• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제48권4호
• /
• pp.443-454
• /
• 2009

This study reviewed the notion and strategies of mathematical creativity from two point of view, mathematics and creativity. By these reviews, the spectrum was presented as frame of mathematical creativity task. Creativity and mathematics were seen as polar opposites and mathematical creativity task fit clearly at various points in this spectrum. Some focused on the quantity of ideas and originality from creative point of view. On the other hand, some focused on reasoning, insight, and generalization from mathematical point of view. The tasks on the spectrum were served as the vehicle of mathematical creativity and mathematics classroom. Therefore, there were some specific suggestions that mathematics classroom could be made a place where students and teachers would be able to foster their mathematical creativity.

• 한국초등수학교육학회지
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.39-61
• /
• 2012

학교 교육을 통하여 창의적인 인간을 양성해야 한다는 요구가 계속되고 있다. 특히 2011 수학과 교육과정 개정에서는 수학적 창의성과 인성을 길러주는데 초점을 두고 있다. 이를 위해 교육 현장에서 학생들의 창의성 개발을 위한 구체적인 방안의 모색이 필요하다. 이에 본 연구에서는 수학적 창의성의 요소를 추출하고, 창의성 개발을 위한 수업 모델을 탐색해 보았다. 먼저, 수학적 창의성에서의 논점과 수학적 창의성의 요소를 인지적, 정의적, 태도적 측면으로 알아보았다. 이러한 요소들은 수학적 창의성 개발 수업에서 창의성 개발에 영향을 주는 요소이며, 창의성을 평가하는 요소가 될 것이다. 이러한 기저를 바탕으로 수학 학습에서 학생들의 수학적 창의성을 기를 수 있는 8가지 수학과 창의성 개발 수업 모델을 제시하였다. 8가지 수학적 창의성 개발을 위한 수업 모델은 수학의 특성과 최근에 강조되는 수학교육 이론 및 창의성 이론을 바탕으로 하였다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집
• /
• 제20권4호
• /
• pp.561-574
• /
• 2006

Mathematical creativity has been confused with general creativity or mathematical problem solving ability in many studies. Also, it is considered as a special talent that only a few mathematicians and gifted students could possess. However, this paper revisited the mathematical creativity from a mathematics educator's point of view and attempted to redefine its definition. This paper proposes a model of creativity in school mathematics. It also proposes that the basis for mathematical creativity is in the understanding of basic mathematical concept and structure.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집
• /
• 제23권3호
• /
• pp.803-822
• /
• 2009

오늘날 창의성은 모든 분야에서 가장 중요한 요소로 부각이 되고 있다. 수학교육에서도 창의성을 강조하고 있으나 많은 수학교육자들에게 창의성 및 수학적 창의성의 개념에 대한 견해는 다양하다. 본 연구에서는 수학교육에서 수학적 창의성의 의미를 여러 선행 연구에서 에서는 어떻게 규정하고 있는지 알아보고, 학교 현장에서 수학시간에 교과서를 문제를 기반으로 이를 신장 시킬 수 있는 방안을 제안하였다. 이를 위하여 특정한 수학 문항에 대한 초등학생들의 반응을 분석하고 교과서의 예를 기반으로 한 창의적인 문제를 위한 확장 방안을 제시하였다. 연구의 결과에 의하면 학생들은 제한된 수학 전략을 사용하였으며, 수학교과서는 학생들의 창의성을 신장시키기 위한 과제로 개선할 필요가 있었다. 이의 개선을 위해서 수학교육에서 학생들의 창의성 신장을 위하여 과제 및 교재의 개발 및 교사교육 프로그램의 재조명이 필요함을 제안하였다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제51권4호
• /
• pp.337-349
• /
• 2012

The purpose of this study is to survey and analyze conception on creativity carried out from elementary school teachers in Seoul and Gyeonggi-do area. As results, first, most of teachers replied divergent thinking, creative problem solving, and new creation as general creativity and mathematical creativity. Secondly, they showed that thinking process would be related to transfer and cognition in terms of mathematical creativity factors. Lastly, there are significant differences among groups according to gender, teaching career, and age, even though most teachers expressed sympathy for need of creativity education in mathematics education.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구
• /
• 제9권4호
• /
• pp.341-350
• /
• 2005

In this increasingly technological world, the creativity development has been highlighted much in many countries. In this paper, two mathematical activities with Chinese characteristics are presented to illustrate how to integrate algorithmic teaching into mathematical activities to develop students' creativity. Case studies show that the learning of algorithm can be transferred into creative learning when students construct their own algorithms in Logo environment rather than being indoctrinated the existing algorithms. Creativity development in different stages of mathematical activities and creativity development in programming are also discussed.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제46권3호
• /
• pp.293-302
• /
• 2007

In this paper, we review definition and concept of mathematical creativity. A couple of criteria have established for perspectives in mathematical creativity, The first is specific domain(mathematics) vs general domain(creativity) and the second is process(thinking process) vs outcome(divergent production). By these criteria, four perspectives have constructed : mathematics-thinking process approach(McTd), mathematics-divergent production approach(MctD), creativity-thinking process approach(mCTd), creativity-divergent production approach(mCtD). When mathematical creativity is researched by the specific reason and particular focus, an appropriate approach can be chosen in four perspectives.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈C:초등수학교육
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.65-74
• /
• 2002

In this paper, inquiry-oriented mathematics instruction was suggested as a teaching method to foster mathematical creativity. And it is argued that inquiry learning assist students to explore the mathematical problem actively and thus participate in mathematical activities like mathematicians. Through inquiry activities, the students learn mathematical ideas and develop new and creative mathematical ideas. Although creativity is often viewed as being associated with exceptional ability, for mathematics teacher who want to develop students' mathematical creativity, it is productive to view mathematical creativity as a mathematical ability that can be fostered in general school education. And also, both teacher and student have to think that they can develop mathematical ideas by themselves. That is very important to foster mathematical creativity in the mathematics class.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제47권2호
• /
• pp.135-154
• /
• 2008

The purpose of this study is to help to improve the method of math teaching by analysing how learner-centered teaching method offsets mathematical creativity and mathematical disposition. For this purpose, research questions are established as follows; (1) Mathematical creativity between open-ended learning activity approach(OLAA) and general classroom-based instruction(GCI) shows any difference? (2) Mathematical disposition between OLAA and GCI shows any difference? The results obtained through this study were as follows: (1) There was significant difference between OLAA group and CCI group in mathematical creativity. This means that open-ended learning activity approach was generally more effective in improving mathematical creativity than general classroom-based instruction. (2) There was no significant difference between OLAA group and GCI group in mathematical disposition. But the average scores of mathematical disposition except mathematical confidence improved a little. So we can say that open-ended learning activity approach brought an positive influence on students' mathematical disposition. The results obtained in this study suggest that the OLAA can be used to cultivate the children's mathematical creativity and disposition. Therefore, I suggest that teachers should use the OLAA to improve the children's mathematical creativity and disposition.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.181-196
• /
• 2011

In mathematical modeling tasks, where students are exposed to model-eliciting for real and open problems, students are supposed to formulate and use a variety of mathematical skills and tools at hand to achieve feasible and meaningful solutions using appropriate problem solving strategies. In contrast to problem solving activities in conventional math classes, math modeling tasks call for varieties of mathematical ability including mathematical creativity. Mathematical creativity encompasses complex and compound traits. Many researchers suggest the exhaustive list of criterions of mathematical creativity. With regard to the research considering the possibility of enhancing creativity via math modeling instruction, a quantitative scheme to scale and calibrate the creativity was investigated and the assessment of math modeling activity was suggested for practical purposes.