• 한국식생활문화학회지
• /
• 제24권5호
• /
• pp.486-495
• /
• 2009

The purpose of this research was to investigate whether the perception of KPIs by restaurant managers from financial and non-financial perspectives was affected by BSC implementation. The perceptions that were examined were importance, adoption, performance, and utilization of KPIs. We surveyed managers from multinational restaurant chains that were adopting BSC and those that were not. From a non-financial perspective, the difference in perceived importance between BSC adopted firms and firms that did not adopt BSC was significant. The managers of BSC adopted firms perceived KPIs more seriously than the others. Secondly, according to the managers' working experiences, the difference of perceived utilization in the internal business process perspective was significant between BSC adopted firms and firms that did not adopt BSC. In addition, from the learning and growth perspective, the difference in perceived adoption and utilization between the two groups was significant. Finally, in the BSC adopted firms, the perceived importance of the managers affected the other perceptions like adoption and utilization from both the financial and non-financial perspectives.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제10권8호
• /
• pp.2103-2109
• /
• 2009

균형성과표는 전통적인 기업의 성과 관리 체계인 단순한 재무적 지표 중심의 평가에서 벗어나 기업의 미래와 목표 달성을 위한 핵심적인 관점들인 재무 관점, 고객 관점, 내부프로세스 관점, 학습 및 성장 관점 등에 대해 일관된 측정 수단을 통해 균형 있게 측정하고 관리하고자 하는 기업의 성과 측정 수단의 하나이다. 균형성과표의 도입은 도입 자체의 효과와 아울러 그 선후관계 존재 여부를 파악하는 것 역시 경영 전략 수립에 있어 중요한 시사점이 된다. 따라서 본 연구는 균형성과표 도입의 효과가 있는지, 그리고 그 효과간에 시차적(time lag) 선후관계가 존재하는지 연구하였다. 연구결과 균형성과표 도입은 기업의 학습과 성장 관점 영역, 내부프로세스 관점 영역, 재무 관점 영역에 긍정적 효과를 주는 것으로 나타났으며 재무적 성과의 경우엔 그 효과가 더 긴 것으로 나타났다. 한편 기업성과 지표로서의 균형성과표상의 관점을 선행 지표와 후행지표로 구분하여 두 지표간에 시차 상관관계가 존재하는 지를 분석한 결과에 의하면 균형성과표 도입에 따라 내부비즈니스 프로세스가 우선적으로 개선되고 이러한 효과는 곧 재무적 성과에 긍정적 영향을 미치는 것으로 판단되었다.

• 한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구
• /
• 제33권1호
• /
• pp.115-131
• /
• 2024

Purpose This study aims to analyse the impact of the development of fintech and the emergence of internet primary banks due to the increasing use of smartphones on the performance of traditional local banks from both financial and non-financial perspectives. Return on equity (ROE) and return on assets (ROA) are used to assess the performance differences between the two types of banks and how these differences are affected by their financial characteristics. Design/methodology/approach Using return on equity (ROE) and return on assets (ROA) as indicators, we identified the differences in operating performance between the two types of banks. In addition, this study analysed the impact of financial characteristics on profitability through regression analysis with various control variables. We further studied the impact of non-financial characteristics (customer reviews, social media reactions, etc.) on operating performance. Findings The net interest margin ratio of local banks had a positive impact, while the marketable securities ratio of Internet primary banks had a negative impact. The non-financial analysis shows that the number of customer reviews and social media reactions have a significant impact on the performance of Internet primary banks, suggesting that customer satisfaction and positive market perception are important factors in the performance of Internet primary banks.

• 산학경영연구
• /
• 제21권2호
• /
• pp.111-136
• /
• 2008

균형성과표(BSC) 모형은 기업의 경영성과를 비재무적 지표로서 학습 및 성장성과, 내부 경영프로세스 성과, 고객성과, 재무적 지표로서 재무적 성과를 중심으로 측정하고 평가하는 통합적 성과 측정 시스템이다. 이러한 균형성과표(BSC) 모형은 재무적 성과 지표를 중심으로 기업의 경영성과를 측정하고 평가하는데 있어서 나타나는 한계를 보완하고 종합적으로 측정하고 평가함으로써 합리적인 기업의 성과를 예측하고 측정하는 평가시스템이다. 본 연구에서는 기업이 균형성과표(BSC) 모형을 도입하여 활용하는 경우 도입전과 후의 성과에서 유의미한 차이가 있는지를 구명하고, 비재무적 성과 지표와 재무적 성과 지표, 그리고 전반적인 경영성과 간의 영향관계를 분석하였다. 분석결과 균형성과표(BSC) 모형을 도입하여 활용하는 경우 기업의 학습 및 성장성과에 유의미한 차이가 분석되었으며, 비재무적 성과 지표들은 재무적 성과를 개선하여 전반적인 기업의 경영성과를 향상시키는 것으로 분석되었다.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제28권2호
• /
• pp.18-26
• /
• 2005

The balanced scorecard(BSC) overcomes the limit of traditional financial statement that focuses on only financial performance. BSC is widely used in government and industry because of the clear representation of the relationship and logic between the key performance indicators(KPI) of 4 perspectives - financial, customer, internal process, and loaming and growth. However, traditional BSC does not consider evaluating the difference between the results measured by BSC. By using relatively small number of inputs and outputs In comparing decision-making units, data envelopment analysis(DEA) can aggregate multiple performance measures. In this research, we propose a methodology named CDB(Combined DEA and BSC) to evaluate the performance of organization considering financial and non-financial perspectives. CDB uses KPI of cause-and-effect relationship on BSC as inputs and outputs of DEA method. In addition, this research proposes a method of converting the KPI of BSC to the input and output variables of DEA, and enhancing discrimination power using the limit number of variables. We illustrate the methodology by giving an example of evaluating aquisition-unit efficiency in a supply chain.

