• 과학교육연구지
• /
• 제47권1호
• /
• pp.75-87
• /
• 2023

이 연구는 '생물교과논리 및 논술' 수업에서 실시된 논증글쓰기에 대한 동료평가와 자기평가, 교수자 평가 간 상관관계를 분석하는 것이다. 이를 위해 14명의 예비 생물교사들이 네 차례에 걸쳐 논증글쓰기를 하였고, 이 결과물들을 대상으로 동료평가와 자기평가, 교수자 평가가 이루어졌다. 논증글쓰기에 대한 동료평가는 평균 2.70점이었고, 자기평가 평균은 2.68점, 교수자 평가 평균은 2.71점이었다. 하위 평가 영역별 평균을 살펴보면 동료평가에서는 과학지식이 가장 높았고, 자기평가에서는 구성 영역이 가장 높았다. 또한 교수자 평가에서는 과학지식 영역이 가장 높았다. 표준편차를 살펴본 결과 자기평가의 표준편차가 가장 크게 나타났다. 평가 유형 간 상관관계를 분석한 결과 동료평가와 교수자 평가 간에는 높은 상관관계를 보였고, 자기평가와 교수자 평가 간에는 보통의 상관관계를 나타냈다. 반면에 동료평가와 자기평가 간에는 유의미한 상관관계가 나타나지 않았다. 평가 영역별 상관관계를 분석한 결과에서는 동료평가와 자기평가 간에는 과학 지식, 과학 논증, 구성, 표현의 네 영역에서 모두 유의미한 상관관계가 나타나지 않았다. 또한 동료평가와 교수자 평가 간 분석에서는 과학 지식, 과학 논증, 구성 영역에서 유의미한 상관관계가 나타났다. 또한 자기평가와 교수자 평가 간에는 표현 영역에서만 유의미한 상관관계를 보였다. 이 연구의 결과는 '교과논리 및 논술' 수업에서 동료평가의 적용 가능성이 높음을 보여주는 것이다. 또한 동료평가와 자기평가를 활용하기 위해서는 평가 유형에 따른 평가 기준 세분화가 필요함을 시사하고 있다.

• 디자인학연구
• /
• 제9권
• /
• pp.801-810
• /
• 1994

Design Problems are often both multidimensional and highly interactive. Very rarely does any part of a designed thing serve only one purpose. The activity of designing is thus a goal-directed activity and normally a goal-directed problem-solving activity. This means, problem solving is finding a way to get from some initial situation to a desired goal. Designers are transforming agents within a society whose goals are to improve the human condition through physical metamorphosis. Many theorist have agreed that designing involves problem solving or decision making. Accordingly evaluation plays an essential role in design activity. The evaluation factors include all attributes that have levels specified by quantitative and qualitative objectives Alternatives in multi-objective decision prOblems generally possess numerous attributes by which they can be described and compared. The evaluation factors include all attributes that have levels specified by quantitative and qualitative objectives. However since qualitative factors are difficult to quantify as numeral estimates, these factors have tended to be ignored without regard for their importance to human content. We adapted the Accumulative Evaluation Model as an evaluation algorithm for IDES. Industrial Design Evaluation System (IDES) consists of 3 major modules ( 1 Design Element, 2.Matrix, 3.Evaluation). It is intended to be an aid for design evaluation. The luther thinks IDES is a new design evaluation approach which could provide effective rating of design values to make value judgements. It is an attempt to provide industrial designers with access to design evaluation. The author's aim is to produce an Object-Oriented Evaluation System which can guide the designers and decision makers under complex design projects. It uses\ulcorner an Object-Oriented Programming for this prototype, Because of managing complexity (Flexibility and Reusability) and improving productivity(Extensibility & Maintainability and Programming by User) in software development process. The author has chose the C++ because it is a hybrid, rather than pure Object-Oriented Language.

