• 한국수학사학회지
• /
• 제23권4호
• /
• pp.83-100
• /
• 2010

본 연구는 2006년 8월에 고시된 수학과 개정교육과정의 그래프와 일차변환의 내용이 학교 현장에서 지도될 때 생길 수 있는 문제점들을 제시하고, 그 해결방안을 모색하는데 목적이 있다. 제 7차교육과정 이후의 두단원에 대한 선행연구들과 교육과정의 변천과정을 살펴보고, '수학I', '수학의 활용' 그리고 '기하와 벡터' 과목의 검인정 교과서 및 익힘책 전부(27종 전 54권)에 대하여 두 단원의 학습내용을 비교하여본다. 이러한 과정을 통하여 학교현장에서 두 단원에 대한 교사의 교육과정 이해도 제고와 교육과정 내용의 올바른 적용 적용 방안을 제언한다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제40권2호
• /
• pp.179-194
• /
• 2001

The seventh curriculum put into operation gradually from first-year student in 2000 academic years of elementary school is subject to form and apply a step-wise level curriculum. Mathematics(correspond to junior high school course from 7th school year to 9th school year) should apply a step-wise level curriculum from 7th school year in 2001 academic years. Accordingly, mathematics teachers must diagnose actual conditions of educations, distribution tables of test results, step-wise teaching-studying programs etc. They also make proper plans suitable for actual situations of each school, prepare appropriate teaching materials and aids. I investigated preceding studies planned for preparation of putting into operation of a step-wise level curriculum. It showed that most of the studies were conducted at schools of medium or large scale and studies conducted at schools of small scale was rare. There were 113 small scale middle schools out of total 297 middle schools in Kyongsangbuk-do area in 2000. In this situation, I felt necessities of modeling of a step-wise level curriculum suitable for small scale schools. In this study, I modeled a step-wise level curriculum suitable for small scale middle schools, applied this model to 44 students in M middle school. I modeled two types of curriculum. One is a step-wise level curriculum that execute special supplementation process to students who do not complete 7-가 step successfully. The other is a step-wise level curriculum which is a regular model for a step-wise level of 7-나 step. I carried out an academic achievement test and intimacy test about mathematics before and after the application of the model. In this study, I found out that this model was very effective in academic achievement of students and helpful to declined students in scholarship. In the intimacy test, It was found out that most of the students gained confidence in mathematics, felt less anxiety, formed positive self consciousness. Therefore, I think that this model will be helpful to the application of the seventh step-wise level curriculum.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제40권1호
• /
• pp.125-137
• /
• 2001

We review the mathematics education in Korea just after the 1595 Liberation and the first, second curriculum announced in 1955 and 1963, respectively. The 3rd curriculum announced in 1973 is influenced by “New Mathematics” in America. There were theoretical research about “New Mathematics”, but no experimental research about it in the school. So, there was not much effect of “New Mathematics” in mathematics education. After that we have the 4th, 5th and 6th curriculum which is improved by the result of experience in teaching. The 7th curriculum announced in 1997 emphasized practical mathematics. In this paper, we review the mathematics education and consider some problems in the 7th curriculum. We also consider some problems in mathematics textbook authorization under the 7th curriculum. To solve these problems, we suggest some facts. Especially, we need the philosophy about mathematics education and the enough knowledge about “Mathematics for Mathematics Teachers”.

• 한국학교수학회논문집
• /
• 제18권2호
• /
• pp.169-186
• /
• 2015

대입 제도가 변화하고 2017학년도 대학수학능력시험에 2009 개정에 따른 수학과 교육과정이 처음으로 적용됨에 따라 수학 영역은 시험의 성격을 재조명하고 출제와 관련된 세부 방안을 마련해야 한다. 특히 대학수학능력시험의 취지에 부합하면서 고등학교 교육과정의 정상적 운영에 기여하기 위해서는 학교 현장의 목소리를 반영할 필요가 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 전국 고등학교 2,338개교 중 시 도교육청별 유층표집을 통하여 312개 학교를 추출하고 해당 학교의 교사를 대상으로 설문 조사를 실시하였다. 설문 조사 결과를 분석하여 2017학년도 대학수학능력시험 수학 영역에 대한 성격과 역할을 재조명하고 수학 영역의 선택 과목별 문항 배분을 비롯한 출제와 관련한 세부 사항을 탐색하였다.

