• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제26권4호
• /
• pp.946-962
• /
• 1996

The purpose of this study was to contribute to the development of clinical instruction by students' ratings of teaching effectiveness in clinical nursing education. The subjects were comprised of graduating class 618 students from 24 nursing colleges in the nation. The instruments used in this study were "general characteristics & status of clinical nursing education" developed by the researcher and "Instrument to Measure Effectiveness of Clinical Instructors" by Reeve(1994). The 50 questions used in the questionaire were categorized into 13 components subject to factor analysis. The 13 components were interpersonal relationships, communication skills, role model, resource for students, favorable to students, encouraging to think for selves, teaching methods, evaluation, finding assignments for objectives, organization of subject matter, professional competence, knowledge of subject matter & working with agency personnel. The results of this study are as follows 1. Status of clinical nursing educaion : 1) Clinical nursing education were led by nursing professors(44.9%), a team of both nuring professor & head nurse(6.8%), instructors from specific hospital(15.1%), instuctos for a specific subject(14.6%), & head nurse(6.8%). For 3-year program students, 34.6% of the clinical nursing education were led by instructors from specific hospital & 51.4% of the education by nursing professors for Bachelor's program. 2) The contents for clinical education comprised of Conference being the most frequent of 34.5% ; a combination of Nursing skills, Orientation, Conference etc.22.0% : Nursing process 21.7% : Orientation 13.5% : Inspection(making rounds ) 6.4%, & Nursing skills of 2% being the least frequent. 3) Students' preference of clinical teachers from the highest to the lowest were instructors for a specific subject being the most desired (44.9%) followed by nursing professor, head nurse, a team of both nursing professor & head nurse, & instructors from specific hospital being the least desired. 4) Students felt that the qualification for clinical teachers should be at least a master's degree holder and 5 or more years of clinical experience. The reason they felt was because knowledge & experience are imperative for professional education. 2. Clinical teaching effectiveness : The total points for teaching effectiveness was 147.97(mean of 2.95±0.98) where the total score is considered to be an average rating. 3. Teaching effectiveness as status of clinical nursing education : 1) The score ratings for the clinical instructors from the highest to the lowest were as follows : instructors for a specific subject, instructors from specific hospitals, a team of both nursing professors & head nurses, nursing professors, head nurses, which resulted in significunt difference(F=4.53, P<0.001). 2) The rating scores based on the teaching program from the highest to the lowest were as follws ; nursing skills, nursing process, a combination of nursing skills, orientation, conference etc. , conferences, orientation, inspection, which resulted in significunt difference(F=10.97, P<0.001). 4. Based on 13 categorized components from the questionaires, questions related to communication skills scored the highest points of 3.20 where inquiries regarding resource for students scored the lowest points of 2.38. 5. Among the 13 categorial components from the questionaire, Interpersonal relationship, Communication skills, Resource for students, Encouraging to think for selves, Evaluation, Teaching method, Finding assignment for objectives, Organization of subject matter, Professional competence, & Working with agency personnel, instructors for a specific subject scored the highest points and head nurse scored the lowest, which resulted in significant difference. Favorable for students, instructors for a specific subject scored highest points and nursing professor scored the lowest, which resulted in significant deference (F=5.39, P<0.001). Role model & Professional competence, instructors for a specific subject scored the highest points and head nurse scored the lowest, with minimum variation(F=1.29, P>0.05 : F=1.64, P>0.05) 6. Based on 13 categorial components as a whole, the highest points scored among the 5 groups of clinical teachers was instructors for a specific subject and the lowest, by head nurse(F=1.94, P<0. 001). A team of both nursing professor & head nurse attained higher score in clinical education than their independent education.

• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제41권4호
• /
• pp.433-443
• /
• 2011

Purpose: Clinical training for nursing students is limited to rudimentary skills to avoid potential risks. Simulation-Based Training (SBT) can overcome the shortcomings of clinical training. We evaluated the educational effect of SBT for obstetrical nursing students using high-fidelity simulation courses. Methods: We developed a simulation program for obstetrical nursing students to practice nursing skills that are necessary to provide quality care. The program consisted of four sessions. 1st: An orientation and a preliminary test. 2nd: Learning core skills required in obstetrical nursing. 3rd: Testing each student with scenario. 4th: Providing a debriefing session. At the beginning of the program, students were surveyed about their self-confidence in obstetrical nursing care, and at the end of the program, they were surveyed about the adequacy of SBT as well as self-confidence. Results: Students' self-confidence showed a significant difference before and after simulation. Mean adequacy of SBT was $7.15{\pm}1.35$ (out of 10). Most students became more interested in Women's Health Nursing after SBT. Conclusion: The results from evaluating the effects of simulation-based obstetrical nursing training show that SBT provides invaluable clinical experience for obstetrical nursing students by overcoming the lack of actual clinical involvement in clinical training programs.

