• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.40 no.1
• /
• pp.241-262
• /
• 2006

The University libraries need to develop the balanced scorecard concerning general management in order to measure the total performance of the organization that measure not only quantity measurement based on resources and quality measurement based on information services but also effectiveness of resource utilization, efficiency ability providing the services and potential capability of the members adopting the diverse changes flexibility as organic organization under the rapidly changing circumstances nowadays. This study developed the BSC model into the four perspectives such as customer, resource, internal process, learning and growing modifying BSC model developed by Kaplan and Norton to fit university libraries as nonprofit organization and developed the strategic map and performance measurement indicators on the strategy of each perspective. Ultimately, this study tried to provide an integrated strategic management indicators providing comprehensive picture of university libraries from strategic plan to performance applying the BSC linking strategic plan.

• Information Systems Review
• /
• v.8 no.3
• /
• pp.245-259
• /
• 2006

In order to utilize BSC as an operational tool for communicating strategies across the hierarchies of the organization, a growing number of companies have tried to link BSC processes with other PI tools. Company D has carried out the SEM project to identify the causal structure between innovation activities and performance management in 2005 and 2006. The company synthesizes BSC and 6 Sigma methodologies at the BU level, and the new process made it possible to manage performances and make decision more "realistic" on the basis of information technologies. We expect that this study provide organizations, which have difficulties streamlining the performance management processes at the strategic level and those of operational level, with implications for realizing more "execution-oriented" RTE.

• Journal of Information Technology Applications and Management
• /
• v.13 no.1
• /
• pp.17-38
• /
• 2006

Recently, ASP business models based on Web services are attracting considerable attention and regarded as the next generation of the ASP business models. It is, however, undesirable for ASP users to adopt them simply because the Web services are the new trend in the IT world. Instead, an in-depth comparison of the benefits against the costs between the Web services based ASP business models and the traditional models are required. Furthermore, it is desirable that this comparative analysis should be applied from the ASP users' viewpoints rather than those of the government or ASP providers. So, we have applied a comparative ROI (Return on Investment) analysis from the ASP users' perspective and shown that the Web services based ASP business models (382%) are superior to the traditional models (280%) in terms of ROI. We have also employed Balanced Scorecard (BSC) framework to keep the balance between tangible and intangible benefits considering the characteristics of IT value measurement.

• The Journal of Information Systems
• /
• v.17 no.4
• /
• pp.79-98
• /
• 2008

FTTH(Fiber to The Home), a next generation communication service, is expected to boost up the growth of the whole IT industry and to creating new businesses by enabling the convergence of the broadcasting and communication technologies. It will consequently contribute to improve the quality of our life. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of EPFSD using the Balanced Scorecard(BSC) model with five perspectives which are known to have inherent relationship: regional economy, regional customer, regional process, innovation and growth in the region, and regional infrastructure. 16 critical success factors(CSFs) and 37 key performance indicators(KPIs) are developed based on the BSC model to measure the performance indicators of the EPFSD.

• Journal of Information Technology Applications and Management
• /
• v.16 no.2
• /
• pp.1-21
• /
• 2009

The balanced scorecard(BSC) framework is a tool for strategic decision making and task support that aims for efficiency in performance management and strategy execution. BSC evolved from an old performance management practice, which tended to be limited to a finance-only perspective, to a new system of corporate management looking at corporate tasks from a multi-dimensional, future-inclined value perspective. This form of BSC amounts to a framework capable of driving management innovation and renewing the ways in which companies conceive their strategy and perform their operations. Since BSC draws integrally on user participation, it can be expected that users' satisfaction with BSC systems is an important factor in systems' success or failure. However, previous studies of the BSC system have not yet considered it as a theoretical model, specifically examining BSC system and task characteristics. To date, only a few studies have put forward plans for the implementation and use of BSC systems, and these studies have the common limitation of failing to consider the circumstances or theoretical structure of the companies for which a BSC system is being proposed. This paper then begins to fill some of this gap by characterizing the BSC system from the perspective of contingency theories. Contingency theories can be particularly useful in the Korean context in exploring how different companies use the BSC system in ways determined by their unique environmental characteristics, which may also determine the performance factors behind the application of a company's particular BSC system. In order to provide concrete suggestions for implanting and using the BSC system from a contingency theory perspective, this study sets out to determine the relationships between the contingency variables affecting BSC system performance and BSC system property variables(in given cases) through an empirical analysis. The study takes into account the perspective from which contingency theory is to be applied in individual cases, sets contingency and BSC property variables with reference to the BSC system user's environment and BSC system's character, and frames initial hypotheses concerning corporate structure and environmental variables and BSC system performance variables with reference to previous studies. A survey was then conducted on users in Korean companies that have implemented the BSC system in order to verify the research model and understand results.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.10 no.8
• /
• pp.2103-2109
• /
• 2009

Balanced Scorecard(BSC) is one of the ways to estimate the achievement results of enterprises which, beyond the simple financial index traditionally used for enterprise achievement result management system, aims to estimate and manage the key perspectives for the future and goal achievement of enterprises as financial perspectives, customer perspectives, internal business perspectives, learning and growth perspectives with a fully consistent and balanced measure, and moreover manage their relationships regarding cause and effect on its basis. Introduction of BSC can be a profound implication for management strategies not only in that its introduction itself has numerous direct effects but also in the way of understanding whether or not its sequential relations exist. Thus this study focused on if the introduction of BSC is effectual, and if there exist any time-lag sequential relations between the effects. The results of the this study indicate that the introduction of BSC has positive effects on the internal business perspectives, learning and growth perspectives, financial perspectives, with the last aspect lasting longer. After dividing perspectives of BSC into leading indicator and lagging indicator, the analysis on if there was some relationships between two indicators was done. As a result, the introduction makes internal process improve first, which has positive effects on financial performance next.