• 한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.107-124
• /
• 2005

ERP systems are comprehensive sorfware packages that seek to integrate the complete range of lbusiness processes and functions in order to present a heuristic perspectives of a firm from a single information and information technlogy architecture. The ERP systems have delicate internal controls with built-in devices. It is known that the delicate internal controls help to enhance the accounting transparency. We empirically investigate the relationship between the ERP systems inplementations and an accounting transparency. In order to measure the accounting transparency differences, we compare the ERP systems implementation firms with firms which did not implement the ERP systems by 6 financial ratios (accruals, net profit margin, operation cash folo to sales, total debt to equity, accounts receivable changes, assets quality). Data are collecte from 135 firms implemented the ERP systems and 135 firms non-implemented the systems (the firms listed in the Korea Stock Exchange). We analyze financial statements from 270 firms for the period 2001-2003 to ezamine the 6 financial ratios differences. The results of 810 firms analyses over the 3-year period indicate that the ERP systems implementation firms show the statistically significant differences in the accrual ratio, the net profit margin ratio, operating cash flow to sales ratio, and total debt to equity ratio from the ERP systems non-implementation firms. But there is statistically no differences between the two groups for accounts receivable changes to sales ratio and assets quality.

• 복식문화연구
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.177-188
• /
• 2009

SCM as the important marketing strategy enhance the firm's efficiency and compatibility in global market environment such as global outsourcing. Firms adopted SCM realized the need to evaluate precisely the performance of SCM. In spite of importance of SCM, there was not much intention and research to measure SCM performance in textile fashion industry. Therefore, the purpose of this case study was to measure performance of supply chain management in textile fashion business using BSC(Balanced Score Card) to measure not only financial perspective but also non-financial perspectives such as customer perspective, internal business perspectives, financial perspective, and innovation & learning perspective. The questionnaire developed by the reviews of the literature was adopted for this study. The results of this study showed that SCM performance was enhanced from the point of customer perspective(cost, quality, time, service), financial perspective(cash cycle time, inventory turn over, inventory obsolescence, return on asset, return on investment, capacity utilization), and innovation & learning perspective(cost for human resource management, service for human resources). But there was same performance level regarding internal business perspective(lead time, cost for manufacturing process, product quality control, productive flexibility for time, quantity, and variety). Therefore, we should keep close relationship and two way communication among supply chain members to promote better SCM performance.

• 한국산업경영시스템학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국산업경영시스템학회 2002년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.113-118
• /
• 2002

Research and Development(R&D) was once considered to be a unique, creative and unstructured process that was difficult, if not impossible, to manage and control. R&D decisions impact the entire enterprise. Therefore, decisions must not be based solely on R&D's perception of what is important or worthwhile. R&D contributions are difficult to measure separately from other functional organizations such as manufacturing and marketing. While some firms are attempting to overcome perceived limitations in traditional accounting-based performance measures using ROI, EVA, others are embracing the use of non-financial measures for decision making and performance evaluation. In particular, many firms are implementing 'Balanced Scorecard(BSC)' systems that supplement traditional accounting measures with non-financial measures focused on at least three other perspectives-customers, internal business processes, and learning and growth. AHP is a popular multi-attribute decision making model that allows for the development of importance rankings. The AHP has been applied in a wide variety of practical settings to model complex decision problems. The former, determine Perspectives and the Key Performance indicator(KPI) through the former research, the latter compose the questionnaire for determine the weight of perspectives and KPIs. And then, make a survey with researchers about 4 perspectives and 18 KPIs. The results will be simulate with Expert Choice 2000 for determine the weights. This results helps establish the firm's business strategy and technology strategy The firm should establish the business strategy to consider market position, business growth potential, and technological capabilities.

• 응용통계연구
• /
• 제29권1호
• /
• pp.1-12
• /
• 2016

금융시계열은 일반 시계열과는 차별적으로 stylized facts로 불리는 특징을 가지고 있다. 이 특징들은 급첨 성질, 비정규분포, 변동성 집중 및 비대칭성을 포함한다. 이러한 특징들을 설명하기 위해서는 기존의 선형 ARMA 모형에서 벗어난 특수한 모형이 필요하게 되었다. 본 논문은 변동성 모형인 GARCH 형태의 모형을 중심으로 특수 금융시계열 모형들을 소개하고 연관된 통계적 이슈들에 대해 가능한 최근 연구를 중심으로 폭 넓게 조망하고 있다.

• 한국경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국경영과학회 2001년도 추계학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.111-115
• /
• 2001

A good business performance measurement system is an effective tool io sustained growth in profits. Although interest in creating performance measurement models is widespread, a well-designed system is rare. To be successful in today's competitive environment, a performance measurement system should incorporate strategic success factors and contain financial and non-financial measuring index to carry out strategic management. In the 1990s, Kaplan & Norton introduced a concept called the Balanced Scorecard. The Balanced Scorecard supplements traditional financial measures with criteria that measured performance from three additional perspectives - those perspectives of customers, internal business processes, and learning and growth. This paper presents five measuring index criteria for each perspective. To calculate the relative priority for These measuring index, we investigate weights investigated by interviews with management consultant. Then, AHP method is employed for calculating priority weight. Our evaluation model may be referred to as the Balanced Analytic Hierarchical Performance Model(BAHPM) in the sense that the analytic hierarchical scheme, along with the AHP, is applied. The BAHPM is the first kind of analytical model to cover a wide variety of measures. In comparison with previous evaluation models, our model shows strengths in structural flexibility, ease of incorporating feedback, group evaluation capacity, participation promotion, sensitivity analysis, and computational simplicity. A prototype based on the BAHPM can be applied to various industry sectors.