• 디지털산업정보학회논문지
• /
• 제6권3호
• /
• pp.191-201
• /
• 2010

The Korean central government has been investing a lot of efforts to promote performance of local governments. For example, the Ministry of Public Administration and Security (MOPAS) supported the local governments to develop and provide with a 'balanced score card' and a 'customer satisfaction innovation. ' Many other central ministries also conducted individual evaluations for local governments in their substantive policy areas. These evaluation systems of 78 appraisals for local governments conducted by the MOPAS and other ministries had made the local governments to work harder. However, most local governments have appealed their 'reform fatigue' caused by the overlapping evaluation systems. In this context, the MOPAS initiated merging the evaluations into a co-evaluation system under the new Government Performance Evaluation Act of 2006. In this process of introduction of new evaluation system, there are two significant movements. Firstly, as Korean Government has strong information technology, MOPAS has developed 'Virtual Policy Studio (VPS)' which evaluates the performance of each local government with on line. In other words, in the co-evaluation system for local government performance most evaluation steps are implemented by computer and Internet. So most stakeholder can access and work on the VPS in real time when they want to. And the other thing is that cooperation among stakeholders has been occurred in the co-evaluation system. Furthurmore the cooperative governance is systemized and sustain for a long time because MOPAS made IT based co-evaluation system. Therefore this paper intends to illustrate the process of introduction of VPS, main process of co-evaluation system based on VPS and analyze collaborative governance of the co-evaluation system.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.21-29
• /
• 2021

The objective of this research is to devise a BARS evaluation system as a performance evaluation plan for non-face-to-face capstone design and to verify the validity through the expert FGI as the remote education is highlighted as a new normal standard in the post corona epoch. The conclusion of this research is as follows. First, the non-face-to-face capstone design is a competency centered subject that allows you to develop the engineering and majoring knowledge and its function and attitude, and the achievement of program outcome is the objective competency, and the researcher proposes the BARS method evaluation, one of competency evaluation method, as a new performance evaluation plan. Second, for the evaluation of PO achievement of non-face-to-face capstone design, the researcher deduced 20 behavior identification standard(anchor) of BARS evaluation system, and developed the achievement standard per 4 levels. Third, as the evaluation tool of non-face-to-face capstone design, the presentation data(PPT), presentation video, product such as trial product(model), non-face-to-face class participation video, discussion participating video, team activity report, and result report for the evidential data of BARS evaluation were appeared as proper. Finally, the BARS evaluation plan of non-face-to-face capstone design would be efficiently made through the establishment of evaluation plan, the establishment of grading standard of BARS evaluation scale, the determination of evaluation subject and online BARS evaluation site.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제56권4호
• /
• pp.309-333
• /
• 2022

본 연구에서는 전국의 국공립 및 사립, 전문대학의 교수들 2,618명을 대상으로 교수연구업적평가와 관련하여 교수들의 인식을 파악하고자 설문조사를 수행하였다. 설문조사는 두 가지 부분에 대한 인식을 파악하기 위한 조사로 하나는 현재 각 대학에서 진행되고 있는 교수연구업적평가에 대한 인식조사이며, 다른 하나는 정량 위주의 업적평가 방식의 대안으로 여겨지는 정성적 평가 지표의 도입에 대한 인식조사이다. 설문 결과, 교수 연구업적평가에서 정량 중심 평가는 여전히 대다수의 대학에서 크게 활용되며, 계열 또는 분야에 적합하지 않은 연구업적평가가 이루어지고 있으며, 평가 기간의 확대가 필요를 요구하고, 정량 위주의 업적평가 방식은 학술 커뮤니티에 부정적인 영향을 가져오며, 연구업적평가에 대한 개선의 필요하다는 인식을 가지고 있는 것을 확인할 수 있었다. 정성적 평가 지표의 도입과 관련하여 교수들은 연구업적평가에 정성적 평가가 필요하다는 인식을 하고 있으며, 정성적 평가 도입과 관련하여 부정적인 의견 또한 존재하는 것을 확인할 수 있었다.