• Journal of the Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society
• /
• v.25 no.3
• /
• pp.137-154
• /
• 2000

This paper suggests a balanced scorecard (BSC) framework for measuring and evaluating the performance of knowledge workers in professional service firms(PSFs) which are typical knowldege-based organizations. As a strategic learning system, the balanced scorecard allows business leaders to drive and modify their business strategies based on the balanced measurement of key performance indicators(KPIs), which are basically divided into four domains such as financial achievement, customer orientation, internal business process, and innovation and learning. Conducting a focused case study on performance evaluation of knowledge workers from a balanced viewpoint, we could evaluate their competency and potential in more comprehensive manner. We also employ the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach for derive relative weights of key performance indicators and link it to a spreadsheet model for rating the individual performance of knowledge workers in a systematic way.

• The Journal of Information Systems
• /
• v.17 no.2
• /
• pp.1-26
• /
• 2008

SCM is one of the important key issues in Internet-based business environment. This study intends to suggest a research model to measure the influence of environmental, organizational, information technology factors on organizational performance using the four perspectives of balanced scorecard (BSC). 9 independent variables and 4 dependent variables were adopted from existing literature review. 103 companies data were collected by survey. Four hypotheses in this study were generated to analyze the positive relationship of environmental, organizational, information systems on organizational performance with 4 perspectives of BSC. The results of hypothesis testing show as follows. First, organizational performance of learning and growth perspective has a positive influence of IS maturity, process innovation, top management support, use of SCM package, IS interoperability, and objectives sharing. Second organizational performance of infernal process perspective has a positive influence of process innovation, IS interoperability, objectives sharing, top management support, use of SCM package, competitiveness, and IS maturity. Third, organizational performance of customer perspective has a positive influence of IS interoperability, objectives sharing, process innovation, IS maturity, competitiveness, and use of SCM package. Finally, organizational performance of financial perspective has a positive influence of process in innovation, use of SCM package, IS maturity, objectives sharing, IS interoperability, and top management support. The contribution of this study is that it provides a conceptual framework and empirical evidences of the causal relationship between environmental, organizational, IS factor and organizational performance with 4 perspectives of BSC.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.5 no.5 s.21
• /
• pp.172-182
• /
• 2004

The performance measurement system of a company is an important tool to evaluate business result, to manage human resource and to achieve strategic management goals. Until 1990's, the performance in most of companies had been measured by financial perspectives. Recently non-financial perspectives with various and balanced view points are used. In the construction industry, the same situation is happened. However, effective tools are not developed yet. Therefore, this research proposes a framework of the comparable performance measurement in the construction industry. This framework is based on concept of the balanced scorecard(BSC) and prepared respectively for owner, contractor and architect/engineer Using this framework, it is possible to compare performance of a company with each other and to benchmark the best performance.

• Proceedings of the Korean Operations and Management Science Society Conference
• /
• 2002.05a
• /
• pp.809-816
• /
• 2002

전통적 재무제표가 기업의 재무적인 성과 측정에만 초점을 맞춘다는 한계를 극복하기 위한 방법으로서 BSC(Balanced Scorecard)가 제시되었다. BSC는 KPI(Key Performance Indicator)들의 상관관계가 명확하고 논리적이라는 장점 때문에 정부 및 기업의 다양한 분야에서 적용되어왔다. 이러한 BSC는 KPI를 통해 측정된 값의 비교에 대한 고려를 하고 있지 않으므로 다수 조직의 성과를 비교하기에 어려움이 있다. 조직의 효율성을 rPfidd적으로 나타내는 여러 기법 중, 경영과학 기법을 이용한 DEA의 경우 다수의 측정 지표를 단일의 통합된 성과 측정 지표 (Aggregate Performance Measure)_로 나타낼 수 있다는 장점이 있으나, DEA에 고려되는 입력 및 출력의 개수에 제한이 있으며 다수 조직의 분석에 사용해야 한다는 단점이 있다. 본 연구에서는, 재무적인 요소와 비재무적인 요소를 포괄하여 조직간의 효율성을 비교하기 위한 벙법으로서, DEA를 이용한 효율성 평가에 조직의 성과측정 기법인 BSC가 제공하는 KPI 간의 노릴적 인과관계(cause-and-effect relationship)와 측정 지표를 이용하는 방법으로 CDB(Combined DEA and BSC methodology)를 제안한다. 이를 위하여 BSC 정보 비교 가능한 형태로 바꾸는 방법을 제시하며, 기존 DEA가 지니는 입력 및 출력 변수 개수의 증가에 따른 효율성의 구분능력의 감소와 관련된 한계를 극복할 수 있는 방법을 제시한다.