벤처창업연구 (Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship)

  • 제18권2호
  • /
  • Pages.35-52
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1975-7557(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2671-9509(eISSN)
한국벤처창업학회 (The Korean Society of Business Venturing)
권호 표지

Digital Healthcare 벤처창업 촉진을 위한, 사용자 가치가 Smartwatch Digital Healthcare 수용의도에 미치는 영향 연구

A Study on the Effect of User Value on Smartwatch Digital HealthcareAcceptance Intention to Promote Digital Healthcare Venture Start Up

  • 진익성 (호서대학교 벤처대학원 정보경영학과) ;
  • 이소영 (호서대학교 벤처대학원 정보경영학과)
  • Eekseong Jin (Dept. of Information Management, Hoseo Graduate school of Venture) ;
  • soyoung Lee (Dept. of Information Management, Hoseo Graduate school of Venture)
  • 투고 : 2023.03.09
  • 심사 : 2023.04.24
  • 발행 : 2023.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

최근 코로나19, 환경오염 등으로 비대면 환경이 전개되면서 온라인 디지털 헬스케어의 중요성이 커지고 있으며 관련하여 건강관리, 원격진료, 디지털 치료제 등의 벤처창업 및 활동도 활발히 진행되고 있다. 본 연구는 디지털 헬스케어 스마트워치 수용성에 미치는 영향을 확장된 통합기술수용모형(UTAUT2)과 행동추론모형(BRT)의 통합적 접근으로 진행하였다. 첨단 ICT와 의료가 융합된 디지털 헬스케어에 적합한 요인 발굴은 혁신기술 수용연구에 가장 진보적으로 평가받는 확장된 통합기술수용모형을 활용하여 효용기대, 사회영향, 사용편의, 가격장벽, 대안부족, 이용장벽 등의 주요 요인을 도출하였고, 소비자의 가치-이유-태도-행동의도를 일괄 검증 할 수 있으면서 수용이유뿐만 아니라 비수용이유-소비자 스마트워치 디지털 헬스케어 인식의 긍정적 측면뿐만 아니라 부정적 측면까지-분석 할 수 있는 행동추론모형을 활용하여 인과관계 영향과 크기를 검증하였다. 연구를 위해 전국에 있는 10대에서 60대에 이르는 일반인을 대상으로 약 410여건의 설문 응답을 취합하여 이를 바탕으로 데이터에 대한 신뢰성 및 타당성 검정을 거쳐 구조방정식을 이용하여 가설을 검증하였다. 연구 분석에는 SPSS 23, AMOS 23 등을 활용하였다. 연구 결과, 개인혁신성은 수용이유(효용가치, 사회영향, 사용편의), 태도, 비수용이유(가격장벽, 대안부족, 이용장벽)에 유의미한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 결과는 혁신된 ICT의 주요 가치의 사용자 수용의도에의 영항을 확인한 선행연구 연구결과와 동일하다. 그리고 수용이유는 태도에 유의미한 영향을 미치나 비수용이유의 영향은 유의하지 않은 것으로 나타났다. 이는 소비자들이 ICT 신제품·신규서비스에는 관심이 크지만 이의 구입은 보다 신중하게 선택적으로 한다고 보여 진다. 본 연구는 학술적으로는 기존의 소비자 범용 혁신기술 수용성 분석을 새롭고 향후 중요분야인 스마트워치 디지털 헬스케어 분야의 소비자 가치 수용성 분석으로 발전시켰으며 확장된 통합기술수용모형과 행동추론모형의 장점을 살려 통합적으로 실행한 점 등이 있겠으며, 산업적으로는 기존 소비자의 수용성 이유 분석 중심에서 소비자 수용·비수용 이유 통합 검증으로 스마트워치를 구매하는 이유뿐만 아니라 구매하지 않는 이유까지 분석하여 제품·서비스 기획, 개발, 마케팅에 기여 할 수 있게 했다는 점 등이 있겠다. 본 연구가 향후 우리 생활에 중요한 역할을 할 디지털 헬스케어 분야의 연구 증대에 기여 할 수 있기 바라며 또한 본 연구와 같은 통합적 접근 모형과 소비자 수용·비수용 이유 통합 분석 등을 통하여 혁신과 향후 관련 연구들이 좀 더 소비자 가치에 적합한 심도 있는 요인 발굴과 검증으로 발전하기를 기대한다.

