• 제목/요약/키워드: Engineering design competency

검색결과 96건 처리시간 0.023초

자기 보고식 공학설계 역량 검사 도구 개발 (Development of The Self-Reported Measurement for Engineering Design Competency)

  • 김태훈;조한진;강문주
    • 공학교육연구
    • /
    • 제23권1호
    • /
    • pp.37-46
    • /
    • 2020
  • The purpose of this study is to develop the self-reported measurement for engineering design competency. In this study, engineering design competency is defined as the overall individual ability that is necessary for an engineer for his/her successful accomplishment of engineering design. This measurement was developed through reviewing documents, defining factor and sub-factor, making an item and constructing validity verification. The self-reported measurement for engineering design competency consists of 6 factors and 40 items. 6 factors cover competency of design performance, competency of considering economic and social influence, competency of utilizing mathematical and scientific knowledge, competency of teamwork, competency of design-centered thinking and competency of collecting and using data. A 6-points Likert scale was used for each item.

자기 보고식 공학설계 역량 검사 도구 규준화 연구 (A Research on the Norming of The Self-Reported Test for Engineering Design Competency)

  • 조한진;위선복;김태훈
    • 공학교육연구
    • /
    • 제23권3호
    • /
    • pp.66-75
    • /
    • 2020
  • The purpose of this study is to norm the engineering design competency test. To achieve the purpose of the study, a survey was conducted on engineering college students nationwide using engineering design competency test developed in the precedent study, and a total of 2,859 questionnaires were analyzed. The main results are as follows. First, the national average of engineering design competency scores was 158 out of 240 points. Second, there was no significant difference between genders in engineering design competency by background variables. On the other hand, there was a significant difference by major. It was found that mechanical and construction majors have higher engineering design competency than IT and chemical/material engineering majors. Also, the scores of engineering design competency increased as the grade went up. Third, the number of courses related to engineering design did not affect by engineering design competency, but the actual number of times of experience in engineering design was affected by engineering design competency.

융복합 Capstone Design 활동이 공학설계 역량에 미치는 효과 분석 (An Analysis of the Effect of Convergence Capstone Design Activity on Engineering Design Competency)

  • 위선복;김태훈
    • 공학교육연구
    • /
    • 제25권4호
    • /
    • pp.3-12
    • /
    • 2022
  • The purpose of this study is to analyze the educational effects of convergence Capstone Design activities. To this end, it analyzed the difference in engineering design competency before and after completing the curriculum in the Capstone Design process, where students from various majors team up, and analyzed the impact of convergence Capstone Design activities on engineering design competency. A survey study was conducted on experimental participants to collect data on individual characteristics and engineering design competency, and to analyze differences by background variable. As a result of analysis according to background variables, the engineering design competency was improved afterwards than before, except for some competency areas.

대학생의 기술적 문제해결 성향과 공학설계 역량 간의 관계 분석 (Analysis of the Relationship between Technological Problem-Solving Traits and Engineering Design Competency of Universities)

  • 위선복;김태훈
    • 공학교육연구
    • /
    • 제25권6호
    • /
    • pp.103-113
    • /
    • 2022
  • The purpose of this study is to correlation analysis between technological problem-solving traits and engineering design competency. To this end, correlation analysis and regression analysis between technological problem-solving traits and engineering design competency were used to analyze the relationship between each other. To collect data on individual characteristics, technological problem-solving traits, and engineering design competency, a survey was conducted with university students. As a result of the analysis, there was no difference in engineering design competency by gender, but there was a difference in technological problem-solving traits. There was no difference in technological problem-solving traits by major, but there was a difference in engineering design competency. As a result of correlation analysis, the correlation was found. In the case of regression analysis, a statistically significant result was found in the problem-solving trait domain, and the regression analysis model was found to be suitable. The results of the analysis of differences in engineering design competency according to technological problem-solving traits showed that the effective problem solvers were significantly higher.

