벤처창업연구 (Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship)

  • 제18권2호
  • /
  • Pages.21-34
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1975-7557(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2671-9509(eISSN)
한국벤처창업학회 (The Korean Society of Business Venturing)
권호 표지

키워드 네트워크 분석을 활용한 창업분야 지속가능발전목표(SDGs) 연구동향 분석

A Bibliometric Study on Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Research Trends in Entrepreneurship

  • 안승권 (한서대학교 안전보건학과) ;
  • 최민정 (글로벌에스디지임팩트협회)
  • 투고 : 2023.03.10
  • 심사 : 2023.04.18
  • 발행 : 2023.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 지속가능발전목표(SDGs)가 유엔총회에서 결의된 이후 전 세계적으로 창업분야에서 SDGs 연구가 얼마나 수행되었는지 살펴보고, 해외 및 국내 연구동향을 비교하여 국내 SDGs 이행을 위한 창업분야의 연구 방향성을 모색하는 데 있다. 이를 위해 검색어를 선정한 후 Web of Science(Wos), KCI, DBpia 등 세 개의 데이터베이스를 활용하여 창업분야의 SDGs 연구물을 추출하였다. 데이터 정제를 거쳐 해외는 총 356편의 연구물을, 국내는 총 4편의 연구물을 분석에 활용하였다. 국내 연구물은 숫자가 너무 적어 해외 연구물만 빈도분석과 키워드 네트워크 분석을 실시하여 연구동향을 살펴보았다. 연구 결과 빈도분석에서는 창업분야 SDGs 연구가 지속가능성과 관련된 용어들을 중심으로 비즈니스 모델, 혁신, 창업교육, 전략 등과 함께 연구되는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 연도별 빈도분석을 통해 창업분야 SDGs 정책, SDGs 이행에 있어 여성 창업가들의 역할, 에너지 창업분야의 SDGs, 경영대학원의 SDGs 이행 방향성과 SDGs 교육, SDGs 이행과 평가를 위한 지표, 지속가능성을 위한 기술 등으로 매년 주제가 다양하게 확장되는 것으로 나타났다. 키워드 네트워크 분석에서는 연구제목과 저자 키워드, 초록을 모두 포함하여 분석한 결과, 비즈니스, 지속가능성, SDGs, 혁신, 창업가정신, 비즈니스 모델, 교육 등의 핵심 키워드를 중심으로 연구범위가 창업생태계, 변화와 전략, 윤리, 기후 등으로 확장되는 것이 확인되었다. 본 연구는 해외 창업분야의 SDGs 연구동향을 제시함으로써 불모지에 가까운 국내 창업분야 SDGs 연구의 발판을 마련하였다는 점에 의의가 있다.

