• 의학교육논단
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.91-102
• /
• 2018

This study explored medical students' major research topics and research methods by analyzing 184 academic articles pertaining to the characteristics of medical students from 2007 to 2017. Results showed many papers dealing with medical students' emotional and cognitive aspects, student counseling, clinical practice education, and curriculum management. According to the medical education accreditation board, research trends were found mostly in the student and curriculum areas of learner characteristics, medical humanities, student counseling, clinical practice education, and curriculum management. Common research topics have been steadily increasing since the introduction of the evaluation accreditation standard in 2012. Medical students predominantly used quantitative research methods for the studies. In the future, it is necessary to ensure that research topics such as CQI, digital- and performance-based clinical practice, and convergent curriculum within the Fourth Industrial Revolution are being studied. In addition, it is crucial to investigate learners' unique, dynamic, and qualitative characteristics through qualitative and mixed methods.

• 대한예방한의학회지
• /
• 제28권1호
• /
• pp.43-57
• /
• 2024

Objectives : The aim of this study was to identify the effect of Medical humanities curriculum on students of Korean medical school in terms of cognitive, affective, and psychomotor level of humanities skill. Methods : The course was taught to second- and third-year Korean medicine students. The classes were held eight times a semester for second-year students and 9 times for third-year students, and each class was held once a week for 2 hours. Formative and summative assessments, group and individual assignments, and peer assessments were conducted to evaluate educational effectiveness, as well as basic lecture evaluations and satisfaction surveys. Results : Most of the students who took Medical humanities showed a performance rate of more than 60-70% in the cognitive aspect, and the total score was 14.48 with a standard deviation of 2.70 in the knowledge application stage. In terms of class satisfaction, students in Medical humanities I were more satisfied with the evaluation criteria and class management expertise, while students in Medical humanities II were most satisfied with the class organization, with an average score of 4.86/5. Conclusions : It was confirmed that students' humanities improved in cognitive, affective, and psychological aspects after medical humanities courses, and future research should be conducted on the long-term educational effects of medical humanities, effective teaching methods, and evaluation methods.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제19권6호
• /
• pp.57-62
• /
• 2016

In this work, we present a case study of using the assessments for the enhancement of students' learning motivation in engineering education. The assessments, given in between summative assessments such as midterms and finals, may have a component of formative evaluation, which are reported as very effective tools as the sources of feedback to improve teaching and learning. We studied how the students' performance is improved by additional tests in engineering education. Also, we examined the factors of successful results of the cooperative learning model, Student Teams-Achievement Division, which is based on imposing a number of tests, achieved in our previous work.

• 대한예방한의학회지
• /
• 제24권3호
• /
• pp.1-13
• /
• 2020

Objectives : The objective of this survey was to examine students' perception of the clinical performance examination (CPX) in college of traditional Korean medicine using student standardized patients. Methods : College of traditional Korean medicine students who completed the first-semester clinical practice education were selected as the subjects, and they participated in a survey asking questions about the following matters: satisfaction with CPX, self-evaluation, difficulties experienced during the CPX course, level of prior knowledge of clinical practice education, and usefulness of and intimacy with Student Standardized Patients (SSP). Results : Satisfaction with CPX was calculated to be 4.10 (5 being the perfect score), and self-evaluation of CPX was calculated to be 4.12. The subjects chose physical examination as the most difficult item relating to CPX. 80.5% responded positively to the question relating to diverse experiences in practice education, and 52.8% responded positively to the question relating to prior knowledge of diverse standardized patients. 55.6% responded positively to the question relating to performance proficiency of SSP, 63.9% responded positively to the question relating to usefulness of SSP to prepare for CPX, and 69.4% responded positively to the question relating to usefulness of SSP in evaluating CPX, and 55.6% responded positively to the questions relating to intimacy with SSP. It was confirmed that there was a strong quantitative correlation between prior knowledge of clinical practice education and usefulness of SSP, and that there was a strong quantitative correlation between performance proficiency of SSP and usefulness of SSP. It was confirmed that there was a middle-level correlation between performance proficiency of SSP and intimacy with SSP, and that there was a middle-level quantitative correlation between intimacy with SSP and usefulness of SSP. Conclusions : It was confirmed that senior students enrolled in college of traditional Korean medicine were mostly satisfied with the clinical performance examination in college of traditional Korean medicine using SSP, and that usefulness of SSP had a quantitative correlation with prior knowledge of diverse clinical practice educations, performance proficiency of SSP, and intimacy with SSP.