• 한국간호교육학회지
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.226-234
• /
• 2011

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify the effect of a simulation-based practice on clinical performance and problem solving processes for nursing students. Method: The study used a one group pre-post test design. Students experienced a simulation-based practice that included team base learning, skill training, taking a high-fidelity simulation with SimMan 3G, and also being debriefed for 12 weeks (August 2010 to December 2010). The pre-test and post-test were conducted to compare the differences in knowledge, clinical nursing skills, and problem solving processes. Result: After students had received the simulation-based practice, they showed statistically significant higher knowledge (t=14.73, p<.001) and clinical nursing skills (t=15.47, p<.001) than before. However, there was no significant difference in the problem solving process score (t=1.53, p=.127). Conclusion: This study showed that knowledge and clinical nursing skills were significantly improved by the simulation-based practice. Further research would be required to identify how the problem solving process that uses simulation-based practice could be developed further.

• 동서간호학연구지
• /
• 제29권1호
• /
• pp.78-85
• /
• 2023

Purpose: This study aims to examine factors affecting nursing professionalism among nursing students. Methods: Data were collected using a structured questionnaire from July to August, 2022. The participants were a total of 266 students in the 3^rd and 4^th grades located in A and C cities. T-test, ANOVA, Scheffe' test, Pearson's correlation coefficient and multiple regression were used for data analysis using SPSS 24.0 program. Results: The average score for clinical competency was 4.05±0.59 (out of 5), confidence in essential nursing skill was 3.52±0.64 (out of 5), and nursing professionalism was 4.11±0.52 (out of 5). There was a positive correlation between clinical competency and confidence in essential nursing skills with nursing professionalism. The factors influencing nursing professionalism were clinical competency and grade, which explained 30% of nursing professionalism. Conclusion: The results of this study may be used as basic data for developing educational methods to improve nursing professionalism.

• 한국융합학회논문지
• /
• 제9권11호
• /
• pp.569-579
• /
• 2018

본 연구는 간호대학생의 핵심기본간호술의 임상수행 경험과 자신감, 임상수행능력 정도를 알아보기 위한 연구이다. 자료는 빈도와 백분율, 평균과 표준편차, t-test, ANOVA, Pearson's Correlation Coefficient, 다중회귀분석을 통하여 분석하였다. 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 핵심기본간호술의 임상수행경험, 수행자신감 및 임상수행능력에서 유의한 차이를 보인 일반적 특성은 학년이며, 임상수행능력과 핵심기본간호술 수행경험 그리고 수행자신감은 순상관관계가 있었다. 임상수행능력에 가장 큰 영향을 미치는 요인은 핵심기본간호술 수행자신감으로 31.2%의 설명력을 보였다. 이러한 결과는 간호대학생의 임상수행능력을 높이기 위해 간호대학생의 핵심기본간호술 수행자신감을 높일 수 있는 다양한 교육과정 개발이 필요함을 보여주는 것이라 하겠다.

• 한국간호교육학회지
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.75-85
• /
• 2015

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of preclinical clinical performance examination (CPX) on nursing students' confidence in their nursing skills and critical thinking competence. Methods: The design of this research was one-group pretest-posttest, and the participants were 112 nursing students. The preclinical CPX consisted of a clinical examination, patient-nurse relationship, oral test of related knowledge, written test of the nursing process, and debriefing using comprehensive scenarios based on real patient cases. The confidence of nursing skills consisted of an 8-item NRS and the critical thinking competence consisted of a 12-item 4-point scale developed by researchers and measured in both the pretest and posttest. The collected data were analyzed using paired t-tests, ANOVA, and Pearson correlation coefficients. Results: The score for confidence in nursing skills (t=10.60, p<.001) and that for critical thinking competence (t=7.03, p<.001) increased significantly after preclinical CPX. Conclusion: This study showed that preclinical CPX was effective in improving nursing students' confidence in their nursing skills and critical thinking competence. Therefore, preclinical CPX is expected to be utilized in nursing practice education. Additional studies including those on control groups are recommended to compare differences between the preclinical CPX group and control group.

