Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education (대한지구과학교육학회지)

The Korean Society of Earth Science Education (대한지구과학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Setting on Aims of Elementary Science Gifted Classes and Teaching Professionalism of Elementary Science Gifted Teachers through Delphi Method

델파이 기법을 통한 초등과학 영재수업의 목적과 담당교사의 수업전문성 설정

  • Received : 2013.11.01
  • Accepted : 2013.12.31
  • Published : 2014.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to obtain consensus from the expert community on the aims of Elementary Science Classes for the Gifted(ESCG) and teaching professionalism of Elementary Science Teachers for the Gifted(ESTG). For the delphi study, nineteen experts were consulted with open-ended and closed questions. Delphi research was conducted a total of 3 times. The Delphi survey was done by e-mail. The experts can express their opinions freely during the research. The results of this study were as follows : First, there were six aims for ESCG. The six aims of ESCG are scientific inquiry ability growth, creative problem solving ability growth, primary science gifted's giftedness development, the future science-talented-children training, the growth of attitudes toward science, scientific attitudes growth. Second, there were four teaching professionalism about teaching professionalism of ESTG. Four teaching professionalism are understanding the characteristics of primary science gifted, the ability to understand and apply the learning methods suitable for primary science gifted education, professional knowledge and ability to understand the science curriculum, the ability to develop and apply primary science education programs.

Keywords

References

  1. An jin-sang(2011). Developing evaluation criteria for historic gardens preservation condition by applying delphi technique and analytic hierarchy process. Sungkyunkwan University Graduate School of Education.
  2. Bak seong-ik(2003). Desired direction and challenges of Gifted and Talented Education. Seoul Education Training Institute.
  3. Bak seong-ik(2003). The direction and issue of Gifted teaching-learning methods development. Korea Institute of gifted education, International Conference kit on Gifted Science.
  4. Borland, J, H.(1997). The Construct of Giftedness. Peabody Journal of Education,72(3and4).
  5. Choi byeong-mo(2005). Articles : A desired survey and anaiysis of goals and content system of schools' economic education in the 21th century. Theory and Research in Citizenship Education, 37(10).
  6. Choi kyu-ri(2012). The Direction of Science Gifted Education based on Creativity and Character. The Korean Society of Elementary Science Education, 32(7). https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.7.1169
  7. Choi won-gyeong(2009). Study English Gifted Through the Delphi method. Korea University Graduate School of Education.
  8. Gwon eon-geun, Kim yun-kyung(2009). Researches of the Science Education for the Gifted in Korea - from 1980 to 2008. Science Gifted Education, 1(2).
  9. Jeon seong-jin(2007). Searching for the Quality of Elementary School Teacher in the Future Society. the Study of Elementary Education, 14(1).
  10. Jo seok-hui, Kim hong-won, Bak seong-ik, Kim tae-seo (2000). Gifted and Talented long-term comprehensive development plan. Korea Educational Development Institute CR2000-17.
  11. Ju in-jung, Bak dong-yeol, Jin mi-seok(2010). Areas based on job skills and Research achievement standards. Korea Research Institute for Vocational Education and Training.
  12. Kim mi-sook(2007). The first comprehensive plan gifted assessments and long-term prospects for the Promotion Study. Seoul:Korea Educational Development Institute.
  13. Kim mi-sook, Bak hyo-jeong, Yu hyo-hyeon, Jeon mi-ran, Bak chun-seong(2006). Gifted for Leadership in fostering basic research and program developmentII. Seoul:Korea Educational Development Institute.
  14. Lawshe, C. H (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28.
  15. Lee bong-woo, Son jeong-woo, Choi won-jo, yiinho, Jeon young-seok, Choi jeong-hun(2008). The Korean Society of Elementary Science Education, 27(3).
  16. Lee jong-seong(2006). Delphi Method. Kyoyookbook.
  17. Lee Yun-jo(2009). The Development of Evaluation Criteria for the Environmental Education Programs at the Elementary and Secondary Schools. Seoul University Graduate School of Education.
  18. Okoli, C., and Pawlowski, S. D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Information and Management, 42(1).
  19. Renzulli, J. S.(2004). Expanding the umbrella: An interview with Joseph Renzulli. Gifted Child Today, 31(2).
  20. Rowe, Gene, Wright, George(1999). The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis. International journal of forecasting, 15(4).
  21. Seo ye-won, Lee jae-bun, Yu gyeong-jae, Jeong young-ok, Park Ji-eun, Lee Kyung-sook(2012). the Third Gifted Education Research Development Comprehensive Plan. The Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity.
  22. Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education(2013). 2013 Science, environment, gifted education major work plan. Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education.

Cited by

  1. Development of a survey form through Delphi study about adverse events associated with the miniscalpel needle, for application in prospective observational studies regarding safety of miniscalpel needles vol.97, pp.41, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012736