• 산업공학
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.78-88
• /
• 2010

In this paper we develop a model for the performance evaluation of defense R&D test development projects based on analytic hierarchy process. First, evaluation indicators are collected through the related literature survey and a delphi inquiry method. Second, stepwise multiple linear regression is used for developing a hierarchical structure for analytic hierarchy process in the evaluation model, which can make the selected evaluation indicators of the hierarchical structure independent. Also we verify the effectiveness of proposed indicators of the performance evaluation by comparing with the existing evaluation indicators. The developed indicators for the performance evaluation is more reasonable and practical than the previous indicators on defense R&D test development projects.

• 실천공학교육논문지
• /
• 제16권3_spc호
• /
• pp.309-325
• /
• 2024

이 연구의 목적은 LINC 3.0 기술혁신선도형 사업운영의 객관적 검증과 성과분석을 위한 자체평가지표를 개발하는 데 있다. 이러한 목적을 달성하기 위해 인력양성 분야와 기술개발 및 사업화 분야의 평가지표를 개발하고 그 타당성을 검증하였다. 이를 위해 평가관련 선행연구 및 유사사례를 조사하여 평가모델 및 체계를 구성하고 평가지표를 개발하였다. 개발한 평가지표 및 척도는 2회의 델파이조사를 통해 타당성을 확보하였다. 연구결과, LINC 3.0 자체평가지표는 인력양성 분야와 기술개발 및 사업화 분야로 구분, 총 66개의 평가지표를 개발하였다. 인력양성 분야는 평가항목 13개, 평가지표 38개로 개발하였고, 기술개발 및 사업화 분야는 평가항목 12개, 평가지표 28개를 도출하였다. 본 연구는 LINC 3.0 사업의 자체평가지표를 개발함으로써 대학 산학협력 모델의 객관적 검증과 타당성을 높이는 방안을 제시하였다는 의의를 갖는다. 연구에서 개발한 평가지표에 대해서는 현장활용성을 토대로 지속적으로 고도화 작업이 필요하며, 평가결과 도출된 우수사례의 공유·확산을 통해 대학교육의 질적 수준을 높이고 경쟁력을 강화하는 것이 필요하다.

• International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology
• /
• 제14권2호
• /
• pp.99-139
• /
• 2024

In this study, the library ESG evaluation indicators specialized for libraries were developed, and based on which, a survey was conducted targeting the actual libraries to evaluate the ESG level of libraries. As a result of the study, first, among the ESG evaluation indicators, the indicators of the social field and the governance field are demonstrating high in which field of the library's ESG evaluation indicators will appear the highest. The social area's high score of 3.70 seems to be because the protection of users' rights, occupational safety, and contribution to society and the local community are very closely related to the original role of the library. Second, it may be seen that there is a difference between the questions in the corporate governance part, while the averages are the same. In the case of library's cooperation, it turned out that it was 3.94 in the necessity evaluation of the evaluation indicators, but it was lowered to 3.61 in the actual library situation evaluation. Meanwhile, in connection with the activities of the director of library and the board of directors, it may be seen that the index evaluation increased from 3.32 to 3.58 in the actual evaluation.

• 한국환경과학회지
• /
• 제15권12호
• /
• pp.1205-1220
• /
• 2006

This study was conducted to develop the evaluation model which can analyse local agenda 21 comprehensively and systematically from the making process to the designed contents. The evaluation model was devised through the theoretical review of local agenda 21 and designing the evaluation system composed of evaluation domains, related indicators and scales. The evaluation system was carefully constructed based on planning theories and the discussion and agreement of specialists regarding local agenda 21. This model has three evaluation domains of process, content, and evaluation of implementation with different weighting values. Each domain contains large indicators, medium indicators and small indicators. Each indicator has different weighting value according to its importance. Basically, each small indicator was scored by 3 or 5 point scale. This evaluation system can not only analyse local agenda 21 quantitatively, but also find out good points, problems, and limits of various phases of planning and implementing local agenda 21.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제45권2호
• /
• pp.309-324
• /
• 2011

이 연구의 목적은 우리나라 대학도서관 평가에 적용할 수 있는 평가 지표를 개발하는 것이다. 이 연구에서는 (1) 평가 방법, 절차 및 기준의 확정, (2) 평가에 사용될 정량적 및 정성적 평가 지표의 개발, (3) 시범 평가를 통한 지표의 적용 가능성 평가라는 세 가지 요소로 구성된 대학도서관 평가 모형을 구축하는 동시에 일반 현황 지표, 전국 대학 공동활용 지표, 특성화 지표 및 이용자 만족도 지표를 개발하였다. 이 지표들을 사용하여 2010년 대학도서관 평가 시범사업을 시행함으로써 이들의 적용 가능성 및 타당성을 검증하고자 시도하였다.

