• The Journal of Sustainable Design and Educational Environment Research
• /
• v.17 no.3
• /
• pp.9-16
• /
• 2018

This research is intended to propose future research directions by identifying differences between Korea and China's public facilities at the time of introduction and presenting improvement measures by comparing the criteria for green building certification. The study focuses on the comparison of Korea's G-SEED 2016 and China's ESGB 2014. For data related to green building certification in Korea, refer to the Construction Technology Research Institute Green Building Certification Criteria 2016 v1.2 Guide for New Housing. A study on the Green Building Certification System in China referred to the Green Building Assessment Standards. Comparisons were made between G-SEED 2016 general building certification review criteria and ESGB 2014 public facility certification criteria, and certification methods, essential items and specialties for each area.

• The Journal of Sustainable Design and Educational Environment Research
• /
• v.14 no.3
• /
• pp.1-8
• /
• 2015

This study has certified green school facility into a target of 10 cases, and obtain a certificate of our own sector application, and scoring rate of Green Building Certification Analyze problems is derived. The study in Green Building Certification by School Facilities through the plan is aimed at providing basic data for designers and associated personnel. This study of Eco-friendly School Buildings and subsequent certification review and evaluation based on the study improved through active to expect.

• Land and Housing Review
• /
• v.4 no.4
• /
• pp.435-447
• /
• 2013

This study aims to propose basic data for improvements that can actively respond to climate change in the Green Building Certifications that came into effect in March 2013, including the analysis of evaluation criteria and applications. In response to climate change, Green Building Certifications in developed countries such as BREEAM(UK), LEED(USA), DGNB(Germany), and CASBEE(Japan), have been extended to the neighborhood unit or city levels, i.e., BREEAM Communities, LEED Neighborhood Development, DGNB Stadtquartiere, CASBEE Urban Development. On the other hand, for the Green Building Certifications in Korea, some criteria such as indoor environment and energy have been given more emphasis than others such as external environment(land use, traffic, ecological environment). In addition, results from the analysis of the evaluation scores on the external environment of 79 housing complexes show that the score on the indoor environment and energy determines the evaluation grade, whereas the score on the external environment is less weighted and has less impact. Therefore, the new evaluation system for the Green Building Certifications responding to climate change should be extended from building level to urban district levels.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.15 no.10
• /
• pp.6354-6365
• /
• 2014

This study aims to suggest a direction to develop Korea's certification system by comparing the evaluation items between Korea's G-SEED (Green Standard for Energy & Environmental Design) and Germany's sustainable building certification. A number of eco-friendly building certification systems are being implemented globally. On the other hand, mutually comparable evaluation items have not been suggested up until now. Therefore, international standards have been trying to establish evaluation criteria for eco-friendly buildings, and Germany's sustainable building certification is the first certification standard that has accepted those evaluation criteria. According to the result of comparing Korea's green building certification with Germany's sustainable certification, the green building certification has evaluation items not only on environmentality (62.6%), but also on social aspects (25.4%) and economic aspects (3.0%). This suggests a crucial direction to the development of evaluation items regarding the social and economic aspects of green building certification.

• The Journal of Sustainable Design and Educational Environment Research
• /
• v.16 no.1
• /
• pp.12-19
• /
• 2017

This study investigates and analyzes the current status of green building certification (ESGB) in China, which is experiencing serious environmental pollution due to rapid economic development as an international pending issue for green growth, It is a basic research. This will be used as a resource to contribute to the reduction of carbon emissions in the future construction sector. The research method is to investigate the status of green building certification and the types of facilities in the whole of China, and to examine the evaluation criteria and items of ESGB 2014 and analyze the differences with ESGB 2006. Most of the research methods are based on the literature review and refer to the website of China Green Building Evaluation and the data of China Urban Science Institute.

• The Journal of Sustainable Design and Educational Environment Research
• /
• v.13 no.1
• /
• pp.41-49
• /
• 2014

Currently G-SEED certification standards was in an effort to building energy-saving and carbon emissions reduction. In this study, focusing on school facilities to suggest an alternative improve green building certification standards through data analysis and conduct an expert Delphi survey. In this study, evaluation of the existing areas of green building certification 7-5 suggest that one out. There are five proposed areas of ecology, health, function, energy and resources. Further it can add areas of economics and $LCCO_2$. Through the assessment items of foreign certification standards evaluated to the feasibility of introducing in Korea. Furthermore taking into account the characteristics of each class, kindergarten, elementary, primary, middle and high schools, College or University were broken down by purpose.

• Journal of The Korea Institute of Healthcare Architecture
• /
• v.24 no.4
• /
• pp.89-94
• /
• 2018

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.19 no.12
• /
• pp.203-214
• /
• 2019

Green building certification is being implemented in various countries around the world for the purpose of securing sustainability and reducing energy use and carbon emissions. Korea has been implementing G-SEED, a green building certification, for buildings since 2002, but in foreign countries, the evaluation target has been expanded from buildings to neighborhood units, cities, and infrastructure. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to establish Korean green building certification system in terms of neighborhood scale. In order to make Korean certification scheme for neighborhood communities, three major international certification systems (BREEAM Communities, LEED-ND, and CASBEE-UD) were compared. Comparison was executed about definitions and goals, certification system and range, certification categories, and regulation relationship by literature review. Based on the results, the evaluation system proposal including the scope, subjects, and items for green building certification in Korea was proposed.

• The Journal of Sustainable Design and Educational Environment Research
• /
• v.14 no.3
• /
• pp.9-17
• /
• 2015

In this paper, there are several analysis on G-SEED, Building Energy Efficiency Rating System, Energy Performance Index, Energy Saving Plan about how they are applied by classification and planning standard. The analysis result found out that G-SEED has low select percentage by having difficulties to managing and additional cost when the each class is selected. And also, Building Energy Efficiency Rating System in school is planed in comparably simple design and similar size and also mostly uses high efficient machines, which was in high lever comparing to the system in facilities in other uses. In the case of EPI, there are differences on acquiring grades by each region. Especially, Gyung-gi region has a low grade on architecture part comparing to other parts, which seems to acquire more grades by strengthen insulation performance. By the result from the three standards, many facilities has only formal plan to pass the required standard without considering specialities of each buildings, which has a tendency to have a pattern to have a minimum criteria. However, School has a symbolic building which has a obligation to be the base of the aim for growing green energy buildings and green education for students. Therefore, planning with understanding of specialities of the facility, having various and rational evaluation standards from the planning of the building is necessary.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.18 no.1
• /
• pp.27-36
• /
• 2017

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport established Heating and cooling energy conservation plan of apartment for 2017, reducing 90% compared to energy consumption of 1990. Also, at 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference, the Ministry announced to reduce 37% of estimated $CO^2$ emission(850 million ton) at 2030. To satisfy this, it is urgent to reduce $CO^2$ emission due to the building, which takes majority amount of total $CO^2$ emission, and public interest for the commissioning of intensified building performance is uprising. However, the building commissioning at construction is not enacted, and not activated due to the lackness of promotion and will of general contractor. Furthermore, commissioning is not mandatory for obtaining G-SEED certification. Therefore, this paper describes effectiveness of commissioning with comparison of commissioning evaluation criteria of G-SEED with LEED and BREEAM, to propose making commissioning as mandatory process and drive changes in perception among stakeholders for activation of domestic building commissioning.