• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.15 no.10
• /
• pp.6354-6365
• /
• 2014

This study aims to suggest a direction to develop Korea's certification system by comparing the evaluation items between Korea's G-SEED (Green Standard for Energy & Environmental Design) and Germany's sustainable building certification. A number of eco-friendly building certification systems are being implemented globally. On the other hand, mutually comparable evaluation items have not been suggested up until now. Therefore, international standards have been trying to establish evaluation criteria for eco-friendly buildings, and Germany's sustainable building certification is the first certification standard that has accepted those evaluation criteria. According to the result of comparing Korea's green building certification with Germany's sustainable certification, the green building certification has evaluation items not only on environmentality (62.6%), but also on social aspects (25.4%) and economic aspects (3.0%). This suggests a crucial direction to the development of evaluation items regarding the social and economic aspects of green building certification.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.19 no.12
• /
• pp.203-214
• /
• 2019

Green building certification is being implemented in various countries around the world for the purpose of securing sustainability and reducing energy use and carbon emissions. Korea has been implementing G-SEED, a green building certification, for buildings since 2002, but in foreign countries, the evaluation target has been expanded from buildings to neighborhood units, cities, and infrastructure. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to establish Korean green building certification system in terms of neighborhood scale. In order to make Korean certification scheme for neighborhood communities, three major international certification systems (BREEAM Communities, LEED-ND, and CASBEE-UD) were compared. Comparison was executed about definitions and goals, certification system and range, certification categories, and regulation relationship by literature review. Based on the results, the evaluation system proposal including the scope, subjects, and items for green building certification in Korea was proposed.

• The Journal of Sustainable Design and Educational Environment Research
• /
• v.14 no.3
• /
• pp.1-8
• /
• 2015

This study has certified green school facility into a target of 10 cases, and obtain a certificate of our own sector application, and scoring rate of Green Building Certification Analyze problems is derived. The study in Green Building Certification by School Facilities through the plan is aimed at providing basic data for designers and associated personnel. This study of Eco-friendly School Buildings and subsequent certification review and evaluation based on the study improved through active to expect.

• 월간 기계설비
• /
• s.318
• /
• pp.56-58
• /
• 2017

국토교통부는 녹색건축물 조성지원법 시행령 시행규칙을 개정하고 1월 20일부터 제로에너지건축물 인증제 시행에 들어간다. 제로에너지건축물은 고단열 건축자재와 신재생에너지를 결합하여 외부 에너지 유입을 최소화 한 건축물로 건축주는 인증을 원할 경우 인증기관에 신청하여 제로에너지건축물 인증을 받을 수 있으며, 인증받은 건축물에 대해서는 용적률 완화, 신재생에너지 설치보조금, 기부채납 부담률 완화 등의 인센티브가 제공된다.

• The Journal of Sustainable Design and Educational Environment Research
• /
• v.17 no.3
• /
• pp.9-16
• /
• 2018

This research is intended to propose future research directions by identifying differences between Korea and China's public facilities at the time of introduction and presenting improvement measures by comparing the criteria for green building certification. The study focuses on the comparison of Korea's G-SEED 2016 and China's ESGB 2014. For data related to green building certification in Korea, refer to the Construction Technology Research Institute Green Building Certification Criteria 2016 v1.2 Guide for New Housing. A study on the Green Building Certification System in China referred to the Green Building Assessment Standards. Comparisons were made between G-SEED 2016 general building certification review criteria and ESGB 2014 public facility certification criteria, and certification methods, essential items and specialties for each area.

• 월간 기계설비
• /
• s.288
• /
• pp.81-82
• /
• 2014

국토교통부(장관 서승환)는 그린리모델링 사업지원 및 효율적 건물 에너지 관리 방안 등을 담은 '녹색건축물 조성지원법'을 일부 개정해 지난 5월 28일 공포했다. 이로써 정부는 녹색건축물 시공 전문기업을 지원할 뿐만 아니라, 에너지 절약적이고 친환경적인 건축물의 보급 활성화를 위하여 일정규모 이상의 건축물을 건축하는 경우에는 녹색건축 에너지효율등급 인증을 받도록 하고, 건축물 에너지 소비 절감을 위한 고효율 냉 난방 장치 설치를 의무화했다.