Recently, as the non-face-to-face environment has developed due to COVID-19 and environmental pollution, the importance of online digital healthcare is increasing, and venture start-ups and activities such as health care, telemedicine, and digital treatments are also actively underway. This study conducted the impact on the acceptability of digital healthcare smartwatches with an integrated approach of the expanded integrated technology acceptance model (UTAUT2) and the behavioral inference model (BRT). The most advanced integrated technology acceptance model for innovative technology acceptance research was used to identify major factors such as utility expectations, social effects, convenience, price barriers, lack of alternatives, and behavioral intentions. For the study, about 410 responses from ordinary people in their teens to 60s across the country were collected, and based on this, the hypothesis was verified using structural equations after testing reliability and validity of the data. SPSS 23 and AMOS 23 were used for research analysis. Studies have shown that personal innovation has a significant impact on the reasons for acceptance (use value, social impact, convenience of use), attitude, and non-use (price barriers, lack of alternatives, and barriers to use). These results are the same as the results of previous studies that confirmed the influence of the main value of innovative ICT on user acceptance intention. In addition, the reason for acceptance had a significant effect on attitude, but the effect of the reason for non-acceptance was not significant. It can be analyzed that consumers are interested in new ICT products and new services, but purchase them more carefully and selectively. This study has evolved from the acceptance analysis of general-purpose consumer innovation technology to the acceptance analysis of consumer value in smartwatch digital healthcare, which is a new and important area in the future. Industrially, it can contribute to the product's purchase and marketing. It is hoped that this study will contribute to increasing research in the digital healthcare sector, which will play an important role in our lives in the future, and that it will develop into in-depth factors that are more suitable for consumer value through integrated approach models and integrated analysis of consumer acceptance and non-acceptance.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ahn, D. S.(2020). Determinants of intention to purchase innovative new products. Master's thesis. Hanbat University in Daejeon.
  2. Ahn, K. H.(2018). 7th edition of the Marketing Principles. Paju: Hakhyeonsa.
  3. Ajzen, I.(1991). The theory of planned behavior. Orgnizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 50, 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  4. Baek, H. J., & Cho, J. G.(2018). Development of wearable healthcare devices in the form of rings. Journal of the Electrical Society, 67(7), 892-897.
  5. Baek, M. R., Choi, H. H., & Lee, H. Y.(2015). Age-Specific Acceptance Intention over Wearable Smart Healthcare Device. Korean Journal of Business Administration, 28(12), 3171-3189.
  6. Bagozzi, R. P., & Lee, K. H.(2002). Multiple Routes for Social Influence: The Role of Compliance, Internalization, and Social Identity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 65(3), 226-247.
  7. BCG(2021). Smartwatch Consumer Insight. Seoul: Boston Consulting Group.
  8. Brijesh, S.(2018). Adoption of Online Subscription Beauty Boxes: A Behavioural Reasoning Theory (BRT) Perspective. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 16(4), 19-40. https://doi.org/10.4018/JECO.2018100102
  9. Chung, C. Y., & Lee, S. Y.(2020). The Effect of Start-up Education for Senior on Start-up Intention: Focusing on the Integrated Model of Planned Behavior Theory and Self-Determination Theory, Venture Start-up Research. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship. 15(4), 69-81.
  10. Choi, W. S.(2017). A Study on the Factors Influencing the Intention to Use and Purchase Intention of Virtual Reality Devices: Focusing on the Extended Integrated Technology Acceptance Model. Information Society & Media, 18(3), 173-208.
  11. Claudy, M. C., Garcia, R., & O'Driscoll, A.(2015). Consumer resistance to innovation-a behavioral reasoning perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(4), 528-544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0399-0
  12. Hawkins, D., Best, R., & Coney, K.(1998). Consumer Behavior: Building Marketing Strategy. McGraw-Hill, Irwin.
  13. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R.(1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8), 982-1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  14. Dhir, A., Koshta, N., Goyal, R. K., Sakashita, M., & Almotairi, M.(2020). Behavioral reasoning theory (BRT) perspectives on E-waste recycling and management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 280, 124269.
  15. Rogers, E. M.(2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.), New York: Free Press.
  16. FDA: Food and Drug Administration(2022). Digital Health Center of Exellence. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/digital-health-center-excellence.
  17. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I.(1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. MA: Addison-Wesley.
