Journal of the Korea Institute of Military Science and Technology (한국군사과학기술학회지)

The Korea Institute of Military Science and Technology (한국군사과학기술학회)
권호 표지

The Development of Evaluation Indicators for the Performance of Defense Core-Technology R&D Projects Using SMR/AHP

SMR/AHP 기법을 활용한 국방핵심기술 연구개발사업 성과평가지표 개발

  • 이형준 (서울산업대학교 산업정보시스템) ;
  • 김찬수 (국방기술품질원) ;
  • 김우제 (서울산업대학교 산업정보시스템)
  • Published : 2009.02.05
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Currently, the investment on Research and Development(R&D) for defense core technology is continuously increasing to maintain advanced country's R&D level. In accordance with this trend, the national defense R&D investment management system is being more strengthening, and importance of performance evaluation is being emphasized more and more. However, the existing indicators of performance evaluation for defense core technology R&D is limited in efficient management because of the qualitative evaluation items and subjective allocation of points. In this paper, we developed a novel indicator for defense core technology R&D performance evaluation through domestic and foreign related literature and inquiry, brainstorming, and analysis techniques by Stepwise Multiple linear Regression(SMR) and Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP). And we verified effectiveness of proposed indicators of performance evaluation by comparing with the existing evaluation indicators. Our proposed indicators for performance evaluation will create superiority performance on defense R&D fields.

Keywords

References

  1. 2006 국방백서, 국방부, pp. 167-168, 2006
  2. 방위사업관리규정, 방위사업청, pp. 78-93, 2007
  3. 오동훈, 김재영 등 10명, '연구개발 성과의 평가관리체계 구축을 위한 표준 평가지침 및 교육프로그램 개발', 한국과학기술기획평가원(KISTEP), 정책연구 2005-06, pp. 100-104, 2005
  4. 양희승, '우리나라 국가연구개발사업 연구평가지표의 개선에 관한 연구', 대한산업공학회 춘계학술대회 pp. SA10-1-SA10-4, 2004
  5. 박소희, '평가지표 인식유형에 관한 연구', 한국과학기술기획평가원, pp. 1-12, 2006
  6. 조택, '공공기관의 경영평가지표 개편안에 관한 연구', 한국거버넌스학회, Vol. 14(3), pp. 285-313, 2007
  7. Lee, H. J., Kim, W. J., 'A Study on the Development of Evaluation Indicators for the Performance of Defence Core-Technology R&D Project', KIMST Conference, pp. 41-44, 2008
  8. Project Management Institute, Inc, 'Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK)', V. 3.0, p. 9, 2004
  9. Park, Y. T., Kim, S. D., 'A Study on Brainstorming and Its Variants', Korean J. of The Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, Session BO4.4, pp. 435-441, 1999
  10. 장재윤, '전자브레인스토밍: 집단 창의성 기법으로서의 허와 실', 한국심리학회지, Vol. 14(3), pp. 79-108, 2000
  11. 강병서, 김계수, '사회과학 통계분석(SPSS 12K)', 한나래, pp. 251-294, 2007
  12. Hyot, W. T., Leierer, S. and Millington, M. J., 'Analysis and Interpretation of Findings Using Multiple Regression Techniques', Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin(RCB), Vol. 49(4), pp. 223-233, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1177/00343552060490040401
  13. Saaty, T. L. & Vargas, L. G., 'Model, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process', Boston : Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 3-9, 2001
  14. Cho, K. T., Jo, Y. G. and Kang, H. S., 'The Analytic Hierarchy Process', Donghyun pub., Seoul Korea, 2003