• 월간 기계설비
• /
• s.239
• /
• pp.28-30
• /
• 2010

국토해양부(장관 정종환)와 환경부(장관 이만의)는 6개 용도의 신축건축물에만 가능했던 친환경건축물 인증을 모든 용도의 신축건축물에 가능토록 하는 "친환경건축물의 인증에 관한 규칙" 개정안을 지난 5월17일 개정 공포('10.7.1 시행)했다. 이번 개정안은 저탄소 녹색건축물의 공급을 활성화하기 위해 모든 용도의 신축건축물에 대한 친환경인증[공공건축물(1만$m^2$ 이상)은 의무화, 민간건축물은 자발적 참여로 운영] 평가기준 마련과 인증기관의 전문성 강화 등을 주요내용으로 하고 있으며, 취 등록세 감면 등 인센티브 제도가 원활히 시행될 수 있도록 인증시기 및 절차를 개선하고, 인증등급을 세분화(2 $\rightarrow$ 4등급)하는 내용도 포함됐다. 국토해양부와 환경부는 이번 조치로 민간분야의 경우 본인들이 인센티브를 받기를 원하는 경우에는 친환경건축물 인증을 받을 수 있도록 하는 등 민간분야의 친환경설계를 적극 유도할 수 있는 기반을 마련했으며, "친환경건축물의 인증에 관한 규칙"의 차질 없는 시행을 위해 7월 1일까지 "친환경건축물 인증기준" (국토해양부, 환경부 공동 고시)을 개정할 계획이다. 한편, 내년부터는 기존 건축물도 친환경건축물 인증을 받을 수 있도록 그 대상범위를 확대해 나갈 예정이다.

• KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
• /
• v.41 no.3
• /
• pp.289-296
• /
• 2021

The Korean construction industry has been implementing G-SEED, a certification system that evaluates the environmental properties of buildings for the purpose of reducing environmental burdens such as energy and resource consumption and pollutant emissions. Also, creating a pleasant environment in general is one more purpose of G-SEED certification system. However, G-SEED certification in practice is difficult and time consuming due to the complexity of the certification acquisition process coupled with little economic consideration for the materials of each certification item. Therefore, in this study, we present a model for the optimal selection of materials and economic assessment using a genetic algorithm. The development of the model involves building a material database based on life-cycle costing (LCC) targeted at "Application of Indoor Air Pollutant Low Emission Material" from G-SEED. Next, the model was validated using a real non-residential building case study. The result shows an average cost reduction rate of 74.5 % compared with the existing cost. This model is expected to be used as an economically efficient tool in G-SEED.

• The Journal of Sustainable Design and Educational Environment Research
• /
• v.14 no.3
• /
• pp.9-17
• /
• 2015

In this paper, there are several analysis on G-SEED, Building Energy Efficiency Rating System, Energy Performance Index, Energy Saving Plan about how they are applied by classification and planning standard. The analysis result found out that G-SEED has low select percentage by having difficulties to managing and additional cost when the each class is selected. And also, Building Energy Efficiency Rating System in school is planed in comparably simple design and similar size and also mostly uses high efficient machines, which was in high lever comparing to the system in facilities in other uses. In the case of EPI, there are differences on acquiring grades by each region. Especially, Gyung-gi region has a low grade on architecture part comparing to other parts, which seems to acquire more grades by strengthen insulation performance. By the result from the three standards, many facilities has only formal plan to pass the required standard without considering specialities of each buildings, which has a tendency to have a pattern to have a minimum criteria. However, School has a symbolic building which has a obligation to be the base of the aim for growing green energy buildings and green education for students. Therefore, planning with understanding of specialities of the facility, having various and rational evaluation standards from the planning of the building is necessary.

• Proceedings of the Korea Information Processing Society Conference
• /
• 2015.04a
• /
• pp.522-525
• /
• 2015

"녹색건축 인증제도"는 건축물의 자재생산단계, 설계, 건설, 유지 관리, 폐기에 걸쳐 건축물의 전 과정에서 발생할 수 있는 에너지와 자원의 사용 및 오염물질 배출과 같은 환경 부담을 줄이고, 쾌적한 환경을 조성하기 위한 목적으로 건축물의 친환경성을 평가하여 인증하는 제도이다. 우리나라는 2002년부터 제도를 운영해오고 있지만 LCA를 기반으로 한 평가기준이 미비하고, 인증대상 확대에 따른 수요를 대처하기 어려운 구조이다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 G-SEED와 국외 인증제도의 비교분석을 통해 문제점을 도출하고, 이를 해결하기 위한 IoT 환경에서의 G-SEED : EB 시스템 설계를 목적으로 하였다.