  18. He, M. Y.(2021). China Wearable Healthcare Devices Market Analysis Report. Master's thesis, Dongguk University.
  19. Han S. S., & Lee S. C.(2018). Nursing and health statistics analysis using SPSS/Amos. Han Na-rae Publishing Company.
  20. Hwang, N. J., & Lee, S. Y.(2020), a study on the intention to participate and irrational behavior of domestic securities-type crowdfunding investors: Venture start-up research, 15(2), 2-18.
  21. Jung, G. H., & Seo, Y. W.(2021). A study on the impact of innovative characteristics, brands, and images of wearable healthcare devices on product acceptance intentions. Internet e-commerce research, 21(6), 37-573. https://doi.org/10.37272/JIECR.2021.12.21.6.37
  22. Jung, B. K.(2018). Comparative Analysis of Technology Acceptance Model: focusing on UTAUT1 and UTAUT2. Venture Innovation Research, 1(2), 109-121.
  23. Jeong, E. J.(2019). a study on the intention to reuse airline applications(application) using the UTAUT2 model. tourism management research, 23(2), 719-735. https://doi.org/10.18604/tmro.2019.23.2.34
  24. Jung, J. Y., & Roh, T. W.(2017). An Empirical Study on the Intention to Use Wearable Devices: Focusing on the Modified Technology Acceptance Model. Digital Conversations, 15(4), 205-212.
  25. Joo, J. H.(2015). A Study on the Social Commerce Usage Behavior of Korean University Students: focusing on the technology acceptance model expanded by social influence. A Digital Convergence Study, 13(3), 107-115. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2015.13.3.107
  26. Jin, S.(2020). A Study on the Effect of Personal Characteristics on the Intention to Accept Wearable Healthcare Devices: Focusing on the Extended Integrated Acceptance Model and Innovation. Journal of the Korean Computer Information Society, 23(3), 129-143.
  27. Jin, S., & Ahn, H. C.(2019). A Study on the Acceptance of Wearable Healthcare Devices: Integrated Approach of Extended Integrated Technology Acceptance Model and Innovation Resistance Model. Information Systems Research, 28(3), 159-202.
  28. Jin, W. K.(2018). A Study on User Acceptance Intent of Wearable Devices Based on UTAUT Model: Focusing on Smart Clothing. Basic Modality Study, 21(2), 311-327.
  29. Khan, I. U., Hameed, Z., & Khan, S. U.(2017). Understanding online banking adoption in a developing country: UTAUT2 with cultural moderators. Journal of Global Information Management(JGIM), 25(1), 43-65.
  30. Kim, Y. W, Han, S. M., & Kim, K. S.(2018). A Study on the Determinants of the Intention to Use Digital Health Care Services and Middle-aged and Old. Information Society & Media, 19(3), 1-23.
  31. Kong, Y. Y., & Choi, H. S.(2018). A study on the intention of college students to use mobile simple remittance services using the UTAUT2 model and security. humanities and society 21, 9(5), 1353-1368.
  32. Lee, D. H.(2021). Analysis of the main factors affecting the intention to continue using healthcare wearable devices: the general public vs. a medical worker. Journal of Service Management, 22(1), 40-69.
  33. Lee S. I.(2016). An Empirical Study on Acceptance Intention Towards Healthcare Wearable Device. The Journal of Information Systems, 25(2), 27-50. https://doi.org/10.5859/KAIS.2016.25.2.27
  34. Lee, S. H.(2018), Hotel customers' intention to use self-service technology (SST), focusing on the expanded integrated technology acceptance model (UTAUT2). hotel resort research, 17(4), 5-24.
  35. Lee, J. K., Kang, J. H., Kim, H. B., Ahn, Y. S., Oh, M. J. & Cho, H.(2016). Factors influencing the intention to adopt wearable devices. Internet e-commerce research, 16(1), 195-213.
  36. Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P.(2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  37. Lee H. J., Lee M. S., Park G. E., & Kang A. R.(2022). The prevalence and incidence of diabetic chronic complications in type 2 diabetes patients: a retrospective cohort study using the National Health Insurance Service health examination data from 2002 to 2015. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing, 34(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2022.34.1.39
  38. Lee, H. S.(2020). Consumer Action 7th Edition. Seoul: JibHyunJae.
  39. Lee, H. O.(2020). Consumer Perception andAcceptance of Innovative Food. Doctoral dissertation. Seoul National University.
  40. Lee, H. G., & Lee, S. Y.(2021). A study on factors affecting the intention to use subscription services of one-time consumer goods: focusing on behavioral reasoning theory. Digital Convergence Research, 19(9), 157-168.
