• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.29-41
• /
• 2000

The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of the Portfolio applied science instruction on the students' scientific affective domain and perceptions of portfolio in elementary schools. Portfolio applied science instruction of the 6th grade science unit 'Environment pollution and Nature protection' was developed for this study. Traditional instruction was implemented to the control group and portfolio applied science instruction was implemented to the experimental group. Pretests of the scientific affective domain were administered to both groups. The treatment was given for about seven weeks for both groups. Instruments about scientific affective domain were administered to both groups. A questionnaire on perception of portfolio applied science instruction was given to the experimental group after the treatment. The results were analyzed using t-test on the students' scientific affective domain. The results of this study are as follows: 1. Portfolio applied science instruction program for elementary schools was developed. Students themselves determine the portfolio learning goal in a portfolio applied science instruction. Students construct the portfolio and they evaluate themselves and other colleagues. Also teachers go on portfolio applied science instruction considering portfolio purpose, concepts, evaluation. 2. There was not a statistically meaningful difference between an experimental group and a control group o]1 the students' scientific affective domain. In three sub categories of a scientific affective domain, the science perception, the interest on science and scientific attitude, there were not statistically meaningful difference among them. 3. As the results of the questionnaire on perceptions of portfolio, they didn't understand it very well but after learning portfolio, they showed positive attitude to perceptions of portfolio. Students in portfolio applied science instruction like more the portfolio applied science instruction than general instruction. 4. Portfolio applied science instruction has an useful value as a method of teaching and evaluation. Students and teachers can produce various portfolios products in portfolio applied science instruction. As a conclusion, portfolio applied science instruction was not statistically meaningful on the students' scientific affective domain, but it gives positive effects on perceptions of portfolio in elementary schools. Therefore, portfolio has an educational value as a method of teaching and evaluation for students' growth. In the future, teachers and students must have interaction and feedback in portfolio applied science instruction.

• 과학교육연구지
• /
• 제35권2호
• /
• pp.307-323
• /
• 2011

본 연구는 우리나라 중학생의 자기조절학습능력의 수준을 측정하고, 자기조절학습능력과 과학의 탐구능력, 과학의 정의적 영역의 특징을 분석하는 데 목적을 두었다. 본 연구의 연구문제는 첫째, 중학생의 자기조절학습능력의 수준이 어떻게 되는가? 둘째, 자기조절학습능력과 과학의 탐구능력 간에 어떤 관계가 있는가? 셋째, 자기조절학습능력과 과학의 정의적 영역은 어떤 관계가 있는가? 이다. 연구방법은 첫째, 자기조절학습능력, 과학의 탐구능력, 과학의 정의적 영역의 이론적 배경을 조사하였다. 둘째, 자기조절학습능력, 과학의 탐구영역, 과학의 정의적 영역의 검사지를 다음과 같이 구성하였다. (1) 자기조절학습능력 검사(정현철 등, 2004) (2) 과학의 탐구능력검사 중 문제발견능력검사(정현철 등, 2004) (3) 과학의 정의적 영역설문(서혜애 등, 2008). 연구대상은 부산광역시, 울산광역시, 경상남도 소재의 7개 학교 3개 학년 재학생을 무작위로 선정하였으며, 총704명의 응답결과를 분석하였다. 연구결과, 첫째, 자기조절학습능력의 수준은 3.02였으며, 둘째, 과학의 탐구능력이 높은 학생들은 자기조절학습능력도 높게 (p<.05)나타났다. 셋째, 과학의 정의적 영역의 특징은 남학생이 여학생보다 높은 자기 효능감을 나타냈다. 학년이 올라갈수록 과학의 정의적 영역은 감소(p=.048)하였다. 특히 자기 효능감에서 가장 큰 유의한(p=.002) 차이를 보였다. 넷째, 자기조절학습능력과 과학의 탐구능력, 과학의 정의적 영역 모두 통계적으로 유의한(p=.000) 상관이 있었다. 이는 자기조절학습능력이 높은 학생은 과학의 탐구능력이 높고, 과학의 정의적 영역도 높다고 볼 수 있다.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제25권4호
• /
• pp.454-464
• /
• 2006

