• 대한수학교육학회지:수학교육학연구
• /
• 제24권3호
• /
• pp.333-357
• /
• 2014

본 연구에서 제시하는 무게중심 확인실험 프로그램개발은 2013년 '동국대학교 과학영재교육원'에서 융합형 영재프로그램으로 개발되어 초등 영재학생 10개 집단 120명과 중등수학영재학생 24명을 대상으로 진행되었다. 무게중심 확인실험은 한국 과학창의재단에서 제시하는 융합형인재교육(STEAM) 학습준거 틀에서 수행된 3단계 과정을 이행하여 창의적 융합교육의 효과를 극대화하였다. 본 연구가 갖는 3가지 특징은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 연구에서 새롭게 개발된 무게중심 확인실험은 수학과 물리가 융합된 교육방식이다. 둘째, 실험에 사용되는 모형은 학생들의 능동적 활동으로 창의적인 모형 설계가 가능하다. 셋째, 무게중심 확인실험 프로그램은 학습 능력에 따라 수준별 수업으로서 전환이 가능하다. 위에서 제시한 특성들을 바탕으로 무게중심 확인실험을 통하여 창의적 융합교육의 효과를 극대화시킨다. 설문조사 결과는 주어진 지식을 단순 암기하는 학습에서 벗어나 실험에 필요한 배경지식 이해, 실험 설계, 실험 과정, 실험 결과의 단계를 거쳐 학습된다. 설문조사와 학생들의 실험 후 토의 결과, 현재 수학 또는 과학 교육과정이 제시하는 무게중심 학습과 비교하여, 새롭게 개발된 융합형 프로그램이 교육의 효과가 뛰어남을 보여 준다. 본 연구는 수학이 다른 교과영역과 융합되는 새로운 융합형 교육방식을 제시한다. 특히 무게중심을 찾고 이를 확인하는 새로운 형태를 제시한다. 결론적으로 교수자와 학습자가 모두 만족할 수 있는 새로운 무게중심 교육의 틀을 제시한다.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제36권4호
• /
• pp.379-393
• /
• 2017

This study analyzed the relationship between self-directedness of science-gifted elementary students and their expression of scientific creativity in science-gifted class. A science-gifted program on the topic of Hydraulic Machine was implemented to 34 fifth-graders in the Science-Gifted Education Center of an education office in Seoul, Korea for four weeks. The self-directedness of the gifted students was divided into three types of 'General, Scientific, and Topic-Related Self-Directedness'. The products of the students' activities were assessed by using a scientific creativity assessment formula. Qualitative research, such as analysis of observations and interviews, was also conducted in order to identify characteristics that were not apparently revealed by quantitative data. The main results of this study are as follows: First, science-gifted elementary students' general self-directedness and their scientific creativity were significantly correlated (r=.373). Second, the students' scientific self-directedness and scientific creativity did not have a significant correlation (r=.294). Third, there was a positive correlation between the students' topic-related self-directedness and their expression of scientific creativity. Their self-rated scores (r=.420) for the topic-related self-directedness and the number of activity types associated with the topic had a positive correlation (r=.350). Fourth, the students were categorized into four groups according to the levels of their self-directedness and scientific creativity, and the result showed that Type HH (high self-directedness and high scientific creativity) was the most common type (15 students, 38.5%), followed by Type LL (low self-directedness and low scientific creativity) (11 students, 28.2%). Eight (20.5%) and five students (12.8 %) belonged to Type LH (low self-directedness and high scientific creativity) and Type HL (high self-directedness and low scientific creativity) respectively. Fifth, the classroom observation of the students in groups revealed that groups with more number of Type HH demonstrated better cooperation and performance. Sixth, the analysis results of the observation were almost matched to the results of the self-directedness and scientific creativity tests. The students with higher self-directedness demonstrated active class participation and good cooperative skills. The students with higher scientific creativity had a tendency to generate creative ideas more frequently in given situations. Seventh, dynamic activities were perceived as enjoyable and exciting by 76.9% of the students, but static activities that require creativity were regarded as interesting only by 23.1% of the students. Among the students who were satisfied with both the creative and static activities, Type HH accounted for the largest proportion (55.6%). In conclusion, factors such as students' interests, initiatives, and attitudes displayed through voluntary participations originated from their own daily life can predict the degree of scientific creativity associated with the topic. Also, when students were categorized into four types according to the level of self-directedness and scientific creativity, there was a tendency of active behavior in class, cooperative skill, and activity satisfaction. This suggested that we should consider self-directedness and scientific creativity in selecting the gifted, grouping them in class, and designing and executing programs for science-gifted elementary students.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제32권4호
• /
• pp.567-580
• /
• 2013

