• Journal of applied mathematics & informatics
• /
• v.26 no.3_4
• /
• pp.541-547
• /
• 2008

Suppose R is an idempotence-diagonalizable ring. Let n and m be two arbitrary positive integers with $n\;{\geq}\;3$. We denote by $M_n(R)$ the ring of all $n{\times}n$ matrices over R. Let ($J_n(R)$) be the additive subgroup of $M_n(R)$ generated additively by all idempotent matrices. Let ($D=J_n(R)$) or $M_n(R)$. In this paper, by using an additive idem potence-preserving result obtained by Coo (see [4]), I characterize (i) the additive preservers of tripotence from D to $M_m(R)$ when 2 and 3 are units of R; (ii) the additive preservers of inverses (respectively, Drazin inverses, group inverses, {1}-inverses, {2}-inverses, {1, 2}-inverses) from $M_n(R)$ to $M_n(R)$ when 2 and 3 are units of R.

• Bulletin of the Korean Mathematical Society
• /
• v.53 no.5
• /
• pp.1385-1394
• /
• 2016

Let (R, m) be a Noetherian local ring, I, J two ideals of R, and A an Artinian R-module. Let $k{\geq}0$ be an integer and $r=Width_{>k}(I,A)$ the supremum of lengths of A-cosequences in dimension > k in I defined by Nhan-Hoang [9]. It is first shown that for each $t{\leq}r$ and each sequence $x_1,{\cdots},x_t$ which is an A-cosequence in dimension > k, the set $$\Large(\bigcup^{t}_{i=0}Att_R(0:_A(x_1^{n_1},{\ldots},x_i^{n_i})))_{{\geq}k}$$ is independent of the choice of $n_1,{\ldots},n_t$. Let r be the eventual value of $Width_{>k}(0:_AJ^n)$. Then our second result says that for each $t{\leq}r$ the set $\large(\bigcup\limits_{i=0}^{t}Att_R(Tor_i^R(R/I,\;(0:_AJ^n))))_{{\geq}k}$ is stable for large n.

• Journal of applied mathematics & informatics
• /
• v.12 no.1_2
• /
• pp.313-321
• /
• 2003

In this Paper we show the following: Let R be a prime ring (with characteristic different two) and a $\in$ R. Let Θ, $\phi$ : R longrightarrow R be automorphisms and let d : R longrightarrow R be a nonzero Θ-derivation. (i) if［d($\chi$), a］Θo$\phi$ = 0 (or d(［$\chi$, a］$\phi$ = 0) for all $\chi$ $\in$ R, then a+$\phi$(a) $\in$ Z, the conte. of R, (ii) if〈d($\chi$), a〉 = 0 for all $\chi$$\in$R, then d(a) =0. (iii) if [ad($\chi$), $\chi$］$\phi$= 0 for all $\chi$$\in$R, then either a = 0 or R is commutative.

• The Pure and Applied Mathematics
• /
• v.10 no.4
• /
• pp.207-215
• /
• 2003

Let R be a prime ring with characteristic different from two and let $\theta,\varphi,\sigma,\tau$ be the automorphisms of R. Let d : $R{\rightarrow}R$ be a nonzero ($\theta,\varphi$)-derivation. We prove the following results: (i) if $a{\in}R$ and [d(R), a]$_{{\theta}o{\sigma},{\varphi}o{\tau}}$=0, then $\sigma(a)\;+\;\tau(a)\;\in\;Z$, the center of R, (ii) if $d([R,a]_{\sigma,\;\tau)\;=\;0,\;then\;\sigma(a)\;+\;\tau(a)\;\in\;Z$, (iii) if $[ad(x),\;x]_{\sigma,\;\tau}\;=\;0;for\;all\;x\;\in\;RE$, then a = 0 or R is commutative.

• Bulletin of the Korean Mathematical Society
• /
• v.57 no.5
• /
• pp.1319-1334
• /
• 2020

In this paper, we study the basic theory of the category of graded w-Noetherian modules over a graded ring R. Some elementary concepts, such as w-envelope of graded modules, graded w-Noetherian rings and so on, are introduced. It is shown that: (1) A graded domain R is graded w-Noetherian if and only if R^g_𝔪 is a graded Noetherian ring for any gr-maximal w-ideal m of R, and there are only finite numbers of gr-maximal w-ideals including a for any nonzero homogeneous element a. (2) Let R be a strongly graded ring. Then R is a graded w-Noetherian ring if and only if R_e is a w-Noetherian ring. (3) Let R be a graded w-Noetherian domain and let a ∈ R be a homogeneous element. Suppose 𝖕 is a minimal graded prime ideal of (a). Then the graded height of the graded prime ideal 𝖕 is at most 1.