• 대한치과마취과학회지
• /
• 제12권4호
• /
• pp.209-214
• /
• 2012

Background: This study evaluates the existing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) knowledge and skills of 1 st year dental students and also compares their CPR performance skill with those of 4 th year students. Methods: Incoming 1 st year and 4 th year dental students were surveyed about the level of their CPR knowledge before conventional CPR instruction. After we trained them for CPR performance, we tested CPR performance skill to randomly selected 10 1st year and 4 th year dental students and compared their CPR performance. Results: Overall CPR knowledge was low for both 1 st and 4 th year dental students. Especially, only 1 among 89 fourth year dental students answered the right sequence of CPR revised in 2010. Overall CPR performance was relatively low for both 1 st and 4 th year dental students. Irrespective of previous experiences of CPR education, their CPR performance was not statistically different. Conclusions: Retraining of CPR is a necessity. Information about the existing CPR knowledge for dental students will aid in establishing the goal of future CPR training and improve the current deficiency.

• 한국식품영양과학회지
• /
• 제38권7호
• /
• pp.862-869
• /
• 2009

학부모 급식모니터링 프로그램의 운영실태를 파악하여 발전적인 운영방안을 모색하고자 울산지역 학교 100곳의 영양사와 학부모 총 600명을 대상으로 2007년 6월 한 달간 설문조사를 실시한 결과 총 51개교에서 영양사 51부, 학부모 306부의 설문이 회수되었다(회수율 51.0%). 조사대상 학교는 초등학교가 62.8%, 중학교가 29.4%, 고등학교가 7.8%였다. 조사대상 학부모의 학력수준은 고등학교 졸업 이하가 45.8%, 전문대 졸업과 대학교 졸업 이상이 각각 27.1%였다. 정기적으로 급식모니터링을 실시하고 있는 학교는 조사대상 전체의 90.2%였고 급식모니터링 사전교육 실시율은 76.5%였다. 급식모니터링은 검수(95.4%), 조리(92.7%), 청소 및 시설위생(88.1%), 배식(80.1%), 쓰레기처리 및 방역(79.5%), 검식(78.1%), 식단의 작성(64.2%) 순으로 실시율이 높았다. 급식모니터링 중 가장 어렵다고 평가한 영역은 식단의 작성(64.2%)이었고 식단의 작성에 대한 사전교육요구도 (45.5%)도 가장 높았다. 급식모니터링 실시영역에 대한 학부모의 중요도를 5점 척도로 평가한 결과 조리(4.58점), 청소 및 시설위생(4.38점), 검수(4.33점)의 순으로 평가점수가 높았다. 학부모 학력에 따라서는 식단의 작성(p<0.05), 청소 및 시설위생(p<0.05)에서 대학교 졸업 이상의 학력을 가진 학부모의 중요도가 유의적으로 높았고 학부모의 HACCP 인지도에 따라서는 식단의 작성(p<0.05), 검수(p<0.05), 배식(p<0.05)에서 HACCP 인지도가 높은 학부모의 평가점수가 유의적으로 높았다. 급식모니터링 영역에 대한 중요도와 수행도 차이분석 결과 사전교육 실시여부에 따라서는 전체영역에서 유의적인 차이가 없었다. 학부모 급식모니터링의 효과를 극대화하기 위해서는 학부모의 자발적인 참여와 더불어 학부모의 교육 요구도와 학부모의 지식 보유수준을 고려한 급식모니터링 사전교육 프로그램의 개발과 적용이 필요하다고 생각된다. 관련부서는 학부모가 학교급식 개선활동에 적극적으로 참여할 수 있는 기반조성에 힘쓰고 효과적인 학부모 참여 프로그램의 개발과 실행을 위한 정책적인 지원을 체계적으로 제공할 필요가 있다고 판단된다.

