• 충청수학회지
• /
• 제26권4호
• /
• pp.781-786
• /
• 2013

Let * be a star-operation on an integral domain R. We show that if R is a $*_{\omega}$-Noetherian domain, then quasi-$*_{\omega}$-invertible prime $*_{\omega}$-ideals of R are minimal, and prime ideals of R minimal over a $*_{\omega}$-invertible $*_{\omega}$-ideal are minimal.

• 충청수학회지
• /
• 제26권4호
• /
• pp.703-706
• /
• 2013

Let R be a commutative noetherian algebra and let ${\delta}$ be a nonzero derivation. Here we determine the prime ideals of the skew polynomial algebra R[z;${\delta}$] and the Poisson prime ideals of R[z;${\delta}$]p.

• 호남수학학술지
• /
• 제28권4호
• /
• pp.485-497
• /
• 2006

Further properties on a fuzzy ideal of a right K(G)-algbera $\mathcal{G}$ are investigated. Using a family of ideals of a right K(G)-algebra $\mathcal{G}$ with additional conditions, a fuzzy ideal of $\mathcal{G}$ is established. Given a fuzzy set $\mu$ in $\mathcal{G}$, the least fuzzy ideal of $\mathcal{G}$ containing $\mu$ is described. Using a chain of ideals of $\mathcal{G}$, a fuzzy ideal of $\mathcal{G}$ is constructed, and their properties are investigated.

• 호남수학학술지
• /
• 제31권3호
• /
• pp.335-349
• /
• 2009

Soft set theory by Molodtsov is applied to ideals in BCC-algebras. The notion of soft BCC-ideals of soft BCC-algebras and idealistic soft BCC-algebras are introduced, and several examples are provided. Relations between a fuzzy BCC-ideal and an idealistic soft BCC-algebra are given, and the characterization of idealistic soft BCC-algebras is established.

• 대한수학회보
• /
• 제44권1호
• /
• pp.151-156
• /
• 2007

A connection between weak ${\pi}-regularity$ and the condition every prime ideal is maximal will be investigated. We prove that a certain 2-primal ring R is weakly ${\pi}-regular$ if and only if every prime ideal is maximal. This result extends several known results nontrivially. Moreover a characterization of minimal prime ideals is also considered.

• 대한수학회지
• /
• 제46권4호
• /
• pp.775-784
• /
• 2009

In 1932, Lehmer [4] gave the definition of a ternary semigroup. We can see that any semigroup can be reduced to a ternary semigroup. In this paper, we give some auxiliary results which are also necessary for our considerations and characterize the relationship between the (0-)minimal and maximal ordered lateral ideals and the lateral simple and lateral 0-simple ordered ternary semigroups analogous to the characterizations of minimal and maximal left ideals in ordered semigroups considered by Cao and Xu [2].

• 대한수학회지
• /
• 제36권2호
• /
• pp.369-380
• /
• 1999

As a continuation of the paper [3], in this paper we investigate the further properties on LI-ideals, and show that how to generate an LI-ideal by both and LI-ideal and an element. We define a prime LI-ideal, and give an equivalent condition for a proper LI-ideal to be prime. Using this result, we establish the extension property and prime LI-ideal theorem.

• 대한수학회보
• /
• 제46권3호
• /
• pp.591-598
• /
• 2009

This paper studies the relations between ideals, filters, regular congruences and normal congruences in inclines. It is shown that for any incline, there are a one-to-one correspondence between all ideals and all regular congruences and a one-to-one correspondence between all filters and all normal congruences.

• 대한수학회논문집
• /
• 제23권3호
• /
• pp.333-342
• /
• 2008

We introduce weak Armendariz ideals which are a generalization of ideals have the weakly insertion of factors property (or simply weakly IFP) and investigate their properties. Moreover, we prove that, if I is a weak Armendariz ideal of R, then I[x] is a weak Armendariz ideal of R[x]. As a consequence, we show that, R is weak Armendariz if and only if R[x] is a weak Armendariz ring. Also we obtain a generalization of [8] and [9].

• Korean Journal of Mathematics
• /
• 제8권1호
• /
• pp.19-26
• /
• 2000

In this paper, it is shown that if R is a commutative ring with identity and there exists a multiplicatively closed subset S of R such that $S{\cap}Z(R/(I_1I_2{{\cdots}I_n))={\emptyset}$ and $I_1R_s,I_2R_s{\cdots},I_nR_s$ are pairwise comaximal, then $I_1I_2{\cdots}I_n=I_1{\cap}I_2{\cap}{\cdots}{\cap}I_n={\cap}^n_{i=1}(I_i\;:_R\;I_1{\cdots}I_{i-1}I_{i+1}{\cdots}I_n)$.