• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제31권5호
• /
• pp.73-85
• /
• 2003

With more and more people paying attention to substantial democracy, participatory democracy is presented as a practical strategy and an index of Korean democracy. In this social and political atmosphere, participation in environmental planning and design is essential. Nonetheless, the true meaning of “participation” is not used properly because many people do not understand it correctly, The concept of social and political participation is “the action or attempt of ordinary members of society for affecting on the result of decision making.” Based on this concept, participation is accomplished through conventional means and as a form of mobilization in environmental planning and desist Most of the theories on public participation in landscape architecture are technical theories. Therefore, this paper proposes that planning and design of landscape architecture be understood as a communicative action that aims to enable stakeholders to reach a consensus through communication. This study offers the framework of theory to understand and practice planning and design of landscape architecture as a communicative action, after reviewing communicative action theory and communicative planning theory. Results suggest that communicative action theory should be accepted in landscape architecture to overcome the shortcomings of instrumental rationality -- the same way planning theory accepted this theory --and to join the culture of experts focusing on the artistic truth and the culture of life of the world. In addition, accepting communicative action theory enables the acquisition of the instrumental effect and social learning effect and the making of social capital. This study also suggested prerequisite for using the method. There should be change in the social institution and in individual action. In addition the method is composed of three steps: creating the atmosphere for communication; communicating, and; reaching a consensus among stakeholders. Finally, raising the possibility of applying the theory presented in this study requires the accumulation of know-how through trial and error.

• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제31권1호
• /
• pp.78-89
• /
• 2003

This paper presents a community participatory small-park design. It proposes that environmental planning and design can be understood as a communicative action that aims to achieve consensus among stakeholders through communication with the local residents. By studying the communicative action theory and communicative planning theory, three strategies were set for practicing small-park design as a communicative action: (1) stakeholders should how what data and actions are needed; (2) citizens should have access to the data and participate in the process; (3) the community's concerns should be consulted and their opinions heard. In applying the three strategies to the small-Park design, a council composed of experts, community members, and NGO's was established. All processes were then executed after careful deliberation. From interviews, the town-touring program and surveys, the design of the site was determined among the stakeholders. The site was subsequently designed based on the needs of the community and revised according to their suggestions. Finally, the small park was constructed. Even though the researchers experienced many limitations because the site is very small, the significance of this study can be outlined as follows: (1) the need to construct the park was suggested by the community rather than by the administration; (2) experts, members of the community, and NGO's constituted the council; (3) the design process involved deliberation among the members of council rather than a method previously established by experts; (4) the administration supported rather than led the entire process: (5) citizens discussed and reached a consensus by themselves.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제13권8호
• /
• pp.439-447
• /
• 2015

본 연구의 목적은 융복합 사회에서 대학구조개혁정책을 Habermas의 의사소통행위이론 관점에서 논의하고, 한국대학구조개혁정책에 시사점 제공이다. 본 연구는 문헌연구이고 한국대학구조개혁정책과 Habermas의 의사소통행위이론을 분석하여 Habermas의 의사소통행위이론 관점에서 한국대학구조개혁정책에 주는 시사점을 분석하였다. 한국대학구조개혁은 대학의 재구조화와 대학교육의 질적인 향상을 위하여 추진되었으나, 국가통제의 성격이 강하다. Habermas의 의사소통행위이론의 주요개념은 상호이해이며, 사회를 체계와 생활세계로 파악한다. 생활세계는 의사소통적 합리성을 추구하며 이해지향적이다. 체계는 합리성을 추구하며 화폐와 권력을 매체로 하여 성공(목적)지향적이다. 한국 대학구조개혁정책은 국가권력에 의하여 화폐(지원금 등)를 강제적으로 배분하는 것이 아니라, 생활세계의 영역에서 국가와 대학구성원 간의 상호이해와 의사소통을 통하여 추진해 나가야 한다.

