Journal of Science Education (과학교육연구지)

Science Education Research Institute Kyungpook National University (경북대학교 과학교육연구소)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Correlation Analysis among Peer Evaluation, Self-evaluation and Instructor Evaluation on Argumentation Writing in the 'Biology Logic and Essay'

'생물교과논리 및 논술' 에서의 논증글쓰기에 대한 동료평가-자기평가-교수자 평가 간 상관관계 분석

  • Received : 2023.03.06
  • Accepted : 2023.04.17
  • Published : 2023.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study analyzed correlation among peer evaluation, self-evaluation, and instructor evaluation of argumentation writing conducted in the 'Biology logic and essay' class. To this end, 14 pre-service biology teachers wrote argumentation four times, and peer evaluation, self-evaluation, and instructor evaluation were conducted on these results. The peer evaluation for argumentation writing averaged 2.70 points, the self-evaluation average was 2.68 points, and the instructor evaluation average was 2.71. Looking at the average of each sub-evaluation area, scientific knowledge was the highest in peer evaluation, and the composition area was the highest in self-evaluation. In addition, the area of scientific knowledge was the highest in the instructor evaluation. As a result of examining the standard deviation, the standard deviation of self-evaluation was the largest. As a result of analyzing the correlation between evaluation types, there was a high correlation between peer evaluation and instructor evaluation, and there was a moderate correlation between self-evaluation and instructor evaluation. On the other hand, there was no significant correlation between peer evaluation and self-evaluation. As a result of analyzing the correlation by evaluation area, there was no significant correlation between peer evaluation and self-evaluation in all four areas of scientific knowledge, scientific argumentation, composition, and expression. On the other hand, in the analysis between peer evaluation and instructor evaluation, there was a significant correlation in the areas of scientific knowledge, scientific argumentation, and composition. In addition, there was a significant correlation between self-evaluation and instructor evaluation only in the area of expression. The results of this study show that peer evaluation is highly likely to be applied in the 'Subject logic and essay' class. It also suggests that it is necessary to subdivide evaluation criteria according to the type of evaluation in order to use peer evaluation and self-evaluation.

이 연구는 '생물교과논리 및 논술' 수업에서 실시된 논증글쓰기에 대한 동료평가와 자기평가, 교수자 평가 간 상관관계를 분석하는 것이다. 이를 위해 14명의 예비 생물교사들이 네 차례에 걸쳐 논증글쓰기를 하였고, 이 결과물들을 대상으로 동료평가와 자기평가, 교수자 평가가 이루어졌다. 논증글쓰기에 대한 동료평가는 평균 2.70점이었고, 자기평가 평균은 2.68점, 교수자 평가 평균은 2.71점이었다. 하위 평가 영역별 평균을 살펴보면 동료평가에서는 과학지식이 가장 높았고, 자기평가에서는 구성 영역이 가장 높았다. 또한 교수자 평가에서는 과학지식 영역이 가장 높았다. 표준편차를 살펴본 결과 자기평가의 표준편차가 가장 크게 나타났다. 평가 유형 간 상관관계를 분석한 결과 동료평가와 교수자 평가 간에는 높은 상관관계를 보였고, 자기평가와 교수자 평가 간에는 보통의 상관관계를 나타냈다. 반면에 동료평가와 자기평가 간에는 유의미한 상관관계가 나타나지 않았다. 평가 영역별 상관관계를 분석한 결과에서는 동료평가와 자기평가 간에는 과학 지식, 과학 논증, 구성, 표현의 네 영역에서 모두 유의미한 상관관계가 나타나지 않았다. 또한 동료평가와 교수자 평가 간 분석에서는 과학 지식, 과학 논증, 구성 영역에서 유의미한 상관관계가 나타났다. 또한 자기평가와 교수자 평가 간에는 표현 영역에서만 유의미한 상관관계를 보였다. 이 연구의 결과는 '교과논리 및 논술' 수업에서 동료평가의 적용 가능성이 높음을 보여주는 것이다. 또한 동료평가와 자기평가를 활용하기 위해서는 평가 유형에 따른 평가 기준 세분화가 필요함을 시사하고 있다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 2023학년도 제주대학교 교육‧연구 및 학생지도비 지원에 의해서 연구되었음.