  41. Lee, H. M.(2008). A Study on the Acceptance and Consumer Segmentation of Wearable Computers. PhD Claiming Paper, Ewha Womans University.
  42. Lee, N. Y.(2016). Effects of Healthcare Service User's Compliance Intention on Continuous usage. The Journal of Society for e-Business Studies, 21(4), 95-117. https://doi.org/10.7838/jsebs.2016.21.4.095
  43. Lim, C. S.(2017). Analysis of major technology/service issues for wearable devices and research on the direction of development. Korea Society for Next Generation Computing, 13(4), 81-89.
  44. Martin, H. S., & Herrero, A.(2011). Influence of the user's psychological factors on the online purchase intention in rural tourism, integrating innovativeness to the UTAUT framework. Tourism Management, 33(2), 341-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2011.04.003
  45. McKinsey & Company(2020). Healthcare in 2020 and Beyond. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/in dustries/healthcare-systems-and-services/our-insights/healt hcare-in-2020-and-beyond.
  46. Medical Policy Research Institute(2020). the latest global trends in digital health. Retrieved(2020.10.24.), http://rihp.re.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=policy_analysis&wi_id=36.
  47. Ong, J. W., Poong, Y. S., & Ng T. H.(2008). 3G services adoption among university students: Diffusion of innovation theory. Communications of the IBIMA. 3, 114-121.
  48. Park, Y. G., Jung, J. H., Kang, S. J., Lee, K. W., Lim, J. H., Jeon, H. J., Kim, H. Y., & Cho, Y. D.(2022). In addition to the current status and policy tasks of the digital healthcare and digital therapeutics industry, the Digital Treatment Future Strategy Forum. Seoul: IT Shipbuilding.
  49. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Goldman, R.(1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(5), 847-855. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.41.5.847
  50. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P.(2003). Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
  51. Porter, C. E., & Donthu, N.(2006). Choosing Strategies for change. Harvard Business Review.
  52. Robinson Jr, L., Marshall, G. W., & Stamps, M. B.(2005). Sales force use of technology: antecedents to technology acceptance. Journal of Business Research, 58(12), 1623-1631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.07.010
  53. Samil PwC Management Research Institute(2022). The enlightenment of digital healthcare-the current status of telemedicine. PwC Korea
  54. Son, Y. K., & Lee, B. K.(2012). meta-analysis of the usefulness of social cognitive behavior models applying planned behavior theory. Korean Journal of Journalism, 56(6), 127-161.
  55. Son, H. J., Lee, S. W., & Cho, M. H.(2014). Factors Influencing University Students' Intention to Use Wearable Devices-Application of the UTAUT2 Model. Korea Press Information Society, 7-33.
  56. Shin, J. K., & Lee, S. W.(2016). A study on the acceptance intention of wrist-type wearable devices based on an innovative resistance model. Journal of the Korean Society of Contents, 16(6), 123-134. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2016.16.06.123
  57. Shin, M. S., & Lee, Y. J.(2015). A study on the factors influencing the purchase intention of wrist-type wearable devices. Journal of the Korean Society of Contents, 15(5), 498-506.
  58. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D.(2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  59. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D.(2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425-478.
  60. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X.(2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory ofacceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157-178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
  61. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X.(2016). Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: A Synthesis and the Road Ahead, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(5), 328-376. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00428
  62. Vijayalakshmi, S., & Mahalakshmi, V.(2013). An impact of consumer buying behavior in decision making process in purchase of electronic home appliances in Chennai (India): an empirical study. Elixir Marketing Mgmt, 59, 15267-15273.
  63. Wang, H. H., & Hwang, Y. C.(2022). a study on the satisfaction and intention of continuous use of wrist-worn wearable devices. Business Convergence Research, 7(4), 41-47. https://doi.org/10.31152/JB.2022.11.7.4.41
  64. Westaby, J. D.(2005). Behavioral reasoning theory: Identifying new linkages underlying intentions and behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 98(2), 97-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.07.003
  65. Woo, J. P.(2017). Concept and understanding of structural equation model. Seoul: Hanna Rae Publishing Company.
  66. WHO(2019). WHO Guideline, Recommendations on digital interventions for health system strengthening. World Health Organization.
  67. Yoon, I. Y.(2021). Seoul National University Hospital's differentiated sleep center in Bundang. MEDI: GATENEWS. https://medigatenews.com/news/1684257430.