• 정보관리학회지
• /
• 제32권1호
• /
• pp.43-62
• /
• 2015

본 연구는 국내 공공도서관에서 장서개발정책 수립 시에 활용할 수 있는 다양한 장서평가 지표를 제시할 목적으로 수행되었다. 이러한 탐색적 연구를 위하여 공공도서관의 실제 데이터를 개별 장서평가 지표에 적용하는 사례연구를 통해서 그 활용 가능성을 확인하고자 하였다. 장서평가 지표 분석을 위하여 서울시 광진구립도서관의 최근 10년간 장서대출 데이터가 이용되었다. 주요 장서평가 지표로는 연도별 구입도서의 장서회전율과 이용계수, 연도별 사서 추천도서 장서회전율과 이용계수, 연도별 비대출도서 비율, 대출자 거주지별 도서관 이용도 등이 분석되었다.

• 산업공학
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.96-108
• /
• 2008

This paper proposes the systematic design approach for developing the evaluation indicators that evaluate the candidate proposals in the national defense core-technology R&D projects. To improve the validity and fairness of the evaluation indicators, the existing evaluation process in a military and a public sector are surveyed and also the existing evaluation system of the core-technology R&D programs for the national defense is analysed and discussed. A new system for the evaluation indicators is designed by using the axiomatic design, factor analysis and the analytic hierarchy process. It is expected that the proposed evaluation indicators contribute to enhance the fairness and the reliability of the evaluation process for the proposal of the national defense core-technology R&D projects.

• 농촌계획
• /
• 제4권2호
• /
• pp.70-78
• /
• 1998

The objective of this study was to enforce systematic evaluation on the present condition and ecosystem of coastal wetland to use frame of environmental indicators, For this, the indicators for evaluation of coastal wetland were established and were applied to the present condition. Then, the application possibility of this evaluation indicators and management method by group of coastal method are presented. These results present the following consideration in case that the ideal management method on the conservation and development of coastal wetlands was proposed. In case of Kang-hwa island which had the good natural environment, the mlnimum development with maintenance of the present state must be driven. In case of Tae-an which had the good natural environment and development potential, the development that was in harmony with the nature must to be driven. In case of Seo-chon which was previously developed region, the various development programs which had the minimum effects on the natural, living and socio $.$ economic environment must to be provided.

• 한국군사과학기술학회지
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.70-79
• /
• 2009

Currently, the investment on Research and Development(R&D) for defense core technology is continuously increasing to maintain advanced country's R&D level. In accordance with this trend, the national defense R&D investment management system is being more strengthening, and importance of performance evaluation is being emphasized more and more. However, the existing indicators of performance evaluation for defense core technology R&D is limited in efficient management because of the qualitative evaluation items and subjective allocation of points. In this paper, we developed a novel indicator for defense core technology R&D performance evaluation through domestic and foreign related literature and inquiry, brainstorming, and analysis techniques by Stepwise Multiple linear Regression(SMR) and Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP). And we verified effectiveness of proposed indicators of performance evaluation by comparing with the existing evaluation indicators. Our proposed indicators for performance evaluation will create superiority performance on defense R&D fields.

• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.23-38
• /
• 1997

In this Study, indicators for the evaluation of environmental amenity were determined through the investigation of the resident's consciousness in all thirty one cities and counties of Kyonggi. Also, environmental amenity that the resident feel in terms of recognition level was evaluated and based on the determined environmental indicators, environmental amenity for the physical environmental situation was evaluated. By analyzing the results, basic data for the planning of the future environmental management were prepared. The results of this study can be summarized as follows First, the developed indicators for the evaluation of environmental amenity consist of four intermediate evaluation items and fifteen individual evaluation items, and fifty four evaluation standards in total . Two to five evaluation standards were determined for the respective individual evaluation items. Second, using the developed indicators, the evaluation of environmental amenity were implemented based on both resident's consciousness and statistical data. Third, by analyzing the difference between two evaluation results, future research plan was proposed.