• 간호행정학회지
• /
• 제5권1호
• /
• pp.181-195
• /
• 1999

This study was done to develope a computer program for the evaluation of quality of nurisng care. Because the professional nursing care should be evaluated consistantly, computer program for the measurement of quality of nursing care is necessary for the effective and efficient management of nursing quality. In this study, a computer program for gastrointestinal surgery patients was developed as a module. Visual basic 4.0 was used as a basic program for the development of this program, and Access 7.0 was used for the data base construction of the program. The systems of evaluation criteria were hierarchical. and the titles of the hierarchical criteria were evaluation area-evaluation item-indicator. Each evaluation area contained several items and each evaluation item contained several indicators. The numbers of the evaluation criteria for gastrointestinal surgery patients were 7 evaluation areas, 32 evaluation items. and 71 indicators. Content validity of the evaluation criteria(in this case, 32 evaluation items) was .95. Scoring could be possible with the evaluation items. For the scoring types of this program were two. norm-referenced type(option 1) and criterion-referenced type(option 2), the user can choose the type according to the purpose of the evaluation. With this computer program. accurate and consistant evaluation of the quality of nursing care could be expected. Also. by the rapid feedback to nursing care practice. quality of nursing practice could be improved rapidly. and the systems of the evaluation criteria developed in this study could be used for the development of other moduls for various kinds of patient groups. Because this computer program was developed only for the purpose of research, it is necessary to be refined commercially to be used in real nursing situation.

• 한국전자거래학회지
• /
• 제10권3호
• /
• pp.67-83
• /
• 2005

CC(공통평가기준: Common Criteria, ISO/IEC 15408)는 국가간에 서로 다른 평가기준을 적용하여 평가함으로써 발생되는 문제점을 해결하기 위해 1999년 6월에 발표되었으며, 현재 공식버전은 v2.2이며 드래프트 버전으로 v3.0이 나와 있다. 국내외적으로 CC기반의 평가 수요가 증가되고 있으며 이에 따라 평가시장 창출이 예상되고 실제 평가지침 및 평가활동의 자동화, 평가프로젝트의 관리가 필요하다. 본 논문에서는 평가자원(예: 제출물, 평가기준, 평가자 등)을 관리하고 평가환경에서 효율적으로 이용 가능한 CC 기반 보안평가관리시스템 ( CC-SEMS: CC based Security Evaluation Management System)을 제시하였다. CC-SEMS는 프로젝트관리. 워크플로우관리, 프로세스관리의 어플리케이션을 통합한 것이며 제출물, 평가업무 프로그램, 관리 객체, 평가워크플로우 엔진으로 구성되어 있다.

• 융합경영연구
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.57-68
• /
• 2023

Purpose: This study aims to improve the evaluation system for selecting supportive housing applicants, addressing inconsistency, lack of health and care evaluation, and the need for a quantitative evaluation tool. Proposed improvements include a consistent evaluation index and items for each resident type, selecting suitable residents for independent living and community integration. Research design, data and methodology: This study analyzed the supportive housing selection checklist provided by the Seoul Metropolitan Government, the supportive housing ordinance, and the SH Corporation's operation guidelines. Results: Study finds current supportive housing tenant selection system lacks consistency and proposes improvements. The same terms should be used for the same evaluation items, health and care evaluation items should be added for all tenants, and a quantitative evaluation tool should be used. Consistent evaluation index and items should be created for each resident type in the same evaluation area. The aim is to select suitable tenants with potential for independent living and community integration. Conclusions: This study improves the evaluation system for selecting supportive housing applicants by addressing inconsistencies and adding essential evaluation items related to health and care. While the study is significant, future research should focus on developing quantitative evaluation tools for all detailed items.

• Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods
• /
• 제12권3호
• /
• pp.589-601
• /
• 2005

Student evaluation of university teaching is a common tool for measuring the educational contribution of a professor and improving the quality of classes. There, however, exist external factors in the beyond of control of a instructor, which affect the result of Student's rating to prevent practical use of evaluation for administrative purpose. This paper investigates the factors that spoil the validity and the reliability of student evaluation and proposes a method to control the effect by the statistical analysis of evaluation data of Jeonju University for two years.

• 대한약학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한약학회 2001년도 Proceedings of International Convention of the Pharmaceutical Society of Korea
• /
• pp.285.1-285.1
• /
• 2001