This study is to activate gifted students' brains for creativity ability and also an integrated science and art teaching program. The learning programs integrating science and art, which have 30 periods and 10 topics on art and the knowledge of science, were developed dependant on five steps - observing, having interests and curiosity, experimental designing and performing, internalizing, and expressing in an arts-based manner. This programs were applied to 20 senior gifted students in Y Elementary School in Gyeonggi province, by one group pretest-posttest design. The results from these integrated programs of science and art are as follows: First, in the performance of science tasks, prefrontal lobe(F7, FT7) of left brain increase the relative power of theta wave, whereas in the performance of drawing tasks increase the relative power of beta wave in prefrontal lobe(FP1) of left brain, bilateral frontal(F7, F3, Fz, F4, F8, FT7, FC3, FCz), bilateral temporal(T7, TP7, TP8, P7), parietal lobe of left brain(CP3, CPz, P3, Pz), bilateral occipital(O1, Oz, O2). Second, in the performance of science tasks, the relative power of beta wave activity in the left temporal lobe(T7) of the brains of talented students in science significantly decreased whereas it was greatly activated in another part, the left frontal lobe(F3) of the brain (p<.05). Third, in the performance of drawing tasks, the relative power of theta wave activity in five areas of the brain, namely the left temporal lobe(T7), the left frontal lobe(F3), the right frontal lobe(F4), and the left and right parietal lobes of gifted students in science who took the course of the integrated programs, was considerably increased statistically(p<.05). On top of that, these programs were especially effective in balancing the symmetrical development of both cerebral hemispheres by multiplying theta wave activity in the frontal lobes(F3, F4) and the parietal lobes(CP3, P3, P4), which are particularly related to creative thinking. According to the results of this study of brain-based teaching strategies combining science and art, it is an effective program to develop overall activate gifted students' brains for creativity ability. This is expected to be utilized to activate the brain areas for creativity of gifted students in science.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제39권3호
• /
• pp.382-398
• /
• 2020

This study aims to analyze the relationship between scientific content knowledge of science-gifted elementary students and their expression of scientific creativity, and the characteristics of divided groups according to the levels of their scientific content knowledge and scientific creativity. A science-gifted program was implemented to 33 forth-graders in the Science-Gifted Education Center of an education office in Seoul, Korea. The method of evaluating scientific knowledge was divided into well-structured paper-pencil test (asking specific and limited range of content knowledge of plants) and ill-structured descriptive test (stating all the knowledge they know about plants) to find out which methods were more related to scientific creativity. In addition, in order to find out the characteristics of each group according to the level of scientific content knowledge and scientific creativity, students were required to answer a questionnaire about their own self-perception of scientific knowledge and scientific creativity and how to obtain scientific knowledge. The main results of this study are as follows. First, Both well-structured paper-pencil test (r=.38) and ill-structured descriptive test (r=.51) results of elementary science gifted students were significantly correlated with scientific creativity. Second, As a result of the regression analysis on scientific creativity of science-gifted elementary students, both the knowledge measured by the two evaluation methods have the ability to explain scientific creativity. Third, the students were categorized into four groups according to the levels of their scientific content knowledge and their expression of scientific creativity, and the result showed that the higher the knowledge of science, the higher the scientific creativity. Fourth, the description about self-perception of scientific knowledge revealed that the highest percentage of Type LL students of all 13 students (53.8%, 7 students) answered 'I have little knowledge of plants because I have little interest in them.' Fifth, the description about self-perception of scientific knowledge revealed that the highest percentage of Type HH students of all 15 students (40%, 6 students) answered 'I think my science creativity is high through my experience of scientific creativity. Sixth, the responses to the Questionnaire revealed that 'reading' was the most popular way to obtain scientific knowledge, with 27 out of total 33 students choosing it. In particular, all 18 students from Type HH (high scientific knowledge and high scientific creativity) and Type HL (high scientific knowledge and low scientific creativity) - those with high scientific knowledge - gave that response. On the basis of this research, we should explore practical teaching methods and environment for gifted students to improve their scientific creativity by revealing the nature of the factors that affect scientific creativity and analyzing relationship between knowledge and scientific creativity.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제24권2호
• /
• pp.103-110
• /
• 2005