References

  1. Ahn, J. Y. (2008). A case study on the application of peer assessment technique in the e-learning environment. Journal of Korea Entertainment Industry Association, 2(1), 27-32. https://doi.org/10.21184/jkeia.2008.06.2.1.27
  2. Butler, Y. G., & Lee, J. (2010). The effects of self-assessment among young learners of English. Language Testing, 27, 5-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209346370
  3. Campbell, J. D., & Fehr, B. (1990). Self-esteem and perceptions of conveyed impression: Is negative affectivity associated with greater realism?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 122-123. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.1.122
  4. Chang, S. M. (2019). A priliminary study for systematizing the contents of "logic and essay writing" in Korean language arts - text mining on 2009~2018 syllabus. Korean Writing, 40, 7-43.
  5. Choi, M. J., Jun, M. K., & Chae, J. (2015). The status of 「Logic and Writing in Home Economics Education」 course and the students' perception about the course. Journal of Home Economics Education Research, 27(1), 51-65.
  6. Chong, H. (2009). The validity and reliability of college writing assessment. Korean Writing, 9, 277-305.
  7. Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education, 20(3), 331-350.
  8. Han, L. H. (2019). A study on the method of writing education using self-feedback. Ratio et Oratio, 12(2), 147-182. https://doi.org/10.19042/KSTC.2019.12.2.147
  9. Hwang, H., & Hahn, H. (2020). A comparative study of self, peer, and instructor assessment in a single paragraph writing. Korean Journal of General Education, 14(1), 107-130.
  10. Jang, M. Y. (2021). A study on the design of flipped learning instructional design for the subject of 'Logic and Essay in Early Childhood of Education' using YouTube. The Journal of Humanities and Social science, 12(6), 2861-2876.
  11. Jo, E., Jung, D., & Nam, J. H. (2021). The impact of negotiation-Based peer and self-assessment activities on science-gifted students' modeling. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 65(6), 455-467.
  12. Kim, H. M., & Kang, K. H. (2021). An analysis of science core competencies presented in pre-service biology teachers' SSI (Socioscientific Issues) writing. Biology Education, 49(1), 122-132.
  13. Kim, J. K. (2014). A study on the development of teaching-learning methods for <'Logic and Essay Writing' in the field of Chinese classics education> -Through a teaching case of teacher training course in university. Journal of Korean Classical Chinese Literature, 29(1), 381-405. https://doi.org/10.18213/jkccl.2014.29.1.013
  14. Kim, N. M. (2009). A peer review analysis for university writing classes. The Review of Korean Cultural Studies, 38, 151-180. https://doi.org/10.17329/kcbook.2009..30.006
  15. Kim, S. H. (2008). The operation of writing courses for science and engineering students. Philosophy and Reality, 79, 286-297.
  16. Kim, S. Y. (2015). The effects of preservice biology teachers' argumentation on bioethical issues. Biology Education, 43(1), 27-36. https://doi.org/10.15717/BIOEDU.2015.43.1.27
  17. Kim, S. (2017). A case study of flipped learning in a classroom of logic & essay writing on mathematics. Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology, 7(12), 345-359.
  18. Kulkarni, C., Wei K. P., Le Huy, Chia, D., Papadopoulos, K., Cheng, J., Koller, D., & Klemmer, S. R. (2013). Peer and self assessment in massive online classes, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 20(6), 1-31.
  19. Lee, H. (2018). Considerations on a college writing evaluation. Hansung Language and Literature, 39, 103-125.
  20. Lee, H., & Kim, K. (2018). Logic and writing in home economics education development and evaluation of the course "Creative Thinking & Debate". Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 22(2), 126-138. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2018.22.2.126
  21. Lee, S. H. (2007). A search for effective science writing curriculum composition: Focusing on the case of Catholic university. The Korean Society for Thinking and Communication Conference Proceeding, 37-48.
  22. Lee, S. J. (2014). Usability of peer- and self-assessment in Primary English writing. English Language Assessment, 9, 101-121.
  23. Lee, S. Y., & Chang, Y. H. (2015). A study on the 'Logic and Essay' course in early childhood preservice teacher education programs. Early Childhood Education & Care, 10(1), 189-208. https://doi.org/10.16978/ecec.2015.10.1.009
  24. Lee, Y. B., & Chong, H. M. (2014). A study on aspects and validity of peer feedback in college students' writing. Korean Writing, 20, 299-334.
  25. Lee, Y. K., & Kang, K. H. (2018). The relationship between pre-service science teachers' practical teaching competence and the agreement of self-evaluation and peer evaluation. Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology, 8(8), 477-488.
  26. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. London: SAGE Publication.
  27. Ministry of Education and Science Technology (2009). Manual of Practice for Teacher Qualification Examination. Seoul: Author.
  28. Oh, T. (2009). The aspects and types of peer assessment on writing by utilizing internet bulletin board. Journal of CheongRam Korean Language Education, 40, 235-262.
  29. Park, J. Y. (2019). A case study of the lesson for the logic and writing education in science education based on the integration teaching-learning methods of the writing education. Culture and Convergence, 41(3), 757-800. https://doi.org/10.33645/cnc.2019.06.41.3.757
  30. Sadler, F., & Good, E. (2006). The impact of self and peer grading on student learning. Educational Assessment, 11(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326977ea1101_1
  31. Seo, Y. J., & Jeon, E. J. (2012). A study of peer feedback opinion validity by types in writing. Korean Language Education Research, 44, 369-395.
  32. Shin, S. (2016). Pre-service teachers' perception of 「Logic and Writing in English Education」curriculum. The Mirae Journal of English Language and Literature, 21(1), 455-483.
  33. Sim, J. (2016). A study of preliminary biology teachers' scientific inquiry skills and logical thinking ability through the activity of science writing. Biololgy Education, 44(1), 114-126. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2016.44.1.114
  34. Um, S. W. (2019). A study on the model of Korean writing course using flipped learning. The Korean Journal of Literacy Research, 10(1), 61-80. https://doi.org/10.37736/kjlr.2019.02.10.1.61
  35. Yoo, H. J. (2015). Writing lessons evaluation plans for university students utilizing peer-evaluation. The Journal of Human Sciences Research, 46, 127-146.