• Asia pacific journal of information systems
• /
• 제23권3호
• /
• pp.105-129
• /
• 2013

This study draws important factors in electronic Word-of-Mouth (eWOM) and examines how these influence the building of customer loyalty. eWOM is viewed as social communication between customers and sellers, and thus the communicative action theory is applied. With the theory, we identify reviewer and seller as influential players on customers, and derive important factors such as correctness and veracity of reviews from the reviewers' action, and information compactness and adequacy from the seller's action. We propose these constructs as antecedents of customer loyalty and further hypothesize their curvilinear impacts as follows: the marginal impacts of veracity and correctness will decrease as veracity and correctness increase, and the marginal impacts of compactness and adequacy will increase as compactness and adequacy increase. The result indicates that only the seller's action has a curvilinear impact, whereas the reviewer has proportional positive impact on customer loyalty. This study indentifies important factors in eWOM from a critical social theory perspective and validates them using the positivistic approach. For practitioners, it discusses the important factors in eWOM with the identification of the individuals who are responsible for these factors.

• 한국언론정보학보
• /
• 제30권
• /
• pp.89-119
• /
• 2005

PR커뮤니케이션이 기능주의적인 시각에서 벗어나서 다양한 패러다임 접근을 받아들이는 것은 하버마스의 사회비판이론이 도구적인 이성에서 벗어나 광범위한 의사소통 합리성을 추구하는 것과 유사한 맥락에서 이해될 수 있다. 기능주의 함정으로부터 하버마스가 광범위한 합리성 통합을 통해 해답을 찾는 것과 다양한 패러다임의 통합을 통한 'PR커뮤니케이션 민주주의'의 추구는 많은 유사성을 가지고 있다. 이 연구의 목적은 도구적 이성의 왜곡화로 인해 발생하는 현대사회의 병폐를 치유하기 위한 하버마스의 의사소통합리성 기획이 어떤 면에서 PR커뮤니케이션 이론의 패러다임 변화와 맞닿아 있는가를 밝히고, 그러한 두 분야의 유사성으로부터 새로운 PR커뮤니케이션 이론화의 가능성을 모색해 보는 것이다. 또한, PR커뮤니케이션을 통해서 하버마스 사회비판이론의 실천적인 측면을 탐색해 볼 수 있으며, 개인, 조직, 국가차원의 다양한 관계 속에서 대화의 진작, 사회 합의의 도출, 갈등의 해결, 공론 장의 확대와 같은 포괄적인 커뮤니케이션 합리성을 적용해 보는 계기를 마련해 볼 수 있다.

• 한국간호교육학회지
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.42-50
• /
• 2016

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of action learning on critical thinking disposition, communicative competence, and problem-solving ability in nursing students. Methods: The design for this was a nonequivalent control group pretest-posttest design was used for identification of the effects of lessons using action learning. The consenting participants were 184 fourth-year nursing students in D-city (Experimental group=95, Control group=89). Data was collected and the program was conducted from May 2 to July 19, 2015. Data was analyzed with an ${\chi}^2-test$, a t-test, and a paired t-test and utilized the SPSS win 21.0 program. Results: There were significant differences in critical thinking ability (t=5.00, p<.001), problem-solving ability (t=4.52, p<.001), and communicative competence (t=4.97, p<.001) in the experimental group compared to the control group. Conclusion: The study findings suggest that action-learning programs have proven to be an effective educational program for improving the critical thinking ability, problem solving ability, and communicative competence of nursing students. Action learning can be an effective teaching strategy.

• 철학연구
• /
• 제120호
• /
• pp.89-119
• /
• 2018

하버마스/루만 논쟁의 쟁점들 중 비판이론 대 체계이론이라는 오래된 대립구도를 확인하는 것은 큰 의미가 없다. 오늘날 더 중요한 쟁점들은 두 학자가 논쟁 이후에 이룬 성과와 관련된 것이다. '소통적 행위'와 '토의'가 그런 쟁점들이다. 이 쟁점들로부터 출발해 하버마스는 소통적 행위 이론을 정립했고, 루만은 사회적 체계들의 요소를 소통으로 간주하고 행위를 자기관찰의 요소로 간주했다. 특히 소통을 일차적 개념으로 간주하고, 행위를 행위자에 대한 귀속결과로 본루만의 작업은 행위이론 중심의 사회학 전통에 도전한 매우 생산적인 전환이었다. 그럼에도 이 전환에는 귀속 갈등이 심화될 경우에 대한 고민이 결여되어 있다. 나는 무한 귀속 갈등의 문제를 해결하기 위해서는 하버마스의소통적 행위 개념에 들어있는 '이해시키기'를 주목할 필요가 있다고 본다.

• Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice
• /
• 제12권3호
• /
• pp.14-35
• /
• 2024

This qualitative study explores cyberbullying among college students through Habermas's Theory of Communicative Action to examine the dissonance between online interactions and principles of rational discourse. Cyberbullying is a pervasive issue in digital communication that undermines logical, evidence-based conversation, fostering environments where misinformation, manipulation, and harm thrive. By analyzing case studies from three universities, the research identifies the characteristics, dynamics, and emotional impacts of cyberbullying on victims, highlighting the role of social media platforms in facilitating these negative interactions. The findings reveal significant challenges to authentic and equal online conversations, driven by power imbalances and a lack of genuine communication, leading to psychological distress, erosion of self-esteem, and changes in behavior among victims. The study underscores the potential of social media design and policy interventions to mitigate cyberbullying, emphasizing the need for educational programs, technological solutions, and community support to promote a safer, more respectful digital environment. Key themes include the dynamics of cyberbullying, the suppression of rational discourse, the psychological and emotional consequences of inauthentic communication, and strategies for resilience and recovery. The research contributes to understanding cyberbullying's complexities and suggests a multifaceted approach to addressing it, aligning with Habermas's ideal of communicative rationality to foster healthier online communities. Future research should further explore the intersection of technology design, user behavior, and regulatory policies to combat cyberbullying effectively.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제14권9호
• /
• pp.251-264
• /
• 2016

본 연구는 기업에서 사용하는 모바일 UC의 소통채널로써의 방향성을 수립하는데 목적이 있다. 최근 많은 기업에서 모바일 UC 도입을 검토하거나 도입하여 활성화하기 위해 노력하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 단순한 기능적 측면의 관점에서 벗어나 SNS나 UC의 본래 목적인 소통에 대한 관심에서 출발한다. 하버마스의 의사소통행위이론에 기초하여 사용목적과 생활세계의 기능을 도출하였다. 연구는 첫째, SNS와 mUC 이용에 있어 행위나 발화의 유형에 따른 사용상 차이가 있는지, 둘째 SNS와 mUC가 생활세계에 미치는 영향에 대한 차이가 있는지 확인하고, 셋째 SNS와 mUC 이용에 있어 이용자 특성에 따른 차이가 있는지 검토하는 것을 주제로 하였다. 연구 결과 SNS와 mUC 이용에 있어 행위나 발화의 유형에 따른 사용상 차이가 있었고, 둘째 생활세계에 미치는 영향에 대한 차이는 거의 없었으며, 셋째 이용자 특성에 따른 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 기업에서 mUC를 도입하거나 활성화할 때 방향성 수립에 기여할 것이다.

• 대한가정학회지
• /
• 제36권10호
• /
• pp.49-64
• /
• 1998

The purpose of this study is to find out the degree of practice in three systems of action in home life of female and male middle school students who have learned the home economics under the 6th curriculum revision for three years since 1995 by teacher's major, student's sex, help from the family members, mothers' job, and the form of family. The results of this study are as follows: 1) The practice in systems of action in home life is relatively low in the communicative action, but is high unexpectably in emancipative action. 2) Depending on teacher's major, the practice in systems of action in home life of the students who have been taught by home economics majored teacher is high in communicative action but there is no significant difference in emancipative action between two groups. 3) The r]practice of female students is high in family, clothing, and housing areas, but therer is no significant difference between female and male students in resources and consuming, and food and nutrition areas of home life. 4) The more the family members help the students, the higher their practice in systems of action in home life. 5) The practice in all systems of action in home life has no significant difference between mothers with jobs and mothers without jobs. 6) There is no significant difference in systems of action in home life among groups by forms of family. 7) The result of multiple regression analysis shows that the helf from family members and sex of student independent variables have relative influence in the practice of home life.