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relation between the learning styles and science process skills of students of the gifted class in elementary school. Subjects were forty-eight students of the gifted class who are in the fifth grade studying at the gifted class of S elementary school in Bucheon, M and Y elementary school in Incheon on learning styles and science process skills of students. Learning Style Profile (LSP) was used as instrument to survey learning style of students of the gifted class which was developed by NASSP, and consists of four categories (cognitive skills, perceptual response, orientation and teaming preferences) and twenty-four subscales. The results of this study were as follows: 1. In the learning styles test, students of the gifted class have higher scores of spatial skill, sequential processing skill, persistence orientation, manipulative preference, temperature preference and afternoon preference than general class students, but they have lower scores of discrimination skill and lighting preference, and there were statistically significant difference. 2. In science process skills test, there were statistically significant difference between students of the gifted class and general students. 3. In the correlation between the learning styles and science process skills, there was positive correlation of observing skill with spatial skill and manipulate skill of cognitive skill domain. For classifying skill, there was positive correlation with visual perceptual response, but was negative correlations with auditory and emotive perceptual response of perceptual response domain and with evening preference and verbal risk orientation of study preference domain. For measuring skill, there was positive correlation with sequential processing skill of cognitive skill domain. For formulating hypotheses, there was controlling variables, there was positive correlation with sequential processing skill and simultaneous processing skill of cognitive skill domain, and with verbal-spatial preference and early morning study preference of study preference domain. When planning and managing the gifted class, it will be beneficial and effective to consider the meaningful relations between the elements of loaming style and science process skills in order to improve science process skills.

• 영재교육연구
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.81-98
• /
• 2001

본 연구의 목적은 스포츠영재의 판별과 관련된 다양한 연구된 결과들을 고찰하여 스포츠영재를 판별하고, 육성할 수 있는 현실적 방안과 장기적으로 연구되어야 할 과제를 제시하는 것이다. 스포츠영재의 발굴과 육성에 관한 연구는 주로 구 동독과 구 소련 등의 공산권 국가들에서 이루어졌다. 이들의 보고서와 그 모델에 대한 평가논문 등이 본 과제의 주요 분석 대상들이었다. 이들 자료에 대한 분석을 근거로 다음과 같은 스포츠영재 선발방안을 제시하고자 한다. -선발시기와 관련하여서는, 1차선발과 2차선발의 2단계로 나누어 선발함이 타당하겠다. 1차선발은, 일반학교에서 교내스포츠영재집단을 형성하여 자기 잠재력의 검정과정을 거치게 함을 목적으로 하고, 2차선발은 드디어 특수목적학교로의 진학을 위한 선발검사로서 기능하도록 한다. -선발방법은 초기에는 잠재력중심으로 평가가 이루어져야 하며 성장과정에 따라 전문 종목의 특성을 고려하여야 한다. 그리고 선발의 구성요소로는 체력적 요소, 성장발육상태, 심리적 요소, 환경적 요소 등을 포괄적으로 고려하여야 한다. -육성체제는 초등학교 시기에는 학교내 스포츠영재집단 운영체제가 합당하고, 중학교부터는 특수목적학교를 운영하되 초, 중, 고의 인적 구성은 피라미드형이 되도록 하여야 한다. -스포츠영재의 교육과정은, 어린 나이일 때에는 기초적인 체력육성에 치중하고, 고학년이 되면서 점차 전문화되어 가도록 하여야 한다. -스포츠영재의 판별 및 육성과 관련하여 지속적인 연구가 요구되는 바, 다중지능(multiple intelligences : MI)적 접근으로 신체-운동감각적 지능(bodily-kinesthetic intelligence)의 구체화와 검사도구의 개발이 요구되며. 한편으로는 DNA분석을 통한 보다 엄밀한 유전적 소인을 판별할 수 있는 방안을 강구하여야 할 것이다.