• 대한수학교육학회지:학교수학
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.213-233
• /
• 2004

This study looked into the procedures of and the status on the implementation of the new 7th national curriculum at the elementary school level, especially focused on the subjects of schools and the teachers for the actual curriculum implementation. More specifically the study examined, 1) the degree to which the particular innovation(i.e., student-centered, flexible and autonomous school-based curriculum, etc.) is be-ing implemented as planned; and 2) how it is being implemented. It conducted a situation-oriented analysis in cooperation with three local boards of education. Classroom observations, teacher interviews, questionnaires for teachers and supervisors were utilized and the three major criteria of interpreting the result were the three core concepts of the 7th national curriculum, that is, the degree of "(1)reorganization, (2)student-centeredness, and (3)diversification/specialization" of the curriculum. Detailed documentation on the processes of the local bureaus of education and on the classroom practices are made in order to provide schools and policy makers with relevant and practical suggestions for further improvement of curriculum implementation.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈C:초등수학교육
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.31-41
• /
• 2000

There has been much concern and worry about executing school curriculum from the year 2000 because the seventh curriculum is based on the complicated' differentiated education' concept. Now the new textbook has been developed according to the curriculum. This paper will reinforce the understanding of the curriculum and textbook in school math. In order to do this, this paper will present questions on three subjects to help school teachers and people related to math education to probe and discuss the benefits and problems of teaching math using the new textbook. The three subjects are based on the contents included in certain chapters of the math textbook. These are 1) understanding mathematics concepts using manipulatives or concrete objects, 2) doing math projects or problem solving activities 3) learning mathematics using calculators. furthermore, it is emphasized in this paper that math teachers must keep in mind that they should execute instruction in their own way using the 'textbook' not as a bible but as a guideline.

• 한국수학사학회지
• /
• 제30권2호
• /
• pp.101-119
• /
• 2017

This paper is a follow up study of [2]. In this paper we analyse the contents of middle school mathematics textbooks published in the 1st National Curriculum Period centered on the concept 'straight line' and discuss how they are different from contemporary mathematics textbooks in view of connectedness of contents, mathematical terms, textbook as a learning material vs. teaching material, relationship between contents of national curriculum and textbooks, and some topics related to direct proportion, function, method of equivalence as a method for solving simultaneous linear equations and so on. The results of our analysis and discussion suggest implications for reforming mathematics curriculum and developing mathematics textbooks.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집
• /
• 제37권2호
• /
• pp.105-134
• /
• 2023

본 연구는 우리나라 수학과 교육과정 성취기준에 포함된 수행 동사를 추출하여 그 실태를 파악하고 개선 방안을 탐색하는 데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 먼저 현행 수학과 교육과정인 2015 개정 수학과 교육과정 성취기준에 포함된 수행 동사가 학교급별로 차이가 있는지를 분석하였다. 또 우리나라 수학과 교육과정 성취기준에 포함된 수행 동사가 다른 국가의 수학과 교육과정 성취기준에 포함된 수행 동사와 차이가 있는지도 살펴보았다. 분석 결과 우리나라 2015 개정 수학과 교육과정 성취기준에 포함된 수행 동사는 학교급이 올라갈수록 빈도와 종수가 모두 적어지는 것을 볼 수 있었다. 외국의 수학과 교육과정에서도 유사한 경향성은 보였으나 우리나라에서는 '이해하다', '알다'가 지나치게 많이 사용되어 개선이 필요하다.

• 한국초등수학교육학회지
• /
• 제23권2호
• /
• pp.219-245
• /
• 2019

본 연구에서는 한국의 2015 개정 초등학교 수학과 교육과정과 일본의 소학교 산수 학습지도요령의 개정 방향이 무엇이며 학습내용요소에는 어떤 차이가 있는지 알아보고 차기 교육과정의 기초자료를 제공하는 데 그 목적이 있다. 개정 방향을 비교하여 교육과정의 목표, 교수·학습방법, 평가방법의 측면에서 한국과 일본의 초등학교 수학과 교육과정에 대해 분석하였다. 학습내용요소를 각 영역별로 비교하여 한국과 일본의 교육과정에서 나타나는 내용요소의 차이점과 특징을 분석하였다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구
• /
• 제27권1호
• /
• pp.49-73
• /
• 2024

This study aims to explore the direction of high school statistics education in Korea through a comparative analysis between the revised 2022 Korea mathematics curriculum and the IBDP Mathematics: Application & Interpretation Standard Level (IBDP AI SL) Curriculum and textbooks. The study seeks to investigate the Statistics unit of the two curricula, compare chapter structures and content elements of textbooks, and explore exercises on modeling and utilization of technology tools. The results are as follows: First, the IBDP AI SL statistics covered a broader range of topics. Second, exercises in Korean high school textbooks typically inquire about one or two questions in each topic, whereas the IBDP AI SL textbook's exercises present a real-life scenario on all relevant topics through sub-questions. Third, the Korean textbook guides the utilization of technology tools only in exercises presented after completing the entire chapter or where the calculation is complex. Also, there were only a handful of modeling exercises in the Korean textbook in contrast to most of the lessons and exercises were modeling exercises in the IBDP AI SL textbook. If these findings can be integrated into teaching practices in Korea, it will provide a direction for statistics education in Korean high schools.