해양로봇 활용의 역량중심 메이커 및 설계 교육 사례 연구 (Case Study on Competency-based Maker and Design Education using Marine Robot)

  • 김현식
    • 공학교육연구
    • /
    • 제24권2호
    • /
    • pp.12-19
    • /
    • 2021
  • Recently, the need of the future education in youth and univesity is rapidly increasing according to 4th industrial revolution. However, the maker and design education as a kind of youth and university future education has the following problems: it is implemented as an interesting convergence education including software education, it is managed by integrating youth and university competencies, it is composed in the form of blended class of consilient subject and nonsubject, it requires considering satisfaction in competency measurement and management, it is connected with entering school and getting job. To solve these problems, a case study on competency-based maker and design education using marine robot, which is based on the process-based learing method, integrated competency of youth and university, blended-type curriculum in terms of online and offline, is executed. To verify the competency-based maker and design education, the satisfaction survey in subject and nonsubject is performed. Study results show the example of the marine robot-based maker and design education and the need for additional study.

설계VE팀의 역량평가 체크리스트에 관한 연구 (A Study on Competency Evaluation Checklist of Design Phase VE Team)

  • 서하나;이학기
    • 한국건설관리학회논문집
    • /
    • 제9권4호
    • /
    • pp.154-162
    • /
    • 2008
  • 건설교통부에서는 2006년부터 "설계의경제성등검토"를 총공사비 100억원 이상으로 확대 시행하고 있으며, 이에 따라 건설공사의 예산낭비와 비효율적인 요인을 사전제거함에 따라 설계VE의 중요성이 대두되고 있다. 이러한 제도적 뒷받침이나 기술적인 노력에도 불구하고 국내에서 설계VE는 수행과정에서 다수의 문제점이 지적되고 있어 설계VE도입에 대한효과가 극대화되지 못하고 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 효과적인 팀을 구성하여 설계VE의 성과를 극대화하기 위하여 설계VE팀의 역량을 강화 할 수 있는 역량평가 체크리스트를 제시하고자 하였다. 이를 위하여 설계VE팀의 특성에 따른 29개의 역량인자를 도출하였으며 팀 지식, 팀워크 스킬, 팀 태도로 구분하였다. 중요도에 따라 설계VE팀의 역량평가 항목으로 도출하고, 각평가항목에 대한 상대적인 중요도를 정량화하여 설계VE팀의 역량평가에 객관적 인 기준을 제시할 수 있는 역량평가 방안 제시하였다.

IPA분석을 통한 공학계열 대학생 진로역량 보유수준 및 필요수준에 대한 인식 연구 (A Study on the Perception of the Level of Career Competency and Needs for Engineering Students : Using IPA Analysis Within the Engineering Educational Contexts)

  • 김윤영
    • 공학교육연구
    • /
    • 제26권6호
    • /
    • pp.3-18
    • /
    • 2023
  • The purpose of this study is to identify the difference between the current retention level and the required level of engineering students' career competency that they think they need based on their perceptions. Ultimately, the results of this study are used as basic data when designing the major/general education program and the curricular/extra-curricular career program. The task of this study is to identify the difference between the current retention level and the required level of engineering students' career competency. And based on this, it is to confirm the educational needs of engineering students for the career competency. For this purpose, literature research on career competency education in universities was reviewed in the theoretical background. Next, previous studies on career competency and sub-competence derived from career competency-related studies and detailed questions were analyzed. Based on this, an initial evaluation tool for career competency of engineering students was developed. Finally, through expert review, a career competency evaluation tool with a total of 43 items in 10 competency groups was developed. A career competency evaluation questionnaire was conducted for 197 engineering students who participated in the 2022 Engineering Education Festa, and as a result of the IPA analysis, 'global competency' was found to be the competency with the largest difference between importance and execution. Next, 'major job competency' and 'career development competency' appeared in order. Reflecting the results of this study, it is expected that mutually organic design of competency-based liberal arts curriculum and major curriculum that can cultivate global competency, major job competency, and career development capability will be carried out through learning activities and field practice.