The purpose of this study was to develop MBL(Microcomputer Based Laboratory) programs for sixth-grade elementary students in science laboratory instructions and to ascertain the effects of this program on academic achievement and science-related affective characteristics. In laboratory instructions, using the MBL was found to be effective in improving academic achievement for elementary students, especially in the domain of knowledge. In addition, it helped students to improve science-related affective characteristics. The experimental group showed higher levels, especially in the domains of cognition and interest. When our findings were analyzed in detail, the sub-domains that showed positive effects included 'cognition of science' in the domain of cognition, and interest toward science', 'interest toward science learning', 'interest toward science related activities', and 'anxiety for science' in the domain of interest. Male students exhibited improvement in the domain of cognition while female students showed improvement in the domain of interest. In conclusion, utilizing MBL programs as an experimental measurement in the real field of elementary science education can be said to be both positive and desirable.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제25권4호
• /
• pp.396-406
• /
• 2006

In this study, elementary school students' science learning characteristics together with the levels of inquiry requirement in elementary school science experiment instruction were investigated in terms of the affective domain. We divided seventy-three students of the fifth ade into two groups according to the levels of inquiry requirement. After each instruction had been implemented, the characteristics of the students' learning in terms of the affective domain were compared and analyzed within the context of the levels of inquiry requirement. There were no significant differences between Level 1(LL) and Level 2(HL) groups in terms of the affective characteristics. These results may be caused by the burden imposed by the difficulty in thinking through and setting up the experimental methods. However, the HL group students' levels of interest in science experiments was higher than that of the LL group. In conclusion, the HL instruction contributed little to the improvement of affective characteristics. Some possible reasons might be that students felt difficulties with the somewhat unfamiliar instructions which required them to design and perform experiments. Higher levels of interest in science experiments amongst HL students' implies that well-organized and continuous exercises involving the design and performance of experiments could improve students' scientific affective characteristics.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제24권1호
• /
• pp.86-101
• /
• 2005

In this study, a brain-basrd model for science teaching and learning was developed based on the natural processes which human acquire knowledge about a natural object or on event, the major domains of science educational objectives of the national curriculum, and the human brain's organizational patterns and functions. In the model, each educational objective domain is related to the brain regions as follows: The affective domain is related to the limbic system, especially amygdala of human brain which is involved in emotions, the psychomotor domain is related to the occipital lobes of human brain which perform visual processing, temporal lobes which perform functions of language generating and understandng, and parietal lobes which receive and process sensory information and execute motor activities of body, and the cognitive domain is related to the frontal and prefrontal lobes which are involved in think-ing, planning, judging, and problem solving. The model is a kind of procedural model which proceed fiom affective domain to psychomotor domain, and to cognitive domain of science educational objective system, and emphasize the order of each step and authentic assessment at each step. The model has both properties of circularity and network of activities. At classrooms, the model can be used as various forms according to subjects and student characteristics. STS themes can be appropriately covered by the model.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.357-369
• /
• 1998

학생들의 과학적 소양을 기르는데에는 과학과 관련된 정의적 특성이 중요한 역할을 한다. 과학적 태도, 자연과 과학에 대한 가치, 호기심과 관심 등의 과학과 관련된 정의적 특성이 대부분의 과학교육 목표에 포함되고 있다. 이 연구에서는 과학과 관련된 정의적 특성의 평가체제와 문항을 개발하였다. 인식, 흥미와 과학적 태도의 세 개의 주범주와 16 개의 소범주로 평가체재가 구성되었다. 평가체제의 타당도는 10 명의 과학교육학자들에 의하여 검증되었다. 48 개의 평가 문항을 문항반응분석과 문항-검사 상관계수를 고려하여 총 64 문항 중에서 선정하였다. 크론바하 알파계수는 인식과 흥미에서 0.83 이고, 과학적 태도에서는 0.86 이었다. 검사의 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 과학과 관련된 정의적 특성에서 남학생이 여학생보다 더 높은 점수를 나타내었다. 둘째, 초등학생이 중등학생보다 더 높은 과학과 관련된 특성 점수를 나타내었다. 마지막으로 도시지역의 학생이 시골지역의 학생보다 더 높은 과학과 관련된 특성 점수를 보여 주었다.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제38권3호
• /
• pp.360-374
• /
• 2019

The purpose of this study is to investigate the self-perceptions of the elementary school students' on the affective, behavioral and cognitive domains in science class. To see if there are differences in students' perceptions according to grade levels, a self-perception questionnaire was applied to third and fifth grade students in Seoul, Korea. The major results of the study are as follows. First, the perception level of the affective domain was higher than that of the cognitive domain in third grade students. There was no significant difference in the self-perception level of the fifth grade students. Both third and fifth grade students perceived the greatest improvement in the cognitive domain through one year of science teaching. Second, in the life science class, the same tendency was also observed. The students in the third and fifth grade reported that cognitive domains were the most improved through the one-year life science class. Third, when the students' perceptions were compared by grades, the third grade students showed higher self-perception scores than fifth grade students. As the grade increased, the perception scores of the students' lowered. Based on these findings, implications for science education research and teaching and learning at school are discussed.