The purpose of this study is to examine the extent of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)-related research in the field of entrepreneurship globally since the adoption of the SDGs at the UN General Assembly, and to compare international and domestic research trends in order to determine the direction of SDGs-related research in entrepreneurship in Korea. Utilizing three databases-Web of Science (WoS), KCI, and DBpia- SDGs-related studies in entrepreneurship were extracted by employing specific search terms. After data purification, a total of 356 studies abroad and 4 studies in Korea were used for analysis. After data purification, a total of 356 international studies and 4 Korean studies were analyzed. Due to the limited number of domestic studies, the research trends were examined by conducting frequency analysis and keyword network analysis on international studies alone. Frequency analysis revealed that SDGs research in entrepreneurship primarily focused on sustainability-related terms and was conducted in conjunction with business models, innovation, entrepreneurship education, and strategies. Furthermore, yearly frequency analysis demonstrated an expansion of topics to encompass research on entrepreneurship and SDGs policies, the roles and capabilities of female entrepreneurs in SDGs implementation, energy start-ups and SDGs, directions for implementing SDGs in business schools and SDGs education, indicators for SDGs implementation and evaluation, and technologies for sustainability. The keyword network analysis identified central topics such as business, sustainability, SDGs, innovation, entrepreneurship, business models, and education, with research areas extending to entrepreneurship ecosystems, change and strategy, ethics, and climate. This study holds significance in establishing a foundation for SDGs research in entrepreneurship, which is currently an underexplored area in Korea, by presenting emerging research trends related to SDGs in entrepreneurship.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B.(2003). Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research: An Interdisciplinary Survey and Introduction. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  2. Anand, A., Argade, P., Barkemeyer, R., & Salignac, F.(2021). Trends and Patterns in Sustainable Entrepreneurship Research: A Bibliometric Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Business Venturing, 36(3), 1-24.
  3. Audretsch, D. B., Falck, O., Heblich, S., & Lederer, A.(2011). Handbook of Research on Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  4. Carlsson, B., Braunerhjelm, P., McKelvey, M., Olofsson, C., Persson, L., & Ylinenpaa, H.(2013). The Evolving Domain of Entrepreneurship Research. Small Business Economics, 41(4), 913-930.
  5. Chung, D. Y., & Kim, T. H.(2013). The Impact of Social Entrepreneurship of the Members of Nonprofit Organizations on Cooperative Behavior: Focusing on the mediating effects of value congruence. Journal of Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 14(9), 4303-4312. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2013.14.9.4303
  6. Deacon, B.(2016). Assessing the SDGs from the Point of View of Global Social Governance. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 32(2), 116-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/21699763.2016.1198266
  7. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M.(2021). How to Conduct a Bibliometric Analysis: An Overview and Guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296.
  8. Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G.(2008). Comparison of PubMed. Scopus, WoS, and Google Scholar: Strengths and Weaknesses. Faseb Journal, 22(2), 338-342.
  9. ISS ESG Gateway(2023). SDG Index. Institutional Shareholder Services. Retrieved(0302) from https://www.isscorporatesolutions.com/solutions/esg-solutions/iss-esg-gateway/.
  10. Jeong, H. B., & Lee, H. K.(2019). A Study on the Establishment of Research Area in Startup and/or Entrepreneurship as Science. Journal of the Korean Entrepreneurship Society, 14(2), 41-56.
  11. Kim, D. H., Kim, D. H., Park, K. H., Lee, S. Y., Lim, E. C., Jung, D. K., Jung, S. S., Choi, M. H., Choi, Y. S., & Hwang, B. H.(2017). Is Entrepreneurship Different from Management?. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 12(3), 1-36.
  12. Kim, E. J., & Park, J. H.(2020). Challenges of National Implementation for Ambiguous Global Policy Goal: Analysis on Sustainable Development Goals in Korea. Korean Public Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 51-68. https://doi.org/10.21888/KPAQ.2020.03.32.1.051
  13. Kim, E. K., & Chang, B. W.(2022). Internalization of Sustainable Development Goals by Local Governments: An Analysis on the Adoption and Diffusion of SDGs Policy. Peace Studies, 30(2), 131-166. https://doi.org/10.21051/PS.2022.10.30.2.131
  14. Kim, K. H.(2022). [Leading the ESG Era] Distribution Industry, Reduce, Eliminate, and Spread 'Plastic Free'. Digital Chosun, Retrieved from https://digitalchosun.dizzo.com/site/data/html_dir/2022/01/17/2022011780128.html.
  15. Kim, S. H., & Oh, H. J.(2018). Domestic and Overseas Research Trends Analysis of Archives and Records Management based on Online Public International Journals. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 52(2), 165-189.
  16. Kim, Y. R.(2004). A Study on Innovation and Entrepreneurship. The Review of Business History, 19(3), 157-181.
  17. Korean Law Information Center(2021). Entrepreneurship Support Act for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises. Retrieved from https://www.law.go.kr/%EB%B2%95%EB%A0%B9/%EC%A4%91%EC%86%8C%EA%B8%B0%EC%97%85%EC%B0%BD%EC%97%85%EC%A7%80%EC%9B%90%EB%B2%95.
  18. Lee, S. H., Shin, H. J., & Lee, S. Y.(2021). Social Entrepreneurship Research in South Korea. Journal of Strategic Management, 24(2), 145-172.
  19. Lee, S. H., Yoon, J. H., & Sung, S. H.(2019). A Bibliometric Study on Global Research Trends of Entrepreneurship from 2008 to 2017. Journal of the Korean Entrepreneurship Society, 14(3), 72-93.
  20. Lee, S. S.(2012). Network Analysis Methodology. Seoul: Nonhyung Publishing.
  21. Lee, W. Y.(2022). "Watch out for Hoppang, Samlip and Shani are SPC" The Boycott List is All over the Place. Hankyoreh, Retrieved from https://www.hani.co.kr/arti/society/society_general/1063134.html.
  22. Lim, D. H.(2006). Academia: The Role of Intellectuals. Bounday with Literature, 6(1), 174-184.
  23. Mitchell, R. K., Busenitz, L., Lant, T., McDougall, P. P., Morse, E. A., & Smith, J. B.(2004). The Distinctive and Inclusive Domain of Entrepreneurial Cognition Research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(6), 505-518. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00061.x
  24. Mmbaga, N. A., Mathias, B. D., Williams, D. W., & Cardon, M. S.(2020). A Review of and Future Agenda for Research on Identity in Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 35(6), 1-25.
  25. QS Quacquarelli Symonds(2023). SDG Ratings. Retrieved 0302 from https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/world-university-rankings/2023?qs_qp=topnav.QuacquarelliSymonds.
  26. Shane, S.(2002). The Foundations of Entrepreneurship. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  27. Shane, S.(2012). Reflections on the 2010 AMR Decade Award: Delivering on the Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research. Academy of Management Review, 37(1), 10-20. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0078
  28. Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S.(2000). The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217-226.
  29. Schumpeter, J. A.(1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridege: Harvard University Press.
  30. Sustainable Development Portal(2023). SDGs. Office for Government Policy Coordination. Retrieved(0303) from http://ncsd.go.kr/.
  31. Times Higher Education(2023). Impact Rankings. Inflexion Pvt. Equity Partners LLP. Retrieved(0302) from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/rankings/impact/2022/overall.
  32. Venkataraman, S.(1997). The Distinctive Domain of Entrepreneurship Research in Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth. Greenwich: JAI Press.
  33. Venkataraman, S.(2019). The Distinctive Domain of Entrepreneurship Research. In Seminal Ideas for the Next Twenty-five Years of Advances. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  34. Venkataraman, S. & Sarasvathy, S. D.(2001). Strategy and Entrepreneurship: Outlines of an Untold Story. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1(6). 1-34.
  35. Westhead, P., & Wright, M.(2000). Advances in Entrepreneurship. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  36. Yoo, H. N., & Min, D. K.(2012). A Study on Social Entrepreneurship Attributes Using a Multidimensional Scaling Method: Perspectives of Korean Experts. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Venture Studies, 15(3), 25-42.