설계VE팀의 역량 평가항목에 관한 연구 (A Study on Competency Evaluation Item of Design Phase VE Team)

  • 서하나;이학기
    • 한국건설관리학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 한국건설관리학회 2007년도 정기학술발표대회 논문집
    • /
    • pp.797-800
    • /
    • 2007
  • 건설 프로젝트에서의 VE는 예산낭비와 비효율적 요인을 서전제거하는 유용한 도구로 활용되고 있다. 이에 따라 2006년부터 건설교통부에서는 "설계의경제성등검토"를 총공사비 100억원 이상으로 확대 시행하고 있다. 그러나 이러한 제도적 뒷받침이나 기술적인 노력에도 불구하고 국내 설계VE는 수행과정에서 문제점이 지적되고 있어 효과가 극대화되지 못하고 있다. 효과적인 설계VE팀 구성으로 설계VE의 성과를 극대화하기 위해서는 설계VE팀의 역량평가에 대한 체크리스트의 개발이 필요하다. 따라서 본 연구는 설계VE팀의 역량평가 체크리스트 개발을 위한 기초자료로써 역량 평가항목을 도출하고 가중치를 산정하고자 하였다. 이를 위하여 설계VE팀의 특성에 따른 역량인자를 도출하여 팀 지식, 팀워크스킬, 팀 태도로 구별하여 구성하였다. 도출된 역량인자의 중요도에 대해 1차 설문조사를 실시하여 신뢰도와 타당도를 검증하고, 그 결과로 도출된 제 1, 2, 3계층의 역량 평가항목에 대하여 계층 분석적 의사결정기법을 활용한 2차 설문조사를 실시하여 가중치를 산정하였다.

  • PDF

공학계열 학생 핵심역량 진단도구 개발 및 타당화 연구 (Development and Validation of Core Competency Assessment Tools for Engineering Student)

  • 김윤영;윤지영
    • 공학교육연구
    • /
    • 제24권4호
    • /
    • pp.3-20
    • /
    • 2021
  • As we have become more interested in 'competency' that means ability to do something around the world, the competency of the best performers has also been introduced in the university curriculum as a concept of core competency. Research continues on why this competency-based education is needed compared to existing academic-oriented education, how it can be introduced into existing curricula, and how it can be developed and evaluated in detail. This study develops and validates core competency assessment tools that can diagnose core competencies of engineering students. Therefore, this research paper conducted a literature review related to core competencies and also core competency assessment tools of university students. It seeks to explore the implications of core competency assessment tools for engineering students and then lay the foundation for competency-based teaching and learning at engineering colleges. And also it defines the concepts of core competencies and each core competency of engineering students through prior research analysis of competence, core competence, and core competence of university students. The primary core competency assessment tool consisted of sub-factors and questions of core competencies. It were modified through the expert validation of the primary one and then it was used as a core competency assessment tools for preliminary investigation. The core competency assessment tools for engineering students are consisted of 6 competencies, 22 sub-factors, and 91 questions. There are core competencies as follows: engineering basic competencies, major engineering competencies, self-management competencies, communication competencies, interpersonal competencies, global competencies. The preliminary survey was conducted on 426 engineering students attending the Engineering Education FESTA 2019. The preliminary findings were derived by conducting exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, question characteristics analysis, and reliability analysis for validation. The core competency assessment tools developed through this study can be used to verify the effectiveness of the curriculum and programs for students at engineering colleges. In addition, the developed core competencies, sub-factors, and questions can be utilized in a series of courses that design, conduct, and evaluate engineering curricula and programs as competency-based curriculum. The significance of this study is to lay the groundwork for providing competency-based education engineering students to develop core competencies.

캡스톤디자인 역량 강화 프로그램 개발 연구 - 21C 핵심역량(4C Skills 및 문제해결능력) 함양을 중심으로 - (A Study on the Development of Capstone Design Competency Program - Focusing on 21C Core Competencies(4C Skills & Problem Solving Ability) -)

  • 한수민
    • 공학교육연구
    • /
    • 제26권1호
    • /
    • pp.20-26
    • /
    • 2023
  • In this study, as a competency strengthening program to support learner-centered education, we developed the 'Capstone-design competency Program' for the purpose of cultivating the 4C skills and problem-solving ability required as core competencies of the 21st century. The program was based on the project method, and strategies were derived and materialized for each step through core competency analysis. Then, the validity was confirmed through the implementation of the program. As a result of the implementation of the program, it was confirmed that this program was effective in cultivating the core competencies of college students. In addition, it was confirmed that learners showed results such as specific reflection on core competencies, changes in perspective, and action plans, so that the possibility of actual application was high.