• 한국융합학회논문지
• /
• 제11권3호
• /
• pp.281-289
• /
• 2020

본 연구는 졸업학년 간호대학생의 핵심기본간호술 프로그램이 수행자신감, 임상수행능력 및 핵심간호역량에 미치는 효과를 검증하기 위한 단일군 전후설계 연구이다. 2018년 8월 27일부터 10월 10일까지 6주 동안 핵심기본간호술 프로그램을 졸업학년 간호대학생 80명에게 적용하였다. 자가 기입식 설문조사 방법으로 자료를 수집하였으며, 자료 분석은 SPSS/Win 24.0 PC+ 프로그램을 사용하여 평균, 표준편차, paired t-test로 분석하였다. 그 결과 핵심기본간호술 프로그램을 적용한 이후 수행자신감(t=-10.68, p<.001), 임상수행능력(t=-22.13, p<.001), 핵심간호역량(t=-19.78, p<.001)이 통계적으로 유의하게 높아졌다. 이를 통해 졸업학년 간호대학생의 핵심기본간호술 프로그램의 교육효과에 긍정적으로 작용함을 알 수 있었으며, 보다 숙련되고 전문적인 간호능력을 향상시키는데 유용하게 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

• 한국간호교육학회지
• /
• 제28권4호
• /
• pp.378-388
• /
• 2022

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of Metaverse-based core nursing skill contents (CNSC) developed for undergraduate nursing students. Methods: A nonequivalent control group was sampled with a non-synchronized design. Seventy-two participants (experimental group 34, control group 38) were recruited from May to June 2022 in Gwangju metropolitan city. The CNSC consisted of scenarios of vital sign measurements, and subcutaneous injections (including blood sugar tests). The data were analyzed using SPSS version 25 for Windows. Results: At the completion of the CNSC, statistically differences were found between groups in knowledge of core nursing skills (t=6.20, p<.001), confidence in core nursing skills performance (t=5.71, p<.001), and clinical competency (t=3.32, p=.001). Conclusion: These results indicate that the CNSC developed for undergraduate nursing students is effective in improving knowledge of core nursing skills, confidence in core nursing skills performance, and clinical competency for nursing students.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제13권6호
• /
• pp.2625-2631
• /
• 2012

실무능력을 갖춘 신규간호사를 선발하려면 실기능력을 평가할 수 있어야 한다. 그런데 실기능력을 객관적으로 평가하는 일은 매우 어려워서, 간호사 채용 시 실기능력을 평가하는 병원은 거의 없다. 본 연구는 신규간호사 채용 시의 실기능력 테스트 방법으로 OSCE(Objective Structured Clinical Examination, 구조화된 객관적 임상시험, 이하 OSCE)를 하기로 정하고, 준비과정으로 일개 대학 병원의 간호관리자들로 하여금 직접 OSCE 모듈을 개발하고 OSCE를 운영하도록 한 것이다. 2006년 4월부터 8월까지 전체 간호관리자 20명 중 16명이 참여하여, 7개의 OSCE 모듈을 직접 개발하였고, 이 모듈을 가지고 간호과 3학년 학생 40명을 대상으로 OSCE를 실시하였다. 각 모듈의 평가자간 신뢰도는 한 모듈을 제외하고는 모두 r=0.8이상 이었다. 7점 척도로 측정한 모듈 개발 전후의 자신감은 3.93에서 6.64로 증가하였다. 그리고 간호관리자들은 OSCE 모듈의 개발 및 시험 운영에 긍정적인 반응을 보였다. 이후 신규간호사를 선발하는데 OSCE를 적용하고 있다. 이 개발 경험은 간호사 채용 시 실기능력을 평가하고자 하는 타 병원에도 도움이 될 것이다.

• 중환자간호학회지
• /
• 제5권1호
• /
• pp.12-22
• /
• 2012

Purpose: This study was conducted to evaluate the learning outcomes of simulation-based practice on emergency care for patients with dyspnea in nursing students. Methods: One group pre-post experimental design with 28 nursing students was used. Simulation-based practice on the basis of SimMan Human Patient Simulator including academic lectures, simulation lab exercises and debriefing was applied for four and half hours. The learning outcomes were assessed by measuring knowledge, critical thinking, problem solving process of cognitive skills, self-confidence and learning attitudes of affective domain. Furthermore, self reported clinical performance ability of psychomotor skills was examined. Results: After the completion of simulation-based practice, there was a significant increase in the mean of following measured variables: knowledge, critical thinking, problem solving process of cognitive skills, self-confidence, learning attitudes of affective domain and clinical performance ability of psychomotor skills. Significant positive relationships were found among learning outcome measurement variables. Conclusion: Simulation-based practice is an effective method to improve cognitive skills, affective domain and psychomotor skills of nursing students. Hence, Simulation-based practice should be applied for improving current limited emergency care training for nursing students and enhancing students' competency in clinical situations.