• East Asian mathematical journal
• /
• v.21 no.1
• /
• pp.1-7
• /
• 2005

The object of this paper is to study($\sigma,\;\tau$)-Lie ideals in semi-prime rings with derivation. Main result is the following theorem: Let R be a semi-prime ring with 2-torsion free, $\sigma$ and $\tau$ two automorphisms of R such that $\sigma\tau=\tau\sigma$=, U be both a non-zero ($\sigma,\;\tau$)-Lie ideal and subring of R. If $d^2(U)=0$, then d(U)=0 where d a non-zero derivation of R such that $d\sigma={\sigma}d,\;d\tau={\tau}d$.

• East Asian mathematical journal
• /
• v.17 no.2
• /
• pp.225-232
• /
• 2001

Let R be a prime ring with characteristic not two. U a (${\sigma},{\tau}$)-left Lie ideal of R and d : R$\rightarrow$R a non-zero derivation. The purpose of this paper is to invesitigate identities satisfied on prime rings. We prove the following results: (1) [d(R),a]=0$\Leftrightarrow$d([R,a])=0. (2) if $(R,a)_{{\sigma},{\tau}}$=0 then $a{\in}Z$. (3) if $(R,a)_{{\sigma},{\tau}}{\subset}C_{{\sigma},{\tau}}$ then $a{\in}Z$. (4) if $(U,a){\subset}Z$ then $a^2{\in}Z\;or\;{\sigma}(u)+{\tau}(u){\in}Z$, for all $u{\in}U$. (5) if $(U,R)_{{\sigma},{\tau}}{\subset}C_{{\sigma},{\tau}}$ then $U{\subset}Z$.

• The Pure and Applied Mathematics
• /
• v.17 no.1
• /
• pp.87-92
• /
• 2010

Let R be a 2-torsion free $\sigma$-prime ring with an involution $\sigma$, U a nonzero square closed $\sigma$-Lie ideal, Z(R) the center of Rand d a derivation of R. In this paper, it is proved that d = 0 or $U\;{\subseteq}\;Z(R)$ if one of the following conditions holds: (1) $d(xy)\;-\;xy\;{\in}\;Z(R)$ or $d(xy)\;-\;yx\;{\in}Z(R)$ for all x, $y\;{\in}\;U$. (2) $d(x)\;{\circ}\;d(y)\;=\;0$ or $d(x)\;{\circ}\;d(y)\;=\;x\;{\circ}\;y$ for all x, $y\;{\in}\;U$ and d commutes with $\sigma$.

• Kyungpook Mathematical Journal
• /
• v.55 no.4
• /
• pp.827-835
• /
• 2015

Let U be a ${\sigma}$-square closed Lie ideal of a 2-torsion free ${\sigma}$-prime ${\Gamma}$-ring M. Let $d{\neq}1$ be an automorphism of M such that $[u,d(u)]_{\alpha}{\in}Z(M)$ on U, $d{\sigma}={\sigma}d$ on U, and there exists $u_0$ in $Sa_{\sigma}(M)$ with $M{\Gamma}u_0{\subseteq}U$. Then, $U{\subseteq}Z(M)$. By applying this result, we generalize the results of Oukhtite and Salhi respect to ${\Gamma}$-rings. Finally, for a non-zero derivation of a 2-torsion free ${\sigma}$-prime $\Gamma$-ring, we obtain suitable conditions under which the $\Gamma$-ring must be commutative.

• Communications of the Korean Mathematical Society
• /
• v.27 no.3
• /
• pp.441-448
• /
• 2012

Let R be a prime ring with center Z and characteristic different from two, U a nonzero Lie ideal of R such that $u^2{\in}U$ for all $u{\in}U$ and $d$ be a nonzero (${\sigma}$, ${\tau}$)-derivation of R. We prove the following results: (i) If $[d(u),u]_{{\sigma},{\tau}}$ = 0 or $[d(u),u]_{{\sigma},{\tau}}{\in}C_{{\sigma},{\tau}}$ for all $u{\in}U$, then $U{\subseteq}Z$. (ii) If $a{\in}R$ and $[d(u),a]_{{\sigma},{\tau}}$ = 0 for all $u{\in}U$, then $U{\subseteq}Z$ or $a{\in}Z$. (iii) If $d([u,v])={\pm}[u,v]_{{\sigma},{\tau}}$ for all $u{\in}U$, then $U{\subseteq}Z$.

• The Pure and Applied Mathematics
• /
• v.10 no.4
• /
• pp.207-215
• /
• 2003

Let R be a prime ring with characteristic different from two and let $\theta,\varphi,\sigma,\tau$ be the automorphisms of R. Let d : $R{\rightarrow}R$ be a nonzero ($\theta,\varphi$)-derivation. We prove the following results: (i) if $a{\in}R$ and [d(R), a]$_{{\theta}o{\sigma},{\varphi}o{\tau}}$=0, then $\sigma(a)\;+\;\tau(a)\;\in\;Z$, the center of R, (ii) if $d([R,a]_{\sigma,\;\tau)\;=\;0,\;then\;\sigma(a)\;+\;\tau(a)\;\in\;Z$, (iii) if $[ad(x),\;x]_{\sigma,\;\tau}\;=\;0;for\;all\;x\;\in\;RE$, then a = 0 or R is commutative.

• The Pure and Applied Mathematics
• /
• v.13 no.3 s.33
• /
• pp.189-195
• /
• 2006

Let R be a prime ring with characteristics not 2 and ${\sigma},\;{\tau},\;{\alpha},\;{\beta}$ be auto-morphisms of R. Suppose that $d_1$ is a (${\sigma},\;{\tau}$)-derivation and $d_2$ is a (${\alpha},\;{\beta}$)-derivation on R such that $d_{2}{\alpha}\;=\;{\alpha}d_2,\;d_2{\beta}\;=\;{\beta}d_2$. In this note it is shown that; (1) If $d_1d_2$(R) = 0 then $d_1$ = 0 or $d_2$ = 0. (2) If [$d_1(R),d_2(R)$] = 0 then R is commutative. (3) If($d_1(R),d_2(R)$) = 0 then R is commutative. (4) If $[d_1(R),d_2(R)]_{\sigma,\tau}$ = 0 then R is commutative.