• 의학교육논단
• /
• 제15권3호
• /
• pp.112-119
• /
• 2013

Most medical colleges in Korea have been shifting from traditional education to outcome-based education, which is the general trend in medical education. The purpose of this study was to make some suggestions in light of the reality and challenges of student assessment in medical education from the perspective of outcome- based education. First, those who are responsible for student assessment should be diversified to include faculty, residents, students, and evaluation committee members. They need separate roles in educational evaluation, so evaluation competencies are required for them. Second, various methods for evaluation and score interpretation can be used for effective evaluation. We can adopt diagnostic, formative, and summative evaluation functionally, and the norm-referenced, criterion-referenced, growth-referenced, and ability-referenced evaluation based on criteria for score interpretation. Finally, various evaluation domains and test forms can be administered together in the common lectures in the medical school. We can test not only knowledge but also skills and attitudes, with diverse test forms such as supply and performance types.

• Journal of Information Processing Systems
• /
• 제18권4호
• /
• pp.562-574
• /
• 2022

As traditional ways of evaluation prove to be ineffective in evaluating the effect of interactive multimedia physical education (PE) teaching, this study develops a new evaluation model based on the simulated annealing algorithm. After the evaluation subjects and the principle of the evaluation system are determined, different subjects are well chosen to constitute the evaluation system and given the weight. The backpropagation neural network has been improved through the simulated annealing algorithm, whose improvement indicates the completion of the evaluation model. Simulation results show that the evaluation model is highly efficient. Compared with traditional evaluation models, the proposed one enhances students' performance in PE classes by 50%.

• 한국응급구조학회지
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.77-87
• /
• 2013

Purpose : The purpose of this study was to develop a scenario and to evaluate the students by simulation-based learning of acute abdominal pain case in an emergency unit. The expert group of simulation developed the scenario based on actual abdominal pain by medical treatment records. Methods : Scenario was developed to evaluate the simMan3G simulation-based learning. The scenario was used in 2013 with ten groups of fourth grade 50 nursing students who voluntarily participated in the simulation class. Results : The nursing students were able to express nursing knowledge, learning attitude and self-efficacy. The simulation-based scenario proved to be very effective to students' skill training. The performance of nursing practice through simulation class made the nursing students more confident with patient care. Conclusion : Simulation-based learning was found to be the most effective curriculum to the nursing students and made the students satisfied and confident. So the simulation-based learning would be helpful to other students including paramedic students and medical school students.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제29권4호
• /
• pp.388-399
• /
• 2009

This study was designed to investigate whether applying mind mapping in a biology class had an effect on students' creativity. Participants of this study were 165 1st grade middle school students. The pretest-post test control group design was employed. A control group was instructed with a traditional method and an exerimental group was instructed using the mind-map applied method. The units "Digestion and Circulation" and "Respiration and Excretion" were selected for this study, and each group was treated for 24 class hours. To measure student creativity, the TTCT test was used. For assessing students' level of logical thinking, the compact version of GALT was used. Test results were analyzed by ANCOVA and correlation analysis by SPSS 12.0. The creativity of students in experimental group was significantly improved than the control group (p< .01). Fluency, flexibility, and originality of students in experimental group were improved (p< .01). Students did not show any differences on creativity according to their academic achievement level or gender (p> .05) in the experimental group. Students did not show any differences on creativity according to their logical thinking level (p> .05), either. However, the students of logical thinking level in the experimental group improved their flexibility (p< .05). There was no correlation between students' creativity and their achievement (p> .05), but the creativity shows a lower correlation to performance evaluation (p< .05).