, and to develop a quantitative performance evaluation model. Methods: For the development of a performance evaluation model for defense standard improvement projects, we analyzed past major project performance and derived evaluation items and factors. To increase the objectivity and efficiency of project evaluation, we developed an evaluation index that enables relative evaluation of evaluation targets, and calculated the main importance of evaluation items using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method based on the main opinions of expert groups. Results: The study resulted in the identification of main performance items for defense standard improvement projects, which were classified into defense standard conformity review performance and defense standard improvement performance items. We also simplified the evaluation model by integrating various evaluation items into similar evaluation factors. Additionally, we developed a quantitative evaluation index that enables relative evaluation of the targets and verified the objectivity and validity of the suggested performance evaluation model by reevaluating it using performance data from past commissioned professional institutions Conclusion: Developing a quantitative evaluation model for defense standard improvement projects is expected to provide a means of measuring the effectiveness of the project, and to be used as a tool to determine the appropriateness and effectiveness of medium and long-term project plans.

Keywords

References

  1. Defense Acquisition Program Administration, "standardization work regulations" 2022. 12, https://www.dapa.go.kr/dapa/rlm/rllawd/RlmNttList.do.
  2. Defense Agency for Technology and Quality. 2020. Defense Standardization Guidebook, p.94.
  3. Defense Agency for Technology and Quality. 2021. Defense Standards Improvement Work Guidebook.
  4. Jeon, J. Y. 2020. A Study on the Introduction of Advanced Technology in the Realm of Defense. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society 21(5):249-256.
  5. Jeong, J. S., Kwon, T. M., Hwang, W. Y. 2012. A Study on the Development of the Defense Standardization System. Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management 40(3):295.
  6. Jeong, Y. G., Cho, H. K., Yoo, H. J. 2019. A Study on the Development &Evaluation of Defense Quality Maturity Index. Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management 47(3):479-496.
  7. Jung, H. W, Shim, B. H. 2020. A Study on the Development plan of Configuration Control for Military Product. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society 21(6):70-77. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2020.21.6.70
  8. Jung, H. W, Shim, B. H. 2020. DMSMS Management Survey and Analysis Method. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society 21(5):257-265.
  9. Jung, H. W., Shim, B. H. 2021. Parts Management Method for Weapon System Parts Standardization. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society 22(2):409-417. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2021.22.7.409
  10. Jung, I. H., Seo, S. W., Jang, B. K. 2017. A case study on the quality control strengthening in development phase of weapon systems. Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management 45(3):349-364. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2017.45.3.349
  11. Kim, I. J., Kim, W. S., Kim, J. Y., Chae, H. S., Woo, J. Y., Do, K. M., Lim, S. H., Shin, M. S., Lee, J. E., Kim, H. N. 2022. Discovering Essential AI-based Manufacturing Policy Issues for Competitive Reinforcement of Small and Medium Manufacturing Enterprises. Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management 50(4):647-664. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2022.50.4.647
  12. Kim, P. J., Lee, J. Y. 2010. A Study on Journal Impact Measurement with Hirsch-type Indices. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management 27(1):267-287. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.1.269
  13. Kim, Y. H., Ha, J. S. 2022. A Study on the Development and Institutionalization Plan of a Quantitative Evaluation Model of Defense Quality Management System. Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management 50(2): 183-197. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2022.50.2.183
  14. Korea Institute of Procurement. 2022. Analysis of the effectiveness of defense standard improvement projects and research on project improvement measure.
  15. Kwak, H., Lee, S. W. 2019. Competitiveness Analysis for Artificial Intelligence Technologt through Patent Analysis. The Journal of Information Systems 28(3):141-158. https://doi.org/10.5859/KAIS.2019.28.3.141
  16. Lee, K. K., Kim, G. R., Yoon. S. D., Seol, H. J. 2021. A Study on the Strategy for Improvement of Operational Test and Evaluation of Weapon System and the Determination of Priority. Jouranl of Information and Security 21(1):177-189. https://doi.org/10.33778/kcsa.2021.21.1.177
  17. Park, K. C., Baek, H. M., Kim, T. W., Gil, H. J., Kwon, J. S., Lee, I. L., Song, S. B., Won, S. H. 2018. A Study on the Revision Efficiency of Referenced Specifications/Standards for Raw and Subsidiary Materials in the Field of National Defense. Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management 46(3):497-508. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2014.42.3.497
  18. Park, K. H., Lee, C. G. 2021. A Study on Global Competitiveness Factors of Electrical and Electronic Testing and Certification Bodies. Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management 49(3):281-297.
  19. Seo, C. W., Park, Y. T. 2016. Creativity evaluation of design concepts using AHP. Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management 44(4):855-867. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2016.44.4.855
  20. Seo, J. H., Bae, S. M. 2022. Strategic Action Plan for Companies to Supply Safe Products Using AHP Technology. Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management 50(4):635-646. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2022.50.4.635
  21. Seo, S. W., Heo, H. M., Jang, B. K., Hwang, W. Y., Jung, I. H. 2016. Extracting Priorities of Price Reduction for Military Supplies using AHP Analysis. Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management 44(3):473-386.
  22. Son, E. I., Baek, C. H. 2022. A Study on the Evaluation Model of Government-funded Research Institutes Using AHP. Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management 50(4):665-667. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2022.50.4.665
  23. Won, J. H. 2020. A Study on the Selection Model of Promising Export Items Applicable to the Defense SMEs. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society 21(7):321-33.
  24. Yun, I. W., Kim, J. Y. 2022. A Study on Evaluation Index to selecting weapon system for Defense Technology Planning. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society 23(7):170-176. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2022.23.7.170