• 한국지구과학회지
• /
• 제36권4호
• /
• pp.360-366
• /
• 2015

이 연구의 목적은 STEAM 프로그램이 고등학생의 정의적 영역에 미치는 효과를 알아보는 것이다. 이를 위해 '산사태와 우리생활'을 주제로 한 STEAM 프로그램을 개발하여 고등학교 과학 동아리 학생 16명에게 7주 동안 적용하였다. 정의적 영역에 관한 과학적 태도 검사를 사전과 사후에 실시하였으며, 프로그램 적용이 끝난 후 STEAM 프로그램에 관한 설문조사 및 심층인터뷰를 실시하였다. 과학적 태도의 관점에서 STEAM 프로그램은 즐거움, 가치, 자신감, 그리고 일반적인 과학적 태도에서 긍정적 효과를 가져 온다는 것이 나타났다. 프로그램 평가 설문지 결과를 살펴보면 정의적 영역에 도움이 되었다고 응답한 학생이 가장 많았으며 인지적 영역에서도 긍정적 변화가 있음이 확인되었다.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제32권6호
• /
• pp.1039-1049
• /
• 2012

The first category of Affective Domain objectives in Bloom's Taxonomy is about "Receiving". In it, the first subdivision listed is "Awareness" (Krathwohl, Bloom & Masia, 1964). Since these categories are intended to be hierarchical in ascending order of internalization, it is important that young learners be given ample opportunities in their learning experiences in class to be aware of positive values and effective life skills. This paper reports a feasibility study on the adoption of an integrative cognitive-affective learning approach in a primary school science lesson. 37 primary six students in a Singapore primary school were taught the concept of centre of gravity, including a hands-on activity to find the centre of gravity of an irregularly shaped cardboard by using a plumbline. After reviewing how a plumbline works, their teacher then led them into a discussion on the question "Who is the plumbline in your life?" a reference to identifying positive role models in their lives. From the transcript of the students' in-class sharing and their written responses to the question, it is clear that the integrative cognitive-affective learning approach did enable students to present their ideas and learning experiences in the affective domain quite readily. This conclusion provides a valuable lead to a follow-up project on whether students who are exposed to such integrative learning approaches will be more capable and more aware of identifying important positive social habits or values. If so, then the teaching of values in schools could take on a whole new dimension, that of borrowing students' learning energy in the cognitive domain to learn values and life skills in the affective domain.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.66-74
• /
• 2003

이 연구는 현재 학교에서 실시되고 있는 수행평가 가 중학생들의 과학성취도와 정의적 영역에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지 알아보는데 목적이 있다. 수행평가의 다양한 방법 중에서도 과학과에서 가장 많이 실시되고 있는 실험실습법에 의한 수행평가의 방법이 중학교 과학학습에 미치는 영향을 알아보았다. 연구 결과로부터 볼 때, 과학성취도의 평균이 동질한 두 집단에서 수행평가를 적용한 실험집단의 과학 성취도 점수가 유의미하게 향상되었으며, 특히 사전 과학성취도가 중, 하위권인 학생들의 과학성취도에 통계적으로 유의미하게 영향을 미쳤다. 상위권 학생은 비록 통계적으로 유의미하지는 않지만 성적이 약간 향상되었다. 정의적 영역에서는 실험집단의 사전 사후 검사에서 유의미한 차이는 없었다. 그러나 실험집단은 통계적으로 유의미하지는 않지만 긍정적으로 변화를 보인 반면, 비교집단의 통계적으로 유의미하게 부정적인 방향으로 변화였다. 정의적 영역에 대한 실험집단의 사전 사후 검사를 비교에서 정의적 영역의 하위요소 중 자아개념과 학습습관의 변화는 유의미하게 상승하였으며, 학습에 대한 태도의 변화에는 효과가 없었다. 실험집단의 과학성취도가 상 중 하인 집단 별 정의적 영역점수의 향상정도에서 모두 유의미한 차이는 없었고, 실험집단과 비교집단의 비교분석에서는 정의적 영역의 하위요소 중 학습에 대한 태도에서 중, 하위권 학생들에게 긍정적인 효과가 나타났으며, 학습습관에 있어서는 하위권 학생들에게 긍정적인 효과를 보였다. 따라서 과학과에서 실험실습법에 의한 수행평가의 실시가 중학생들의 과학성취도와 정의적 영역의 향상에 영향을 미치고 있는 것으로 나타났으며 특히 성적이 중, 하위권인 학생들에게 미치는 영향이 더 크게 나타났다.