• 대한수학교육학회지:학교수학
• /
• 제10권1호
• /
• pp.63-78
• /
• 2008

본 연구는 대수의 일반화 과제를 해결하는 2명의 초등학교 6학년 수학영재가 보여주는 사고 과정을 조사하고 이미지가 문제 해결에 미치는 영향을 분석한 것이다. 학습자가 생성한 이미지는 개별적 사례에 대한 구체적 이미지, 구체적 이미지를 변형한 역동적 이미지와 패턴 이미지로 구분할 수 있었다. 본 연구에서는 또한 문제해결 과정 동안 이미지의 생성과 변형이 어떻게 이루어지며, 시각적 사고와 분석적사고 사이에서 이미지가 어떠한 역할을 하는지 분석하였다. 분석 결과, 이미지는 시각적 사고와 분석적 사고의 상호 작용 속에서 생성되고 변형되면서, 정교화되고 구체화됨을 알 수 있었다. 그리고 동시에 이미지는 시각적 사고에서 분석적 사고로, 분석적 사고에서 시각적 사고로 나아가게 하는 원동력임을 확인할 수 있었다.

• 대한수학교육학회지:학교수학
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.85-103
• /
• 2016

이 연구는 5학년 영재반 수업에서 TI-73 그래핑 계산기의 지오보드를 사용하여 Pick의 공식을 찾아가는 과정에서 나타난 수업담화로부터 논증과 논증활동의 특성을 알아보고자 하였다. 분석을 위한 자료는 수업 비디오, 음성녹음록, 활동지가 있으며 Toulmin의 논증 도식을 분석의 준거로 사용하였다. 연구 결과 그래핑 계산기의 지오보드는 주어진 조건의 다양한 격자다각형에 대한 넓이를 계산해줌으로써 실험과 관찰의 환경을 조성하고 '자료${\rightarrow}$주장'의 구성과 이의 정당화를 위한 보증, 지지, 한정어, 반박의 논증활동을 유발시키는 도구적 역할을 하였다. 경계점의 수와 내점의 수로 Pick의 공식을 유도할 때 '집단적 논증'의 방식이 나타났으며 교사는 논증활동을 지휘하는 역할, 지식을 판단하는 권위자의 역할을 하였다.

• 정보교육학회논문지
• /
• 제25권6호
• /
• pp.871-878
• /
• 2021

본 연구에서는 가구의 월평균 전체 사교육비와 소프트웨어 및 인공지능 관련 사교육비, 그리고 학업성취 간 관계를 분석하여 소프트웨어 교육의 양극화 실태를 조명하였다. 이를 위해 전국의 초등학생 자녀를 둔 학부모 2,780명을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하여 자료를 수집하였으며 상관분석과 차이검증을 수행하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 소프트웨어 교육 참여 여부에 따라 자녀의 학업성취도에는 통계적으로 유의미한 차이가 나타났다. 둘째, 자녀의 학업성취도가 높을수록 소프트웨어 사교육에 참여하는 비율도 현격히 증가하는 경향성을 확인하였다. 셋째, 총 사교육비와 소프트웨어 관련 사교육비는 유의미한 정적 상관이 있었다. 넷째, 소프트웨어 사교육비와 학업성취도 간에는 통계적으로 유의미하지는 않았으나 정적 상관이 존재하는 것으로 드러났다. 본 연구를 통하여 학부모는 공교육에서 제공하는 소프트웨어 교육이 충분하지 않은 탓에 사교육 참여와 그 지출 규모를 늘리고 있고, 가구소득에 따라 미래 인재로 성장하기 위한 주요 역량을 키우는 데에 격차가 존재한다는 문제가 있음을 확인하였다.

• 대한지구과학교육학회지
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.99-109
• /
• 2014

The purpose of this study was to obtain consensus from the expert community on the aims of Elementary Science Classes for the Gifted(ESCG) and teaching professionalism of Elementary Science Teachers for the Gifted(ESTG). For the delphi study, nineteen experts were consulted with open-ended and closed questions. Delphi research was conducted a total of 3 times. The Delphi survey was done by e-mail. The experts can express their opinions freely during the research. The results of this study were as follows : First, there were six aims for ESCG. The six aims of ESCG are scientific inquiry ability growth, creative problem solving ability growth, primary science gifted's giftedness development, the future science-talented-children training, the growth of attitudes toward science, scientific attitudes growth. Second, there were four teaching professionalism about teaching professionalism of ESTG. Four teaching professionalism are understanding the characteristics of primary science gifted, the ability to understand and apply the learning methods suitable for primary science gifted education, professional knowledge and ability to understand the science curriculum, the ability to develop and apply primary science education programs.