• Communications of the Korean Mathematical Society
• /
• v.17 no.2
• /
• pp.221-227
• /
• 2002

In this paper we will show that the followings ; (1) Let R be a regular local ring of dimension n. Then $A_{n-2}$(R) = 0. (2) Let R be a regular local ring of dimension n and I be an ideal in R of height 3 such that R/I is a Gorenstein ring. Then [I] = 0 in $A_{n-3}$(R). (3) Let R = V[[ $X_1$, $X_2$, …, $X_{5}$ ]]/(p+ $X_1$$^{t1}$ + $X_2$$^{t2}$ + $X_3$$^{t3}$ + $X_4$$^2$+ $X_{5}$ $^2$/), where p $\neq$2, $t_1$, $t_2$, $t_3$ are arbitrary positive integers and V is a complete discrete valuation ring with (p) = mv. Assume that R/m is algebraically closed. Then all the Chow group for R is 0 except the last Chow group.group.oup.

• Bulletin of the Korean Mathematical Society
• /
• v.47 no.5
• /
• pp.907-913
• /
• 2010

Let D be an integrally closed domain with quotient field K, * be a star operation on D, X, Y be indeterminates over D, $N_*\;=\;\{f\;{\in}\;D[X]|\;(c_D(f))^*\;=\;D\}$ and $R\;=\;D[X]_{N_*}$. Let b be the b-operation on R, and let $*_c$ be the star operation on D defined by $I^{*_c}\;=\;(ID[X]_{N_*})^b\;{\cap}\;K$. Finally, let Kr(R, b) (resp., Kr(D, $*_c$)) be the Kronecker function ring of R (resp., D) with respect to Y (resp., X, Y). In this paper, we show that Kr(R, b) $\subseteq$ Kr(D, $*_c$) and Kr(R, b) is a kfr with respect to K(Y) and X in the notion of [2]. We also prove that Kr(R, b) = Kr(D, $*_c$) if and only if D is a $P{\ast}MD$. As a corollary, we have that if D is not a $P{\ast}MD$, then Kr(R, b) is an example of a kfr with respect to K(Y) and X but not a Kronecker function ring with respect to K(Y) and X.

• Communications of the Korean Mathematical Society
• /
• v.9 no.2
• /
• pp.279-284
• /
• 1994

Let R = ($r_1$, $r_2$, …, $r_{m}$) and S = ($s_1$, $s_2$, …, $s_{n}$ ) be positive integral vectors satisfying $r_1$＋ $r_2$＋…＋ $r_{m}$ = $s_1$＋ $s_2$＋ㆍㆍㆍ＋ $s_{n}$ , and let U(R, S) denote the class of all m $\times$ n matrices A = [$_a{ij}$ ] where $a_{ij}$ = 0 or 1 such that (equation omitted) = $r_{i}$ , (equation omitted) = $s_{j}$ , i = 1, ㆍㆍㆍ, m, j = 1, ㆍㆍㆍ, n.(omitted)

• Bulletin of the Korean Mathematical Society
• /
• v.44 no.4
• /
• pp.789-794
• /
• 2007

Let R be a 3-torsion free semiprime ring and let I be a nonzero two-sided ideal of R. Suppose that there exists a permuting 3-derivation ${\Delta}:R{\times}R{\times}R{\rightarrow}R$ such that the trace is centralizing on I. Then the trace of ${\Delta}$ is commuting on I. In particular, if R is a 3!-torsion free prime ring and ${\Delta}$ is nonzero under the same condition, then R is commutative.

• Bulletin of the Korean Mathematical Society
• /
• v.43 no.1
• /
• pp.101-106
• /
• 2006

Let R be a prime ring and I a nonzero ideal of R. Let $\alpha,\;\nu,\;\tau\;R{\rightarrow}R$ be the endomorphisms and $\beta,\;\mu\;R{\rightarrow}R$ the automorphisms. If R admits a generalized $(\alpha,\;\beta)-derivation$ g associated with a nonzero $(\alpha,\;\beta)-derivation\;\delta$ such that $g([\mu(x),y])\;=\;[\nu/(x),y]\alpha,\;\tau$ for all x, y ${\in}I$, then R is commutative.